in turn , the israel defense forces reports that during the night the country attacked 150 hamas targets, including underground tunnels. several leaders of the movement are said to have been killed, including assem abu rakaba, whom israel considers responsible for planning the october 7 attack. ukraine is not ready to join the north atlantic alliance, said jessica cox, head of nato's nuclear policy director, speaking at the center for strategic and international studies in washington, she emphasized that although allies and are in favor of rapprochement with kiev, it is too early to invite the country into the defense bloc, she did not specify exactly how long, in her opinion , the transition period will last in the krasnoliman direction... special operations, a group of

russian troops in the center repelled four attacks during counter battery fight, two armored vehicles, a self-propelled gun and more than a dozen field artillery crews were destroyed, the west group of troops, in the kupinsky direction, penetrated the ukrainian drone control point, the east group was hit the enemy, including in the area of ​​ugledar and urozhainy. the situation in the middle east is heating up, while even the un is unable to influence the situation, the united states is putting together a coalition around israel, a new division according to old principles, about this and more, see in the international, in the international review immediately after a short advertisement,

vtb is with you at vtb - the best application and payment for housing without commission, i wonder who did it? someone who wants to surround those closest to them with warmth and comfort every day. well done, daughter. we came up with the vtb debit card and improved vtbbon, as for ourselves, so that your life becomes more comfortable. go to vtb right now, one of my friends really needs mega powers. what for? megapowers will make your internet unlimited. watch videos, listen to music, surf social networks as much as you want. free, only for megafon subscribers, megafon, magnit, spaghetti shibekinskie, 47.99. magnet, price, what you need. get cashback up to 5% with a free sofcombank debit card. hair lacking vitality? gliskur exceptional hydration, fills hair the power of hyaluronic acid. without weighing down, elastic,

shiny hair every day. gliskur, expert solutions for your hair. are you sure that you chose me yourself, or listened to a fashion blogger, at bigfest you definitely choose. chicken burger for 39 rubles and other offers at a very competitive price. alfa bank was the first in russia to abolish commissions for all transfers and payments. order a free alpha debit card. not just profitable, alpha profitable. hello, international review is on air, in the studio fyodor lukyanov. today the program includes international review. events of the week. chronicle, facts, comments. tension around the gas sector. the west is mobilizing. materials of our

program: choosing the right side of history, the concept of a free world, instructions for assembling on your own, how far technology has come, they began to litter even in space, a project of an international consortium. the military-political fire in the middle east continues to flare up. brighter, capturing, fortunately, not new countries, but new areas. an unprecedented scandal has erupted around the un secretary general. antonio gutierres, condemning the atrocity militants, noted that the hamas attack did not happen out of nowhere, the reason is that palestinian lands have been occupied for decades. israel called it an unheard of justification for terrorism and demanded his resignation. oonovsky. they threaten to no longer

issue israeli visas, this threat is not symbolic, blocking un work in the region will affect hundreds of thousands of people. yunrwa or bopor is the un agency in the middle east to help palestinian refugees. the agency was created in december 1949 after the first arab-israeli war. eighth year. its structures operate on the west bank of the jordan river, in the gas sector, as well as in jordan, lebanon and syria. it is the largest international humanitarian project in history, currently employing more than 26,000 people. most of them are palestinians, after the so-called six-day war of sixty-seven, with the consent of israel, all humanitarian aid came through beauport. in addition, the agency organizes education, healthcare, and provides other free social assistance to palestinians.

refugees, both in palestine and in neighboring arab countries. the main donor agencies are the united states, the european union, great britain, norway, sweden from arab countries, kuwait and saudi arabia. according to un documents , bapor's mandate applies to a person whose usual place of residence was palestine for at least two years immediately before the outbreak of the conflict in 1948 and who lost his livelihood as a result of the conflict. not only persons eligible for assistance are entitled to receive assistance. under this definition, as well as their children and grandchildren. consider themselves refugees from the first two arab-israeli wars. they all live in eight camps, the main ones being jebaliya, rafah, ashshaty and khan yunis. many are unemployed and rely on subsidies from beauport. on

the western bank of the artan, there are 19 camps housing more than 800,000 refugees. in total , there are about 60 palestinian refugee camps in the arab world. israel has repeatedly demanded the administration of beauport, accusing it of ineffective and misdirected use of funds provided, as well as of supporting hamas militants, however, in december 2017, the un general assembly adopted a resolution in support of the agency’s activities, then 162 states voted for this document, only six voted against. at the same time, the un was attacked from the other side, turkish president erdogan accused the organization of worthlessness, how can a structure that ignores the brutal murders of children be taken seriously, and once again demanded

