in fact, what is happening around serbia and kosovo fits, organically fits into the trend that we observe within the osce. first , agree on something, celebrate the achievement of the result, and then watch how , first small, and then major sabotage begins. i gave you as an example the fate of many agreements that were reached under the osce umbrella, then the west methodically destroyed them, in the case of serbia and kosovo, i remember how the european union is a great mediator in many situations, on call general assembly, he really wanted the un general assembly to specifically appeal to the european union to help build bridges between belgrade and triština.

it was solemnly announced that an agreement had been reached on the creation of a community of serbian municipalities in kosovo. 10 years ago nothing happened, the people who were appointed to lead this heartland in pristina categorically refused and continue to refuse to implement this agreement, and what is the european union doing? do you think he somehow... demands from them behave decently, no, he demands that serbia change its position, he has already composed a new document on the community of servis municipalities of kosovo, which is strikingly different from what both belgrade and prishnina signed 10 years ago, this is very similar to many of the agreements both in osce documents and in parallel the serbs are told: you want to join the european

union, you have been in line for a long time, yes, that’s right, we will not open new chapters for negotiations until you join all foreign policy decisions - the european union, including sanctions against russian federation. this is the power of persuasion europe has. and for now, for now, we will not accept you either, until you recognize kosovo, at least well, do not recognize kosovo, but support the admission of kosovo as a member of international organizations. is this serious? this is about the same thing, this is what is happening behind the wall now, where , where they are bargaining, for how many months who should be extended in these positions, that ’s why i, i’m very worried, frankly, for the people of the heart, because back when i worked in new york, i have

to come, as a representative in the un security council, to come to bosnia, to croatia, to the serdska region , i was in belgrade, i saw what was done to belgrade, those people who are now leading it, it wasn’t there in ninety-nine, it was, that means, as the magazines, american, english, expressed it then, now i don’t remember verbatim, but on the covers there were slogans that... the repentance of serbia will cleanse the serbian people, something like this, well, i see that a similar line continues, not only for serbia, in relation to republika srpska, in relation to those who think about interests of their own people, and who wants to preserve their own human dignity, as politicians , unfortunately, there are fewer and

fewer of them left, everyone else is moving in the direction that was once proclaimed as the end of history, liberal world order, everything fits the same mold, one commander, everyone else is in the wings, we do not impose anything on anyone, it is up to each people to decide what to do next, the fact that the european union has degenerated is obvious. it was created as a union of countries that together, they wanted to improve the well-being of their citizens more effectively than povrosas. look at what the funds from the so-called european peace fund are being spent on now. listen to what the diplomats, the great ones of the european union, say, what the leadership of the european commission proclaims, which by and large.

when member countries begin to wonder on the basis of what powers the european commission decides for member countries, i am not calling for the european union to fall apart, these calls are not necessary... i’m just stating how they behave countries that have declared themselves a model, the crown of democracy, there is no democracy in the european union, there is discipline, drill, in my opinion, even worse than in nato, or rather better than in nato, please, komsomol truth, this monday on... you said that the chances of saving the osce are small, now after the osce meeting, in your opinion, the chances have increased or they have decreased, thank you, the chances have increased, but not but not for saving the osce,

but deutschevel, please, no, you know, i just want to say again, that’s the main thing, many different feelings arose yesterday and when we talked in the corridors, and today this feeling is strengthening, the most important feeling is indifference to something that in me, for example, causes indifference in relation to what will happen to her next. unlike the german authorities, we respect representatives of the media of all countries, please give the floor to the german press, please. i didn’t want to, i have a question: today you clearly said that you do not believe in the bright future of the osce and so on, you are talking about collapse

organizations and so on, you are saying that maybe the organization no longer plays its key role, do you plan to leave the organization? please quote me correctly, i said that i don’t care how the current osce meetings end, the agency, well, you, i don’t know, where did you get your journalist education, you asked the question whether we plan to leave the organization, i said, quote me correctly, and my quote was that i don’t care... how will the current osce meeting end? you see, i, but i know that in germany it’s customary for members of the government to tell journalists what they should write , well, here we still respect our journalists a little, we leave it to their

imagination, how they will to present the results of the press conference, this is not true, no one speaks, but do you still know how to speak russian? yes, please, taz agency, and to whom, who were not allowed, to ask a question, well, they don’t invite us at all, but tas, please, sergey viktorovich, does your arrival in the spear mean that the west is beginning to realize the need to talk with russia, and can we say that in this sense there was some kind of sucking up? you know, i’m glad that you... asked the question, because it was very funny for me to read in various media, including, by the way, in ours, that the poles did not invite lavov, but the macedonians invited him, well, this is a bit by substitution of concepts, when

