[000:00:00;00] that well, collective responsibility is a well-known principle of the work of the british government, if the cabinet line has been worked out, then all members of the british government, there are a lot of them, indeed, the minister, the minister himself, their assistant and so on, and they must support it and go with it, no one can speak out against this approach, but the policeman decided to speak out in contrast, but he was not expelled from the party, he is still in the parliamentary faction, it is important to note that in recent weeks the party has emerged conservatives created a semblance of internal unity on the issue of the middle east crisis and now it becomes obvious that this internal unity among the conservatives, it is not monolithic is a difference, but there are other voices besides bristo, although not in the councils controlled by the conservatives and also

said that they categorically do not agree with the line of unambiguous support from... his actions in the gas, well, people do not agree, there is an internal defeat, well, i will also note that the motives can be different, for some it is a sincere consciousness of, well, imbalance, expressed approach, others believe, others rely on the electorate, believe that the electorate, in general, should dictate the policy of the party here due to migration, there are giant diasporas, pakistanis, indians, and a number of other countries that have, so i just had several eastern ambassadors, because they really talk with their diasporas , which have a great influence in egypt, by the way, there is also a huge diaspora here, the jordanian one, so there are quite a lot of players here who actually create this, vich,

these diasporas that you said, they can still change the policy... the current policy of the british cabinet, and it’s difficult to change, but they can influence it, even the pakistani diaspora, for example, it is now quite strong in the cities of the rust belt , in the largest cities, doctors and lawyers, in addition to managers, there are really very large managers, but i’m not saying that there are also pakistanis in the cabinet now, the british net, the same thing, there are people from the middle east from... from the middle east, this is kind of a trend it is intensifying here, yes, it even concerns scotland, by the way, there is now the leader of the leading scottish national party, he is also not british. will the british establishment and british leadership strengthen in the near future? yes, i think yes, this is a trend that is generally characteristic of europe, but it is especially characteristic of britain, and andrei ivanovich, and

yet, braverman, well, it’s clear from his last name that he will defend israel, taking place in the cities of the country, it, by the way, the head of the ministry of internal affairs of britain, the mass actions taking place in the cities of the country, and how is it possible to understand all this, and did it have any kind of response at all, because after all, you said, the majority of people are against it, and the minister of the interior says such things , is this normal? well, firstly, broverman has nothing to do with israel, she is of a completely different nationality, but - in general, we can say that some british politicians are trying to equate the two, and this is an expression of hatred and anti-semitism, this is of course not true , well, the current head of the ministry of internal affairs is in in general, she diligently cultivates the image of such an ultra-conservative politician, she is well known for her ambiguous statements regarding migration, migrants, and especially

those with anti-muslim... connotations, so she is now publicly butting heads with the leadership of the london police and believes that they are not behaving strictly enough in within the framework of the legislation, and the regulatory framework, which she has been verified, her colleagues have developed, well, the words of your hatred, and the legal assessment, they, uh, of course, only the court can give her legal assessment, this is what it is for, but right away - it must be said that these statements of the verified man, they rather added fuel to the fire, rather than resolving the contradictions, they aggravated them, on the contrary, on one of the sides. this applies, by the way, to brisot, the same thing, but let’s not laugh at the situation, here, in general , manifestations of extremism are actually observed, there were speeches, for example, by hizbud al-trahrir alslam, and this organization in russia is considered terrorist, but here no, and now local observers are wondering how it is, we didn’t have it at one time

banned. andrey. and to sum up our conversation, do you think that the british government will take any active steps in the near future, what do you think? about changing the position, but i think this will not happen, because ... here is its position, it strictly follows the kelvator of the united states, if there is any change there, then there will be a change in britain, but on its own, britain does not will do, especially since the european union is now also advocating, it is not for a humanitarian pause, but rather it is for some kind of humanitarian pause, or maybe a few pauses, but nothing. andrey vladimova, thank you very much, we will follow the development of events, all the best, thank you, all the best, more and more politicians are becoming involved in the palestinian-israeli conflict, but so far such a development of events is not even visible. the israeli authorities are determined to solve the problem by force. we will discuss whether they can do this with the scientific director of the institute of oriental iran, academician