its radical reform. tom stiglich makes fun of queer people. this is a collective a term for people whose sexuality or. gender identity is different from the majority. in the us they often speak out in defense of palestine, with hamas militants on top. another american, michael ramirez, imagines the palestinians as hamas militants in a t-shirt, death to israel, the palestinian himself asks: why can’t we live in peace? metamorphoses - drawing by the spaniard pedripol. this is not a mistake, just a play on words. in spanish, matar - instagram and facebook accuse the meta company of censorship. emad hajaj about the reporter's tragedy aljazeer in the gaza strip, the family of weil

addahduh, who headed the bureau of the television company, was killed in an airstrike by the israeli air force. rodrigotos is from portugal, palestinian-israeli. in the form of a rubik's cube, which is no longer possible to solve, i give up - says the man, in israel the nightmare of october 7 continues to be compared with the american september 11, 2001 . the parallel, unfortunately not unfounded, not only in terms of the number of victims and shock, but in terms of consequences, when the reaction to an attack is more devastating than the attack itself. how then, the us response shook up the entire middle east. having been subjected to violence, the country falls into a frenzy, driving itself into a vicious circle. the definitions we are now hearing from israel are this a new holocaust, these are new nazis, worse than isis? let's think about it,

a rather poorly armed paramilitary group trapped in gas. israel is the region's military superpower and has nuclear weapons. what is the truth? a terrible existential threat, maybe it's something else, there is a blanket of uncritical love in which the united states and most europeans envelops the israelis and it encourages their type of thinking. an echo chamber emerges in which israeli theses are reproduced. in themselves, they are natural at a time when there is an urgent need to demonstrate the power to inspire confidence after a fantastic systemic failure, but if others repeat this, you yourself begin to believe in it all, and this is the worst thing that can happen, because such ideas are self-destructive. the humanitarian consequences of the gas operation are beginning to unnerve many, but the western government is firmly support israel, but society, especially

in european countries, is, to put it mildly, much less unequivocal. there is a growing gap between leaders who are entirely on israel's side and public opinion. we see this almost everywhere in europe, and this is already an internal problem in many western societies. they are not homogeneous. there are different groups that support different sides of this conflict. and if the power. are trying to play on this field, and not just aggravate the split. after russia's withdrawal from world war i, arab the possessions of the former ottoman empire, london and paris were divided into two. at a conference in san remo in april '20, they were given mandates to govern the territories. great britain received a mandate for palestine and iraq, and france for syria, including modern lebanon. wherein. the geographical concept of palestine then included the modern territories of israel, jordan, the west bank of

the jordan river, the gaza strip and northwestern saudi arabia. at the same time in san remo there was a recognized balfour declaration, a letter british foreign secretary arthur balfour, the representative of the british jewish community, alter rothschild, in which the british government agreed to the creation of a jewish national home in. palestine. in july of the twenty-second year, the league of nations approved the mandates of england and france for the former arab possessions of the ottoman empire. great britain was given responsibility for implementing the balfour declaration. at this time there was a mass immigration of jews to palestine. only from 24 to 28 from poland and hungary 82,000 jews fled to palestine to escape the pogroms. but the peak of emigration occurred in the thirties. after the nazis came to power in germany, the arab population opposed the massive influx of migrants. in

'37, armed clashes began between jews and arabs. organized self-defense units operated on both sides. then the british authorities decided to restore order by force. 20,000 british soldiers were thrown against the rebels. during the fighting, 5,000 arabs, 400 jews and 200 british were killed. at thirty-nine the uprising gradually faded away. the british authorities have set a quota for accepting migrants - 75,000 people over 5 years. during the second world war immediately after it, british authorities intercepted ships carrying jewish migrants to palestine and sent them back to where they came from or to third countries. but at the beginning of the british mandate, the population of palestine more than doubled, if... previously , the share of jews was 11% of the population of the region, then by the end of the war it was 33%. the standard of living

in palestine was also rising, but this did not help resolve basic contradictions. in 1947, great britain announced its desire to abandon the mandate for palestine. on may 14, 1948, its effect was terminated. the united nations has declared the need to divide palestine into two states. jewish and arab. on the same day in tel aviv, david bengurion proclaimed the creation of the jewish state of israel. a paradoxical contradiction arises. the tangle of problems that the state and people face is becoming tighter, more confusing and complex, and the proposed recipes their solutions are increasingly simpler, if not more primitive. nationalism is raising its head, raising its head in many countries, in israel it has never lowered its head, so

