[000:01:00;00] yes, or take this question, now israel is suffering colossal economic losses, not only because it called up people , resettled many, but there and so on and so forth, i say, 260 million dollars a year, the official statement of the israeli ministry of finance, here now they are finding out that huge expenses are being incurred due to the fact that merchant ships cannot leave the port of ilad, they used to be the main port from where israeli ships sailed to africa, it’s very convenient nearby, but wait a little we actually exist boats that can sail 500 km, and we can also operate there in the eastern middle earth, which is scary, just think about it, but

the israelis say, this is our first time in ko yemen, that is, israel shoots down a houthi missile in space, that’s just, well, it’s not even completely yemeni, it’s houthi, yes, well, that’s it in general, that is, it’s horror that speaks , so it turns out that the houthis are like elon musk, they’re pushing musk into space, everyone is screaming, the houthis are going into space, well, me. they create these rockets using handicraft methods, this rocket, when it says, a mask, and we are here in a handicraft way, space, and there is an institute for studying the problems of rocket science in the rank, just think about it, they are studying the theory, listen, this is the missile that hezbollah is now using against, the burkan that i said, yes, this is a houthi missile,

they, that is, they made it and by some miracle, it doesn’t get anywhere, yeah, they added it flies 300 kg of trotine equivalent, 500 kg, well, who would have seen this, no one dmitry, yes, well, i won’t comment in any way, this is really very interesting, that's all what is happening now in the middle east, for me this is an illustration, here it is the 21st century, it is not at all what you thought, but since today somehow we are still talking about kissengers, i still don’t understand something i agree, although a lot of what was said is true. and you see, what’s the matter, politics is such a thing, indeed , that’s what kisenger brought some clarity to when they say about him that he is the father of american foreign policy realism, so realism is a cruel bastard, exactly the same there as gravity in famous anecdote, well, to this day, i think america doesn’t understand that he saved it, that’s what dima said in 1968, so that you understand where this whole situation, as it were, came from, also the elections, everyone wrote about that in

the united states. that america and the west are losing the cold war, for sure. it was an absolute feeling from everyone that we were done, we were done for. our economy, our economy is not to hell, the joint power of the soviet union and china will simply squeeze us over time. there is no hope for the europeans, that's all, that's all, they already then they were right about this, well, apparently, yes, as it were, well, but so to speak, well, everything else , asia, there, well, no matter how much we bombed, it ’s pointless, everything, and moreover, from vietnam we need to leave, because inside, and then it must be said that america did not yet have the structure to create a contract army, and the army was not volunteer, conscripts died in vietnam, conscripts died, this is how the situation is, so to speak, so he deployed the whole this situation, he turned america out from under this completely terrible seizure, and separately made a truly chinese project, a separate soviet project, he offered different things to everyone, to the soviet union he offered more political, as it were, detente, to china he offered economic

things, as it were, to the soviet union and china, he simply separated them, everyone divorced, on this matter, moreover, the detente itself, this detente, this is an amazing thing when we talk about ours. western non-partners, that this is our diplomacy and politeness, they perceive our weakness, so do i a counter question to the leaders of all generations of our country, what is it that we perceive them as love for us? this is a forced action. moreover, here is the lesson that needs to be learned from kishenger, look how much they survived from this detente, you will notice what the result is, the french ruin, well, yes, this is what we call détente, they call it french. yes, as if in a borrowed word, not quite french, this is not even a truce, this is not peace, friendship, this is just détente, how long have they survived from it, didn’t hit the head, so to speak, they survived a lot, moreover, i can say the next thing, in my opinion

, that’s who was definitely an anti-communist and then suddenly decided, so to speak, that you can also be friends with communists, it was ronald reikon, he was such a very sincere person in his own way, unlike kisenger, by the way, he sincerely hated the soviet union, then he sincerely fell in love. well, he liked it when they loved him, he liked this kind of acting about him, he liked it, yes, but he was criticized our own people, who supported their entire lives during the eighty-eighth visit, listen, in the eighty-eighth year we had a chance for another détente, but only we squandered it just like the détente of this year, well, there was already a well-known screwer then, listen, there were famous ones here, there were bison here, so we wasted everything, we sat on the oil needle, we gave up half of the middle east, it’s true, well guys, well, you can’t use the connections that he showed us, then there was politics inside struggle? listen, in america then had an internal political struggle that almost ended with nixon's impeachment.

