such an idea, we stop, we need to find a way for ukraine to survive, but the teacher, the students should ask the teacher, why is this, and what does the president have? i teach here and there, well, and the teacher should be able to tell why this is so, well, and not otherwise, in principle, you know, you don’t need to change the constitution for this, seriously, well, that is, maybe somehow we’ll start with this , or the political workers there, yes, what are we fighting for, because the thesis about the national liberation battle that we are waging, well, it’s fundamental.

you'll get it, this is how a person who received a history education, i can tell you, between ivan kalita, who set the task of sovereignty of the russian state, set it, began to solve it, and ivan ii, well, for a second, 150, there, now 1226 and 1480, even more, approximately, well, there was

the question of leaving the occupation in those terms and what maneuvers had to be performed there, and so on. we have passed 20 years of this path, and what was established over us in the nineties was complete external control and domination of the west, well we won’t discuss this, right? while they could go out without war, they did, at the moment when this became impossible, and when we were gathered...

in order to gain this complete freedom that the president is talking about, by the way, he called this word, well, as a key and there is nothing in common with liberalism and everything that has rubbished their pants, because he talks about the freedom of the people for all the people, for this is also a fundamental point, there is something for philosophers here, well, to sort out, so to speak, in this thesis, and so on in everything the rest. about responsibility, of course, vitalich touched on an important, most important topic, here, but about the word comfort - you know, well, comfort, well , yok, for example, believes that for him it is super comfortable to sleep on nails, yes, nails, and he he sleeps with them and he has fun, he is very comfortable , on the one hand, yes, well, every person measures comfort by himself, another thing is that there is a norm of consumer society, through which everything was built... management, including

western society, and the soviet second half of the soviet project, well, with nikita sergegevich khrushchev for sure, but that you will have everything, you will have nothing for it , you only have the prospects of consuming almost no responsibilities, but the responsibilities of the soviet person also decreased until they dried up, so to speak, towards the end, of the soviet project completely, therefore ... of course, here, well, if we talk about something , then responsibilities and duties, they should go ahead of rights, in fact, and rights should be measured against responsibilities and duties, it’s not a matter of comfort, that’s because, you know, this is, well, this is dmitry gennady he said, he says, this is the russian identity, you said, it’s uncomfortable, yes, but i’ll turn it on the other side and say, as

a russian person it’s absolutely comfortable for me, i can’t imagine any other life, this is the best life you can live, but even more so i have something to compare with, i had the opportunity. i can’t say that my choice, as liberals like to say, is because people are kind of driven, they haven’t seen the world, i have, i know, so i am convinced that this identity is the best for me, the best for me, well, in this sense there somewhere in the fifth the most comfortable level is down there, which is why the issue of correlating rights and responsibilities is key for our future. and this is the key question of the society that we are going to build, how they will be linked, what different opportunities people will receive for themselves for the assignment of these rights and responsibilities, if you want fewer responsibilities, it means there will be fewer rights, please, please, but not

without regard, one thing to another, this is the biggest challenge that we will have to solve on the next path, here by the way development... well, something that seems very serious, you know, the fact that russian is more than blood, and than ethnicity, well, we discussed this many times, i definitely think so, yes, but the fact is that our civilization should provide opportunities for diverse self-determination, this is exactly the next step, but in this simple one. well, do you want to do nothing? well, okay, but then your rights will be proportionate to doing absolutely nothing, well, in the sense of political, first of all, the opportunity

to influence something, to influence something in the future, and the last thing, probably, is that i i’ll say here, it’s also very important, this is an appeal, another appeal from the president to the seventeenth that we will consider any intervention as aggression, this is very important, because what the leaf actually said, she said literally the following: america must truly to lead the entire western world, then a republican conservative will come, he will truly lead, with the goal of destroying russia, as soon as we destroy, this is stated in plain text, as soon as we destroy russia, there will be no problems with iran and china, but we discussed it here, and this is the stake that has been voiced, it is in this sense fundamental, for a very large and significant group, one of the dominant groups, in

