[000:00:00;00] i’ve been working towards this all my life, we expect to do it in 10 days, it will be a record, cut , on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he is the only one, at the maximum height, higher, don’t rise, you’ll just fall like a stone , with the speed of the wind, it’s a super cyclone, a killer cyclone

, it’s like it’s chasing you, what do you want, the master of the wind, like the americans, this is their main doctrine of manifest destiny, yes, that’s what they were destined to live from ocean to ocean, then what are there... then the indians already lived - their problems, but this is not ours, we don’t have an oceanic one. and that’s what i thought alexey would say, but in fact, when biden basically talked to and left the atc summit, biden considered this his victory, probably, in general, there are some reasons, because that in america they really believe that this is his defeat, that the entire american press writes that this is biden’s defeat, and only andrei continues to carry out the persecution, read not only, not only i’m not the only one

, there are two of you, well, maybe there are two of us, this those who haven't learned chinese haven't learned chinese, in any case, here is the united states, now hooper, a missile attack has entered territorial waters, what is considered china, what is happening in burma, yesterday the chinese troops began training and announced that they were from burma, excuse me, myanmar, right? chinese citizens should leave this country, what do you think, who supplies weapons there, who does all this, no one is hiding it, and what is all this being prepared for now, well, by and large, we have already talked here once about a great victory beijing with the unification of the two parties, the guomen people, unfortunately, have already managed to quarrel on air, so this is not surprising, because i haven’t learned it yet, but kvnzhe

heads... he heads the taiwan people’s party, it turns out, so i looked up what kind of person he is , the americans described him, a man who at one time supported the first president from the democratic progressive party, yes keshlben, yes, who, who was also an ideologist in the general independence of taiwan, in the twelfth year zatsaen drowned, well, supported her, she really didn’t become president then, she became 4 years later, but in any case it’s taiwanese... the people’s party is by no means as pro-chinese, i mean, pro-beijing, as they think, so now, of course, the americans are preparing sphere, they are preparing a platform for the fact that if something goes wrong, most likely this one will win, i know him as lau william, but william, actually, he ’s called differently in chinese, the current vice president , a person who is completely, generally for independence, for independence

taiwan. so the united states is going to this conflict, but that is, there will be a war, they need it, i don’t think that china will fight, well, simply, i don’t think that china will fight now, but the fact that china is pressuring china that if even this one wins, you can simply take away the islands nearby , declare a blockade, well, okay, china will do it differently, take away these islands that are nearby, conduct a blockade, the blockade is the simplest, the simplest for the americans. charlie flynn, and this is the commander of the pacific, pacific forces, indo-pacific command, he announced that we will deploy medium-range missiles in the region , but i won’t say where, but what difference does it make, what will they do, they will start attacking , located directly near china, what

have they deployed, it must be used? well, okay, they need to be used, what did they do, they hit china, after which china just hammers , destroys, there’s a whole coastline there, you understand that the americans have a different position, they always want to talk, negotiate with the position... numbers it became clear that all these there was no point in talking, when they realized that we didn’t give a damn about all their warnings, we did what we thought was necessary, because it surprises me, in our country , unfortunately, we have a very good university, it ’s called a university, but unfortunately, from this a wonderful university sometimes produces completely mediocre idiots, one of them named sobchak. so she managed to say in an interview with some foreign agent, no , well, well, russia started, well, the troops, that means she couldn’t say any further,

because she’s afraid that she’ll fall under the status, too, if she really studied at the brilliant educational institution mgemo, if she really attended lectures, if she graduated from the henry tech faculty, then she, being a literate person, then, but did not become one, knew that we recognized the independence of the dpr, lpr, signed there was an agreement with them, on the basis of which we could not act otherwise, because we ensured their safety, their security, a phenomenal number of shells were flying into their territory within a week, and we were fulfilling our agreements, we stood up for our allies, but for this purpose it was necessary to study, but we are not chinese, they smoke in the second, and we warned, and we warned, in the second. we actually initially sent our proposals on december 15, this was before the moment of recognition, it’s just those people who really study that she got into mgemo, it would be better if she