israel is a leader in this sense, in general, and israel is also a leader in another sense, which is how political legitimation is based on, well, let’s say, on the bible, which is not a rational argument today. modernization, of course, is observed in many countries, the desire to change history, the desire, as it were, to cleanse not only the country, but how to clear the memory, this is happening in many countries in order to unite the people, and so that the people do not pay attention to what they pay attention to in a democratic society, namely economic inequality, discrimination,

everything else. the support scheme of a slogan can sometimes be effective, an example of this is easy to find in history... president biden’s last speech that we are fighting evil, this whole idea that good and evil arose, in my opinion, from reagan started with this, because even stalinsky no one called the soviet union of evil, that is, an evil empire, this emotionality, a sign of demodernization in my opinion, and as for the rollback, well, of course, it is completely clear to your audience that many remember the nineties of the last century, where doctors of science were sold beer on the corner, well, this is also a sign

of demodernization, well, also what is sometimes called essentialism, probably in russian there is also such a term, that is... that there are peoples who have such a being, but this is completely doesn't fit in the framework of modernization, because someone has some kind of creature, this creature makes them behave this way, and it is impossible to change it, this is a kind of racism, generally speaking, because in the 20th century, well, in the 19th century too, this was a very popular teaching, which was not only accepted by nazi germany. biden, immediately after returning from israel, proposed a new confrontation scheme for americans: we will not allow terrorists like hamas and tyrants like putin to win. the next day the same indestructible block of tyrants and terrorists was branded by the head of the european commission, ursula fondern.

well, has the basis for the consolidation of the free world been found? in his message to congress, harry truman outlined a new foreign policy program. the president said that the united states has an obligation to help free peoples in their struggle against totalitarian regimes and called on congress to provide economic and military assistance to greece and turkey to prevent the spread of soviet influence in southeastern europe. in a situation where almost all countries are forced to choose between two mutually exclusive ones. lifestyles, politics the united states will be to help free peoples defend free institutions and national integrity against aggressors who are trying to impose a totalitarian regime on them. this is how the term free world arose, aka the first world, this is the usa, western europe, as well as canada and australia, the countries of the socialist

camp opposing them, led by the ussr, called the second world, all the remaining countries. asia, africa and latin america are the third world. the logical continuation of the truman doctrine was the marshall plan and the bloc created in 1949 nato. in 1950, the truman administration already strictly adhered to the two worlds doctrine. it was set out in the top-secret strategic document of the us national security council (nsc)-68, which essentially declared a struggle between the free world and the soviet world on the principle of who will win. between 1950 and 1953, the united states tripled defense spending from 5 to 14% of gdp. damage to free institutions anywhere amounted to a general defeat, and the united states was required to ensure a rapid and decisive buildup political, economic and military power

of the free world. with its decision to enter the korean war that year, the administration put theory into practice, demonstrating the united states' commitment to defending the borders of the free world everywhere. in january '61, john kennedy, in his inaugural address, emphasized the rivalry between the free world and the communist world. he promised that the american people would pay any price, bear any burden, face any difficulty, support any friend, oppose any enemy, to ensure survival success of freedom, however, the regime of fideli castre in cuba survived. a new historical stage was the collapse of the berlin wall, the collapse of the socialist camp, and the collapse of the ussr in 1991. the new world order, a unipolar world under the leadership of the united states, was supposed to be the universal triumph of the free

world, but it was short-lived. in the countries of asia and africa, which 40 years ago were called the third world. new, very influential centers of power have formed, which, in principle, are alien to the concept that reproduces the approaches cold war. the concept of the west as a free world played an important role in the confrontation at one time. pyotr slyoskin has been researching this phenomenon for several years. when did the idea of ​​a free world even arise? the free world became a key concept of american foreign policy in 1950, after the so-called loss of china and before the outbreak of the korean war. the main feature of the concept of freedom. world, this is a negative definition. american politicians identified the free world as not the communist world at all, that is, they proceeded

from the fact that the whole world should be harmoniously interconnected, but this was prevented by the communists, who had a different goal, namely global integration, so they had to build to protect the entire territory that remained free from communist oppression. so what came out of this? firstly, the policy of global military containment, well , containment was invented by george kenon back in 1946, wasn’t it? this is not what george kenon had in mind; for him there was a hierarchy of american interests. japan in this scheme was important, but korea and vietnam, not so much. many other politicians and commentators from the fifties complained. then global containment is an impossible strategic task that gives the initiative to the communists, but for the leader of the free world it was impossible to act otherwise

