and those terrorist attacks that, unfortunately, were associated with the death of people, this is a former deputy of the kiev rada, well, to be honest, it seems to me that this is still very relevant when a country that is waging a difficult struggle against those persons who perform terrorist attacks, would abolish the moratorium on the death penalty, i don’t at all...

look how very safely they stored the drugs, you can be sure that they conducted clinical trials on unsuspecting people. african swine fever again in sumy region, cholera in ukrainian nikolaev, new cases of batulism, in ukraine.

vaccines and medicines for these diseases, which they themselves brought here. hello, i am boris akimov, and i am oleg stepanov, and we, the creators of the russia 2062 project, the headquarters of free thought. together with experts, we are discussing how we can develop the russia of the future in the next 40 years. we'll see.

president, the time has come to sum up the results of the year, and the president himself will do this, there will be not only answers to journalists’ questions, but direct communication with citizens, and as always, we will show more than others. results of the year vladimir putin on december 14, at 12:00 moscow time, the president will answer questions from citizens and journalists live. representatives of the media will gather in the program studio, and you can ask your question now through the moscow website. putinu.ru by phone 8

800 20040-40 or via sms to number 040-40.

well, those who want to live in our country understand that it’s impossible now to try to change - in some way - this power to well, that is, no, no, there is no adequate person who can lead the country, plus, of course, it is clear that for vladimir vladimirovich himself , the outcome of this fight is fundamental, this is his fate in history, in world history, he has many achievements, but ultimately his assessment in world history will depend on whether we win this fight or lose , so to speak, and, accordingly, we, together with him , are a country, so of course, we can only wish him success in this matter and avoid those,

of course, many dangers that he will have to overcome, i think, by the way, the most the main danger, i don’t know, i...

i think there will be socialism, i think that we, you know, in ours, we have developed some kind of this, this, this is kind of a legacy from the soviet period, i here is a soviet person , but i think that in this sense it doesn’t seem to work very correctly for us, because in our country, as soon as we say the word socialism, we immediately think about the model that was in the soviet union, which, by the way, , worked in some... but in principle this is only one of the models of socialism, the thing is that capitalism

there are a lot of models, there is american capitalism, there is japanese capitalism, there is swiss capitalism, and there is mexican capitalism or guatam.

well, yes, because that was a completely different story, but i remember well in 1975, not a single hundredth telephone, and not everyone had one, by the way.

at some point they realized that they had screwed up, by the way, apparently, that is, not apparently, exactly

, when the gas pipelines went in, we gained access to europe, of course, europe is always the main one, as it were, well, now asia there has been a turn, yes, but still europe is rich, there are products in europe, in europe you always need to go there, strictly speaking, what are gas pipelines, that they blew them up, because we really came up.

it’s not possible to defeat russia, then , of course, the question will arise that guys, we need cheap resources, and if this question arises, it will of course be a defeat for the united states, and if both republicans and democrats understand this, therefore in this sense american capital, as they say, as they say, it is absolutely united, i am absolutely i’m sure he’s counting on the republicans to come and change it, no. this is the same, because for them the most dangerous thing, as they say, is to lose europe, and they

can lose it if russia really comes out with its trade, so all they do is cut us off from everything, so we are looking now, so to speak, there, the way to the east, by the way, they always did this, i read here , it’s interesting, eger, there is such a historian, a very important one, this one from the 19th century, he... when he describes the war of 1812, he says: what's the main thing napoleon's mistake? the fact that he went to moscow, and not to st. petersburg, because the only access to the sea, as he said, the only european part of russia was st. petersburg, if he had cut off st. petersburg, then he would have been able to overthrow russia, but he went to moscow, which was not of such fundamental importance for so to speak, all this in my opinion is a rather deep thought, so i...

don’t need it, they already border on this, on europe, they have the black sea, from here, that’s all, all, all ukrainian, all ukrainian separatism and all their independence, it again comes from their inner feeling that they can be left without russia, by the way, an interesting question, indeed, is why napoleon did not go to st. petersburg, yes,

look, it’s interesting, he has this in his plans it was, at least... it just said that a blow had to be struck there, not through moscow, he explained, he explained himself, that the russians are some kind of wild, we are used to it, they took the capital, everyone surrenders, so the capital is st. petersburg, he, he, by the way, he, excuse me, he actually sent a corps there, in my opinion macdonald, by the way, is underestimated here , he was defeated by bernadotte, in my opinion, no, not bernadotte, he stood there,

if he had gone to st. petersburg, then the second and third armies would have carried out the plan ; he wasn’t going to reach moscow, he could lies before, this was the main mistake, well , firstly, tarmasov with his own, tarmasov of his third army was not in the aisles at all, i beg your pardon, there was schwenzerberg’s corps, these were the austrians and the eighth corps, naturally, but the question is different, why in general, in that direction there was an attack, someone the idea of ​​invasions was possible.

