[000:00:00;00] you know the thrill when you start a tank engine for the first time, you just feel this power, me, when i decided to come to donbass, they thought i was completely crazy, seventeenth, please go down to the intensive care unit, they asked, called, well, ready , not ready, as if they are not ready, as if they are always ready , as... in the great patriotic war, women made a great contribution, so now women do a lot, here, where i am as a medic, for example, and as a driver, i can probably do more for them bring benefits than i will sit in the office for computer, when she just comes up to you and even just hugs you, says the word that we believe in you, it gives a lot, i won’t

sit at home without a businesswoman. this is my land, i will protect it, i will not give it to anyone. have you flown before? there were a lot of things i hadn’t done before, but then i did. dream, fly with me, will you promise now and not take it? i won’t take it, i’ve been waiting all my life until we can just talk to you, i don’t want to hear anyone, i can’t put it off, we’re preparing a flight, it’s hard to keep up with a person, dad, i want to come to you, who is trying to catch the wind, every day i write a letter to him, and then, when he returns, i give him mine, and he gives me his, i’m going into the storm, why are you bothering me, what do you want, let him go down, wherever, everyone

i'm worried when he leaves, but he... comes back, he promised me, master of the wind, come on, fedor, hang in there, again, now this discussion, the baltic sea, what is it, that means everything, by the way, this is from the international you're right, if i'm not mistaken, it follows that if someone... blocks it, this is an incident of leucorrhoea in its purest form, but this is necessary to say that either stop this talk, or you don’t understand that you are creating a reason for war, for this very reason, which is still somehow in effect, so it’s not a fact that nato will apply the fifth article,

if the balts. .. will try to block the baltic sea. well, what, i don’t know, a silenian cruiser? that is , america will simply say, well, who are the idiots? this is most likely exactly what he will say, whether they are putting into action or not, by the way, again, i think someone said yesterday that you need to take initiative to lead politics, not reactively, you love not reactively, but proactively, that’s what i’m talking about now. this is a nag's story for fast running, so you need to push it, catch up with it, this is the case when you need to run in front of a steam locomotive , you need to run ahead of a steam locomotive, if the nag's story dies in front of the steam locomotive, the locomotive will run over, this is that nag, this is the nag of that history and ours is a nag, our stallion, our stallion, is ahead, here's where we should be, by the way,

putin is saying more and more, more and more - he says some things that remind us of this transition to forced reorganization of world politics and world architecture, in my opinion, we need to act even faster, uh, the situation is simply pushing for this, otherwise they will really throw off this stone and it is for now, but if we act quickly, they will not throw it off, no, because we will have time to reset, we will have time to run up and substitute the brake pad, there is a brake shoe. well , how do you propose to flee to the middle east? well, now hamas and israel, situations where they run up to do something to the neighbor east, take and kill all the hamasists, or take to catch israeli bombs so that they do not fall in the peaceful east, i have already said, i try not to intrude on this topic, but, obviously, now everyone is also gradually

facing this, why is the us blocking, well, we don’t consider europe, they’re just idiots, but if they have a scholz crawling around, like a romanian journalist, like a german delegation crawling on the ground and saying: he’s talking there now, and people are walking by, what’s there to compare, but the americans don’t want him to participate in solving this conflict, because if it is a security council, then it means that russia and china, and they need to decide this themselves, this is to present to the world, but how can the un solve this, this conflict is resolved exclusively from a position of strength, either one country wins or the other , bravo, and he must come out on whose side, he will say, no, no, just a minute, well, you say, now he will gather, special positions of power on whose side? now go up to the israelis and say, so, all the men have calmed down, calmed down, but the most terrible terrorist attack with during the holocaust, well, forget it, like it doesn’t matter, but the israelis will stand up, they’ll just tear up theirs, they’ll talk about everything, yes