, any advance of the unfree world reduced the space of the free world, the free world was indivisible, the loss of freedom in one place meant the loss of freedom everywhere, and well, in the end the united states fought for a long time in korea in vietnam and created military... alliances along the entire perimeter american communist bloc. well, this doesn’t even sound like ideology, it looks more like religious faith. the second consequence of the politics of the free world was the need and impossibility of creating a single ideology common to all. mmm, politicians believed that the communists had their own idea, wrong, destructive, but understandable. this means that the free world also had to offer something of its own, and there were constant attempts to come up with something like that, but it was impossible to come up with a positive ideology, because the free the world was defined negatively. america did not

consider itself the leader of western, christian , capitalist, democratic or any other countries, it considered itself the leader of the entire non-communist world, and because of this, american politics was heavily dependent on a sense of existentialism. threats reacted very painfully to soviet peace policy. in the absence of the communist threat, there was little to bind the free world. and when did the topic begin to be exhausted? by the end of the sixties, american politicians had largely stopped appealing to free world. on the one hand, no one disputed the global scale of american interests. leadership was taken for granted, and leadership of what is no longer so important. on the other hand, the internal contradiction to the concept began to appear more and more clearly; after the end of the acute crises in cuba in berlin, the cold

war gradually became routinized, it became more difficult to perceive the communist threat as existential, and in the meantime both worlds split, the confrontation between the ussr and china destroyed the picture of the communist monolith , and as a result of decolonization, the so-called third world finally broke away from the free world. well, after the sixties, some elements of the politics of the free world remained. firstly, these are military alliances, which have largely become an end in themselves. and secondly, the need for a single existential enemy. after the collapse of the soviet union, it seemed that the entire globe had finally... but less than ten years have passed since bush jr. again declared american leadership of the free world in the fight against global terror and the axis of evil, and how

only the war with terron is more or less... over, the time has come for the confrontation between democracy and autocracies, the defense of the liberal order from the good old enemies, russia and china, now we often hear about an order based on rules, this also turns out to be an ideologeme like the free world, i hear from various politicians in washington, that in general they realize that this is a losing concept and want to find another better one, they are already appealing... more often now to the un charter, so that it is clear what exactly the rules are, so in my opinion, it's them they themselves realized that it didn’t work out very well, but with the divisions of autocracy and democracy, they are also raising, that is, on the one hand, there is a tendency to return to the original logic, ae american leadership, namely the leadership of the free world against the unfree world, both

autocracy and democracy - this this is the same essence, on the other hand, they understand perfectly well that the world has changed, in the fifties it was already difficult to divide the globe into two parts, from recording india as a free world, regardless of what niru himself wanted, and now, even more so, the so-called third world, the former third world, has autonomy and does not want to choose between blocs, and washington understands this very well. and the tyrant-terrorist spike that biden spoke about has a chance of being picked up, but i also think it’s not very good, because just yesterday a long article came out, and it’s all

about the international order. and the main enemies of this order, russia and china, and there is a stake there after the publication of the printed version about hamas, and the war against terror and radical islam is not very well invested in the defense the free world or the international order, but because, on the one hand, terror is not an external geopolitical threat. an internal problem in paris, in brussels, even in the same israel, and the palestinian issue is considered internal, and so this is a bad marriage for the international order for the free world, and opposition to the international order of the order of china and russia, and you can add the northern korea

and iran. but in my opinion, it works much better, washington has been moving towards this for a long time, that is , the main term there is great power competition, the war against global terror is considered a failure, these are just these endless wars, so they want to get away from this and return to big rivalry. a geopolitical to the protection of the entire international order from existential threats, here china and russia more or less fulfill such a role, but hamas not so much, here i think that another concept is important, this is civilization, and this can be seen when barel talks about jungle isad or

american are not conservatives... keygen also wrote about the jungle, and barbarians, the chinese are not you name hamas the afghans, somehow you can imagine this, on the other hand, this is considered a terrible maveton, you can’t talk about civilization, this is the rhetoric of the 19th century, and even if this is a picture in the minds of politicians, if they say it out loud , we must then... take back our words, the axis of evil - it was iran that was added there, well, in general, this was the former communist world, now, i think, after all, this is not an axis of evil, but what was the arrival of the war , that is, everyone knows that there is no need to return to the cold war, americans, chinese, everyone says that we don’t want a cold war, but the confrontation

between america and china and russia is still there.