well, we have a turn. well, yes, there is no economy, there is no military-industrial complex, there are no people willing to fight, it is populated by robots, well, if that is, there is nothing, but russia, on the contrary , has a military-industrial complex, unlike the european promise, there is a million that they cannot fulfill, the westerners are watching , how our military-industrial complex is developing and that means they accept validova, plus we, well, the west admitted that listen, but with russian volunteers, how much is going on, well, yes. and further, that they understand that this is all a one-way road, and then autumn thinks, what what will happen next, he needs to look for a completely different way out, he needs to somehow end this situation.

i’ve been working towards this all my life, we expect to do it in 10 days, it will be a record, cut, on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because... one of them is at the maximum height

, don’t go higher, you’ll just fall stone down, at the speed of the wind, it’s a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it’s like it’s chasing you, what do you want, master of the wind

, if we’ve already started sostina, i’ll probably start too, i’ll say a few words, in 2 days ramstein, ramstein should take place online, even when they all met together, yes , they never achieved the results that ukraine was counting on, but obviously online, i think the result will be the same, but there is a problem, zelensky started there is a lot to say, which causes a certain irritation in the west, it is becoming more and more difficult for americans, let’s say, to group countries, yes, so that they continue to support ukraine, if this confrontation did not exist there within western society, then biden would not have stated that what is required there to support ukraine means someone is resisting inside, this is there, and zelsky can, well, let’s say, make a mess, apparently, probably, but he needs to be instructed, and most importantly, in order to give confidence to the ukrainian military, austin, at a minimum, should was to fly to kiev and take away from zelsky

the keys to the military personnel department, because, because in fact , the information that appeared last week about a possible resignation to zaluzhny’s entourage, it was completely refuted by the presidential administration, and personally by mr. ermak, who said: “we didn’t plan any resignations, these were resignations and then these resignations happened, of course, this, well , imagine the state of the military, who don’t understand all these political squabbles that...” is happening in the country, with what approach they will fight, so in this regard, i think they should somehow put zelsky in his place, i am generally least interested in the fate of these people, i think we will deal with it further, who stood on the maidan, but i would give a lot to understand what happened to those people who were already there under the maidan, down there around the stage, how their fate turned out, yeah, they are today, they are today, well,

they are ready to repeat this experience, they, they are satisfied, because i’m sure that among these people, many are still disappointed with what happened, you just know, it’s very difficult. you have to be a strong person to admit your mistakes , you know, unfortunately, i think, well, at least today the voices of those who can do this publicly are not heard on ukraine, but i think their fate turned out very, very, very bad for all of them, at least not in the way they planned for themselves to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the revolution of dignity, definitely not like that, well, they definitely didn’t plan it for themselves and they were convinced that there could be nothing terrible at all, in fact, we will remove the corrupt yanukovych, install an honest government and we will live and develop, they were convinced of this, but everything turned out completely differently than how it was all actually supposed, i’m generally honest speaking, i wouldn't be so much categorical, and i am not ready, for example, to take responsibility, to say that a third maidan or a fourth maidan in ukraine

is impossible, absolutely not, it is possible, but here we must proceed from this, in ukraine the maidan is possible only under one condition, if it will be the will of the embassy of the united states of america, can this happen in this situation? i just think it can, why? let us see what the united west recorded through its media, it recorded that they provided ukraine with all the weapons and financial resources necessary, they recorded 95 resources, which they allocated 95% of the resources that they planned to allocate to ukraine, there are five left, they will finish them off, they will give everything away, that is, we... corruption in government and these more and more publications are appearing, they have recorded that this corruption exists among top officials, including those around the president

of the country, which may perhaps become the detonator of all these events, people who are outraged that during the war, at that time, when a country is at war, they steal from... outfits, uniforms, salaries, military food , and so on and so forth, which can become a detonator, anything, mass death of military personnel, for example, an operation unjustified from a military point of view, which, on which zelsky will insist, well, suppose the crossing of the dnieper, consolidation on the left bank, 200, 300, 500 people moved there, covered them with factories, in one day, they liquidated them, they showed, you say, this happens every day, maybe and it happens every day, but if the media information... they will fixate on this and write that it was unjustified, that these are people who, and as was on on the maidan on november 30, wasn’t that so, some students, then it turned out not to be students, someone where -they beat him up, maybe it would have been an ordinary event , no one would have paid attention to it, if it weren’t

for the mass media coverage, at the same time it was flying from all points, ah-ay, what a horror, they beat up the students and began to pump up society , the same thing can happen here, i don't believe it. if there is no mechanism legalizing it into a legitimate legitimate government, how can this be done, again through the americans, if through them , then accordingly, it is necessary to implement it through them, why implement the military scenario, if in the conditions of a corrupt government it is possible to absolutely calmly ensure the civil society scenario, which ... it turns out, no, it, it doesn’t seem to say that we fought wrongly, that the russians are good there or, no, it turns out, it says, we didn’t fight enough, not enough, the corrupt government, if only it didn’t was corrupt, our soldiers would have had shells, our soldiers would have had uniforms