, they’re guteishat and they’ll be right, who they are israelis, they’ll say what it means to forget, hamas came, killed our children, cut off heads, burned corpses, women here with us, which he said was from a position of strength. you attacked me when, now, now, now, a position of strength , we go to the other side, after which we say, no, palestinians, you must, they say that you are kidding me, for the time of running more than 2,000 children died, women died, 500 people died, 80% of them are women and children, and here in general, how do you imagine it, the palestinians say, we live in an open-air prison, 20 years, 2, there 2 million people, we are dying, we don’t have basic... help, no one needs us, the world has forgotten about us, and so let’s throw the jews into the sea, it turns out how, right? either let's clean up the gas or reset israel by force, i won't

try my best, i'm telling you, we are now they talked about the role of the un in resolving this issue, you just said at the beginning, it has not been able to resolve this issue for 56 years, it was he who made all the resolutions, he was the one who made the decision, it’s just...’ no, it shouldn’t implement, second, any decision that comes now, one decision will be blocked, will be blocked by the united states, this is the united states of america, and the other by russia, even if there is a single decision, then the israelis will not say: return our hostages, return our people, they say, for starters, so that there is something, return it, to which hamas says, yeah, we are type 2 we've been preparing for years, this is all so that... it's not necessary, did i say that, of course, you want everything, he adopted the resolution, which one, but i don't want him, he is not capable of adopting the entire

resolution, the security council, you they just said that what is needed is for america not to get in the way, then he will do everything, one resolution will be blocked by russia and china, and another will be decided, how is this realistic? tragedy, civilians are dying, and on the one hand, on the other hand, the president very clearly said: guys, you have problems, you are women with each other, regardless of him, if only then this is hypothetical, if we agree, the leaders of china, russia and the united states meet , everyone else doesn’t care, they agree that they are not interested in war, in this one, but they are not interested in war, nozrael will say, listen. we will not allow our people to be killed, to which the arabs will say, we will not allow our people to be killed, you are committing genocides , some say to others, and others say these, i don’t understand, i said that this conflict can only be resolved by force, either one country or another , you

say, there’s a world war, that means this very stone is falling, it’s not yet force, it’s war, it means that this stone is just falling, the israelis are starting an operation in gas, iran is immediately catching up, yemen is there , you know that somehow he didn’t get any interest, just like someone always appeared who said, there will be no russia, there will be no russians, and you know what’s interesting, they never succeeded , so there are no simple solutions, we now have

deeply moral positions, the position of our state, which is clearly formulated by our president, women, children, old people should not suffer, i in general don't know what you're on biden was approached about this. house, i remember, i had one employee, she bought a very decent apartment, they asked her there over a cup of tea, well, this one is in the canteen in the office, he says: well, how are you, such a young girl like that, he says, well, how does he say , he saved on breakfast, so he, maybe he went on trains in the state, excuse me, by the way, really, who gave a piglet, who gave an apple, well, how is it like that with us, yes, but in reality, the most interesting thing is that america became swift, that's me...

how quickly we are flying towards a nuclear war, although we are flying towards it quite quickly , this is obvious, but america rapidly, almost instantly in historical terms, in just 10-12 years it has become a country where nothing is ashamed, in another 12 years many things they were ashamed, they remembered khuseinovich, this means a photograph with a cigarette of incomprehensible content. it’s clear, the memories are clear, but let’s, as they say, think better, that was his phrase, he smoked, but didn’t inhale, they said in the pioneer camp, you can see it from your pioneer camp, yes, apparently it’s there was a specific pioneer camp , and so, uh, everyone remembered her for him, but now it would generally be, as they say, the chairman of the society for the struggle for sobriety, in america he would not be ashamed.

there is nothing to be ashamed of, and this is, of course, an indicator that this political elite , by the way, regardless of age, is being written off, it does not see itself, because any political elite that views itself as some kind of long-term unit is generally -thinks about what is shameful and not ashamed, any in any country, and even... here in the nineties, people keep saying: well, after all, there were things that were shameful, but now in america nothing is shameful at all, there are no problems at all, you know, i’m still interested in this this, this approach of gutierres, but he always said what the americans wrote to him, he was not interested in how the donbass was bombed, he was not interested in anything at all, he was an absolutely

ignorant person who thought from... the state department, now such a sensation, and this, by the way, is an indicator of why there is a sensation, because there is, because there are times when it is necessary to say not what is supposed to be said, he really is what is supposed to be said, but what is needed, but it was possible, just missing half a paragraph, everything was fine, this is also such a signal, i don’t think that this is some kind of random effect of the performer, which awakened his conscience, he doesn’t have a conscience, by the way, he doesn’t have a mind either, because if he had a mind, he would have behaved differently long ago, but this is interesting, i absolutely disagree about the article , jack salivon. yes,

