[000:00:00;00] 1940, when japan proclaims such an ambitious project, creating a sphere of co-prosperity in greater east asia, and, by the way, no doubt it includes not only, say, pro-japanese regimes in manchego, china in thailand, and, let’s say, the colonies and protectorates of european powers , that is, this is such a rather futurological scheme , a vision for the future, simply because in asia... at that time, let’s say, there were not very many independent states that could act as independent actors in formation of some, and this, of course, is a fundamental difference from the european theater, by the mid-thirties, germany, italy and japan coincided in one desire, they wanted to reconsider the world order that had developed after the first world war,

so they were looking for ways to expand influence. on november 25, 1936, in berlin , nazi germany and imperial japan concluded an anti-communist pact; in september 1946, germany, italy and japan signed a tripartite pact. this is how the military alliance of the three powers took shape, called countries of hosea. the document recorded the obligations of the parties to provide mutual political, economic and military assistance, and consolidated the aspirations of the participants. before the establishment of the so-called new order in europe and asia in the late thirties , two military clashes took place between the ussr and japan: on lake khasan in the thirty-eighth and on the khalkhengol river in manzhuria in the thirty-ninth. having suffered quite serious losses and making sure that the red army was actively resisting, japan in april 4th concluded a neutrality pact with the ussr. moscow believed that tokyo's neutrality

could at any moment... germany non-aggression pact. therefore, throughout the war, the soviet union was forced to maintain an impressive military group in the far east. on december 7 , 1941, japanese aircraft and submarines attacked the american military base at pearl harbor on the hawaiian island of oahu. after the raid, it seemed that japan had achieved superiority at sea. tokyo hoped to seize as much territory as possible in the pacific ocean and enter into peace negotiations with washington, however after the first attack, the americans set themselves up for a long war to a victorious end, for which japan did not have enough strength. in addition, after the victory over hitler's germany, the ussr, fulfilling its allied obligations, declared war on japan. the fighting lasted less than a month. the kwantong army was defeated. tokyo's hopes of sheltering the emperor in manchuria and giving battle to the americans

in the metropolis have collapsed. after the second world war, of course, when gradually all of asia became independent, in any case, political dictionaries of our youth, and so on, if you like, but this is, of course, a phenomenon of the post-war order, that is , it does not have deep historical roots, it is the brainchild of the cold war, well, that is, historically it is not common for asian countries to seek alliances for joint defense, i understand correctly, if we recall the classical model of asia in general, what the europeans called paxinica

is china. empires, there are vassals, there are barbarians, there is nothing else, what kind of blocs are there, what kind of blocs can there be, that is, there are relations here they are built, in general, on the principle of vassalage, that is, i don’t know, for europe it is some kind of medieval or model of the early, modern era, well, in general, indeed, let’s say, modernity in the construction block, of course, begins only after... world war ii as a result of world war ii. back in 1950, the united states acted as allies of south korea in the war on the korean peninsula. after the war, washington pledged to provide military assistance to the country and received the right to station troops on its territory. another us strategic partner in asia became japan. there are agreements on mutual cooperation and security;

the american one is constantly present on its territory. marine corps, navy aviation, their numbers are greater than in south korea. on september 1, 1951, in san francisco, representatives of the usa, australia and new zealand signed a treaty. ocean security treaty, anzus. he assumed that an attack on one side would be seen as a potential danger to the others, and each country must counter the common threat. so australia and new zealand were drawn into the war in korea, and then in vietnam on the side of the united states. in august 54, the united states, great britain and france proposed to a number of countries in southeast asia, as well as india and pakistan, to create a new collective security system in the region. burma, india, indonesia and qilon declined the invitation. they adhered to the principle of neutrality and non-participation in military blocs. and pakistan, thailand and the philippines agreed. so in september