a meeting of the osce council of foreign ministers is held, no one should invite anyone anywhere, the country that volunteered... to be the host of the annual chairmanship, she simply has the obligation to ensure the participation of all ministers and those accompanying them, including, by the way, journalists, which did not happen here, and therefore even in this, in this presentation, of this topic, in the fact that poland didn’t invite, but macedonia did, and even this shows the perverted nature of the activities of the organization, which was previously called security and cooperation in europe, you see, they slowly, like on other, various issues, hammer into public opinion that here

we can invite lavrova, or we may not, they don’t have the right not to invite anyone, there’s no need for an invitation, the participating country just announces, here we are flying on such and such routes, on such and such flights, kindly provide your host functions, that's all. please introduce yourself just louder, louder. we have talked about this topic many times over the past few years. president putin, well, in my opinion, there is

not a single big speech of his where he is not asked this question and where he does not give an exhaustive answer to it, once again i will say that an agreement was reached at the end of march in istanbul, after several rounds of negotiations, which were three rounds of belarus in my opinion, here is the final round in istanbul and the fact that this was exactly the case, that it was possible to agree, was recently confirmed by a live, direct a participant in these negotiations, who now heads the zelensky faction in parliament, david arakhami, he was one of the members of the ukrainian delegation in istanbul, he said in a recent interview, yes, we were ready for everything, we practically agreed. and now he said something

like, in retrospect, i understand that there was a lot to gain for us, but boris johnson came and said, no, let ’s fight again, everyone knows that, we talked about it many times, but now the ukrainians themselves have admitted it and admitted it, so far we haven't seen any, any gna. we don’t see either from kiev or from its owners that they are ready to move on to the political process ; moreover, zelensky signed a special decree a year and a half ago, which prohibits negotiating with the putin government, so that this is a judicial matter, he is not going to cancel it, and if you listen to what they are talking about, and what all

the secretaries general and nato and the european union are saying, they say only one thing, that we are obliged to support ukraine, because if ukraine tolerates defeat, then it will be a defeat for the entire west, they have recently begun to add more. and after ukraine, russia, putin will go to the baltic states, poland and other neighboring countries. this was not said by some marginal politician, it was said by the head of the pentagon, mr. austin, he said that russia will not stop in ukraine, so we do not have the right to lose in ukraine, they do not hide the fact that they will lose or win, they are waging a war, that’s why.

so that it’s like in tango, but the guys from the other side, they don’t dance tango, they have to be a soloist, and of course, we want to understand the answers to the questions that were repeatedly asked to our western colleagues, including yesterday in my speech, i quoted the constitution ... contains a description of the duties that the state of ukraine guarantees, i quote, russian and other national minorities, to promote consolidation and development.

the ukrainian nation, its historical consciousness, traditions and culture, cultural, ethnic, linguistic, religious identity , the narrowing, content and scope of existing rights of freedom is not allowed, there can be no privileges on ethnic, linguistic or other grounds, the right to education in one’s native language is guaranteed , if someone compares these... current obligations, current guarantees of the ukrainian state with what they are doing in relation to the russian language, in relation to russians. ethnic russian citizens of ukraine, i just don’t know why no honest journalists are doing this, in particular our german colleagues, they never thought about this topic at all, or maybe they did, but didn’t say anything, not a word, they haven’t published a word, for example, since february, and

as soon as the coup d’état took place, they announced it then. germany, france and poland, whose ministers put their guarantees on the settlement agreement between the opposition and the president. the oppositionists did not care about these guarantees and seized power. we then asked our germans, the french. colleagues, how come, why didn’t you call the ukrainians, the ukrainian oppositionists to order? they didn’t answer us anything intelligible, they just kind of hinted that, you know, democratic processes sometimes take on unusual zigzags, something like that , by the way, approximately, not approximately, in

the same 2014 there was an attempt by the state. in gambia, there is such a country in africa, an attempt was unsuccessful, but the us state department made a harsh statement that the united states will never agree with those authorities in any country who come to power through unconstitutional means. compare, in the same year there was a coup in a state called yemen. and the president of yemen fled. arabia, for many, many years, the entire progressive western community demanded that he be returned to the presidential chair so that he could continue to rule yemen. they spent 7 years achieving this, and then made some decision to create a transitional presidential council, but when we

they said, why does the president of yemen enjoy such support from you? and president yanukovych, who was overthrown, and who is also an absolutely legitimate head of state, a member of the un, why don’t you demand his return in order to start the political process again, they answer us, but he left kiev, he left kiev for kharkov, everyone knows this well, there was a congress of his party, but this still does not justify our western friends with their double standards, it’s just that in ukraine they needed this... anti-russian, neo-nazi coup, in yemena had to fight for the regime that existed there, that’s all, so, well, i quoted you the ukrainian constitution, that ’s what the adviser to the head of zelsky’s office,

