company, cameron comes there , gives an interview, what does he talk about, so i don’t interfere, i don’t interfere in the internal life of the united states, but now the issue of life and death is being discussed, the issue of the fight for ukraine, it is necessary, it is necessary to give this money, because otherwise , it didn’t help, otherwise, otherwise , now volodya, otherwise , american and british people will die, i heard this, this one was already on... yes, they say this all the time, this is it already there is, and the fact that the entire administration, sulivan there, well salivhan was actually there, when he spoke about this, i even looked at it like this, he decided to threaten someone about the fact that the stakes are too high, and the consequences are too serious to allow the minority in congress to hold ukraine’s funding hostage, this is not a threat to us, this is not a threat to anyone else, this is a threat to the republics. to the answer, everything is fine

, you know, here i am biden in one thing, wake up, no, in one thing trump, so to speak, i can, in two things trump could be condemned, this is, that he didn’t imprison her, well, no, hillary clinton, that would be an indicator, the second is that january 6th. climbed onto an armored personnel carrier and refused and disowned the freedom fighters of the united states, this is the game of the damned globalists, the globalists are international, but on the other hand it is very interesting, because america just shows elements of democracy, because look, in europe this is not the case, in in europe, power has already been firmly seized by the brussels bureaucracy; the elected people have no chance to influence anything. america. that is, for them in general

sullivan, blinken - this is nothing, this is nothing , because in principle, for a congressman , behind whom his voters stand, these little people, they mean nothing at all, but well, well, it was always right, for a congressman , for senators - this in principle, the people who are involved in foreign policy in america have always been people of the second class. there is now another movement there, it is, so to speak, going in a more positive direction, we just notice the federal level, there is a state level, for example, now in texas there is, there is such a movement, the texas national movement, that's what it's called , which stands for the freedom of texas, for a way out and being alone from this, yes, it, it is the heir to this movement, there was a party like the republic of texas, of course, well, when - the republic, they sentenced

them to 99 years in prison for this, so now you can hang out the freedom of richard mclaar, who is sitting there, because in the most democratic country, there is, well, the constitution does not say at all that states can secede , the supreme court adopted a decision to completely prohibit any state from separating from the federation, so in fact, a movement that, any movement at the state level that speaks of the need to secede, that's what that mclaren said, says that in principle we were annexed by the united states, therefore the united states the states should give us 93 three dollars, freedom, freedom, and we are leaving.

signatures, and this means one simple legal thing, they, in my opinion, have primaries somewhere in march or something, in texas there will be republican ones, which means for these primaries the question can be raised whether the state of texas should secede from the united states, texas will be free. the united states simply can’t do that, so we need to monitor the elections, excuse me, there are 400 warheads , if only if these warheads, biden really declared war on us, that’s what he basically said, yes, volodya, war was declared on us. no,

no, no, no, no, there have always been nuances here, but excuse me, when the enemy is first used in relation to us by the high military command, and the english language. rich and when the term enemy is chosen, before they didn’t allow themselves this, no, yes, they didn’t allow enemy, there were all sorts of versory, yes, but enemi, this already means they are at war, and biden didn’t mix anything up, and this is not biden he said, this is the problem, he said the minister of defense, they didn’t, this is the minister , what the military called us, the simple fact is that they didn’t put it in the documents, and they always did, now now it’s all very serious, serious, of course, because it's time to measure the area of ​​the states. because for administration, the current administration , the situation is very, very difficult, and how will they get out of it, well, this is the most unpopular administration in the last 30 years, yes, and i don’t remember why in the last 30 years, i would say so the last administration,

which was, even i would not have nixon, but johnson, when he refused to run in march of sixty-eight, before that he was quite decent, it didn’t help, well, maybe, well, you can bet, they turned onto the american road, that you need to know the enemy because if the enemy you don’t know, you don’t understand where it came from, so you need to know the enemy, you need to know it well, you need to clearly understand that many of the things that happen in our country are connected precisely with the american election cycles, for example in war, we clearly understand what is happening , when the shells were delivered there, when they receive them, what they receive, what does this have to do with the elections, and this is the ability to predict, i want to remind you how the great