vitaly naum. i'm interested in your opinion, what 's happening, happened this week, a lot of things, well, let's, you know, start our conversation, from the speech of the leader of hezbollah, rasanna srula made a statement, a lot of people are now commenting on it, naturally, they waited a long time for it, almost two and a half days there, someone was afraid that hezbollah would declare war on israel, someone said no, how do you evaluate this speech? is it good that the confrontation with israel is going on? how do you evaluate this speech? is it extremely important for the situation in the region? it is of course important, but it is in line with all previous statements by hezbollah leaders, in principle, its policy in this direction, i assess it positively, because that hezbollah still positions itself as a national party, it is not some kind of pan-islamist party, its

priorities, its agenda in general, it is connected with the national interests of this particular state, especially its muslim community, primarily the shiite one, and it seems to me that what he said... this statement does not contain anything new, it seems to me that it inspires maximum confidence in avoiding some kind of clash that could be disastrous for lebanon, given the extremist pressure and the completely insane government israel led by netanehu, well... he didn’t give a shit and said that they had already entered the war on october 8, well, this is probably still a figure of speech, more, some separate sections

of territory in lebanon itself, and it seems to me that this after all, not military actions, there is no scale here, nor any tasks set by the politicians that the leadership of this party has, these are rather... small episodes, clashes that have always happened, often happened, there were shelling of israeli territory , were israel in lebanon, large and traces of this can still be seen, compared to what it was, today these are, i would say, generally small acts, small clashes, which in no way can lead to any serious consequences and to the splashing out of... this big palestinian-israeli war outside the actual main theater of military operations, well, once exactly twice, in my opinion, and even there it received from hezbollah in full, and

as i understand it, hezbollah is waiting for this attack, will it wait? it seems to me that no, well, it would be complete madness, i think that reputation and his cabinet in the world has fallen so low that if now he is on some new, absolutely, absolutely untenable accusations against iran, which is also showing restraint, i think that this will not happen, and vitalislavich, in the same speech today it was stated quite frankly that hezbollah is not forcing events, but because america threatened to bomb iran if hezbollah enters the territory of... israel and thus iran, and this is holding back hezbollah, well, practically that's what it said in the speech, it's like this can be understood, commented on, or rather, well, it can be understood in such a way that the united states views hezbollah as a puppet

of iran, which is wrong, because hezbollah , it is quite obvious, is a national party that is supported by iran, it is shia co-religionists, they are close, iranians and hezbollah, but hezbollah does not act on orders from tehran, it acts according to its own plans, works within the framework of its agenda, and the fact that the americans in general, just like the israelis, are fixated on iran in general and any right in line with iran and they are trying in every possible way to provoke iran into some radical actions, of course, such a deterrent for hezbollah, of course, because any, any reason will be considered, will be used as a way to unleash, provoke, more precisely, iran for some kind of radical action against israel. strike a powerful

blow against the west right now, before iran has yet turned into a nuclear power, which is possible in principle, and you know, and i’ve been doing a lot today i’ve already read comments about the sheikh’s speech, and many were expecting more, and they were saying that war would finally be declared on israel and so on, what do you think, these are these high expectations, well, in terms of the arab world, the islamic world, but they were of a constructive nature, because in fact, and if this happened , it would be at least regional, it turns out that this is so, yes, this is a pure provocation, hezbollah has many enemies, in the arab world, in the islamic world, there is an internal contradiction between

shiites and sunnis, even within shiism itself. there are many who want to drag hezbollah into this confrontation and thereby provoke this spreading conflict , obviously very much, well, israeli too, because there is a great desire to strike iran, this needs a reason, there is no reason yet, that all the accusations are in hell with iran, they are completely untenable, but creating a reason is the main task of those who spread such rumors today. well, vitalich, you know, unfortunately, even our colleagues. maybe from they have such notes of misunderstanding, well, where is islamic , arab unity, this matter is really playing into the hands of those who are ready to incite this conflict further, with such comments, but i think that this is due to a misunderstanding by our colleagues, some, i and i agree with you, absolutely, absolutely agree, you are right, vitalich, and let ’s still forecast the situation a little, it is clear that the forecast of affairs is not very rewarding, but colleagues, well, colleagues. depending on the weather, sometimes they even get there quite often