and this did not prevent these people, nevertheless, transactions, i don’t want to offend anyone, our fight of bulldogs is under the carpet, you know , impeachment is not the worst option, half of the political leaders were impeached, one way or another, well, in the sense that ours- then, we knew very well why... and don’t forget what else happened, for some reason no one was mentioned, the seventy-first year, that’s what you haven’t remembered yet, here’s an advertisement, and then they’ll remind you, donkey , me, dog, cat, cockerel, they called themselves the bremen musicians, the fab five, this is my group, why have i never seen you, and the princes?

i actually sing too, you clearly need a rebranding, temporary musicians , grab them soon, so what happened then, yes, the seventy-first year, the so-called abandonment of the gold standard, is inextricably linked with everything that was done and nixon and kissinger, in fact this is certainly not a departure for the gold standard of the gold standard... it never happened, what the soviet union did in 1944 bretton woods signed, everything meant that everything was tied to the dollar, all currencies set the corresponding mutually agreed rates. in the seventy-first year, nixon abandoned the mutual agreement of these very agreements on these rates, of course, inflation is understandable, an attempt, by the way, even to regulate prices, but we essentially, in fact, now have no idea what inflation really was like in the united states back then, it was double-digit inflation at its peak reached 18%, this is... by the way, the rate there right away, yes, the rate, the rate went well under 30%, that is as if at 30%, nabiulina still has to learn to study, here, but this is not told , well, here, in such a situation, how would he act, and the most interesting thing, the most interesting thing is that they swallowed this too,

because by and large, what nixon did and kisenger did not understand perfectly well that without this it was impossible to get out of it, it was impossible to finance all these conflicts, one simple thing had to be done, i understand why our modern... financial leaders do not do this, but why the then soviet they didn’t, i don’t understand either, it was necessary to clearly charge the united states with a violation of part of the un charter, which were the brattenwood agreements, what is this about now? bratenwood accords? i'm not talking about this, who is who? the soviet union could have intentionally presented this then, in order to present it, they had to know it, it was known, it became known immediately, no, uh, no, we then had a completely different structure of institutions, the system of analysis was different, it was necessary to approach, and when they approached, they told you. and you are a young man, will you sneeze? you komsomol members have appointed, or maybe you are trying to drag us into a complex provocation, or maybe you remember how soviet times were, you first came there in your academics to the international department, skaks, there sat such a serious mushroom-broom, who

looked at you like that with a serious look, he said, you’re a young man, what are you talking about, let’s have some tea, in general, in general, in general, yes, even then, unfortunately, everything was vulgar, where it was convergence, not convergence, convergence is another idea, which, by the way, is in the eighties, even before gorbachev, they began to teach at the highest party schools much earlier, convergence as a postulate. all worked, this is a consequence of the gentleman, so, so it’s curious, everything, a curious thing, because in fact, assenger, yes, he, he, he made a lot of people, by the way, disagree with a lot of political forces, i understand correctly , that of all of you, the international department of the central committee spoke, probably only the two of us, yes, that is, well, no, i served, i still, we still managed to catch, no, i will not repeat with we are working with this international movement.

kissenger, in fact, having, possessing, possessing very, very bad cards, postulated one simple thing, yes, but you were already familiar with them, yes, yes, yes, by the way, i really agree that the ideology was absolutely not important for the united states, the only person for whom it was important was reagan, in this whole situation , and he had his own idea, absolutely, he had a purely religious baptist idea, so to speak, and this is absolutely accurate in this sense, but when it was generally stated that in fact... there are great powers, they have interests, let’s play, it really wasn’t a deception, well, kisenger didn’t send spies so that we would rebuild our program for building the automobile industry, or rather ruin it then in the seventies, well, he didn’t send it, he didn’t send it, so to speak, it’s understandable for people to let us ruin agriculture, that’s how it was, it was ruined then in soviet times, who blames the kitty for this, well, well you kind of

