[000:00:00;00] look, they now take 155 and send them to israel, they sent 35,000 there, yes, we understand that this is a two-month production norm there, but based on how they produced there 5 months ago, we understand what kind of factories they use, as far as they can go, we understand how much they need to keep in reserve in order to wage a war of such intensity for 3 days, 5 days a week, what will happen if southeast asia begins, that is, this is what the military does, that is, military

affairs mathematician that greater europe to the urals is, in general, their goal, that is, in fact, somewhere inside their consciousness, inside their motivation, it still remains, they still dream, so to speak, about this vast territory, about these resources, including why, in my opinion, because after all, when the soviet union collapsed, how much it was expected and unexpected for them there, we can talk for a long time, but nevertheless, in the territory of the post-soviet space , the main prize was russia, not ukraine, not the baltic states, the main prize and not south caucasus and not central asia, the main prize should have been russia, this is the main victory, this is the main production, a huge territory, huge resources, nuclear weapons, not incredible logistics, so to speak, capabilities, transport chains and everything connected with this, but from some point it became clear that they they lost this round of the fight for russia, they lost it, they don’t want to talk about it because it’s not profitable for

them, but in essence, well... and so on, in general, they indicated their loss of this round, the main prize is gone out of hand, the main prize went out of hand, and then, so to speak, it all began the rest of the other projects, we are encircling russia, then, fifth and tenth, color revolutions, they grabbed ukraine as the most obvious, the most obvious, so to speak, means of putting pressure on russia, if it was not possible to take all of russia, let’s take ukraine, so to speak, and we will with the help of ukraine to act on russia, but in general i think that’s ideal. they, maybe this did not happen, i don’t know, but i just remember the texts and speeches of the nineties there, even about the possibility of russia’s integration into nato, in fact, i do not rule out that there were plans to use both russia and the entire post-soviet space to fight as a consumable material with china, with the global south, with the east, that is , the consumable material that today ukrainians are against russia, russians and ukrainians, everyone else should have become in the fight, for example

with china, in the fight, for example, with the global south and all that stuff, ours was written directly in the nineties, yes, that is, our russian guys, so to speak, had to die somewhere there for the americans, the americans too, maybe they even helped with something, they would have done something like that , and so on, but that didn’t work out, so we need another round of struggle for this russia, and something like that , although, although here is their mention that they say, when putin leaves, when lukashenko leaves, i understand that it makes no sense to absolutize the words of the bulgarian. yes, but nevertheless, some, some perhaps, so to speak, thoughts reflect this, but when lukashenko is not there, when putin is not there, by the way, this is not in favor of the theory of war, when there is no lukashenko, there will be no putin, this is, in general , some kind of evolutionary process, after which they believe that the departure of specific leaders will so change the internal situation in vast russia, there, or, say, in belarus there in the union state, that democratic leaders will come again on their own, there relatively speaking, pro-western, pro-liberal and everything connected with this, about

the war to me... by the way, all the discussions about the war are interesting, no matter how they really take place, you shouldn’t relax, but nevertheless we cannot exclude the factor of nuclear weapons from all of this reasoning, it is impossible, so when we begin to compare with the second world war, with the first world war, and so on, we still need to understand that nuclear weapons are a factor that did not exist then, is now taking place, and it can only be reset by our indecision to use it in an emergency situation, only we can reset it, or, let’s say, if the enemy suddenly manages to create such an attack system that we will not be able to do anything, but if we we don’t reset it as a possible probability, but honestly, it seems to me that europe has nothing to catch, with a european army, so to speak, without a european army, and here too , of course, it will be, to put it mildly, so to speak, not very, not very good, but nevertheless, therefore, it seems to me, after all, this is their desire, their dreams about how to do this so that they themselves do not participate in anything, but in order to still ruin this russia later, they have everything - still

prevail in my head, another question, another question: in my personal opinion, this one - about illusions, after all, the period of these sweet illusions of the nineties and even the zeros is gone, to a large extent irrevocably, yes, they worked very seriously with the brains. a huge number of people in russia in the post-soviet space, in general, yes, indeed a lot has been lost, some even irrevocably, but nevertheless, including current events, and indeed this entire chain of events of thirty years of post-soviet history, it has seriously changed the view of the world, well, at least the majority of citizens of the russian federation, has seriously changed, and it seems to me that there is some kind of automatic return, as it seems to them, of these nineties or zeros or something like that, when putin is there for some reason, so to speak, lukashenko. or they will leave later due to age or something else, it simply won’t exist in principle, but this moment really, of course, can be key, definitely, in this fight for russia, you also need to be prepared for this moment, and one of the main phases of preparation, so to speak - this is work with youth, this is upbringing,