went to mgu, then you would teach her, no, we don’t need such nice ones, we had our own nice ones, but how china does it, how china does it, we’ll see, for example, burma, like you sorry, yum, well, as neil ferguson said, if there is a second cold war , then the united states, in general, will most likely lose it to china, he said, how could there be a second cold war, he believes that it is now underway, in principle i think , what is it, why do we even think, that they can think about something, who they are, well, these fergusons and all sorts of other people, why did we decide that they at least understand something, at least such a conscious person, no it just surprises me, we have such a breathy feeling we name names... and quote books by people who have never actually guessed anywhere, not a single forecast by prominent american philosophers has ever led to anything, giant think tanks developing models, if they were

right, the world would develop completely in a different way, we have already seen one genius salvan, who said that never before has it been so calm in the middle east as on his watch, here he is... everything has finally calmed down, they called salevan that he is the metternich of modern era, and then someone one of the americans said that he looks like menternich, they are both red-haired, well, actually , well, how can you compare like that, well, even somehow indecent, well, they compared him, just to the middle east, no, it just shows, why stop pronouncing the names of westerners with aspiration, which in fact mean nothing? no, well, first of all, well, about nothing, just as we came up with for ourselves, an outstanding philosopher, look, he wrote this, that’s the end of the story of fokuyama, but he’s a cretin, not fokuyama, well, really, fokuyama is stupid, that’s it

no one even perceived it in the nineties, except liberals, oh, they perceived, they perceived, those who read the theories of international relations, they said that there cannot be an end to history, it cannot. volodya, remember the eternal lenin, marx, what are you doing all sorts of things, that’s right, yes, i generally think that no, i think we are in vain abandoning the creative heritage, because excuse me, but the work, well, there is marx, of course, but here lenin’s works are simply many brilliant, that is, he was an absolutely brilliant politician, the most cruel, that is, if you look at how easily he abandoned his views in order to achieve his goals, yes. now, if you remove all this pataca and look at achieving results, listen, a gigantic country, a completely small one, a small order of defato isuits , well, so to speak, the bearers of the sword, well, yes, seize power,

hold on, drag the majority to your side, defeat the armies, defeat the armies of europe and america, which landed once, at the same time build a parallel economy , create a monetary system, no one wanted to supply and give the west a third of its population, it was not he who gave the west a third of its population, he gave a third population of the emperor, when he left, then began the collapse? i don’t... i want to remind you that the conditions were not met , that is, lenin had a lot of questions, but objectively speaking, he predicted these states of europe, no, he took those that had fallen, he took those that had completely collapsed, that’s the tragedy, he

, it wasn’t he who ruined it, they actually existed, stop the separate conversations communists , that’s why people don’t love you, for eternal separation, but here it is, communists and bundists, advertising to you for this, hello, i’m boris sakilov, and i am oleg stepanov and we are the creators of the russia 2062 headquarters project. together with experts, we are discussing how we can develop the russia of the future in the next 40 years. see you in the future, there was a very interesting message from our friend, dr. alexander sosnovsky, where he... quotes willy wimmer, a famous german public and political

figure, who says that the situation now is very reminiscent of the late eighties, early nineties, that is, the feeling of this approaching storm, while no one expected that the soviet union would will disappear and that the berlin wall will collapse, this was absolutely unpredictable, now europe is in a similar situation, europe is in a stage of colossal transformation and this is not only a victory for the leader of the dutch far right, it is not only the migration crisis, it is not only beerbock, who believes that ukraine must be dragged in at any cost, that this will strengthen, this is the general feeling of a colossal separation of power from the interests of the people, this is such a misunderstanding, that is, again, why we were talking about lenin, yes, lenin had a clear definition a revolutionary situation, one of the prezankas, when the lower classes cannot, and the upper classes do not want

to live in europe, is approaching such a moment and we need to comprehend this and maybe look , again using leninsky, in order to pull out the chain, we need to find the weakest a link, by clinging to which you can pull out leni, we were talking about the state, and we are talking about the state, the european union is not a state, but stop driving yourself into your own dogmas, explaining, doing nothing, this is called giving to yourself definition based on which. explain your own nothing division. it was precisely this dogmatic attitude towards marxism that once destroyed the soviet scientific school, because lenin, when he heard such dogmatism, would have said: “comrade, you think in an extremely skeletal way.” on steam. for a bit, yes. henry segranovich, you really touched on a very important topic related to the election results, and you know, if you look at the news agenda over the past few weeks, then...