deceived, well listen, there’s a problem. deceived deceived, you know, that's what deceived deceived, that means he said, but in reality it was b, nothing of the kind, deceived , communicated, left, and the child is growing, yes, that's what i deceived, yes, by and large, i can say this, this is one of the main problems of ours, in this situation, that we are very good in times of conflict, great, we always lose peace, yes, peace and even... truce and even less détente, that time we lost détente, in fact the memory of kisenjer, that how much he has done for the united states, china still thinks, fir-trees, would such a person really know, i think this is often due to the fact that we then did not even imagine our enemies, exactly, why are there enemies here, but it’s very simple, because in order to make reasonable movements, you have to forgive me, by the way, kissinger had a very good phrase on this topic that the great powers are like two blind fighters, in a room where everyone thinks that this is his rival, sees everything wrong and has

vision, but here, this is not the point, for me, i got a very simple impression from this whole thing, that even if we had not acted differently in the international arena, but simply engaged in internal economic development, it would have worked, everything with detente would have stopped completely, if we couldn’t, well then, why then say that gorbachev betrayed something if we already do. well, really, well, this is a separate topic, but the fact that our economic theory at that moment was already very lame is true, we neither knew ourselves nor the enemy, of course, this hello, what was called, don’t know, don’t know the enemy, okay, but i think that the most important lesson in general from the entire time of foreign policy realism, which, so to speak, actually ended, and now... ended completely with the death of his godfather

father, this is, of course, what is needed, regardless of which enemy is moving in which dark room or somewhere else, that the first and main focus should be never to miss the fact that any time of conflicts, truces, and détente and anything else, you need to use it to speed up our own development, but now we understand this very clearly, now it’s very interesting, because for the first time, well, in a long time , lavrov is present at a meeting in the osce. at the same time, of course, what the little brothers are doing, well, it’s just disgusting, since maria vladimirovna zakharova was on the plane, they decided to ban the flight through the territory, that is, they, in principle, and maria vladimirovna very accurately wrote , violate international law as such, that is, they now believe that it is like air space, and maria writes correctly vladimir, we can play back, and damn, which one of you is now?

over our territory, where, when he can fly, well, they don’t fly like that anymore, no, well, in any case, we can do it, but now let’s talk to brix, and in general, wash yourself with the south, and of course, sergei viktorovich performed brilliantly, i i liked it when someone tried to tell him something, he put them in their place in good english, and then switched to good russian, could you please leave me alone, thank you, and so on in russian. this is what sergei viktorovich said, in general, every word was right on target. any unbiased person understands that it is serious and honest to resolve issues of european security like this? it won’t work, but the western capital with an enviable obsession is pursuing the osce’s chances for revival, they have already created a european political community, without russia and without belarus, thereby drawing another dividing line on our continent, destroying the osce space. the initiator

of this venture should think carefully about how their children relate to those noble ideals of the charter of paris for a new europe. colleagues, traditionally it is customary to end speeches at our meetings on an optimistic, positive note, but now there is no particular reason for optimism. the osce is essentially being turned into an appendage of nato and the european union. the organization, let's face it, is on the edge of the abyss. a simple question arises: does it make sense? to the objective realities of world development to once again become a platform for considering the problems of regional security based on the principles of the helsinki final act, primarily the principle of equality of all participating countries. so far

there are many more questions than answers. well said, sign every word. i would just say that. i won’t talk about the act, but when i hear the hilsinsky act, i start looking, yes, today a lot of words were said about kisenger, but it seems that today we have despised the principle that the deceased is either good, or... either good or bad or nothing but the truth, the classic phrase sounds exactly like that, well, yes, if not in in the greek version, in the generally accepted everyday way, in our culture, and you know, there is another country that i expected to be mentioned today as one of some, well,

not projects, probably not, but objects of american games for sure, of course this is the turkish republic. i have a good idea of ​​what is happening in turkey and in television studios, outside television studios, what they are saying there, i assure you that at that very time, turkish analysts are standing and talking in exactly the same way about where, how america manipulated turkey, how it framed turkey, how kissenger stood behind the scenes a simple question: military coups in turkey for many years, they were carried out regularly, in turkey the belief is that behind so many of these military