1954, in addition to anzus, the organization of the southeast asia treaty, the seatto military bloc, arose. his headquarters was in bangkok. in 67, france officially withdrew from siat, after 5 years. pakistan followed this example, and after the defeat of the united states in vietnam and the withdrawal of american troops, the alliance ceased to exist, as announced in june 1977. nato now has four key partners in the asia-pacific region. these are australia, new zealand, south korea and japan. operational cooperation began back in 2001 after the al-qaeda terrorist attacks. then australia, new zealand and south korea joined the nato mission to force japan self-defense provided logistical support at sea. together with australia, india and the usa, japan is part of the coat alliance, created in 2007. this is a quadripartite dialogue on security in the indo-pacific

region. it is often called an anti-chinese military alliance and an asian nato. 2 years ago, in contrast to china, another military alliance appeared in the region, aokus, uniting the united states. and australia. american approaches to security there did not work as well as nato or the warsaw pact. on the atlantic the ocean is all right. there is the ussr, there is the usa. there is the warsaw pact, there is nato. that is, everything is so very clear. well, of course there are some neutral countries that are neither here nor there, but still the model is quite well-built. uh, on the pacific ocean. there is the united states, there is the soviet union, but still not the strongest pacific power, there is china, the people 's republic of china, continental china - an adversary

of the united states, but let's say, since the turn of the fifties and sixties, china has not been an ally of the ussr, that is, there is absolutely , a the main, also factor of the non-alignment movement, that is, everything here... is quite complicated, that is, on the one hand there is the ussr and its, well, let’s say, allies, as again, let’s take words from almost our childhood, northern korea, northern vietnam, there is china, the people 's republic of china, a completely separate issue, there are satellites of the united states, such as south korea, southern vietnam and so on, taiwan, chinese. there are these very tigers, and there is a non-aligned movement, there is a very powerful force, led by india, indonesia,

let us remember the glorious era of sukarna and so on, and this is something that, of course, does not exist in europe and in general in the atlantic theater this does not exist, that is , the situation here is very confusing, and if we remember, accordingly, all the games of the soviet union with the non-aligned movement, the famous tour, and bulganin in asia in the year fifty-five, this, of course, was such a very specific move and of course, in terms of the impact of the tour with him by the pro-american japanese prime minister kishi in the year fifty-seven-fifty-eight, of course, it cannot be compared, although kishi tried, let’s just say, well, if not to build, then at least to build the non-communist, or even anti-communist regimes of asia into some kind of phalanx. under the leadership of the united states, but still with a certain pan-asian touch, that is, let’s say, these are not american

puppets like lisenman in south korea, this is still an attempt to build a non-communist asia, but due to the fact that the pacific ocean was not the main theater after all, maybe the general level of tension was lower, in moments the tension simply sparkled constantly, it’s enough to remember the korean peninsula, it’s enough to remember vietnam, or you see, as vladim semyonovich vysotsky said, this vaguely reminds me of the indo-pakistan incident. that is, a spark, let’s say, maybe there was no such frontal or total tension, but it sparked, of course, much stronger than in europe, and what is the united states in general for the states of the pacific space, how their perception has changed throughout history, for someone the united states, of course, was great overseas democracy, including for asian intellectuals in colonial semi-colonial countries, as they say, you will ask why, due to the very active

work of american missionaries, especially protestant ones, who not so much represented the united states as a state or as a political regime, but rather that there is such a great, free christian country that has no colonies, which does not conduct colonial policies, and is generally practically the best friend of all the oppressed. then after accordingly, the victory of japan in the russo-japanese war raises the theme of japan as a non-white, non-christian country that defeated a white christian country , especially, by the way, there was a strong resonance in india, but in fact, maybe we can too and it went on somewhere there the philippines and so on, that is, the perception of the states was very ambivalent, i don’t know, i would even

find it difficult to say at what point the unambiguous perception of the states as an imperialist power began, but in japan, of course, from the end of the second term of government theodore roosevelt, gunboat diplomacy, all the things that mean the american flotilla is sailing across the pacific ocean, well, then, you know, for some the states are the enemy. for some, the states are a nuclear and other umbrella, that is, it is very difficult to build some kind of single general picture here, i would rather say that the leaders of countries, principled actors, i’m talking now about the post-war period, leaders of countries see the states as principled actors what they need, someone sees it as a protector , someone sees it as an enemy,