he is, of course, a graphomaniac, the bolsheviks would they didn’t take him, they also liked to sort things out through newspapers, that’s how, but the bolsheviks wouldn’t have taken him, because not only everyone can read this to the end, but i finished reading it, there’s the very truth in the last paragraph, until this is, of course, a monstrous verbiage, which shows only one thing: a complete lack of reflection, yes, a complete absence, well, of some kind of mental work, how did we still come to this situation, but nevertheless, but nevertheless , the last paragraph is the most important, it needs to be consolidated, not time for debate, the future, well, it's there, it's there, it's there, it means, i think that by the way, in the next, in the next there will be

an article by blinkin, yes, where everything will also be, again in the last paragraph there will be the same verbiage, but the subtext will be excused salivana, but what an idea, consolidation is not the time for quarrels, the future of the free world depends on whether the iron old man biden will stand, the idea is very simple, leave me alone. from us, give us the opportunity to do what we want, but don’t know how to, break the law, yes, supplying everything with ammunition according to gray schemes. economic assistance to ukraine there is such a substantial amount of money for it, well, it’s a clean cut, but i understand, ammunition to replenish the pentagon’s reserves, i still

understand that, but here a clean cut is laid, a clean total, well, i would say that there is an excellent sponsorship scheme. military-industrial complex, we are giving you money right now for the fact that you will someday produce ammunition, but we are buying your loyalty, by the way, this is about the question that there is nothing to be ashamed of, that’s what the whole story is there, but by the way, let me draw your attention to the fact that this the article is paired, because yesterday there was an article of our universal, where with the author one of our universal favorites,

there is no your china, china proclaiming this initiative, one train, one way and fixing it where it came. signed your own death warrant, that’s it, your china is gone, you can take an eraser to erase it, and even today salevan’s article comes out in which it turns out that in general things are bad, yes, and not in china, but in the united states, so it must be done at any cost to save the biden regime, and this is no longer a government, this is no longer an administration, this is really already a regime that step by step goes beyond the boundaries of legitimacy, it goes step by step beyond the boundaries that the american constitution has assigned to it, in fact, we just walk like this, like biden’s shuffling gait, but he goes out like this the whole point is that they have entered into a see-saw situation,

they are not fighting now for victory, they are now fighting to gain time, to gain time in order to maintain their power, but i have one thing...' constructive proposal regarding the war, i think that i’m looking at the situation in the middle east and everywhere, and it won’t resolve, it won’t work out there without a big, without a big war, because how big, how big, the question is that i have a proposal to shift its focus, because if the focus really is ... mm on iran, on the persian gulf , and there is a possibility that both israel and the united states will strike iran, accordingly, there could really be a chain reaction there, let's, if we really need to, somewhere other than

the situation in gas , in addition to the war in gas, the outcome, which is approximately clear, the path to this outcome is unclear, it can be very long. and not so fast by any parachute regiment. we also had guys who took one city with one parachute regiment, yes, two regiments in 3 days. yes, but i’ll say this, let’s choose a place that, well, clearly no one cares and which, unlike iran, doesn’t argue with this, no one has a direct connection to this conflict, to this massacre, to this terrorist act of hamas, well, there is the same place, said the israeli ambassador to the un, and the foreign minister did you name the affairs of israel? is this qatar? let's go crazy on the boat, and we'll temporarily turn away, so the persian gulf, the persian gulf , well, i understand, it's scary , there's an american military base there, so it's easier to go crazy on iran, where there is no

american military base, but by and large , it's the same, it’s the same, but it doesn’t matter who, who, who is dying, for now. whoever has a problem, yes, but really, horror, a huge number of extremist movements were sponsored by the boat, so let's squeeze out this abscess, and squeezing out this abscess for sure will not lead to a big war, i believe that today i have proven myself to be a true liberal and even a democrat, i only have one question left: who can explain to me what

