hello, international review is on air, today the program includes international review: events of the week, chronicle, facts, comments. results of the ground operation in the gas sector. what does the future hold for ankla? roadmap for settlement. the future of the united nations, un reform in new conditions, prospects for change. the

focus is shifting to asia, a bloc approach to security. materials of our program. any major military-political crisis is a challenge to the united nations, because it is the guardian of the standards of international right, they expect from her not only a weighty word, but also a good deed, but they also complain when it turns out that her opportunities are limited. sparked unprecedented criticism of the un from both sides. such intensity of attacks has probably never happened before, as have doubts about the prospects of the body itself. why now? many doubted that these 50 countries, so different from each other in race, religion, language and culture, would ever be able to agree, but all differences were forgotten, thanks to an unwavering unity in commitment to one goal, to end

warriors, to put an end to the warriors, us president truman’s speech at the closing of the founding conference of the united nations, june 26 , 1945, and at that moment everyone was already rebuilding to a new strategic confrontation, preparations for the first atomic bomb test were being completed in los amos, he is outstanding achievement of political thought, primarily american-british: but universal. there has probably never been a more effective way to regulate international tension in history. end with it didn’t turn out to be warriors, but there was no head-on conflict between the major powers. the idea of ​​creating an international organization to maintain peace and security was voiced in february 1940 in yalta at a meeting between roosevelt, churchill and stalin. in 2 months in san francisco. the main bodies

of the un, the general assembly, the security council, took shape and, most importantly, a charter was developed. but after roosevelt's death under truman, relations between the former allies cooled sharply. the un has become a forum for bitter disputes. most countries according to on all issues they sided with washington. that is why the soviet union wanted to join the un not as one state, but by all the union republics separately. they compromised and accepted ukraine and belarus. but from 46 to 69, the majority in the security council, where in addition to five permanent members there were six more temporary ones, remained on the side of the united states. to block majority resolutions, the soviet union used 93% of all vetoes. representatives of the ussr, andrei gromyko even received the nickname “mr. no” in the west. by the way, the decision so far... has been made without the ussr.

moscow demanded that china's seat on the security council, which occupied taiwan, be given to communist beijing. as a sign of protest, moscow boycotts the meeting, and the korean resolution is adopted without taking into account the opinion of the soviets. however, by the end of the fifties the picture had changed. the year 1960 was a turning point; it was even called the year of africa. then 17 new independent states appeared on the political map of the world. former colonies of great britain, france, italy and belgium. a year later, they all became members of the un and most of them sympathized with the ussr. newly developing countries often voted against western initiatives. in 1971, china took taiwan's place, and the composition of the security council expanded thanks to temporary members. as a result, from 1970 to 1999, the united states imposed 56% of all vetoes, and the soviet union - less than any of the western powers.

almost every year the organization added several new members. in the seventy-first it included four states of arabia peninsulas: bahrain, qatar, united arab emirates, oman, and bhutan. after the end of the cold war , there was a short period of harmony in the security council. from may '90 to may '93, the veta power was not used even once, the longest period in un history. moreover, for the first time in history, the ussr and the usa mutually agreed to use military force to use the potential of the un during operation desert storm in iraq in 1991; all subsequent us invasions already bypassed the security council. with from 2011 to 2014, russia and china repeatedly blocked attempts to impose sanctions against syria. true, in march 2011 , moscow and beijing abstained from voting on

the creation of a no-fly zone over libya. as a result , nato aircraft began bombing gaddafi's troops. soon the leader of the libyan revolution was brutally killed. with the rebels, everything has an expiration date, even the most successful finds that can redirect rivalry from the battlefield to the meeting room, even if sparkling. the main players in international relations, primarily the soviet union and the united states bet on the un, for them the un was necessary, and a valuable and unique instrument of its kind for resolving contradictions, a forum for discussing serious issues, and accordingly it worked, after the end of the cold war, there are a number of events here, probably, probably, it’s possible -