didn’t fight in that period, it was necessary to defeat the russian army in 2 months, and moreover, according to the plan, if the army had come forward, it would have been defeated immediately, why, why did you have to go across the niemen, since that’s what we’re talking about speech, that is, listen to him, well, if it didn’t bother a person to seriously think through, think through the operation of invading great britain, yes, that is, preparing a very complex naval operation there, then here it was.

such competent historians, i still want to return to our affairs in ukraine, here on this week the washington post newspaper, by the way, the democratic mouthpiece of the democratic party burst out with a whole series of such revelations from my point of view, well , i’m not going to comment on the first two articles about planning, the passage of operations is analyzed in detail in your ... programs, too, i have there several things that were, well, let’s say, a revelation for me personally, well , the fact that the americans planned everything from the very first day, the entire course of hostilities on the part of ukraine, well, in general, this is such a polishaneli secret, but newspaper confirmed washington post and not refuted by anyone.

secondly, this is the famous offensive or counter-offensive as it is called. i kept thinking that it was the americans who imposed this tactic of using strong battalion groups to probe the front, look for weak spots in order to develop success, it turns out not , it turns out that the americans proposed a completely classic version of the direction of the main attack, concentrating all forces in the zaporozhye direction with access to melitopol to the coast of the azov sea for 2 months, and the ukrainians, here zaluzhny for some reason decided that... this was wrong and this was needed, which in the end did not lead to anything, and the most important revelation for me was there in the last paragraph of literally the second article that... the commander in chief of the european command general kovali for weeks could not get through to zaluzhny in order to agree on something and

get some explanations why we all focused on general mil at that time the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff committee. a very important figure appointed on a rotating basis, yesterday there was a ground soldier, today a pilot, tomorrow.

chain of command: president, minister of defense, commander-in-chief of the unified regional command or special command, such as strategic, space special operations, and so on. so, the person who carried out everything, let’s say, planning, operational planning at the operational level, supply, they made the decision to supply equipment, all the logistics. this is at the commander-in-chief of the unified european command, advisers, specialists, they are there conducted eight command and staff exercises to practice this special

operation, this is the responsibility of the commander in chief, the united european command of general kavali, and the fact that he could not talk to his ukrainian counterpart for weeks, for me this is actually absolute nonsense , because mili, i say again, he... has no distributive functions. why couldn't kovali talk? maybe because, in fact, we were just telling the truth, and zaluzhny was seriously wounded, so for several weeks he just i physically couldn’t speak, okay , well, there is no zaluzhny, there is sirsky, but someone is replacing him, it doesn’t happen that he was injured and, well, that is , zaluzhny himself, that’s why i wouldn’t have talked to syrsky, but what is needed is that he could not , so to speak, coordinate his actions , this is absolute nonsense for me, and i believe that in this...

hamas, because it is capable, so to speak, as the authors of the article write, of forever ruining the relations of americans with the huge

muslim, the arab population and the middle east, the whole, the whole world. stray musicians, we don’t have a bright leader , a legendary musical quartet and an irresistible trumpeter, this is my group, where were you before, why have i never seen you, i fell in love with the princess, but the king interferes with our love, we can’t do without deception, for tempting vaults will not replace your palaces.

a dog, a cat, a cockerel, they called themselves premensky musician, premensky musicians, i actually sing too, soon.

thank you too. thank you very much for your dedication to the values ​​for which we live and for which we fight, i am pashto-afghan and i am russian soldier, have the honor, they look at this glow of our donetsk every night, it beckons them, we don’t let them in and we won’t let them in, lie down quietly, i’m trying to motivate.

ukrainian soldiers, i urge you to lay down your arms, we don’t want to sweat idlely, we watch to know everything about russia, historical series, we watch, we watch in the application or on the website.

moreover, a possible or impending russian offensive, yes. the best solution, of course, would be to start peace negotiations, achieve a ceasefire in both cases, but possible or impending russian offensive federation on the ukrainian front, casts such plans in great doubt. well, a few words, i want to say a little about technology, well, first of all, minister...