[000:00:40;00] the incompetent generation of the current american elite continues to waste the legacy of previous generations, the death of kissinger is a reason to comprehend what the modern states have come to, today america has lost its dominant position in the middle east, destroyed the pan-european security system, and kisinjar’s main brainchild of the rapprochement between china and

the united states, the administration. practically nullified , by the way, in my opinion, the baidin administration was the only one that did not find time to meet with kissinger, yes, there for all the years of his work, that is, somehow biden is visible i didn’t favor kissinger, but in washington they are not discouraged, they are trying to come up with another agreement, supposedly iran is preventing the palestinian-israeli conflict from becoming regional, and in return i receive investments from saudi arabia, with such banal one-shots, they want to outwit those who 10. but it’s one thing to suffer losses because of the fight against a large-scale enemy, and another thing is to doom yourself to suffering. there is no other way to describe germany’s policies in recent years as masochism; the country spends three times more money on electricity than the united states and china. about what kind of economic development can we talk about? the russian president gave a comprehensive explanation of the disasters in the german economy and politics.

firstly, themselves. their opportunities in cooperation with us, and for europe, a source of cheap energy resources, it is blocked by them themselves, or this is done by their allies from the united states, who block them for political reasons, our cheap sources of primary energy, or simply blow up gas pipelines, or close , well, yes. poland took and closed the gas flow of emal europe, which was going, actually going to germany, ukraine took and closed one of the systems , one is still working, one they closed, from europe, from the same germany they receive money, including for armaments, for pensions and for social benefits, for salaries, and

the gas they needed from russia was cut off. and the germans swallow all this, because they don’t have anything, sovereignty, and some government leaders don’t have, apparently, sufficient professional training to make quality professional decisions, well , you know, the whole world laughs at them, i now i won’t mention the name there, but the whole world is really laughing at them, but they seem to be living with it for now, living with it. well, kissinger’s departure caused such a big reaction, i don’t take petty experts who have gone crazy and say: yes, at his request i met with him often, i read markov and thought, well, just, of course, a person needs to seek serious psychiatric treatment help, but serious people really

analyze, because well, listen, one of the titans left, you can treat him differently, i treat him with respect, especially to that part of his life when he fought against nazism and was awarded a bronze star , that is, he actually served in the american army and really did a lot of things, i don’t really understand those who for some reason think that he was our friend, never and he wasn’t close to our friend, not at all, but at least he observed some decency, at least externally, and of course, the man was not very stupid, exactly, very not stupid, very systematic, very serious, and most importantly, in comparison with those who stayed, well scale personality is completely different, that is, of course, this is a block, and it is no coincidence that words of condolences to his family were expressed by both the leadership of our country and the leadership of the people 's republic of china, that is, well, enemies must also

be respected, but what is happening: in a world that kisinj left behind him, in many ways he is already the architect of the world order that is now falling apart before our eyes, this is serious, and some of the movements are of course shocking, but that’s how it is. that hamas dreams of a truce, since now there is a terrorist attack in jerusalem at the entrance, two people shoot israelis standing at a bus stop, in my opinion, three people died , and as a result, hamas immediately takes responsibility, that is, they are not trying to play in a truce, on the contrary, they need war, they say , we didn’t arrange all this so that we could jump off so easily, the world immediately begins to lose its shit, it says, well... no, well, wait, well, no one, no one wants it, the authorities say, they say, who cares ? , what do you want, we are already in trouble, yes, we extended it, we agreed, we’ll change it a little bit at a time, and then look, what’s going on here , yes, biden already thinks that’s it,

he can make a hole for himself, they don’t remember what, yes, what, so we achieved a ceasefire, and hamas says, what are you talking about, no, no, we have other plans, and it turns out that no one is involved in these plans...’ is being initiated, that is, not by the political wing of hamas, which, not , no, no, they say you think whatever you want, but we have our own plans, and it turns out that the whole world is involved in such serious showdowns that are not even planned by the state, i hope that it is important, yes, an objectively small organization at all, with a minimal budget, forces everyone not to sleep at night, worry, think the current secretary of state is running around like a sausage back and forth, back and forth, and what ? at the same time, by the way, well, hamas is clear there, for me they are terrorists and