russian chemist, and not only dmitry ivanovich mendeleev, when he was given the military tasks to quickly develop the topic of smokeless powder, which he did, right? turned to russian intelligence, which from a nearby factory figured out what railway stations there were and handed over a list of how many cars were coming with what, and then it was enough to simply adjust the formula, and if they didn’t know what was happening with the enemies, they wouldn’t pay attention to little things, we would miss an important technological leap, so you need to know the enemy, you need to study the enemy and not hesitate to strike, it helps a lot, preventive helps a lot. what do you like better: sarmatian or posedun? so you know the enemy, but not the train schedule. and if you don’t know the train schedule, then you won’t know when the enemy will arrive at your border. well, i understand that vitalich will be against it, but i still, i ’m still talking about the united states, the only

thing i can say to justify my charges is that they are in general, given the election cycle that they have , they practically never leave it, it’s the president, especially a member of the house of representatives in general... yes, well, in fact, the elector immediately begins a campaign for re-election, he thinks about it all the time, and i also agree that, in general, america is the last western country of democracy, where there are real interests behind the politicians, remember, we had such a definition of democracy in 2000, 2010 , that in fact democracy is a mechanism for coordinating interests, no matter whether they are public, business interests, or whatever, that is, it’s like, well, a society has been built. on interests, well, in a sense this is true, well because we all have some kind of interest, we we all want to participate, if we want to participate in the state, this is also typical for russia, by the way, we also don’t want the state to be built separately from us, so to speak, but in america it is a country of classical western democracy,

it is the last, so to speak, which is probably, uh, now destroying this democracy in its own country, in europe it ended from the very moment the structures of the european union became stronger, here it is true, when officials began to manage everything. but if we talk about what we know about the enemy, well, look, regarding the package, still , to make it clear, probably yes, as i understand it, dim, this is not about the fact that it can’t be cut into pieces, but that someone will come out and say, no, let’s as if we would give up on this altogether, well, of course, now it’s already cut into pieces, it’s actually already, yes, it’s been cut into pieces, i had a question in connection with this, i explained it myself, in the program, here with vladimiravich soloviev, and where they tried to exchange the border with ukraine. well, like the border for the republicans, but ukraine for biden, and it didn’t work out, moreover, after this white house came out again, after this wonderful meeting broke down, so to speak, in the senate, then in the house of representatives, the white house came out and

said that it would not agree to tighten migration measures in exchange for ukraine, in exchange for money for ukraine, and i understand perfectly well, i explained this whole thing myself, that listen, well, there are...' leftists in the democratic party, who simply will not forgive either biden, or chuck schumer, or any democrats in general, for what they allowed, relatively speaking , they even wrote a letter. that they won't allow it at all toughen the migration regime, well, here ’s the question, listen, still, probably, it would be possible to persuade, but if ukraine is such a fundamental point, if they are still going to, well, if not win, then stick to ukraine, listen, but a lot -many billions, which means many, many shells, missiles, training, tanks and everything else for ukraine, it was probably worth it to put a little pressure on the left, to promise them something else?

i'll make a guess, there may be different considerations, including those that i said that politically it is now suicide, the left has turned everything away, but maybe they don’t consider ukraine so important now, unlike emigration, because if they start to cover up the issue of emigration, they actually finally decide on their main electoral bases, or as they say , the nuclear electorate, and ukraine, maybe they already think that it doesn’t matter anymore, that it’s already useless, well... which means that if, especially in the pre-election year, that is, that in

is the election year worse? i understand that vitali, i’m annoying you to no end now, but nevertheless, what’s worse in the pre-election year is to end up with a 180° turn in migration policy or lose to ukraine, it depends on which states you’re fighting for, no, for any, the question here is clear, you can’t lose electoral bases, and ukraine didn’t care. states, and trump, if he comes, whoever