education, everything connected with this, who teaches, how he teaches, what he teaches, these people will then come to govern, because sooner or later putin and lukashenko will leave, one way or another, so to speak, this will happen, but nevertheless, this will be... a key moment, the key point of this possible struggle for change, of course, there will be a war, there will not be a war, i hope that there will not be one, but nevertheless, of course, they will not miss this moment, undoubtedly, it is extremely important here, as if yes, this is the internal situation, the situation with young people, about young people, here’s the question of teaching, yes karan gorovitch spoke there about the right, the left there, well, again, there are teachers here , yes, this is interesting, after all, it seems to me that our higher school needs radical... teaching of a whole range of sciences, political science in the first place a queue that is filled with translated textbooks, or, so to speak, books that actually study the reality of the century, left, right, center , listen, friends, this is all in the past, there

is practically nothing left of this, some, so to speak, yes small ashmetki are floating and so on, why are you there political scientist - who is this? unhistorian, or what? no, this is not available, you know what scientific communism, you know what, i’ll tell you what, don’t need these buffoons here: a historian is studying a historian studying history and a political scientist is studying and a political scientist vladimirovich can give advice they are studying political processes and this is not here except jokes for example, the nineties of the 2000s, i ’m telling you as a person from the inside, all this expert expert assessment , so to speak, including, yes, all the expert assessment there was. they prepared projects, decisions, analysis that formed the basis of public policy, that is, a political scientist is one who himself could not, but teaches others what he himself could not, well, then a historian is one who himself could not make

history, but reads books, no, a historian is one who studies what others could not do, that is, he at least has some kind of hostility, i feel, about these people. now that’s it, my friends, you’re laughing in vain, because these will be the people who will write texts, who will prepare decisions and who will determine, among other things, public opinion, public the opinion of the nineties and 2000s was formed by people who were sharply anti-russian, call them political scientists, by the way, most of them were political scientists, by the way, they didn’t have graduate degrees, but they were actually like that, they fulfilled this role, that’s all, that’s what seems important to me, in this sense, we need to start studying this reality from other, more sober positions. if you said that russia is a sovereign civilization, stop living with the cliches of the 10th century, that’s what the left and right say and so on and

so forth, you know why to the right they cling, this wilders, so to speak, won, because there, not because they rely on them, but because there are some other more or less living souls, all the other dead souls, all the others, leftists, and more leftists . where are you communists, social democrats and others who should fight for the rights of workers, who should carry the class agenda, where are you? show me, if you want, i’ll show you, scholz, the social democratic party of germany, a man who... and where is he, who is he? in the same place where he was killed, the very in fact, yes, the western political elites performed an incredibly clever operation of castration on the left, and the left

came to this castration themselves, and they themselves, so to speak , put their personal belongings right on the table, they came themselves, because in fact, no matter how many books there are was not written, for some reason they took it, as if they forgot about all this, they... drank on the simplest passions, on everything that is below the belt, the sexual sphere, that which concerns everyone in one way or another, clean air, clean water, of course, we all want it to live in a comfortable world, these things were scammed, bought, feminism, women’s rights, exactly, right, what kind of women do we need, who give to everyone, i apologize, and you are responsible for this, that’s it, guys, they were scammed on the simplest passions, on which they buy, so to speak, some children, i don’t know, teenagers, where is this marx and engels, where is this capital, so to speak, where is all this, they themselves flushed it all down the toilet, you know me, i’m not a supporter leftist idea, but honestly, i would like to see some a conglomerate of leftist parties.