how is it from a bird's eye view to say that washington won, and such irresponsible... triumphalism is from one such high, high bell tower, and if you look carefully at the events of 9, 1992, very important for clinton, for example, an event, the war in somalia, he decides, gradually, they decide that there is no need to get involved with the un, that it is too complex, a confusing way to resolve crises, which, among other things, does not guarantee the success of the united states. but there was no opponent, he is not a magic wand, there is no need to expect miracles, its political function was to avoid a world war, that in the understanding of the century did not happen, god willing, it will not happen, but the world war

bypassed the usual forms from which the un was protected, instead of a universal collision in which previously, a world order was being formed. now a chain of fierce local confrontations is on the verge of a big explosion, each involving leading players, but here he, powerlessly, has every conflict, a separate combination of interests, participants and circumstances, on which the member countries cannot agree. the un peacekeeping force emerged in 1948, when the security council authorized the deployment of a contingent of military observers in the middle east to maintain a truce between israel and its arab neighbors. since then the united nations has conducted more than 70 peacekeeping operations, most of them after the eighties.

since the uon does not have its own army, states, members of the organization, provide their troops and military equipment on a voluntary basis to carry out missions. soldiers, but in the uniform of their countries, blue helmets or berets, among the frontline peacekeepers are bangladesh, india and pakistan, from the nato countries in the top ten, italy and france, which got there only due to forced participation in peacekeeping operations in lebanon, the united states avoids cooperation with the un in every possible way and tries not to bind itself to international mandates. the last major us operation under the auspices of the un is better known as the korean war. critics point to many things. serious failures of the organization. in 1993 , the mission to somalia ended in failure. in ninety-four, the un was unable to prevent the genocide in rwanda, freeze the conflict in the congo, stop the outbreak of civil war in the balkans, which ultimately ended the nato intervention, however

the mission in sierra lion in the late nineties is considered one of the main successes of peacekeeping operations. most of the assigned tasks were completed. the peacekeepers have achieved it. un peacekeepers contributed to the freezing of the conflict, the adoption of a new constitution and the holding of elections, he contributed to the resolution of conflicts and the achievement of truces in cambodia, el salvador, guatemala, mozambique, namibia, tajikistan and east timor. meanwhile, experts assess most operations as marginally effective. today the un carries out 12 peacekeeping missions missions involving more than 100,000 people. the un structure is the same.

reflects, politically and demographically reflects the world of the fortieth year, the composition of the security council and it is unlikely that the members of the security council will give up their privileged position, which can be said to lead to a dead end to the possibility of an agreement, at least today, of course they will not resign, as they are calling for. global, and the military crisis is not the last, institution number one will have to be radically changed, it will not be possible to mothball it, except perhaps embalm it memory of past stability. tell me why europe and the united states should not support the creation of a state. first of all, because it is unfair to demand the creation of a twenty

arab state, second to the palestinian one after jordan, at the expense of the only jewish state. economist ben nitai, future prime minister of israel, benjamin netanyahu. during the period of study and work in america , he changed his last name so that his interlocutors would not break their tongue. his views on palestinian statehood. little has changed in 45 years. fierce fighting continues in palestine actions. israel is determined to completely eradicate hamas, no matter the cost. the islamists, if you believe their revelation to western journalists, are deliberately provoking the israelis in order to destroy any chance of compromise, only war until victory. everything is completely old testament. people from other countries should.

the threat is not hamas or even hezbollah, which is much more dangerous, israel is involved in a war on at least five fronts, the most difficult, of course, is the gaza strip, but there is a real war on the west bank of the jordan river, military operations are ongoing against hezbollah in the north, is fighting against iran in the south of syria, they have attacked us more than once with missiles, there is a war against yemen, who seeks to attack with ballistic missiles with a flight range of 2,000 km and drones with explosives. the threat could come from western iraq, more specifically from shia militias there, and from arab israeli citizens here. warming up the situation from within is not at all illusory. scenario: the most dangerous fronts are controlled by a strong regional power, iran,