the west, this is a completely real threat, in this sense, when it was said that we are leading national liberation battle, this corresponds... to this threat , so, i want to remind you that, for example, in 16, 916, yes, there were relatively successful actions, including the brusilov breakthrough, but there were also problems, well by the autumn of '16 and by winter they were almost overcome in a military sense, and those who knew this considered the explosion of russia from within as... their last chance, it should have taken place right then, in the autumn, late autumn, winter of 1616, they did it, by the way, remember it is necessary that the bolsheviks had almost nothing to do with this, the bolsheviks were then a consequence of this event, and parasitized on

the results of what happened, and that’s where it all started, at the end of the sixteenth year, that’s it... national problems before the women’s riots , all this was needed by part of the elite associated primarily with the british, so that this still happened in february of the seventeenth year. in ninety-one there was a similar story. by the way, in both cases, in the sixteenth year, it was clear that in the seventeenth, with such planning and preparation, russia would strike, the western front would not survive. and russia will achieve its goals in this war, another thing, it was necessary, and so on, will achieve its goals in this war, one way or another, this could not be allowed, this was not allowed, by the way, again, many argue, but here it is interesting , mikhail, in my opinion, must agree with me, the fall of the soviet

union took place precisely in its liquidation in the ninety -first year, in the face of a very deep american crisis, in the ninety-first... second year, which would certainly have taken place if not for the development of the entire post-soviet space, not only the ussr, but the entire socialist camp, a completely different... opportunity to work with china than the americans had, despite the fact that there was the soviet union. and the last one is short. i absolutely agree that we shouldn't never forget that everything that we have today, including a forced special military operation, sacrifices, hardships, all this is a consequence of this ninety-first year, we should never forget about this when thinking about our... well, today we are again very

we are actively discussing the western, american and english neo-conservative press, we are trying to find some deep meanings there, well , as for the publication in the sunday telegram, to be honest, i don’t even want to discuss it, there is a set of banalities on the one hand, on the other on the other hand, well, daily telegram at the moment, this once very powerful media conglomerate is on the verge of bankruptcy and i think that this bankruptcy will not be announced today, tomorrow, by the way, potential buyers have already been found there, from the united arab emirates, so it is quite possible that in for some time, the editorial policy may change dramatically, so we will lose this topic for discussion, we’ll see, well, by the way, there are a huge number of these guys, columnists who write for telegram and write for specitor, who is also for sale, they sit tightly on convict money, so perhaps she won’t even notice any special changes, that’s what concerns listras, she too, of course, loves convict funds very, very much, but the last thing about her is this and her publication an essay, let's say, in the street journal

, in rupert murdach's newspaper, here, but this, of course, on the one hand, is also a rather banal publication, but at the same time, at the same time, there is a certain deep meaning, there, if you want, you can find , here of course, she herself, in fact, does not particularly strive to ensure that, and i don’t know, suddenly america returned to the period of reagan and reaganism and began to lead the entire western world, although she is of course close to some conservative circles in america, yes, everything is the foundation there the rest are these foundations, where she is also closely connected with them, well, in general, when she says that there should, there should be a change of power in washington in 204, it may be chewable, but of course she’s directly talking about this still doesn’t write, but there are lines between the lines it reads, the republicans will win, well, we understand that the conditional donald trump will win, well, a man who , of course, cannot be called an isolationist, but it’s also difficult to call him an ardent interventionist, and that ’s just for the united kingdom, again, as in trump’s first term

opens up a whole window of opportunity for the implementation of his global britain project, in order to work more actively there, for example, in eastern europe, in fact, because for trump we understand that the issue of ukraine is not so that is very important, it is quite possible that, again , he will leave all this on bail to the same british in the first term, so if you dig around here, you can find such an internal deep meaning, another thing is that i’m not sure that how lystraz is so self-gifted to broadcast such deep meanings somewhere, but that’s okay. this is what concerns britain, the united kingdom, ukraine in general, today we are also discussing this last week’s statement by david arakhami, the head of the faction servants of the people in the verkhovna rada, well, to be honest, everything that concerns boris johnson, of course, looks like just some kind of, in fact, quite primitive media company, nothing more, that is, of course, boris johnson decided some of his own personal questions, when he rushed there to deal with this very ukrainian case, yes, there were scandals, and yes, even dominic kamens