in the west, which would oppose american imperialism, they are not there, they are not there, and we did not give them up, they sold themselves and they started selling themselves back in the sixties and even earlier, despite our support, sex draol, everything, the fight for freedom, for personal rights, so to speak, they were bought, as if they were later resold, bought again by centrists, centrists - this is the so-called system, yeah, this is a system, at least you can work with someone, then you have to work based not on principles left, center, right from some... them, this requires a radical revision of the general view of the world , we have talked here many times, i finished, that in order to be sovereign, you need your own, for example, let's say, scientific language, you need your own own methodology of knowledge, and not the endless translated books of western scientists, which we seem to study with a smart look, then we tell each other what they wrote there, what they wrote there, we need our own scientific school and school of teaching, tell it to the students, so to speak, show them the world like this, what is he like

there is, and not to tell them, so to speak, yes, these are eternal stories from the past, but this past is gone, maybe he will return somehow, i don’t know, it’s hard, hard to say, but he’s no more, guys, i wouldn’t want to , this is no longer there, everything is mixed up like this, so to speak, yes, so that it is not completely recognizable, therefore this reality requires new study, in the end, a sign that means the scientific nature of the work, what is it, so to speak, in the fact that in objective description of reality, you objectively describe reality, dividing everyone into left, right centrists, no. well, no, no, that’s why we cancel scopus, fire the deans, we already refused, i just saw it in your eyes, you always say when the drags are coming, yes, who will evaluate us, and what journals, scientometrics, then these smart conversations begin inside , there will always be someone to evaluate, mauser, we have a slightly different position, so somehow with all these web of science, scopuses,

we have an effective contract not on this. i would like to say here that you know, when they showed peter paul, it flashed through my mind, yes, the worst is, of course, ahead, i mean for the eu, of course, well, let’s separate two things. firstly, the united states, which has a nuclear umbrella, the united states is the only western state , from my point of view, that can still return to defining its goals, national interests, which, strictly speaking, europe cannot do, in fact, in the states, the struggle is going on around this, around this, we return to our national position or we don’t return, that’s where all the talk comes from, here’s a sign wandering around europe, a ghost, that is, he is no longer communism, but

trump, that’s if he returns. that nato’s brain was already dying, remember, he already died once under trump, then they brought him home , it turned out to be alive, this brain, they are now launching, what should we do, this is the creation of a european army that alexander sosnovsky spoke about, well, i would say , that this is nonsense, nonsense, because the army has sovereign power, a sovereign power, who determines the goals, interests and hence the use of the armed forces? secondly, sovereign power has a leader, that is, one the person who leads this state, that ursula vondern will make, make a decision on how to use the armed forces, but it won’t work out that way, thirdly, here arises a model on what kind of model this european army, the european union, in general will be built on where no one speaks english, not a single country exists there now. he will build a command language that

all young people will know english english , that’s the point, it will be english, and how is it different from nato, and this is the fourth question, because albride also said, no duplication, no nothing, we leave nato, but the main thing here is what you want, create it, but it will all be under the control of nato, and the last one who will give it to them, because remember, also in the eighteenth year there is such an outstanding french leader as emmanul macron, who said: we need to create our own army against russia, against china and maybe against the united states. yes, and this is just macron macron, yes, he’s talking about this , well, then there was trump there, here the situation is here the situation is simple, excuse me, i have a question for you as an artist, but macron served in the army, no, he has a hat, why did he buy it recently, yes, he bought it, he was just selling himself, maybe he had a military department

somewhere, in my opinion, no, he was involved in finance and this is the last question of creating a european army. the army is not just thousands of men dressed in some kind of uniform and armed with rifles, this is the structure of the army - this is a huge structure, the military-industrial complex, this is science, and these are the people which galileo cannot create, but we created glanas , the americans have gps, this is not simple, not just navigation, so to speak, which there will be no army, but soslovsky spoke about something else, the european union is suitable for declaring war, so. .. this is the treaty on the european union of the treaty of mastricht of the year ninety-two, it is now being discussed, this is not the first discussion, but there is another idea that can be used against us without triggering either the forty-second article or the fifth

article of nato, but that's how it is legally national army, here is peter pavel, he is the czech president, he opposed what? he opposed it after the visegrad four summit. and in fact, he was saying that now, well, this nonsense, of course, he said, complete, about the fact that russia is now depleting its own, but some, some time, after some time it will restore its forces, so during this time we need to prepare for a high-intensity conflict, he supported it, karen georgivich said correctly, because there is one, mrs. novak, she is president. there in hungary, so she supported him, fully said, and that and that the czech republic, and yes, excuse me, the czech republic, not in novok, hungary, in hungary, there is a president in hungary, a president with a czech surname, yes , minova, kova, novak, i know one novak , a wonderful person, deputy prime minister, well, she is