within 3 days, when it’s possible, yes, predict, calculate the movement of clouds, judging by the way the israeli military is advancing, things are coming to an end , hezbollah won’t last long if it doesn’t , hamas, read, i said, of course, hamas won’t last long, i wouldn’t say said that hamas's resources have not yet run out, they are far from running out. there is still the will to resist, which was dug by the incredible work of the hamas and their supporters - in the gas, i think that the resource, the combat resource of the hamas, has not yet been exhausted, besides this, probably, well one can only hope for many today's arabs, who and the palestinians, in particular, not not hamas, but those who are residents who suffer from all this from... the terrible massacre that israel carried out against civilians, they

would certainly dream that this ended quickly, and not everything is going smoothly there either, there is an internal contradiction between different groups of palestinians, they of course expect that hamas will still hold out, and in the meantime, given the growing opposition to israel’s actions in the world, some kind of then the consensus is about. in favor of bringing the conflicting parties to the negotiating table, this inspires some hope that this will suddenly happen, although there are few hopes. vitalislavovich, information has appeared, it is appearing more and more often, that supposedly the netanyahu government is considering stopping the operation for now, at least for a while, in order to solve the problem in a way, and then it will be seen how

do you think the event could develop like this? you know, of course israel would be interested the idea is that all the hamas members leave, from gaza and there, perhaps, some part of the population remains, it’s even better if everyone leaves , because the idea of ​​​​the so-called transfer, and a long-standing one since the forties, that is, relocations in general in the air and it is absolutely untenable, the palestinians, this is palestinian land, the palestinians in their entirety will not leave from there, and i think that maybe this will not happen with hamas, it would be beneficial. israel, but israel is now saying that any cessation military actions, it is in the interests of hamas, because it is using this pause to supposedly regroup, rearm with renewed vigor and resume hostilities, we don’t know whether this is true or not, but the position has been clearly

stated, so far we can convince israel needs to make such a negotiating pause , or in general... the ceasefire has not yet succeeded, because netanyahu is doing, and the ministers of his cabinet are doing such radical fluff, i think that firstly this will not happen, and secondly, i don’t believe that israel suddenly took and abandoned the point of view that it has been stupidly expressing during this entire time, it would suddenly take and agree to open a humanitarian corridor to let everyone out, yes most likely the most... such stubborn hamas fighters, they also will not leave field b, because they have it, it is clear that everything is very complicated here, but this is the plan that, in general, israel, well, netanyahu even admitted that there were such conversations, he did not talk about the plan, he said, well, these were business games or there are some forecasts about

the resettlement and survival of palestinians from this land, because if they solve the problem with the sector. after all, they will continue to force this plan and survive the palestinians from their territories? they really wanted to survive from the gas, this is absolutely not possible from the western bank, no one will leave from there, they can’t even have such plans in my opinion, but of course there are certain dreamers there, completely insane members of the cabinet or bengvir and they have them their supporters naturally and rather even as an unarmed example, here’s one of our partners, daniel levy, it’s clear what his ethnicity is from his name, you know, today

i made a mistake with my ethnicity once in a conversation , so you were mistaken and i won’t be mistaken, i’m talking about levy, i know perfectly well he heads the organization , which is called the usa and the islamic world, that is, he deals with the relations of the usa with the islamic world and here he is, we correspond with him, one of many with whom i correspond in these conditions, a lot of letters come, here he is directly wrote that hamas is a political organization, it should be viewed as such and dealt with in that way, and offers to work with it , to contact it, like many others, another... very well-known figure, specialist in the region, daniel kurtser, of the same ethnicity, former us ambassador to israel, yesterday forren efeys wrote, wrote an article called netanyahu must leave, he believes that now the main path to a solution lies in his