, his then political strategist, now, of course, his archivist, admits that well, this played a certain role, but of course, wherein yes, after all, of course, there were - the fundamental interests of the british establishment, in general , in eastern europe, including in ukraine, and even if, again , there was someone else in boris johnson’s place, he would also be quite active in this was, however, perhaps somewhat less active, well, as we see, in general, in the summer of twenty-two , boris. nevertheless, in general, the united kingdom, as it dealt with the topic of ukraine, is also engaged in it, even the recent visit of david cameron, man , which has now become lord cameron, in order to enter the cabinet of ministers, and even head the foreign office, this also proves, by the way, according to my information, again, lord cameron came with a proposal to resolve the issue related to the crisis on the ukrainian-polish border, with the fact that polish and ukrainian grain is not allowed to enter eastern europe, including poland, and i think that in fact this issue will be resolved in the coming weeks, that is, we shouldn’t make any promises here, think that this crisis will be infinite, most likely not,

now, of course, they have been in a parliamentary crisis for 2 weeks, and for now mr. morawiecki has formed his own zombie government and is leading it, but in 2 weeks he will most likely be replaced by donald tusk, and i think that this issue will be resolved, so as for the general geopolitical situation, about the general geopolitical situation immediately after, big advertising. bees, i'm a dog, a cat, a cockerel, they called themselves the remensky musician, the magnificent five, this is my group. why have i never seen you, and princess, i actually sing too, obviously for you we need a rebranding, bremen musicians, grab them, soon, yes, i continue, and

as for the general geopolitical situation, now we are once again watching... rather fierce complex negotiations that are taking place in qatar, but if it continues in the gas sector, let and shaky, but some kind of temporary truce, now the parties, and i will remind you, yes, that in doha, although in theory it should have ended already, but it ended, but it was extended again, then extended again, apparently , things are coming to the point that this very temporary truce can to become quasi-permanent, we’ll see, again, but nevertheless, quite serious comrades gathered in doha, mr. burns, the director of the cia, representatives of masada, just. the director of masada and representatives there from the hamas leadership, because i remind you that the hamas headquarters is located in doha, so they are discussing the possibility of this very temporary truce developing into something permanent and full-fledged, but another thing is that, of course, hamass is there , well, very tough proposals, demands put forward to israel, i i’m not sure that even massad, who at the moment certainly has

no sympathy for netanyahu, will agree to this, that is , we are talking about the fact that hamas is really releasing all israeli hostages in exchange for israel letting in, well, whole thousands, most likely, of palestinian prisoners from their prisons. now, of course, if this happens, yes, and this will be exchanged, yes, for some kind of full-fledged truce, but this will already be one hundred percent the end of mr. netanyahu’s example, so i think that he is either way most likely a political one to ask the question, what was all this for, yes, yes, plus, the americans are now putting forward quite strict conditions regarding how the military operation will be carried out or whether it will be carried out at all in the south of gaza, because they do not want what it was in the north of gas, and that’s true. led there to huge rallies in the west, including in the united states of america, and the rise of islamophobia on the one hand, anti-semitism on the other hand , quite seriously undermined biden's ratings in general , there are many problems such as if now it will be possible to arrange some kind of agreement like this, i don’t know how you just attacked me, some videos from israel were made in russian, they raped

women and you support them , are you slut’ well, we don’t support hamas, of course we we are just saying that there is no need to kill palestinian children and women, or that you think that the cruelty of the terrorist attack on october 7 justifies the killing of women and children, are you sick there? is the nationality of the victim important to you? will you come to your senses a little bit? by the way, i would like to separately express dissatisfaction, publishes material, the headline is written: 300,000 israelis left israel after the outbreak of hostilities. link to the jerusalem post, but i go to the jerusalem post, and there’s something else, three arrived, no, there’s something else, that they were moved, from the borders where they are under fire, deep into the country, well , of course, don’t do that, it’s not good,