katalin, she is katalin novak, yes, she also added that russia should not do this under any circumstances. in order to prevent russia from winning, to squeeze , this is what it all reminds of milon, this is proven, and we will all jump out and say, no, this is it, that is, this is what it will be, the visegrad four is a bunch of dwarfs , the visegrad four, why dwarfs, it is the core of the buchares nine, the buchares nine is the core of the initiative of

the three seas, but death is everything equally in the egg, all not the american six, which they discussed, andrey, but death is still in the egg, so... worry as much as you want, we’ll break the egg, we’ll break the needle, i’m torturing, i’m trying, i’m trying, explain, explain one simple thing, they were given instructions, not even let’s point our fingers, this is the first time we have treated the whole of europe so politely, they have been given instructions to somehow keep russia in the western direction, the war can be different, i know a thousand times what difference it makes. this is the initiative of the three seas of the adriatic baltic, which means and the black includes 13 13 eu states and moldova from ukraine this is how many sarmatians there are a little correct what difference does it make to us how many three seas six countries nine with

almaty count me you know how the territory of great britain is easier for me to calculate the sormats how many sormats are needed for great britain. here we clearly know stalin’s prolifenet two poseidons let’s think classically correctly the visegrad floor of the new york metropolis, this has already been calculated , but now about the visegrad four we immediately need two expressions, i will express the pro-visegrad four half-sars that the lycans are americans in the american they must understand this because they are each since they think that we will live according to invented rules, so every time they say here in all seriousness, no, you shouldn’t, how can you argue, about the use of nuclear weapons, should you argue if we are talking about war, they must understand everything.

how long the polonaise is flying to you, well, there won’t be warsaw, i don’t know how long the polonaise is flying, no, well, they are reasoning correctly, they are clearly and specifically twitch, well, it’s no coincidence that alexander grigorievich said the answer will be such that all questions will be answered, no one has any doubt that the answer will be exactly like that for some reason, their skinny says quietly and politely that this does not mean that we will answer in a way that will not show much, they were sure that we would not do anything on february 24. they were sure that we would not do anything, i there is even no doubt that most likely they will not fight, they will build, build different structures, this is the difference between all kinds of structures, until the security of the russian federation is ensured, to the end, that is, we will complete a special military operation, no matter how much they want it, even if they say so there,

they will call for another one. from vancouver to vladivostok, which again spreads the russian land since they are building this structure in order to keep the tension when they built this structure. which is not barks, that’s when it was lined up, why are you refusing

the sobun ? forward, this is a must, you definitely have to go to lisbon, andrey, don’t throw away russian lands, i don’t say hawaii, and hawaii too, and seryozha too, please, yes, i want to support sergei alexandrovich, but first of all. physics, physics, physicist with basic education, but political science , after all, is probably not even so much consultation, because after all, a consultant is more like a position, a calling, so to speak, i don’t know political science , as it were, a science, but politics is about the laws of making political decisions and their consequences, so to put it very well, to say, this is what , which in the west is called political science, although in our country, so to speak, they even once tried to import political philosophy from europe, something like that. but in reality, political science is really an exposition of the basis on which political leaders make decisions,

how it all works there in reality, the science of power is a science, well, not only about power, but as in political interaction, this is not the study of the past, it is the study of methods for managing the present and predicting the future, that’s why it is important, history, history is also here interesting because it gives some clues, but it’s absolutely fair that it’s something like a weather forecaster, but without scientific knowledge, why, that is, he predicts the future like that, why predict, a person, how to manage, that in soviet times it wasn’t, that in soviet times it wasn’t , another time, soviet times, that means an assistant, an assistant, some big leader, he had practical experience, he didn’t have, no one, honestly, i’m kidding , and you are arranging, here , but still, still, still really, as if you can’t go anywhere without this, an assessment of what is happening there. so why is it happening there, but as if among neighbors, distant, so to speak, not partners there, this seems to be a really important thing, it is important