in general, this is the case, of course, when there are no clear answers, well, after all, the states are a guarantor of security, right? the states are more like a guarantor of the status quo, that is, like, things may not be very good now, but it could be worse, so let it be so, in general, the states are perceived as a guarantor of the status quo in japan, because, of course, with the advent for the presidency of donald trump , here the comrades tensed when trump asked if japan even wanted to pay for the nuclear umbrella and, in general , for everything, in the republic of korea, like me i understand that the united states is the guarantor of some kind of status, about the republic of china in taiwan, the same thing, that is , you understand, the perception of the states is rather on the principle that it would not be worse. well, the memory of the japanese occupation and military acts of tokyo

in the middle of the last century, does this now affect the readiness of other countries and the region to cooperate with tokyo? this is a huge problem in terms of the volume of information, but by no means in terms of its significance; this factor occupies a large place in official foreign policy and especially domestic political rhetoric, of course in the republic. korea, well, i’m not talking about kainder, this is a thorough topic in the people’s republic of china in general, that is , it is such an important moment in domestic political rhetoric, but they remember it either before the elections, or at the moment of aggravation of any, say, especially trade contradictions with japan, you know, they can’t agree on any specific current trade and economic issues, so they start. when did they start to be afraid of china? this

started after 1949 and not only because what has happened since the creation of the people's republic of china, not only because a communist regime appeared in china, but in general because china since 1911, at least for the first time, became a unified state, because let’s not, as they say, fool ourselves, after the senyakhai revolution in in 1911, there was no united china, that is, this was drawn on the world map, which means it was written china, there was no single state, according to the principle of the king of the hill, the government that sat in beijing, and... in nanjing received international recognition as a national government, it was considered the government of china, but there was no united china, and accordingly, the first milestone means that china has united, you know, i’ll even say, i don’t know what is more important from the point of view of foreign actors, the fact that china

was united or that it was united by the communists, especially since it was suggested by many left-liberal anglo-american authors. naudzen was considered not even a communist, so to speak, not a bolshevik, but such a folk peasant national leader, that is the emphasis was placed on the national factor , that a certain nationalist, but not like chenkaishi, that a certain nationalist successfully united all of china, and that this nationalist acts as an ally of the soviet union. the fact that china was united by a certain national force, which is not anyone’s puppet, but the fact that chunk aishe is an american puppet, frankly speaking, was no secret to anyone, just as the fact that maladzem is not a soviet

puppet, well, i think it was clear to everyone, and even, especially at the time of mao’s quarrel with khrushchov, it became clear that mao is not only ... an independent player, an independent actor, but even that mao is not an ally of the soviet union, that this is precisely the third force, so i return to what i said, it is accepted to the atlantic theater, everything seems to be clear to the ussr, but here there are many more actors, and this at least introduced, well, fear, not fear, but a certain complexity into this situation, years in japan there was a fairly strong movement for the recognition of communist china and for the establishment of diplomatic relations with the prc is completely non-communist in nature. these were nationalists and capitalists, pragmatic realists who took into account that

there was such a country with great economic and trade potential, and that this country was not a vassal. neither the united states, nor the soviet union, and that in general, it’s probably profitable to trade with this country , profitable, maybe even, if not to be very friendly, then at least not to be at enmity, that is, here the picture was initially more complicated, thank you , we talked with vasily molodyakov, political relations between states are one thing, love, well, or not people’s love, is completely different , it doesn’t always coincide, from beijing, our tireless transfer to the silent electric car pekinini, this reverberator immediately makes it okay to just turn around and shudder, but precisely for the sake of this attention, they saddled brutal iron horses, from which, cutting through the narrow streets

of the fashionable art world in the chinese capital, they evoke a special spirit, as if during a seance. growls like the devil is outside breaks out, and at this moment i am in seventh heaven, because damn it, it’s me who controls this colossus, members of the beijing super player club have been playing this symbol of american freedom for more than 10 years, and after barely plunging into the biker world, they discovered america in every sense. at first i thought that these were russian motorcycles, because i saw how putin rode the same one, only on a three-wheeler, yes, yes, putin is cool, only then... i found out that this is an american motorcycle, although in fact it doesn’t matter whose it is, it’s like an iphone, it no longer has anything to do with the usa, so does harley, it’s already part of our chinese culture. many american things have taken root in the middle kingdom to such an extent that today they are perceived as native in the country of endless tea