will take his place, well, of course not nikiy, sorry, but how do you like this little nuance, you know, it seems to me that the fate of leopards also began to slow down very much, it first slowed down abrams, so to speak , at all orders to keep away, which is what i 'm getting at, because it also seemed to them that hamers were a game changer, when the percentage of hamers shot down went over 80, they realized that they couldn't sell an elephant, when they saw how they were being burned, they suddenly realized that if they now strike a blow at one of the main sponsors of almost all electoral processes , the military-industrial complex, it will not be so hot, at all, well, the military-industrial complex in general, in principle, is there in the united states, it’s kind of a complicated, complicated matter, quite obviously, which is not only for military-industrial complex, for a whole range of political structures in general, political ones, so to speak, clans of families there and so on, to show that weapons... are at least equal to russian ones, if not worse, but that’s all, that’s a bummer, they put such a bet on this matter, it’s one thing for trump, who will say

you’ve ruined everything, you’re all production, there ’s a trillion-dollar budget, but there are so many of them, and here , being russian, it’s completely different to be in the establishment and get this, well, in connection with this , and what will they do, well, in my opinion, if now, of course, they really don’t give money to ukraine or give it in a very reduced amount, and then of course they will blame everyone for this, us, congress, republicans, republicans, of course, here... trumpists, well, that means that they they will need to do something in this situation, if they manage to cope with the discord in management, no matter who the president is, relatively speaking, someone is obama’s henchman or trump or someone else, well, of course, an era of competition will begin, what he was talking about, so to speak, both biden and trump were talking about it he said, in this sense, they are similar , well, firstly, the first thing they will need to do, in this era of competition, is not to let this other world, russia and china, all join, maybe there will be two or three regions , doesn't matter. but this world finds mutual understanding, not to allow them to become equal in technology and access to critical technologies,

and for us it is just as critical that we should not lag behind here, we cannot, like under the soviet union, pretend that soviet means excellent and really lagging behind in technology , and in no way, not only in military there, some other space ones, but also in everyday life, so to speak, because now the world is more interconnected and you can’t untie it, so to speak, like then , anyway, even... it means that this noxious smell of the best technologies leaked in, this is still such a thing, in no case should we lag behind this, moreover, on the contrary, we must get ahead, we must get ahead, because we are catching up with them, we are ahead of them, we are displacing them from the position of hegemon. what else are they trying to do? they won’t try not to give to build human logistics, this is already being done, china has seas there, nianma, which means that taiwan here in this sense is already acquiring not a symbolic meaning, but a directly logistical one and a lot of other things that will be done, moreover, almost certainly now

the search for ways to block there is access to the same ground technologies, transport , that is, not to be given...' now they will build supply chains, and where they can be destroyed, this will be the nicest thing, so the next one will be a war for this, i don’t think, by the way, i don't think so, by the way that they will stick around in the north, they simply have nothing, 100% they will stick around, well, what, they are now building their icebreaker fleet, i ’ll tell you sometime in solovyov, when i have a lot of time, so as not to take up, it’s really funny , well, that is, even submarines of this class, so to speak, are new... not funny than that, but realistic, maybe, maybe, so let's look at it as it is, no, maybe in this sense, as if it were necessary, we must wait from everywhere, they are now taking the polar countries, they are taking them away, and what what’s the point, they’re already cooperating with them, no, no, no, now that sweden is ready to host american equipment at seventeen sites, plus they’re not even against

nuclear weapons, a movement is starting there, well , let’s do it, logistics chains, they will try to break, you must keep in mind that this is. it is in the common interests to build them now , in the common interests to defend them with joint forces, this must be directly stated as a program, because this is what they will try to do, they cannot win and destroy us, they can’t change the regime , they can’t do anything else, but they can do this for a long time, while constantly balancing the rewards of the belli incident, as they think they are doing very well, now the next thing, well, about financial bombs i’ll just say very briefly, financial bombs are laid under us , just so as not to irritate the presenter , we repeat this every time, but carthage should be destroyed, but not in my program, not every evening, there is no need to destroy anything here except the united states , that means, but also such a moment, of course, is to try to destabilize that eurasia itself , they perfectly understood that the de-americanization of eurasia is underway, whatever their torch, their lighter, zip can reach, they will try to set it on fire, that’s