which, unfortunately, is supported by such great powers like russia and china. until recently, we considered moscow and beijing our friends, but unfortunately, we were mistaken. i repeat, israel cannot shake the feeling of a new existential threat, to be or not to be, that is the question. today we should talk about a real existential threat. especially residents of the gas sector. the israeli minister of heritage affairs recently stated that israel has two hundred nuclear bombs and even proposed dropping one of them on the gas strip. what's happening today appalling and completely unacceptable. a real existential threat now looms over the palestinians, who are facing ethnic cleansing and whom netanyahu appears determined to dislodge entirely. gas palestinians there are dealing with genocide, ethnic cleansing and

experiencing all the hardships and deprivations of collective punishment. i do not accept any form of violence against civilians, be they jews or palestinians, but the conflict did not begin on october 7, what we are witnessing is the result of palestine being under the israeli military occupation for 56 years, the longest occupation in modern history. and ethnic cleansing that began 75 years ago. 70% of the population of gaza are refugees displaced by israel in 1948, when there were 520 palestinian communities... hypocritical , just look at how different the attitude is towards what is happening in ukraine and what palestine faces today with such mutual rejection, no wonder that and the idea of ​​the future are diametrical.

all talk about two states is an illusion; the parties have simply become obsolete. hope for the change is linked to the idea of ​​a new multi-layered , multi-player architecture to be built in the region. this idea belongs to the united states, but it is based on the israeli vision, the creation of a regional system, as a result of the normalization of relations between israel and the arab states, where palestinian autonomy will have full participation, the construction of a new regional structure, increasing the pie would allow the israelis and palestinians to receive additional benefits for themselves, compensate for inevitable costs, the restoration of gas, as well as the formation of a new system in the region, will take a long time, there is a long evolutionary transition ahead from one model to another, at least 5-6 years, depending on the development of events, at least

in the coming years, the northern part of the gas sector, which almost razed to the ground, let it be in the form in which it is now. the reconstruction process should be focused on other parts of the gaza strip. the ruins of gaza are what every palestinian should see before their eyes when they wake up in the morning. this is the price the palestinians will pay for their atrocities and barbaric behavior. a price that the palestinians will have to pay again if it arises again. unfortunately, people in the middle east, including palestinians, do not understand anything else, as a doctor, i will tell you that the patient will die if, during diagnosis , you look only at the symptoms, ignoring the cause of the disease, in 1948 israel appeared on the world map, according to the resolution un, there

should have been a palestinian state, which, however, was not allowed to fully exist. israel entered into another war and occupied the remaining part. there are three solutions to the conflict that could end the palestinian occupation, ethnic cleansing and the apartheid system. firstly, the creation of two states, which, however, is not easy to realize after 30 years of settlement. the implementation of a two-state solution is possible, secondly, the option of the existence of one state in which the jewish and palestinian peoples could live peacefully, having equal rights, this was the case before the advent of the zionist movement and the adoption

balfar declaration, in which the british government gave impetus to the aggravation between jews and palestinians. finally, the third way, what netanyahu is trying to do today, namely, solve the palestinian problem through ethnic cleansing, primarily in the gas sector; this is a fascist solution; it will not lead to the elimination of the problem. we palestinians, especially after what the israelis did in gaza, will never agree with the situation of slaves in the israeli occupation system. when we talk about destroying hamas, secondly, hamas should not be able to regain control of the gaza strip. in this sense , the elimination of hamas and its military potential does not mean the destruction of the last terrorist or the last missile. it is necessary

to look for the most significant excuses and destroy them so that the organization loses the ability to act effectively with the military. political points of view. unfortunately, the hamas ideology is almost impossible to deal with. this is something that sits deep in the minds and hearts of people. to combat the spread and support for the ideas of hamas, one must resort to the practice of denazification, which worked well in the case of the japanese and germans after world war ii. de-hamassization needs to be carried out in palestine, but this will take years. hamas is part of the palestinian political structure; a distinction must be made between fighting for the restoration of palestinian rights and liberation from israeli occupation, and supporting hamas as a political force. in 2025 , the first year we were supposed to have elections, which israel ultimately did not allow

hold, just as the great democratic state of the united states refused to support the elections in palestine, if the elections did take place, according to public opinion polls, neither hamas nor fat would have received an absolute majority, a semblance of a pluralistic democracy would have been established in palestine, in which small political forces would have a voice and a place. if elections had been held in 2021, we would not be in this situation today, but israel and its allies are preventing any elections from taking place because that they do not want palestinian unity. the old colonial principle of divide and rule goes so far that they want to impose an almost colonial status on gaza, once again separating it from the west bank; this is completely unacceptable. these are the points of view. and these are not the harshest statements of our israeli and palestinian interlocutors, so judge for yourself how close peace is in the middle east, watch to

learn about the world, educational programs and documentaries, watch, watch, in the application or on the website.