coups, either the americans were directly or so or otherwise they provided them with information. support, right up to the last coup attempt, which, as we know, happened in 2016, behind which turkey spotted the traces of the fugitive preacher fethullah gülen, who lives in pennsylvania, who lives on a green card signed by the former director of the cia, every turkish child knows about this , about military coups, but there is another side to the issue, literally in the spirit of this very triangle policy, that was not enough, they were played very much in a certain sense, at very early stages with the project of political islam, which turned out to be literally the opposite of these military coups that were carried out

by the turkish military, generally speaking, i immediately i will say that very serious america has put its hand into the process of training turkish military personnel, very, very many go there for internships, to write master’s and other dissertations, this is what it is like... the public there is very seriously uprooting it now by recep erdogan, that’s political islam, here, political islam is another project that has now received the most unpredictable development in the middle east and, generally speaking, this project, which has gotten out of their control to a certain extent, is again very much on television now tourist studios say that they played with political islam, as a result ricep type erdogan came to power, it was believed that he was an american creature, so he came out, got out of control. and is now pursuing its own policies. there is also a third result of their games in turkey, these are games aimed directly against their northern neighbor, against the soviet union and the russian federation, everything related to the monument. so-called, again the project was conceived in different ways, fascist

germany began it there, generally speaking, in the era there before the second world war throughout the second world war, and then the americans picked it up to use it against the russian federation, there is another project, the patriarch of constantinople, about which semyon arkachi brilliantly spoke about how the americans demolished the reasonable one and brought in the unreasonable one, immediately after the war. yes, this is a separate story, the factor of religion, which, by the way, fit very well not into their ideas, into the ideas of rizep erdogan, because they thought that , well, now the country will be torn apart from the inside, turkey will never be strong enough to to return to their previous position, so a man was found, recep type erdogan , who actually established, albeit fragile, but some kind of fragile control over the country, 50 percent there, plus something, integrating in a paradoxical way. in his ideology , he integrated everything from the above, literally everything, political islam, and pan-islamism, pan-turkism, everything, anything, into this, now this

project is beginning to live its own life, and he has already lived to see that turkey , generally speaking, behaves very impudently and defiantly towards the united states of america, which became especially noticeable in the example of the last period of their relations, well, during the course of the palestine-israeli conflict, for what it’s worth... mentions in the turkish press that hugging netanyahu is for biden - this is the most shameful photo of the 21st century, the 21st century is not over yet, but the shame is already, and the shame is already impossible to hug, but just like that, so so turkey is such a project to a certain extent or an object of turkish manipulation , when they they were playing something that they don’t understand, because there are americans in turkey, of course, the americans, you said, the turkish manipu of the american, american manipulators made a slip of the tongue and they are now fighting for some completely incomprehensible player who has

a lot of seal and ambitions, who adopted the rhetoric of the global south, spins it, and so does edek, and there will be more surprises for the united states of america, at least everyone saw footage from the american inzherlik base, and what the protesters were doing there, there were already words from the minister of internal affairs deeds to the american ambassador: take your dirty hands off the turkish republic, and there was a lot, a lot more, so it’s interesting in all respects, the american legacy, including, i’ll emphasize, a lot of what i listed today are actions directly personal henry kissenger , who is remembered in turkey and exactly at these moments now they are also remembering it like this in the studios, well, then we need to remember him, the kurdish factor, oh the kurds, yes, yes , of course, the kurdish factor as a factor

of the region. greek factor when they they are arming the greeks against the turks, they are militarizing the islands in direct line of sight from the turkish republic, also trying to somehow pit them against each other a little like this, what a difficult time we live in, a truly difficult time and the logic of historical development tells us that... such, finally someone has found the logic of historical development, development has a logic, but people who are trying to implement this development, sometimes, if you look, especially at our dear beloved ursulas, borely and others, there of course, there is no logic, but if you abstract a little from this madhouse, then you can try to unearth the logic , but indeed kissinger was a titan of international politics and we talked a lot about him today, i kept wondering who he reminds me so much of,