actually it, they seem to be leaving, weakening , but they set fire they set fire, but here are four challenges with which, with which we really. i’ll start with the united states and ukraine, and the closer the defeat in ukraine, the ukrainian troops, the closer there is a change of regime, and it feels like some kind of unpredictable, difficult to control for the americans, the harshness of biden’s statements somehow correlates with this, which indeed means threats of war. and so on, isn’t the biden administration and biden personally facing the most direct defeat and failure, these days, now, in december, in january, because the feeling is that if we lose in ukraine, if peace lies in ours conditions, then the entire structure of the democrats is collapsing, and the republicans are not bargaining

only because they understand very well that they have a lot of chances to shake biden and... that’s why this is all happening now, yes, well, indeed, if they shake him up and such severe polarization, i don’t remember the exact poll numbers, but in my opinion , the majority of americans are confident that there is a very high probability of civil war in the united states war, that is, on the one hand we have democracy or an attempt to build democracy, on the other hand, the inability of states to secede from the united states, in total this gives a real civil war, that is, if, well, maybe these are hypothetical reasoning, but really... the world is after a large emission pumping, after the fact that most countries of the world, holders of united states bonds, are leaving these bonds, in fact , they are draining the dollar very quickly, the world is on the verge of a very large recession, it seems approximately what happened in the nineteenth, that is , the beginning of the twentieth, these are all factors, they intersect, and indeed the united states is facing a very big challenge, perhaps

collapse, indeed there are several thousand nuclear warheads, something needs to be done about this... most likely, we are entering a parallel with the departure of this hegemon into a big fight of all against all, and i think that the world should not only be fair, but the world should...

a line with india and china, that is, only, apparently, russia has this line to build a conflict-free world, not only a fair but a conflict-free world, because well , the sino-indian conflict is not going anywhere, and so on and so forth, therefore... it’s like this whole structure is being built here here on the show in that including, because the united states is busy with its own problems, china has certain difficulties, it seems to me that every chinese leader, not at all with the thought of hegemonism, gets up in the morning, but thinks, how to give these people jobs, that means how to ensure there, so that they have housing, cope with all sorts of different crises and so on, well, a few words about china, we came out with statistics today, we have overcome the trade turnover of 200 billion, we have 218 billion in goods... this is a very large amount, we are essentially , excluding hong kong and taiwan, we came in fourth trading partner of the people's republic of china, these are just colossal changes , well, in parallel with the forum

held by vtb, there were inscriptions in english in chinese in three languages, quite rightly, that is, one and a half billion is a quarter of humanity or a little less, but still i want more from interaction with the people's republic of china, last year officially investments from china to russia accounted for half a percent, this is very little, it is impossible to invest if there are a lot of barriers, from language, simply not you can’t find a translator in moscow, there are no personnel , no, heads of representative offices, there is nothing that means visas, but there are still no individual visas, kazakhstan has opened visas , malaysia has opened visas for the chinese, you just come, they set the standard, singapore opened, and we somewhere to the side, and there are a lot, a lot of such barriers, but we won’t wait for any investments, of course, something must change here.

but europe is completely dependent on the people's republic of china, a lot of production is jointly owned with china, and china exports important and goods that the european union cannot do without, chinese investments, this is the port of hamburg, the port of perea in athens, and so on and so forth, and china speaks very politely with ursula fondern, realizing that elections in the european union are very soon and they have... that is, there are great opportunities, by the way, both in the american direction, well, to take such a position, i won’t say influence, he will not influence, but to take such a position so that the right candidate comes, and ursula vonderleen

understands this very well, so when they say refuse, in general, the main thing is what the purpose of the trip was, to convey a letter from the owner from washington, that stop being friends with russia, otherwise we will impose sanctions on 13 of your companies, china is not afraid of this, china is ready to impose retaliatory sanctions, because it will not allow this to happen to itself , to leave himself, to be shown who is his ally and who is not, well, in principle, this line was clear, i did not expect anything else from sidinpin, but since the man is polite to the highest degree, he, of course, let them in, that is, on the threshold, accepted, means i talked to them and sent them to having mastered it, there is no need to expect that there will be any pressure on us from china, it is our friendship that cannot be destroyed in any way, the strategic course towards interaction with russia, it is such, let’s say, a strategy that has been verified over almost a decade.