, our soldiers would definitely have won, and the last thing that maidan gives to western society, you understand that in fact, this is absolutely one hundred percent, they are shifting the answer... i think , it was not the west who decided, let us remind you, it is the zaluzhny who wrote how much he needed, the zaluzhny who says that they didn’t give him something, but they gave him more than he asked for, who is to blame, from the point of view of efficiency, zaluzhny should immediately raise zelsky's criticism yes this is good

great idea, i suggest we duel and shoot each other, to hell with your matter, he will shoot and he will spit no , zelsky said that he shoots very well, so i want to tell you zelsky’s fear, they don’t happen, he too, he also understands what really happens in the case if there i want. i can tell you that there are enough categories of people there who, under martial law , even under a ban on holding rallies, will calmly come out and no one will touch them, no one will touch them, no one will dare. simply, firstly, if necessary, they will laugh for these, no, i mean, if this is a decision that is made at the embassy, ​​no one will even come close to them, no one will come close, and if they do, the military will also say their word, the police will not beat them there, relatively speaking , yes, it won’t, i won’t, the police will beat anyone, there already, well, listen, well, if the police beat an old woman who protects temples, these are two different things, i say again, if the decision. will be adopted by the embassy about the organization of the maidan and

these people will be taken out with a torpedo, no one will touch them there and there will be this maidan absolutely, if the decision is made by the embassy, ​​the police will not come out, because the salaries of the ukrainian police are paid by american taxpayers, the police will also come out, but they will be absolutely, but the americans pay the salaries, if the american embassy says, we need this, yes and the police won’t move anywhere, it’s very convenient, i think, in general, this is an ideal option, as... we did everything, so they stole everything there, lost the war, and we, well, plus, what’s important is what zelensky gives opportunity for the west this way will jump back because he is behaving extremely stupidly, he is being set up, articles appear about the expenses of his wife, about himself, that is, he is being set up when he says: “i will turn to the peoples, the palisi say, what? the peoples generally hate you, then

there are people who generally hate you, and now even more so there is a new toy israel, man, i’m tired of you, you’re from the previous season, your series was taken off the air, forget everything, you’re not interesting, he’s not interesting, and the defeat that ukraine has now suffered, why does the west want him to sebericans he is not he is not interested, why because in conditions of defeat they need a wide, huge one. if they look into it later, it should be noted that ukraine several times missed the strongest military strategic steps that it could have taken but for their military leadership.

on this day, november 20, well, i’m not quoting our outstanding military leaders, so i’m discussing military topics with you, i just do n’t know, maybe there were such options and such chances, the meeting of the tribunal began on november 20, 1945, that is, on this day, we all we know history very well, i just want to remind you that at that time four countries were the winners, and yes, a special court was created, eight people, eight judges, and four countries were the winners, but they convicted or made a decision through judges, and the decision, which is great everyone knows, but confusion occurs, in fact, so nazism was condemned or not, of course, there were banderaites, are they nazis or not nazis, these are the people who are now in power in ukraine, are they followers of these banderaites

or not, they are responsible or not, here is the connection between this, how many times in your program have you raised this topic, how many times do other historians and analysts talk, few people come to the simple conclusion that stefanchuk, the current head of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, is a nazi, is he a follower of bandera or not, but the policy that he pursues as the head of state of ukraine, because ukraine, a parliamentary presidential country, his statements, those that he publicly said today, for these statements he, i conditionally, hypothetically, can be brought to the following meeting of the judiciary tribunal, or some other tribunal should be, will be hanged, by the way, i agree with you that he is guilty, i don’t disagree with when a person declares

that yes no, i watched this interview several times, this same interview , the parliamentary television channel, which was already broadcast in this single marathon, yes, this is the position of a person, he thought about these words, these are not accidental statements, he said them clearly, he spoke a lot, explained, and then gave them away after all, he didn't have to say it key phrase, but he said it, he is convinced that he is right, he is convinced that this is how it should be, he is convinced, exactly the same as in 1914, his ancestors came for my ancestors and said, if you don’t pray, if you don’t say the our father, don’t say it in greek catholic , blah blah blah, i won’t say how, you’ll be sent to a concentration camp, that’s exactly what stefanchuk says now, if you’re human , you go to

the moscow church because there is no patriarchy, what are you, a criminal, you don’t even have the right to go there to go, because we told you off, that’s all, you shouldn’t , you can say something somewhere in the family, but publicly you can’t say anything anywhere in russian, like how this is what this is called, what it is, and not only that, on top of all this, he says that the venice commission and i have found a common language, we have found a common language with the european commission, which means they support us, we have a common position, which is that it’s not nazism, not common nazism, well you see, volodya, without this, without such things that, well, i think that today we need to talk about this, because further, if we go deeper, respected experts said today about what happened in the thirteenth year, the fourteenth year and so on and so on, vladimir adolfovich, in the fourteenth year, just imagine, this is institutskaya street