ottofunn bisburg, the man who actually made germany from well, second-rate, second-rate prussia, one of the leading powers in europe, then germany was also in a deep, protracted crisis for about 50 years, since then, how napoleon in 1806 liquidated the first empire and divided it there, created the union of rein, then all these german principalities were shaken, then by the napoleonic wars , then by the revolution of 1848, here comes a young, ambitious man who knows what he is doing, he is still there when he was not 40 years old, he said, lord israel, beware of this man, he knows what he is doing, the war with denmark, the war with austria, the war with france, the confrontation with the then all-powerful vatican of the kamf cultures, and here you go, the proclamation of the german reich in versailles, in fact, a case... it was possible to do something similar already in the new realities of the 10th century, but indeed, having pulled america out of

a fairly deep crisis, but it is true, it should be noted that. the starting positions were different, of course, the starting position, kissin came to power in the country, well, not to power, he came to serve in the country, excuse me, alexander, you know, i think that’s not right, sasha, after all, you know, kisinger doesn’t live up to bismarck, because bismarck filled the entire internet with his own people, and it’s unlikely for him it will succeed, wait, wait, believe me, a few more years and kisinger’s quotes will also be on every corner, on every internet, i don’t believe it, if only for third place, respectively, but the logic of historical development also lies in the fact that after the political titans political dwarfs or political impotents are sure to take their place, this was in germany,

bismarck is replaced by the absolutely faded and lack of initiative chancellor leo von caprivi. after which germany's policy changes strictly to 180°. then they still understood what it meant to change by 180, and not by 360°. accordingly, in the usa the situation is somewhat different, but now seeing the degradation here of politics, primarily european, and of course american, well, yes, grandfather of course made a very powerful joke, this smells only worse than the anecdote about reagan and zvoytsakh yeruzelsky, i was not just afraid, what will biden say, now, do you want me to show you how it works? let's open the suitcase now , let me show you how it works, something like this, something like this our dear beloved scholz is teaching us approximately in this spirit when he says that germany is on the threshold of such a powerful technological revolution, which is comparable to the industrial revolution of the 19th century, that is, the industrialization, the collapse of virtually

its own economy, the company... century, the bass closes its branches, michelin is closing a third of its factories in germany, the steel industry is shrinking by 40%, and this is called on the verge of a grandiose technological revolution, green energy, hurray, well, not comrades, but to me i like it, but steinmay flies in, and it turns out that no one is there, he says, but i arrived. he says, who are you? he says: i am the president of germany, he says, and you, what kind of president of germany, a man comes out, stands there, looking for the family, they say, and someone will meet me, and he says, did you pay for the marhaba, if you haven’t paid, no one will meet you, no, well, there was a korau , there was a korau, there were no greeters, there were no greeters,

there was a karau so that he wouldn’t leave by accident, that ’s god willing. wants to punish a person, he deprives him of his reason, and here we get a collective punishment of the entire cultural-historical type of the european type, and really, why meet with steinway if they have such a chancellor? what can the federal president say, but the figure is purely nominal, he hands out awards there, badges there, in rare cases he represents the country as such an erzad minister of foreign affairs, but with such a minister or there as her minister, they say the eminent mrs. berbock, the figure of steim generally seems comical, not, well, of course, the level of degradation, it’s so surprising, in general, how should i dedicate a program there, what happened, i was talking today, guests came from america, he was at the nightingale, and he spoke the idea that is now very widespread among such american, conservative

traditionalists and revolutionaries, and takira carlson, this whole group, the power was stolen, that is, the power was simply stolen from the american people, and the same thing in europe, yes, because we are witnessing the absolute degeneration of the mechanism of democracy, it is not there, no, it exists, in this -problem, it exists and it’s great it works, the only result of its work is that it makes it possible to regularly bring in the next bureaucrat, spitting on the will of the people , this is self-service, a circle where the will of the people has nothing to do with it at all, but the people do not choose scholz, of course, look, in france , yes, that is, thanks to technology, a person who is by no means the most popular is brought to power, and if he comes to power where there is still some illusion of elections, and then through the party, yes, like holland, then a frenzied hysteria begins , mechanisms are turned on to deprive people , all there is also a real possibility, what i