i have no questions about determining the status of these people, but excuse me, but i’m afraid of biden much more, i’m afraid, well, because, well, when a person visits a plant in colorado, suddenly decides to joke like this with the workers, i don’t know about you, but i... i don’t remember anyone ever making such jokes, hi nick, you know, my marine has a code that allows him to blow up the world, you don’t have nuclear weapons, no, but good, that’s how to treat it, commander-in-chief, well, that’s how it is, but it’s just kind of creepy, dmitry, well, yes, i think that i’m the only one of mine...” a university friend wrote : you know, he says, most of all i’m ashamed, for what? i say why, he says, for jokes about leonidovich brezhnev, right now, and me too, but

you know, i’ll probably start with kissinger, and this was of course an enemy, it was a very deep enemy, who at least thought about the mechanisms by which the world develops, but it was an enemy with whom one could play chess. this does not mean that he played chess according to the rules of chess, this is not entirely true, but one could try to play chess with him, unfortunately, or fortunately, we will only find out, so to speak, in 5-7 years, that’s if it will all end without what was promised big war, then fortunately, and if not, well then unfortunately, the day in the west , not only in the united states, but in the west in general, there are no politicians left who not only know how to play chess, they know the rules, but

who play chess, these are, of course, some very frivolous people, shallow, who think most of all about how they look on the tv screen, no, of course, pr was not alien to kissinger either, he understood it, and he loved it . he built what is called a biography for himself , also constructed, but at least he i thought about what the consequences would be for his, first of all, country, the rest there interested him less, but that’s what i thought, and he always the main term that he used in his political scientific career, by the way, it was the term order, yes , he wrote about the new world order, he wrote about diplomacy as the basis of the new world order, he wrote about rare containment as the basis of the cold war order, that’s what he saw in the last years of his life, i think that for him it was scary because he

saw how the american-centric order began to be replaced by american-centric chaos, and he realized that there was no next one. there is simply no order, but there are people who personify chaos, these people have “made in usa” written all over them. moreover, they stuck this made in usa on all noticeable places, but in this sense, you know, a certain legacy of kissinger, as a man of order, it will grow beyond the borders of the american-centric world, after all, this idea of ​​some kind of balance, as a condition

development, she, well, first of all, he’s all about her... made a certain contribution, yes, based on the interests of the united states, which generally needed to get out of the deepest political crisis, the geopolitical crisis of the early seventies, let's not forget that when we say that kisinger is such a whipper, let's not forget that he was one of those people who pulled the united states out of a very deep place, perhaps, not counting today, from one of the most it was one, he was one of them, but from these people, but that the idea of ​​order, as a condition for development without war, she in general, he begins to master quite a

wide range of skills. in the world, by the way, it is visible, by the way, under, well, i don’t really like the term global south , it’s still a kind of phantom, it’s very different, but nevertheless, the very fact of the appearance of this term says that they also want to streamline the global south, so that africa is not a territory of genocides of constant internecine wars there and so on, but some what are called developing elements, this is such a thing, very strong, and i think that this will be kisinger’s legacy that will outlive, perhaps even united states, but at the moment that i would like, with which i would like to conclude , look how, after all, inside every large and outgrown empire or system, a gravedigger is born, well, for example, the same nasim taliban, he says:

i don’t like them, yes, i have a bad attitude towards them, they destroy trust, all this is understandable, but the sanctions that the united states introduced to maintain the integrity of the american-centric economy, they were the first impetus for the destruction of ties, that is , what is called economic interdependence , which were beneficial united states. the gravedigger was inside, now we are seeing an attempt to create several very different information post-realities for different countries of the world, for the usa, one for europe, another, for the mediterranean and in east asia they are generally pushing some completely different picture, this is also an element of the destruction of american-centricity, they were so proud that... the entire information society, that

they created a single agenda for the whole world, and this agenda is controlled from the state of california, where it is actually registered the company that owns manages, by and large, this internet, which seems to be no one’s, and then it turns out that it is someone else’s, as it were, someone else’s, yes, to the question of who runs the world, there is no need to look for reptilians there, where is the certificate of ownership, right? reptilians where they are, well, you don’t need to give them away, but god forbid you find them, and then what to do with it, then you’ll have to live with it, you never need to explain, obvious screw-ups, a secret box, yes, that’s me so-so i say, well, but it’s they themselves who are destroying the unified information world, do they understand this, no, they don’t understand this, well, for example, here’s the next and perhaps decisive moment... they created capitalism, they create capitalism that

operates according to political rules, according to the rules of political expediency, they imposed it on the whole world, in particular , they imposed political capitalism in their world where it had never existed, for example, in the technological development of technological competition, only they thought that they themselves would manage it, but it turned out that the technological centers you can... there can be a lot, they were not ready for this, and now a very simple question, in the hydrocarbon sphere, they created, there, however, political capitalism has always been there, right? but they created political capitalism out of such an absolutely obvious thing, and what they didn’t achieve is that brazil is seriously considering joining opec plus, but this also destroys the american-centric system. in this sense, we are now, to some extent,