well, yes, this is of course an example of very bad journalism, returning to the situation around israel, well, today the bank, israel, that is, the country’s central bank, in general admitted that it is a very expensive pleasure to conduct such a military operation, yes, they spent 53 billion dollars on october 7, yes , of course, israel’s financial capabilities are quite extensive, they have a currency cushion there of a colossal 200 billion dollars, but still it is not infinite, not limitless, sooner or later it will end, and military resources will also run out , and now, as we see, firstly , the us congress is discussing the issue that the next kind of military assistance to israel will be provided to minimize casualties among the civilian population and so on, voices are being heard that it may be possible to impose sanctions on someone, but i think that this will not happen yet, but as if rhetorically, it appears publicly, but ilona and musk broke through knees, yes ilan musk yes, but again i think that here , of course, il musk, he himself fell into his own trap, given that he was quite actively immersed in the republican agenda, they of course do not forgive this, yes, if you

you play on the republican field, you start move some things with criticism of israel, well, that’s the end, so he’s in the air pretty quickly, but if he actively cooperated with the democrats, as he is now doing with the republicans, i think that , of course, he would quite calmly go nowhere went, everything was great with him, well, those things that he wrote on twitter really shouldn’t have been written, that’s obvious, well, after all, if some kind of permanent truce is concluded with really humiliating conditions for israel, this will happen with one on both sides, the victory is still the biden administration, no matter how you look at it, and netanyahu is actually completely 100% happy with the political defeat, but if this happens, there is a nuance, now it is not netanyahu who is in charge, but the military committee , well , he’s a military man, but for them now netanyahu is a political corpse, everyone understands this. but now to explain to israeli society that having gone through all this, and now we all stop, everything is fine, they will say, wait, wait, wait, but what they saw

is the most terrible loss of the jewish people after the tragedy of the holocaust, after the catastrophe, and not take revenge, that is, then this is what it was all for, this is the most terrible question, because they will get such an internal explosion in israel that this will not result in any victory for biden, so in fact, hamas is still forcing ...israel is playing according to its own scenario, well, i think, not even hamas itself, but those guys in the penitentiary wing, the military wing of the hamas wing, yes, of course, which, by the way, came to power thanks to nathaneh, he also exchanged the leaders of this militant krylasy broadcasts their demands, well again, that is, it is clear that the military committee really deals with many issues, especially military ones, yes, but the economy and finances are still dealt with by the netanyahu cabinet, and here , of course, there is still a change of administration, yes... a change of the first leader can quite seriously influence, for example, the foreign policy of israel, some benny hans will come , well, an absolutely controllable character for the americans, well, it will be much easier in general to conduct business with such a cabinet, especially since there

are the main especially right-wing comrades there, yes, whom the democrats cannot stand, look, they will most likely be thrown out, but america has its own problems, in washington traditionally, and all these budget battles continue, and the other day the head of the intelligence committee mike turner admitted that most likely not until january it will be possible for neither israel nor ukraine to agree on the tranches, in principle, well, i agree with this assessment, i think that this will be approximately the case, yes, of course, in early december, when congress has fully convened after the thanksgiving holiday, here are the democrats they will try to snore through these tranches very quickly, but most likely this will not work, well, next week we will observe all this and i think that it is quite possible to discuss it in the senate, it will still be possible to pass this or that bill, that’s why that chuck schumer. the leader of the democrats in the senate and the leader of the majority in the senate is pretty tough-minded that we still have to accept something, so i admit that some republicans will try to declare