russia is a country of big people. achievements. right now we are making a discovery in science, our children are throwing open the doors of modern classrooms. we create new cultural spaces. and of course, we are opening new routes and points of attraction. discover the achievements of our country. come to the forum russia exhibition. i'll feel it. then go ahead, i want winter to become summer, i want to marry the tsar’s daughter,

that’s another matter, it’s just me, i’m just warming up, daughters, this is my fish, at the behest of the pike. investment rating, economics, through specific stories, we can reach people, we often talk about money, the amounts are serious, in russia there is a clear and clear signal , at what point you will say, everything i did in this project, everything i could, i will never say whether i can russian industry to replace... suppliers, it is necessary to mobilize all resources, a recipe, give me, in general, this is how to achieve what you have achieved, it seems to you that you have completed the world, got up, dusted yourself off, went, is

russia ready to change, in any structure , is evolution happening?

we will take on this matter, it will be honest detective. against the backdrop of two acute military-political crises in ukraine in palestine, which are attracting the attention of the united states, asia has become worried. during secretary of state blinken's trip to the region, the new york times published an alarming article. is

the us capable? engage in two heated confrontations while simultaneously containing china. there is revival in the pacific space: by the end of the year it is promised to complete the integration of american, south korean and japanese potentials in order to create a unified warning system missile attack. japanese prime minister kishida paid visits to the philippines to malaysia, strengthening defense ties, his... colleague albanese met in beijing with sizenping, interrupting a seven-year deep cooling in relations between the two countries, which are major economic partners, well, everyone is waiting for xi to communicate with biden in san francisco at ates next week. dangerous games, drawing by emmanul from italy, these are the wrong people,

they do the wrong thing. trying to get a ball in the colors of the taiwan flag. caricature by singaporean artist hankim soong for new york times. one china policy. this principle is based on the recognition of only one china. taiwanese president ingwen is driving a small car. chinese artist loo ji for english speakers. the flag says taiwan independence, but in the hands of the president. for global leadership from the american hudson institute. michael ramirez following the visit of former congress speaker nancy pilosi to taiwan. republicans blame democrats. do you want to reconsider the budget sequestration under the current conditions, ms. polosi? dragon cartographer: paryshnat from india with a drawing: china redraws borders and is rude to neighbors. he includes everyone in his strategy, says the man. pad from

switzerland: tik is like a tool of chinese espionage, another rihanna video, a chinese soldier screams, and i am not responsible for myself. we’ll talk about the ote meeting in an important indicator next week, but for now let’s take a little break from the routine. in the 20th century, the pacific region was not as much of a focus as it is now, but there was a fair amount of action. we’ll talk about the specifics of the pacific strategic theater with a wonderful specialist, historian vasily molodikov. vasily, to what extent do bloc allied relations generally correspond to the traditions of asia, for example, in comparison with europe. something first, which uh, may be similar to something block representation in our traditional understanding in asia may only date back to 1940.

when japan proclaims such an ambitious project of creating a sphere of co-prosperity in greater east asia, and, by the way, no doubt it includes not only, say, the pro-japanese regimes in mancha china in thailand, but let’s say, colonies and protectorates of european powers, that is, this is such a fairly futurological scheme, a vision for the future, simply because in asia at that time, let’s say, there weren’t... very many independent states that could act as independent actors during the formation of some, and this is of course a fundamental difference from the european theater, by the mid-thirties, germany, italy and japan coincided in one desire, they wanted to reconsider the world order that had developed after the first world war, that's why...