the fact that now there are no rules, that it works in the economy, the system is one’s own, someone else’s, there was a lot of talk today about what other economic interventions there could be in relation to the russian federation from the west, all this sounded, yes, when i started my career, as an outside sales associate, yes, it always surprised me, people come from abroad, from foreign missions , they are greeted, a clearing is laid out for them, he says he came back from the front line, that’s when... he asked, i also asked in my youth, listen, where are you in spend your vacation, probably abroad, they looked at me , excuse me, like i was an idiot, firstly, not a vacation, but a visit, and secondly, not

abroad, people. that's why, because in soviet times everyone understood very well what was happening in the economy, what was happening in the economy there are continuous wars, and that they are ready to eat us wherever they can, well, i’m not sure that modern foreign trade figures are taught this very well, and i ’ll talk about this a little later, but nevertheless, nevertheless, here this was and i , this is me, this is in the visit of vladimir vladimirovich putin, he clearly saw that when he talks about economy, he also talks about values, he says: we do not perceive you as a market, we perceive you as partners, this is a fundamental, fundamental difference , that’s when i too am with our foreign partners i work a lot, they say: this is your fundamental difference, this is your very important advantage in our eyes compared to the west, the west everything works with excel tables, buy sell, there are exports, imports and so on, you speak a different language to us, this is the language, i think it needs

to be replicated. we need to convey it in all possible audio-visual ways to our foreign partners, unfortunately we have problems with this, and yes, i would like to talk about them, problems, as always, with our soft power, we have enough a large number of large corporations that successfully operate abroad, earn very good money there, in the global west, now they are expanding globally for very good money, why not give them more workload, you know how there is... workload restores new regions of russia, the burden is on our soft power, so that, conditionally, i’ll say about turkey , yes, so that on the shelves of turkish stores there would be books, modern russian literature, so that there would be films, content, and so that these our values, they would be there, because yes, we know how to make money very well , our rossotrudnichestvo there is struggling with the small budget that they have, they just published a book about the great patriotic war, thank god,

they brought in ankara, he played an opera , a symphony concert in leningrad , wonderful, it went very well, but that ’s not enough, it’s a drop in the bucket, so give each corporation a load, you ’re responsible for dostoevsky, you’re responsible for lermotov there, you’re responsible for pushkin, so so that at all in the languages ​​of our partners, who else is ready to read all this, perceive it all, it all happened, otherwise it comes to the point of saying funny things, and the next thing comes to funny things, in general, here again vladimirov putin says that here we are, yes, we are values, he, he, he, he is one of the most popular politicians in the middle east, i always joke that if we put him forward for the election process now, i don’t yet know who will win in individual middle eastern countries, so here we are he promotes values, why can i conditionally read the book of rezeptagan in russian , a more modern world is possible, but why can’t i, why can’t a turk, conditionally

, read a book express... publish, so the turks came to the russians, give money to publish the book of vladimir vladimirovich putin and statement, there was no money, no one, to be honest, exactly a week later, a direct line with the president of russia, i’m talking about this soft power, about giving a load, why are they earning money on the shelf? dollars continue to there is nothing on the shelves, why i don’t understand why give money for this if the book will already be sold and make a profit, this is not charity, this is a reasonable investment, a reasonable investment, but a percentage, half a percent, a pretty penny from turnover, if you, and the instinct of self-preservation in people should work, if the image of russia is positive, if we are better understood, well, probably, well, well, if this kind of moral and ethical logic does not work, then logic can still work pragmatic, that they will know us better

, so they will...more will buy us better, for some reason this doesn’t work, in a week i’ll pick up the line with the president, honestly, i’m so eager to dial , ask a question, ask, yes, i will ask, i’m taking advantage of the opportunity to ask now, maybe i’ll call again and ask.