ceremonies, clerks everywhere are already rushing to offices with glasses of americana, and every 9 hours a new starbucks coffee shop opens in china, 200 more. only in the usa itself. nowadays it has become fashionable to drink coffee in china. moreover, all of it is grown here, in the south of the country. so war is war, even if it is shopping, and lunch is exactly on schedule. and this is a texas burger, or a striploin steak, aka new york. this meat has a good aroma, it is tender, and after the resumption of beef exports from the united states, the chinese again fell in love with american steaks. and trade disputes that intensified under biden following restrictive tariffs on both sides raised prices for american goods in china , including beef, but these couldn’t refuse burgers here... that the diet is no longer miss karisa, its chinese, by the way,

too they prefer to drink it with cola. for the chinese, coca-cola is more than just a soda, albeit the most popular in the middle kingdom, especially love for it manifested itself during the covid lockdowns, when quarantined neighbors wrote to each other in a general chat, i’ll exchange it for a can of cola, a computer or even a game console. on social networks you can still find screenshots of these messages and cartoons in their wake. the chinese generally liked america. even the name of the usa sounds like maygo in chinese, which means beautiful country. here is a survey conducted by the tabloid huangqiu shibbau showed: although the vast majority of chinese disapprove of washington's official policies, more than half are crazy about hollywood films of sports teams, especially those from the nba. these are shakilo's sneakers. yes, they are huge, size seven. and he himself

played in the past and even became one. this jersey is especially dear to me, it was worn by shanon brown. behind the carefully hung players' jerseys, the us flag and a tear in the sky are ready to be worn on their hands. the army of fans reaches half a million people. china is generally the main one for the national association a foreign market that brings in more than a billion dollars every year from broadcasts alone... and basketball has gone to china to the masses. a whole village basketball league has even appeared here, passions on the court, in the stands, like at nba super matches. this is a great game, a fierce battle, i'm very excited. now this is an american game with chinese characteristics, and even the stars invited as guests, although in the center of attention, but even with their growth and popularity, are lost against the backdrop of gambling chinese fans. and cheerleaders in national costumes, all that remained from the american one was perhaps a dream that the chinese

simply combined with their own, hard work and achieving goals, step by step. alexander bolsky, nikolai petrov, specially for international review from china. a terrible story in south korea, on a conveyor line for sorting peppers, a robotic hand crushed to death... a technician who came to check the sensors, the robot mistook a person for a box of vegetables and sorted it, it smacks of techno-horror films, many people die from injuries at work without any artificial intelligence, by accident, and more often by stupidity, but this is what is called our human right. over the course of a century, people in general have extremely improved methods of self-destruction. but then, of his own free will, a person passes as the master of his own destiny, and not a

soulless piece of iron. there is a proposal: to slow down self-destruction, as soon as there are more and more factors that disobey us, both natural and now also man-made, otherwise we won’t even notice how we will all become boxes of vegetables, in the watchful sensors of those who would like to sort us everyone purely at their own discretion. and he will sort it out, it was an international

review, goodbye. i’ve been working towards this all my life, we expect to do it in 10 days, it will be a record, cut , on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he is the only one, don’t rise higher, you ’ll just fall like a stone, like

the wind , this is a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it ’s like it’s chasing you. what do you want? lord of the wind. this is the flight control center on the simulator.

when you walk in, you have a complete feeling that you're inside a real cabin. well, let’s fly to combat, what kind of flight do you have? it’s already somewhere over 150 flights, it’s all for the people, you know, in my opinion, in some countries of this size there are one-room apartments, it turns out that you work on everything, that is, everything you see, you keep hitting, well, the tar has some excitement

when they appear in the air. vladimir putin held a meeting with permanent members of the russian security council. today we have an important, very relevant one, not only, by the way, for our country, but for us, in particular, especially i mean the current situation, the issue of increasing the effectiveness of measures to ensure information security in russia, our speaker is vladimir selin, director of the federal service for technical and export