an object is that is similar to yako? on the subject, excuse me, i can’t do anything here, i simply don’t have any other yakars for you, and of course, it’s a tragic situation, but we still find a place for a joke, yes, well, of course, a subject similar to anchors, this is really, i’ll explain, this is an investigative language, pranik goes there, you know, because, you know, firstly, they look like an anchor, secondly, the investigation always has a question, was it a specially made crime weapon , or was it a standard anchor, a ship, this, you know, a lot depends on this, dmitry gadavich, i’m just i support the group by prior agreement. well, but for the presence of intent, here is the definition of intent, was it an anchor that could accidentally

fall off, or is it an object made, similar to an anchor, but on purpose, yes, misleading is a consequence, but excuse me, i i just supported the conversation, but now if i say a little about something else, here i am, not to argue, again, vitalyvich, but just nearby... well, a slightly different attitude towards comrade biden’s position, about the fact that he gathered there to build something, i have a question for us, for ourselves, in general, when we listen to all this, it’s not only about this, well, this statement, everything else is the same, that’s why we think it comes out, no, we’re used to it, if the head of state comes out and says there, addresses parliament, or some kind of programmatic speech. we understand that he says what he is going to do, and we are with him, it sits so firmly with us that we

are transferring this relationship there, by the way, i would like to draw your attention to the united states, well, they were for the minsk agreements, they supported them, well, the inulan came there, well , formally, they voted at the un, they didn’t flirt, they voted a resolution to implement these same minsk ones. the united states has done everything and more than everything so that they are not implemented and so that a war scenario begins. when biden says that he is going to build something, i think that no, they are not going to build any new order. let's go straight to this very thing, straight to what biden said, it's interesting, he came out and said, the old

order has collapsed, it was so good, it lasted 50 years, yalta, we will build a new one, i listened like that, i say right away , and another 30 years, where do you divide it, well, 50 years from forty is, well, a maximum of 95, and so on how can you look at it, and it’s still 30 years until today? where are you going, comrade biden? and then saliva comes out, all this bullshit, she had to, how would she explain that the yalta order, we, in general, the ussr, he didn’t say we won, but he said we won, somehow, we won, we got with an advantage, they won, the yalta order was privatized, and this was the first stage of american world greatness, this is the stage, then it turns out there was a second, when they were in charge of everything, everything was very successful, now they are starting

third, i wanted to understand what the third stage is, and the third stage is when we will manage everyone in the same way, nothing will change in general, well, if someone doesn’t understand something, we will explain, here in in principle, everything that was said there, the third stage is no different, but from the second. when we owned everything, well, sallin’s function for us was to explain what had been happening for 30 years, that nothing would change, and the most important thing was that salin had to tell everyone, whoever reads the article, some people here say, we have everything under control about the third world war, the united states has everything under control, note that sulivan does not have a single strong... not a single strong statement about the situation, that there is any a problem, something is not being solved, something

threatens something, it doesn’t exist, that’s it, that’s it. we have it under control, don’t worry, some in the form of trump, takir kalsen, and elon musk, who has joined them, say that we are on the threshold of the third world war, this is all nonsense, they are crazy, everything is the same with us, like 80 as the years have passed, it will continue to go on, so we must be completely calm, that’s

what salevan said, “i’m coming back.” what they say and what they do, well, in my opinion, the parallel with ukraine easily, at the level of logic, refers to the middle east situation. i think, dmitry gennadyvich, that comrade guterres, and you precisely defined, well, his functionality, this time he said what was directly written on a piece of paper, this is exactly what he said, to which israel reacted. the permanent representative was written verbatim, this is what you should do to say, he took it, he said, because what is the game going on, now, it’s like with the minsk agreements, it seems, well, america, of course, supports israel, but there’s no need, so that it supports so carefully, but at the same time

it does everything, everything happens so that israel would go so deep into this situation that israel would be to blame for all the consequences that would arise around it, and the united states would say, well, we did what we could, in general, we all did, and biden made a mistake a couple of times, biden i made a couple more mistakes, well , probably, but the scenario is exactly the same, yes and guterres is in place, for revenge, and the reaction of the israeli envoy is predictable, wonderful, it’s just how it should be, a few more steps like this, all this will flare up, despite the fact that america in the person of biden, salevan, blinken and everyone else, well, didn’t want no war. america explains to everyone that we don’t want any war, we don’t want any, when they say this, i understand that they are doing exactly the opposite,