another filibuster, but it’s quite possible that there’s 60 they will still find votes in support of the bill from tranches to israel and ukraine and will agree on this very bill. the main problems are in the election of representatives; here, as we observe, the position of the republicans also remains quite tough. we are ready to allocate tranches to both israel and ukraine, but under certain conditions. yes, that is , a certain blackmail continues, on the one hand, to optimize government spending, on the other hand, to ensure the security of the southern border of the united states, so there is a budget impasse for now it will most likely remain until january. of course, we shouldn’t generalize here either, i think that sooner or later, well, the dates before january 19, they will still agree on a certain tranche size for both israel and ukraine, maybe not 60 billion dollars, as the biden administration is asking for, maybe 20 billion, maybe 30 billion, but they will still allocate a certain amount of money, most likely, here, everything that concerns what will be allocated to ukraine will largely depend and will depend on the situation on the battlefield, with

on the one hand, on the other hand, of course, from the military capabilities of the pentagon and those resources that still remain, well, as we see, a certain turmoil is happening in kiev, and they have been feeding them such absolutely panicky publications and narratives for 2-3 months now to everyone else, and the fact that everything is bad, the war is lost, the economy is in ruins... tp, it is quite possible, yes, that this will lead to some kind of change of power, we’ll see, mikhailovich, well, first of all, i would like it should be noted that putin’s phrase today, that russian is responsibility, it just seemed to be very heavy on me, because a couple of days ago i wrote that the antonym of the word liberal, that is, the opposite in meaning of the word, is not a conservative at all, but rather an antonym. is not the word conservative, the word responsibility, accordingly, it immediately follows that a russian cannot be a liberal, so i absolutely confirm this

logic, it corresponds to me, now as for the national liberation movement, but the fact is that only in the 20th century we pulled ourselves out from under this several times here is the external hydra that... tried to capture us, and this, of course, is not a colonial system, as it was in the sixties in africa, but nevertheless it tried for the first time, it was during the interim government, territory occupied during the civil war , murmansk by the british , odessa by the french, the far east by the americans and the japanese, they occupied territories that were agreed to be given back by the provisional government, that is , they believe that it is theirs. and the next stage was a fight for what would be a red global

project, communist movement. there was, so to speak, a london version of the original 19th century, our national version appeared, there was a fight between them in the twenties, thirties , the fight was desperate, thank god our version won, by the way, in this sense, the notorious events of the thirties, it was a special operation of that unit aimed at then to overthrow the national part at the head of the composition. the third option began in the sixties, and these are the remnants of this kommenttern project, which was almost completely liquidated in the thirties, but not all, and then it grew, it was his followers who, in the late eighties, began to collapse the ussr, no longer under the red project

, but under the western one, under the bankers, finally, in the nineties they seized power here, not completely, yes, so i worked in presidential administration in the nineties, i worked with yeltsin, and i can assure you that everything was completely different, not unambiguous , in fact, the appearance of putin is not an accident at all , that is, it is not a miracle, but this is a lot of work that was carried out in the nineties years those. today we have to to finally overcome this force that a russian person cannot be a liberal, but now the most important thing is that since the enemy does not sleep, he is all

the time... trying to us, as it were, a russian person cannot be a liberal , a freethinker, maybe a freethinker, of course, phew, well, at least something, liberals are values, because a russian person who does not value will, freedom, is not that person, there must be a free will, a liberal is a fixed a set of values, and a freethinker is internal freedom, a russian person a priori, he has an internal element in it, it just seems to me that the term liberal has been so degenerated from... rotten, rotten that it has completely lost on your discussion, the same kotkov looks with great surprise if i honestly explain what’s the matter, because liberalism is from a philosophical term has become a political term, can we say, is it really correct to say political liberalism?

investment rating, economics, through specific stories, we can reach people, we often talk about money, the amounts are serious, in russia there is a clear and clear signal, in at what point will you say, i did everything in this project, everything i could, i will never say whether russian industry is capable of replacing foreign suppliers, it is necessary to mobilize all resources, give me the recipe, in general, here’s how to achieve what you have achieved, you it seems that he is on top of the world, he stood up, shook himself off, and went, is russia ready to change, is there a revolution taking place in any structure?