kissinger’s death is symbolic, at a stage when the gravediggers of the american-centric system, americano. you thought we were strengthening you, but we are gravediggers, we are now going to kill you, this is of course, such a very interesting process, but i am afraid that it will be sick, i think that we need to prepare for the collapse of the american-centric world, it will affect everyone, here... by the way, i have a cooler proposal, it’s somehow frivolous to say that kissinger persuaded me to meet, and i met, because i have a cooler

proposal, kitty cher persuaded me, and i said , didn't find the time, didn't find the time, y me at me. and now i’m a little ashamed now somehow i feel embarrassed that after all the old man left, well, in general, there is room for development in this direction in terms of image, but this is just a note in the margins , you know, well, of course, a smart stupid enemy and so further, well, all this is true here, of course, well, but if i say so, about the essence of the matter, then, well, the professor touched on it, you need to understand that i think so, this is my point of view, i’m ready to discuss it, debate it, but in in principle,

kisinger saved the united states from death, in early seventies, here he is the real savior of america. he gave america 50 years of life, here it is in his so to speak, this has a very high price, but no one seemed to realize this, yes, neither in the world, nor, above all, in the united states itself, that this life was bought was a very high price for the americans, because, by the way, you know, when they now say that it was a friend of china. they speak completely sincerely, in the sense that they beat the americans at the moment when it was hard for america, they had no way out, they got out of america everything they needed, chinese comrades, this one, if it weren’t for the entire

volume of colossal, gigantic american investment there inside, then i can say that, well, not china would have had everything same way, this is civilization. yes, but nothing, nothing that we call, so to speak, the chinese miracle, would have happened in this form, this is the first , so to speak, price of the issue, but yes, it made it possible for the united states to resist when they have almost no chance was, second, this of course, well, he is the king of deception, that’s it, and since he worked with the soviet union, this is the main technique of deception here, let me remind you that we considered that nixon and kissinger came with surrender in the year seventy-three, in the seventy-second, sorry, well, i misspoke in '72, yes, that's because they brought, they brought two things, well, the reduction of the nuclear threat, the treaty,

the second main statement, which in our ideologued, so to speak, to the point of madness, space was considered incredibly important, well how we signed an act of cooperation, in which, which testifies to the victory of the soviet union, but they wrote to the americans that the ideological difference is not a barrier to building relationships, interaction, the economy of everything else, oh america recognized what this means... .. ideology, what a victory, what a victory, well, by the way, it’s interesting how their heads were structured in general, and how they generally thought, how they looked at... it, because when they inhaled oxygen and received

the chinese position, they received a financial scheme unrestrained non-repayable lending, when reagan declared us an evil, communist empire, exactly almost 10 years later, well, or nine there, but i don’t remember exactly when reagan said this, in my opinion in eighty-two, but all ten-third, eighty-third, yes, when he announced us. in which the ideological difference is insignificant, well, in principle, it’s like , well, no way, how fast everything is, well, no way, yes, and this is very interesting, because, you know, on the one hand he is the king of deception, on the other on the other hand, he really did what he called realpolitik, but he did not consider it a deception, this is what he considered realpolitik,

because in fact, in this act he actually stated that we will not destroy you for communism , what does communism have to do with it, it doesn’t matter, it matters for you, but it doesn’t matter for us , let you be tsarist russia, well, whatever you want, we have a vital need to destroy you, but i won’t tell you that. do you want to say this about communism? okay, we we’ll sign about communism, but then everything will be different. and in this sense, he was, well, this was real politics, because the soviet union was destined, so to speak, both the soviet union and russia, for destruction, regardless of his ideological preferences, by the way, the nineties, the two thousand, but that’s all definitely confirmed. and by the way, we received this knowledge, which is very

important for us, that the anti-russian orientation of the united states is not connected with any ideological preferences, by the way, about autocracy and democracy - this is exactly the same as about democracy and capitalism, these are all bows , they have nothing to do with the matter , because the condition for the survival of the united states, as they understand it, is the destruction of russia, that’s all, and this is real politics , real, and kissinger understood it in exactly the same way, no matter what he said, well, it didn’t work out with china, by the way, with russia he didn’t, no, in the trend, in the long term, yes, in which, in which he pledged , it didn’t work out, it didn’t work out. that's because the performers let us down, no, not the performers, not