, institutskaya street, one of the central streets that divides the government quarter , here is the presidential administration, here... is the supreme court, and there is the ministry of internal affairs, this is on one side of institutskaya, on the other is the cabinet of ministers, and there, through another street of the supreme verkhovna rada, that is, the government quarter , in fact, it is several kilometers that can be walked back and forth 10 times during the day, i am an official, i need to go to a meeting with the presidential administration in the government, i have to go across institutskaya street, i have an id of an administration employee , i go and before i go in, i just have to go up to the cabinet building, there is a kamaz truck, the kamaz car is on fire, it is on fire, not just the tires are on fire, it is on fire, part of it they are burning, they are burning, but i need go through the totuarchik, there are two natsiks, in yellow armbands , i show them my id, i say that i am wearing

it there, they let me through, then i go into the cabinet building, there i am already... the official authorities let me through, in the same way , i’m going back, this worked, this is how the power system worked for many days, many days , you know, that is, this is all, this is here , this is not somewhere, this is not the masses, this is not the american embassy, ​​this is what is called the current ukrainian government at that time, everyone agreed, everything they were talking, everyone was talking to each other, and i’ll tell you such a sensual phrase, if you go through the phrase, if you go to the cabinet of ministers, go to... grushevsky street, everything was blocked there, no one went anywhere, but on this on this grushevsky street there was a sanahant building, very expensive things were sold there, and people passed there with passes, it was such , well, let’s say, maybe a hellish cauldron, you can say a lot more about what happened in 13-14, how it ended, we are today here we sit, everyone

of us and we say, wow, it’s already been 10 years, yes, it’s been 10 years, my neighbor then in the thirteenth year, what was the population of ukraine then, you understand 42 42 million people and now no one knows 20 maybe maybe 19 and me i want to finish i want to finish these sentences with what is left of ukraine zero as the americans say zero why because last week the head of the cia came to ukraine . the head of the pentagon came this week, that is, the us secretary of defense, so they decide what to do, how to do it and so on and what it makes a difference what zelsky says, what this neo-nazi stefanchuk says, what he says there is pedlyasny, pedguzno and so on, and what difference does it make what the zaluzhny says, who is the zaluzhny, when you asked the question the hero of the operations, kharkov,

kherson, was syrsky , syrsky sounded last year, and syrsky is now standing next to zelensky, or not at all, or where he stands, no one knows, so the americans come and say: where have we ended up, maybe, god willing, if the americans come to their senses, they’ll understand, what did they get into? where to run from where, let them, as best as in afghanistan, rush to run away , and we will figure it out ourselves, that’s all, see you tomorrow, russia is a country that we are proud of, we are proud to bring light and warmth around the world, we look forward with pride, paving new paths in the oceans and overcoming gravity, we are proud of our successes. but we never stop there, discover the achievements of our country, come to the exhibition forum russia, invest

rating, economy, through specific stories, we can reach people, we often talk about money, the sums are serious, there is a clear and clear signal in russia, at what point will you say, i did everything in this project: everything i could, i will never say whether russian industry is capable of replacing foreign suppliers, it is necessary to mobilize all resources, give me a recipe, in general, here’s how to achieve what you have achieved, it seems to you that you are on top of the world, you have dusted yourself off and gone, is russia ready to change, is evolution taking place in any structure? hello, i'm boris sakinov. and i, oleg stepanov, and we, the creators of the russia project, but received a session of rossophobia, at the closing of the international

european festival in moscow ilision, after the banquet, a very peculiar company gathered, and they spoke from the stage, not at all about films, this is the ambassador of the european union roland galarak, a fragment of his demonstration , so to speak, russian speeches against ukraine. this led to a threat of cooperation. at the opening of the festival, here in moscow, he said the same thing, as if it were a carbon copy - says russian writer denis timofeev. he loves french cinema and thought that at the meeting they would talk about art, but not so. and again i heard these mantras: russia is the aggressor, ukraine is the victim, everything like that, he finished his speech, i stayed in the second row, so to speak, analge, i say, sir, i say, galalar, i tell you. i say, it’s not a shame, but you, i say, came to russia, you are an ambassador, i say, from the european union, and here, i say, the festival is purely about art, i say, come, call our country, i say, an aggressor, but as i say, you so