they usually draw parallels between gert wilters, between, that is, javer miley in argentina, they are also trying to connect all this with donald trump, saying that this is all part of one chain, but in reality, these are three completely different cases, which are united only by the fact that we are talking about non-systemic candidates, but if we look at the difference between trump and wilders, the only person who was before trump or in parallel with trump, who was very similar to him in image, is berlusconi and it seems to me that many political technologies associated with him were taken from silva berlusconi, but you can’t compare him with wilters, because this is a completely different case, trump, a person who came completely from outside the system, at least the public one, and could claim to be a matrix error, that is, when a failure occurred in the matrix, who -he hijacked one of the parties, came to power , i’ve never been involved in all this before, in the case of wilders, he

has been involved in public politics for decades, at least, if i’m not mistaken, he has had this function since 2005 party, he did not change his point of view during this period, he said the same thing all the time, these are extremely radical views about migrants, about everything related to social policy, his position practically did not change... the population chose to vote for him, that is, he continued to say everything that he said 5 years ago, 10 years ago, the population has now decided that the time has come to finally trust, that means, this point. how exactly he will behave, unlike wilders, he does not have such a trail political activity is a leader by whom one could easily determine what his ideology is, because the person calls

himself a libertarian and says that he is a fan of the market economy, while noting that he is categorically against trade with china and brazil because they are communists, i don't know what kind of market economy functions this way, the market economy comes from profit from these interests and not from who ideologically supports what, but in his case we see quite successful, such an attempt to break the system of the current mainstream parties due to such a black swan that bursts into this space, which we see as... an attempt by the system to respond to these new candidates, if we take spain, because wilters has not yet formed a government, he just recruited more than the rest and last time the netherlands took an extremely long time to form and i think that we cannot exclude the possibility that wilders will not form a government in the netherlands, despite his

victory in the elections, because here we have the example of spain, where the people's party won the elections, and the government was formed headed by the current prime minister sanchez, due to what? due to the fact that he simply entered into such a national conspiracy, if you like, with those who defend the independence of catalonia , he created such a single bloc with them and just if you understand the scale of this action, he has now brought the issue of catalonia and its status to the level of national politics , that is, this is no longer a confrontation between the center and the region, but this is already a question national agenda, just to stay in office. here, too, a minority government is possible, when one person wins, and the other forms the government, but this is juggling, tricks and tricks of illusionists, they give a short-term result, but cannot solve any problem in the long term, because what does this lead to next, the population sees that no matter how it

votes, no matter how it behaves during official democratic procedures, the government. if to add to this the government of the european union, which is generally opaque and unaccountable for them, then the population is actually driven into the bosom of such a revolutionary struggle, because it does not understand how else it can change the situation, it begins to look for the most marginal forces, who promise to solve all problems and deal with all opponents without any democratic procedures of anything else, and we must understand that these decisions, which... as an example, are not an institutional decision, institutional decision, if a person wins, he is elected, then different branches of government, different authorities balance each other and do not allow him to go beyond the framework of the rule of law, in the case when the population can choose anyone, and at the same time the state will be headed at all

third party, this goes very far beyond the scope of such an institutional decision, and in fact represents a political technology, nothing more. what exactly is the british empire like? that's what concerns a purely deceiver? by the way, they also have, if i’m not mistaken, elections are expected in 2024, early, so anything can happen there, now as for mr. arakhami’s interview, i would note two aspects here, the first is the content, then, what he said, of course, this is probably one of the... scandalous interviews that came out from not just representatives of the ukrainian leadership, as far as i know, this is one of the closest people to the president of ukraine directly, they have such close personal relationship, this is a scandalous story from all points of view, because in fact it is stated that

ukraine actually had no reason not to sign this agreement, because the first argument that is given is, where does it come from? we could know that we would not be deceived and would not start again, well, even if we proceed from this logic, okay , you signed, you were deceived, hostilities began again, what a negative result , the beginning of hostilities, and if you do not sign, then what is the result, continuation of hostilities, that is, you had a chance here that these hostilities would stop, you preferred to simply cross out this chance, so this option is not being considered at all, the second option, which says that boris johnson is there. this means that western countries directly exerted pressure, this is, of course, a scandal, which in diplomatic circles, i think, has not yet... and based on this, who should we now consider the president of ukraine, that is, in principle, zelensky has completely lost