mr. podalyak, says in may last year. i am for the kharkov, lugansk and donetsk regions to completely forget the word russian. the ambassador of ukraine to kazakhstan, officially, while giving an interview, said, i quote, we are trying to kill as many russians as possible, the more russians we kill now, the less our children will have to kill. end of quote, anyone influence. those who are there in the kremlin, they will end badly, i don’t know how, but i would like to quickly , they definitely will not end with their deaths , interestingly, i can continue, secretary

of the security council of ukraine, danilov, everything will burn and burn until everything is burned moscow. ermak, the head of the presidential office, russians, these non-humans, do not have the right to be among the civilized citizens of western countries, that is , in one sentence he wrote down everyone else, except the west, as uncivilized. the west somehow said at least something based on its such historical achievements as he presents himself. leader of the whole world, the west did not react in any way, so zelsky, finally zelsky, is asked in an interview with some western media what he thinks about those people who ended up in the east of ukraine,

who refused to accept the results coup and these minsk agreements were concluded with these people, he says, but you call them people, because there are different ones, there are representatives of people, not all representatives of people, people, there are individuals, like you have this russian charge, no one paid attention, well, finally , the crown of zelsky’s position, august august of the twenty-first year, there is no special military operation, quote: i think for the future of your children and grandchildren, if you love russia, understand that in the name of your children and grandchildren, you already need to go look for your place in russia, get lost, this is the man whom

the western political elite calls the hope of democracy and the man who is fighting against russia for european values, values. countries of the european union, what’s also surprising is that the issue of ukraine was not the first, not the second, but the seventh, i’m very afraid that they will forget about it, but we won’t let them know, please.

ask a question, yes, yes, louder , anton zolotnitsky news, sergei viktorovich, zelsky, said that ukraine is moving to the construction of defensive barriers, structures along the entire front line, what does this mean in your opinion, that kievsky the regime actually admitted defeat, refused, and also read the news about it. i'm just coming out because the leadership of our special military operation knows what goals it is achieving, control of this operation is carried out on an ongoing basis by the supreme commander-in-chief, and we do not see any looking around, if only for the sake of returning these people to execution. from its own constitution, and so that finally, the western press , or something, i don’t know, makes some kind of noise about this, how can it be that

the decision that lies at the basis of the ukrainian state is violated, simply trampled on in practice many times, all free media somehow they remain silent, in fact, just like those who are responsible for the osce for media freedom, for national minorities, for human rights and a democratic institution, remain silent. yes please. serbia signed last year's agreement on foreign policy. serbia has been a source

of inter-ethnic clashes and serious instability, at least for the balkan countries, including kosovo, and recently there has been armed aggression against the serbs in northern kosovo. with minister silakovich in new york we

signed a plan for consultation between the ministries of foreign affairs, where it is written that january is being met. i know that after this plan for consultation, no one hid anything, there were journalists, serbian, russian, who were filming footage, washington immediately heard such a cry as you dared, the serbs were told, to sign a plan for consultations with russia, which is the aggressor, so now it also means, it has settled in your head, that this is political alainment, policy coordination, i beg you very much, after all, if you represent the media, which you consider respectable, but do not

let your masters down. yes please. there were reports that us secretary of state antony blinken attended a meeting with israel's national security council. how can you comment on the facts of such meetings? and the fact of unconditional us support. i think this is precisely an example of policy consolidation. well, in fact, in fact, what is happening is that the situation in the gas sector and around it is very difficult. statistics that are announced by both the leaders

of the un and various... death toll civilians, the number of dead children has already exceeded 6,000, more than 400 women, and we have spoken out on this topic more than once, we have condemned and categorically condemned the terrorist attack on israel on october 7. but we also categorically cannot agree that terrorism can be fought by any means, including gross violations of international humanitarian law, our israeli colleagues are well aware of this, and the same position is taken by almost all other countries that are not indifferent to this region, i listened.

a statement by representatives of the united states and anthony blinken, including, at least as i watched this morning, aljazira news, and it emphasized that the americans are calling on the israeli leadership to minimize the consequences for the civilian population, well , this is probably the minimum that can be done. but we tried to go a little further in the security council immediately after the start of this situation, when it followed a terrorist act - a military operation began, we proposed to declare a humanitarian ceasefire in these security areas, we this was not allowed to be done, the united states was against it, then

brazil put forward a similar resolution. similar, the united states vetoed it, then the countries of the region, well, first of all, arab and muslim countries, introduced a draft resolution already at the un general assembly, it was there, it was, i’m not bothering the girl, no.