to understand their motives, it is important to understand where they are going next time they will go there and so on, it is built on, so to speak , there is an analytical apparatus in this matter there and so on, you can accept it, you can not accept it, just like until now, so to speak, in fact they laugh there, for example, over weather forecasters, or or for example, they argue about economics, is it a science or not a science, you know, how one can argue, but the fact is that this knowledge is needed, right? now, now about the fact that it should be sovereign, well, of course, it should be sovereign, and of course, it should be based based on modern knowledge, and not bygone pasts, but the same applies to finance and economics, sovereign and modern, well , because otherwise how would it be here, but how can science be sovereign, i’ll explain now, there is such a thing, look, look , no matter how, well, this is like aryan physics, like it was in reiki, or what? no, sovereign, that means, that means, i’ll explain now, we have a lot of science popularizers. spoke out against svo, 80% rubbed their videos, i looked later, and the rest left everything, these are people who communicate with young people, no, but

this is not a category of sovereign, wait, no, no, these people. the concept that there is the sovereignty of science, i am in this regard, there is an american interpretation of history, history remains science, you see, this is all very good, this is all very good, as long as you don’t have people there, that’s as long as you have there there are no people, this is all wonderful, you know, but as soon as you have people there, everything becomes a little different, for example, of course, i’m just from the accuracy of the terms, okay, well, mathematics remains mathematics, no dependencies, political mathematics, of course it remains the humanities sphere - this is not the field of science, if it is not science, the question is not science at all, you understand, something like that , you just don’t understand it, say it,

it’s scary, colleagues, yes , that's strong. i can explain how exact science can be a sovereign and non-sovereign field, all climatology is sub-american garbage now and is absolutely not scientific, does not correspond to either mathematics or physics, but of course, here you go, exact science climatology, precise climatology, based on a wonderful mathematical, mathematical analysis, but here we are talking about a different , mathematical apparatus, but these conclusions can be political, i’m just for the frequency of the term, which is... seemingly objective, here are scientists, yes, scientists can to distort in one's own interests, well, once again, we are talking about the fact that the scientific system, and science in general, when we say russian science, what do we assume, a mathematics textbook or a calculator, we assume, generally speaking, mainly people of science, in in this sense, of course, they must be sovereign, that’s what i was saying, and so to speak, here the same applies to economics, maybe it’s science, maybe not science, it’s a field of knowledge, in

any case, the same applies to finance, from which we still can’t jump out and so on, well, by the way, based on this we need to say so, it’s enough to look at it soberly, i also don’t think that in the west we have any friends among these wrong ones , by no means, they are so to speak , as right as i don't know, the same one is dearer, he not not a libertarian, as he calls himself, these are populists, they were called populists for a reason, in our country the word populist has an exclusively negative connotation, but actually this is a person who, well, in theory, in a positive connotation, fulfills the will of the people, what kind of will the american people who elected trump? in due time, maybe he will elect a second time, he is trying to elect all these guys , it’s very simple, their aspiration is actually very simple, this is the desire for national sovereignty, the only aspiration is what can be more or less understood is that this is the dynamic there , they are trying not to give it to them, they have good experience, from 1970 to 1919 they rode out this whole populist wave, but it is coming back, the same geert wilders in

1718 year, he spoke quite well, they had a whole union of these same populist parties, let’s all bring down the globalists together, then we’ll run off to national apartments, we don’t need to think that these are our friends, it’s just a trend, no, of course, and this is a very important thing , here we are somehow here they were discussing an article in foren policy about the fact that they themselves admit , and the council on foreign relations, that they are losing the narratives of russia, china, someone else, in an amazing way, despite everything that they have done for this , in order to pin down these same opposition populist movements, it turns out that this liberal-globalist narrative... it lost inside, in the internal market of the west, that all this is an attempt, you know, to tell about what they have there here it will be this is a new liberal future, a new global future, in fact the majority of the population still did not buy it, i think that in 24 the main field of struggle will be this there, this also needs to be understood, now, of course , very important, this is what

we talked about before the advertisement, during the advertisement, now everyone will count, not just the shells. now they will consider absolutely everything, for example, they have blocked some strait, one or two, how much oil will be enough for the oil refineries? by the way, what kind of oil are they designed for? these factories? now a warhead will fly across taiwan, god forbid, right at the tsms plant, this same taiwanese enterprise, in