legitimacy, of course, and i based on this based on what you say, based on the reaction that colleagues here are also showing about this interview, i think we should ask ourselves a question about the second component, about the tense form of this statement, about goal setting, for some reason this interview and these the theses were about not six months ago, not a year ago, but now, i think, this can be quite explained by the release, by the way , of an article in the draft, which says that western countries have agreed to take such and such a position, that since ukraine failed to ensure a result, they will supply a certain amount of weapons that will allow them to at least somehow hold the current front line, but they will not have to count on more than this, this should encourage the ukrainian to negotiate an attempt to conclude an agreement with the russian federation, if to proceed from this, that this

actually corresponds to the truth, then such an interview with mr. arakhami could solve only two problems, specifically for the ukrainian population, this is, in fact, the suicide of this political force, it is going to obank, because it tells the ukrainian population that i am not proceeding from your interests, i am not worried about how to ensure your safety, but what johnson thinks about me there. other people, they actually deceived me, that’s what they say, but they solve two problems with this, the largest and most ambitious in my opinion, they tell western countries that if you continue like this, we will start talking, and this is the only thing they are doing now can blackmail that all that meanness and dirt into which you dragged us all this time is against, well, we’ll try to use this against you, we’ll try to use this as a means of blackmail , give us at least something, let us survive , as politically johnson has already lost his political career, and not... we can tell you, watch the rest, and what else can they tell us, we don’t know, they are now shooting at those, well, these are targets to show that what we did with johnson,

we can do the same with those who are still there in the office or anyone else to be re-elected, it seems to me, the first, their plan, the second plan is smaller, but also has a place to be, is to create public opinion in russia, he, i don’t know if he is such a short-sighted person that during... an interview publicly declare that all the negotiations that we conducted were just a smokescreen in order to delay time, and he directly openly says to deceive the russians, we were set up for this, this immediately causes a reaction in russia, what and what are we then went to these, but why did we need them now, if someone will promote the topic of negotiations in the public sphere so that this topic will automatically be taboo in russia, why, because if this topic is taboo in russia, then the public... political power, our leadership, will act as an unconstructive side, that is, here it is necessary for our people, citizens to understand

that holding negotiations is one thing, signing an agreement with each other and fulfilling it, the third, if we are the party that will say every time that we are not even negotiating if we don’t lead everything , then for that part of the world that still treats us with sympathy, we will act as a country with which there is nothing to negotiate and we will not evoke any sympathy from anyone anymore, therefore... here is a smaller task, it seems to me that this interview also fulfills this purpose. the history of democracy in russia goes back to ancient times. the national meeting of residents of the veche made decisions on all significant issues and played a key role in the formation of russian statehood. century by. new class institution representations: cathedrals all over the earth. they ensured legitimacy and continuity

of power and established a new electoral tradition. catherine ii included elements of election to solve a number of state problems. for the first time , the foundations of suffrage were laid in relation to cities and the urban population. thanks to the reforms of alexander ii, zemstvos appeared in russia. the people were legitimized. as a new source of power. the state duma became the country's first all-class legislative body. she was elected for 5 years. there were elections multi-stage, carried out in four stages. elections to the constituent assembly became universal, equal and direct, and were held by secret ballot. the adopted law turned out to be revolutionary for russia. voting rights were granted not only to men, but also to women. in 1936, universal, equal, direct elections were enshrined in the ussr constitution. in december

1993, the current constitution was adopted. russia, modern electoral legislation is being formed, legislation on political parties, electoral systems commissions, the foundations for gas elections are laid. the digitalization of election procedures is actively underway. russia is significantly ahead of other countries in organizing and conducting elections. today , every russian voter understands how important it is to make their choice in order to support changes for the better in our lives, elections in russia: important, honest, convenient. investment rating, economics, through specific stories we can reach people. we often talk about

money, the amounts are serious. a clear signal at what point you will say: that's it, i'm done in this project, everything i could, i will never say whether russian industry is capable of replacing foreign suppliers, it is necessary to mobilize all resources, give me the recipe in general, here’s how to achieve what you have achieved, it seems to you that you are on top of the world, got up, dusted yourself off let's go, is russia ready to change? evolution occurs in any structure.

essentially, this is a state within a state,

because inside. for us, the most important thing is that, regardless of those information dumps and those narratives that our opponents are trying to to introduce such a cognitive space into our own, we had a very clear, understandable, for ourselves, it is clear that for the leadership, it is understandable, for the population, a very clear goal-setting and clear criteria for what is acceptable and unacceptable, which were not invented by me here by colleagues, experts, public speakers, but the leadership of the country,