performers, volodya, non-performers, his position, you know, i can be here , but he would have to tighten up his positions all the time, markov was not around, yes, you see, i’ll turn to our culture here when in the film brother -2, so you deceived, well , tell me, yes, so you deceived and you think you are stronger and you think that you are stronger? it’s just that everything becomes clear after some time and the price of the fact that they opened up china, well, this opportunity, literally flooded it with money, they themselves flooded it with money, so it will be ahead, you know, there is one, well, they have it there this is trump, these are difficult realtors, you understand what they are discussing there , life is a supermarket, you can get anything, anything, well, remember that when you leave the hall, there is a cash register, well, you

can get everything, that’s it, therefore, therefore, for me, for me, kisenger is really the man who saved america, if not for this whole scheme that he created in the seventies, history could have been completely different, in this, probably, sense, but only in this i mean , yes, you can say that well... this person indeed, so to speak, well, he intervened in the historical process, yes, in fact, in fact, everything else, of course, must be considered in the same historical process, answering the question, what are the consequences of this, because russia acquired the knowledge which she didn’t have, although it was very difficult for her, she got rid of, by the way, a lot of illusions, because after the ideologists there was something else, yes, that they will accept us, that we must come... not just this it’s not a question that ideology is stopping us cooperate, it’s not for us, now if we

remove the ideologies, then we will become a part, this is gorbachev. this is gorbachev, she doesn’t seem to interfere with our cooperation, it’s already become clear, well, let’s remove her anyway, in general, we’ll remove her, so we’ll just become part of a single whole, that’s a single whole, and that didn’t work out either , this knowledge for russia, obtained with blood, the most difficult trials, historical knowledge, is now very important, we stand on it, and it will form the basis of our final victory, so what has america come to? well, she got china, now they openly call it their main enemy, well, they don’t dare, although some call it their main rival, the future of america turns out, they themselves think so , depends on what happens to china, how

interesting, really, is the future of america it depends on it, that’s what they say about it. this is what will happen to china, and of course , world hegemony, kisenger, of course, said that well, russia, historically, it should exist there, but i think, i think that he, like a realist in his understanding, knew for sure that words have very little meaning, and he explained to his people in america, there is no need to shout about hegemony, about leadership, about how you indicate something to everyone there, there is no need, just be, in words say something completely different, as i said in the seventies, well, learn, i said in the seventies that i want to be friends with everyone, but what did i do, i saved america, and america got this chance,

and what are you doing, you are yelling that you own the whole world, but you are ruining... so to speak, the american position, really, to ruin the american superpower, in this sense, yes, i think, i think that kissinger was such a realist, but will there be anyone who will save america a second time, i don’t see, in this situation, i don’t i see, well, no, here now if there is a re-advertising, if i may, i’ll say a few words, in my opinion, kisinger brought to america that cruelty that was not in america initially, because there was not a single serious crime on the big political arena in the time of kitjer, which would have passed him by, carpet cuttings in vietnam, which we recalled the destruction of dresdan, cambodia then also bombings, the same cambodia, the terrible massacre pakistan carried out, the overthrow of salvador allenda, for him there was never a question at all, there was no,

any blood was in the interests of the united states, any blood. destroy anyone, why do i say that if there is nothing for it, no, well, he, he came from a friend, exactly, he was exactly, for him it was not important, he was sure that nothing would happen for it , that's why when they already tried, remember, when he spoke, there were attempts to carry out a citizen’s arrest, when he spoke there in congress several years ago, that is , these were the same questions, that is, our kisengers see such a gracious old man, and a grandfather, and kistenger generally did not care about the lives of anyone except the americans. yes, in fact, he cared about the lives of americans as much as it was necessary to sacrifice someone, he would have sacrificed, why do i say that there were simply no people worthy of cruelty with a cold mind followers, because now the blood would flow terribly, for kissinger it was not even a question, if in the interests of america it is necessary to slaughter as many people as desired, well, it would be named, look,

they were found, in this part everything works, ukraine, this same example. no, no, well, sent to the slaughterhouse is not even close to an example of this, because if it was kisinger, then ukraine would have received the most terrible weapons in the required quantity to carry out the most terrible crimes, the americans would have bombed themselves, and the americans would have been bombed themselves , that is for him, as you know, don’t overextend it, for him it was, don’t overextend it, but yes, no problem, an interesting interlocutor, very tough, pragmatic, just don’t need