can you? timofeev continued to speak in the sense that why turn cinema, or, say, sports into a platform for unscrupulous political games, so he was almost taken out of the hall, you had interesting spectators, one man was quite plump, he probably ate well at the banquet, i’m talking to... this is, in all difficult political situations , an opportunity for unification, he says, if you and i don’t want to unite, he said, if he says, we don’t want to unite with you, like go over there, speak out, i say , so i'm the opposite i came here, i say, to watch a movie, you know who this man was who showed the writer timofeev the door, andrei nichaev, the former first minister of economics of russia, a very peculiar character. there was andrei nechaev, yes, the former minister of economics of russia, well, such an outcast to the core, just read his twitter, such a spiteful critic

, sitting on pension, grandpa, yes, even he writes such vile things, if you have illiberal, so to speak, views from the audience, so it turns out that european cinema is not for you, that’s all this is taking place in moscow, which the west allegedly accuses of censorship, the european film festival in russia... did not take place in the year when it began, it was the decision of the organizers themselves from the eu. now they have decided to resume the festival and no one is stopping them. let’s imagine, let’s reflect on how the situation is now accepted , the same forum is being organized in latvia, well, where they will talk about how important russian culture is, and how inappropriately they treated the monument to alexandrugevich pushkin or academician keldysh, they closed it there, there they would security guards would arrive, screw everyone, and it’s not a fact that everyone would come out in a few hours, let’s see who was at this meeting in elesion, except for the ambassador - galarag and the russian

theater and cinema crowd, the belgian ambassador, michelson, for example, and in general many diplomats, a very large list, including from the us embassy, ​​poland, slovenia, france, denmark, estonia , the latvian embassy, ​​there were even two representatives, there were foreign media. bbc, steve rosenberg, financial times, maxed, and namaria rak from german ard. they all listened to the holorag and the foreign press, all this will most likely fly apart in an instant. whoever you are, a diplomat representing the interests of unfriendly countries, a foreign individual, a citizen of the russian federation, no one gives you the right to discredit the participants in our special military operation, in our country these things are criminal... the need to amend the current legislation for in order to stop such covens, it means that we are ready to quickly and efficiently prepare

amendments to the current legislation, if if you take a closer look at the list of invitees, you will see, for example, foreign agent alexey venediktov, the former editor-in-chief of echo of moscow, which was liquidated in russia. true, he did not come to the closing of the festival. there were venediktovs at the opening, there were definitely venediktovs, i only found out later that he was there, at the closing venediktov was not there, he wasn’t, but there were a lot of diplomats, i’m sure, mr. roland galalar, he told me, let’s talk to you later, after that , well, after that i didn’t have the desire to communicate, but i think he did, because i ’m sure he had it beforehand a prepared political action with which he came to moscow from europe. perhaps the european ambassador wanted with his statements to blur the impression of the international cultural forum that was recently held in st. petersburg, but in the end he simply exposed western russophobia, and this cannot be erased from the script. the history of democracy in russia

goes back to ancient times. the national meeting of residents of the veche made decisions on all significant issues and played a key role in the formation of the russian statehood. by the 19th century, a new institution of class representation, the cathedrals of the whole earth, appeared. they ensured legitimacy and continuity of power. laid the foundation for a new electoral tradition. catherine ii. included elements of election to solve a number of government tasks. for the first time , the foundations of suffrage were laid in relation to cities and the urban population. thanks to the reforms of alexander ii , zemstvos appeared in russia. the people were legitimized as a new source of power. the state duma became the first all-class legislative body of the country. she

was elected for 5 years, the elections were multi-stage, held in four districts, elections to the constituent assembly became universal, equal, direct and took place by secret ballot. the adopted law turned out to be revolutionary for russia. voting rights were granted not only to men, but also to women. in 1936, universal, equal, direct elections were enshrined in the ussr constitution. in december 19, the current constitution of russia was adopted, modern electoral legislation, legislation on political parties, the system of election commissions, lay the foundation for gas elections. the digitalization of election procedures is actively underway. russia is significantly ahead of other countries in organizing and conducting elections. today every russian voter

understands how important it is to do this. your choice to support changes for the better in our lives, elections in russia, is important, honest, convenient.

we’ll tell you how this day in history is remembered right now, hello, november 21, 1877 , thomas edison announced the invention a miracle device, the phonograph, the first device in history that could record sound, the inventor was working on telephone communications, and the phonograph was invented casually: the circuit was brilliantly simple. a special membrane responded to sound vibrations and set the needle in motion. she left beads on the foil-covered cylinder. when playing.