cabinet all leaving, not the palestinians leaving, and so that tanehu does not leave with his ministers, i don’t know how it is with you, of course. much better than me, but it seems to me that this was a global provocation in order to solve internal israeli problems by removing netanyahu, who, of course, will now be accused of all sins, he missed everything there, missed everything, and he didn’t sleep there not in spirit, he was framed in the same way as perhaps part of the hamas leadership and it was a completely different operation of other special services under a false flag, as they say, american, you also think so, there is, we have no time left at all, but today sheikh asanala said a very interesting thing, but i’m thinking about a different topic with you, he said that the flood of alyaksa is the answer to not destroying the alyaksa mosque, this is a cardinal thing, he said, he somehow few people

paid attention to it, but this is a very big conversation, and i really hope that you and i will succeed, it’s just that there really isn’t anything completely ethereal left. well, insha allah, if allah wills , as they say, fine, we will proceed from this, i agree, thank you very much, vitaly vyacheslavovich, really a lot interesting topics, let me remind you that we talked with the scientific director of the institute of orientalization of the russian academy of sciences, and vitaly naumkin, a meeting was held at the ministry of internal affairs this evening, the heads of the department vladimir kolokoltsev with the representative of the public chamber alexander kholodov discussed changes in the traffic rules, in particular with regard to electric scooters. anton potkovenko has all the details, the meeting

ended just recently , in fact, the focus is on personal mobility means, scooters , unicycles, and self-driving taxis to which in general, not that far. so, the minister of the ministry of internal affairs vladimirok and alexander kholodov are a member of the public chamber commission for interaction with the public. commission, they were discussing, in fact, the feasibility of creating a new set of traffic rules, a meeting, as you noted, it was organized, well, unusually quickly, immediately after vladimir putin’s meeting with the new composition of the public chamber, at this meeting, alexander kholodov himself and expressed an initiative such as this, voiced the idea that there is already an urgent need to create new rules of the road, and the president said that it is actually worth discussing this directly with the minister of internal affairs , it would seem that such a publicly accessible, but rather special area of ​​activity,

so let’s agree, i will now ask the minister of internal affairs, he will invite you today or tomorrow for a conversation and you and him, you discuss with him the meeting was organized very very quickly, kholodov voiced at it that there was a need for a new set of traffic rules, clear, understandable to both pedestrians and drivers, rules and... those the changes that are being made to the current set of rules, they introduce some confusion, according to alexander kholodov, and most importantly, really new means of transportation are emerging, as i said, scooters, future drones, robotic food delivery, in general, all this is created new conditions, and so that there is no legal vacuum, it is the public chamber that collects initiatives of citizens of the russian federation from all regions, and there are many of these initiatives, in fact, they even have a certain foundation ready for creating a new document, here what... said alexander kholodov. now society, some new challenges are emerging, that is, for example, robot suppliers are appearing

who ride around in moscow, for sure, and it is not clear how they should work from the point of view of traffic rules, electric scooters are appearing, and some other means individual mobility, now driverless cars, also a legal vacuum. and if our country accelerates now, we will be the first in the world. the minister, in turn, noted that those changes, those additions that are being made to the current reports. traffic rules, although they are temporary in nature according to the documents, in essence, their meaning is that when the current set of traffic rules ends in 2020, and those decisions that have already been tested by life, to which pedestrians and drivers will already become accustomed , those who actually work on the road will consider them appropriate, all this will be left, and this is most likely the main array of these changes and additions, well, everything is not needed, accordingly it will be removed, and thus in fact, the collection of data, the introduction of amendments to the current set of traffic rules and the creation of a future set of traffic rules are two

parallel processes: an evolutionary approach. any adjustment, any change, it must be clearly verified, clearly thought out, only then will this adjustment work, then we will add to this adjustment the right of consciousness of our citizens, pedestrians and drivers, road users, then the rights and culture will all increase collectively confirm that amendments are being prepared, i can’t say that, you are the amendments are being accepted, but you need to act here according to one such principle, measure once, cut once, well, in fact, we can say that this meeting, it was held in a very constructive manner, this