an important person, everything is fine with my daughter , she is a normal girl, just like everyone else , and the girl is repentant, it seems like they drove her to paris, we’ll eat an oyster, we could forgive her, but according to the law, siberia is supposed to be, siberia, siberia , yes, i’ll cut out your tongue now, we won’t hang you, we’ll cut her off. i would tear you to pieces with horses, lackey 2, where are you going, drown yourself, soon.

and we return to the celebration of constitution day, today marks the 30th anniversary of the dream...

the adoption of the fundamental law and now reflections on the constitution of director vladimir side. hello, i'm director vladimir bortka and i'm from st. petersburg. for me, as for you, i think the most important thing is.

well, let me remind you that such calls under the article of the criminal code of the russian federation entail a long term of imprisonment.

yes, the population of a national republic or region understands that such actions imply very significant costs in their lives, therefore they do not allow these plans to be realized, hence the conclusion. if the collapse of russia in peacetime conditions is practically impossible, then the defeat of russia, the military operation, will lead to her dismemberment and death, why. its dear neighbors have strived for centuries. i must say that the special military operation currently taking place does not raise any questions for me, because we are talking about the restoration of the historical integrity of russia, the unity of its peoples. and it’s not just about the liberation of the people of donbass, the return of the ancestral russian lands, the core. deposits of our

state, without which russia is a land cut off from its mother base. what was lost must be returned.

democracy is a form of political structure of the state that involves the involvement of citizens in the electoral process, where the main element is the ability of the people to elect to change governments through free and fair

elections. if the main emphasis is placed on the key word, the government is replaced, then in russia the picture changes dramatically. well, for example, maybe the country was ruled at least for some time by a democratic elected teaching assembly, who chose the interim government or those who replaced it bolsheviks, how they were elected and whether those councils were elected at all, on whose behalf they seized power, whether it happened that at the congresses of the cpsu, during an alternative vote, party members replaced the general secretary.

not in hatred of us as russians, in the unacceptability of our state system for centuries, associated with authoritarianism and totalitarianism. how ugly it sounds, and yet it happens, why? due to the structure of russia, which has not changed over the centuries, acquiring various state forms, but always remaining, if not...

but the essence of power remained the same, absolute totalitarianism, and this basis cannot be different, otherwise the state would collapse. why is it that, a little later, the emerging state of the ussr, born on the basis of the most western progressive ideology at that time, remained totalitarian, everyone was obliged to share a single point of view, just like the countries of people's democracy, by the way, maybe i'm wrong, but it seems that the russian federation that replaced the ssr is. an authoritarian state, that is, with appearance of a democratic system

and existing economic freedom, citizens cannot and should not encroach on the inviolability of the supreme power that holds the state together, so it’s not a matter of russophobia, non-acceptance of our state system, but once again, why russia is like this, let’s consider, in addition to other differences, countries there are...

in fact, the ruler of them did not want to defend this state, the interests of the king and the elite diverged. it’s funny, of course, but the ussr collapsed for a similar reason. in the structure of the monarchy lies its purpose. in this case this fuck was vividly embodied in the image of the weak tsar nicholas. the actual personal quality of a monarch is anyone’s achilles heel.

into the territory of the russian empire of a national republic and region , contributed as much as possible to the identification and consolidation of the national elites that were part of russia ; in fact, it raised and discharged them; it is incredible that these elites would accept a representative of the house of romanov or anyone else as a god-given monarch, a spokesman for their interests, and therefore the interests of their peoples. and what's on territory of the former empire, marxism, and not a parliamentary republic

, triumphed, is absolutely logical, since marxist ideology turned out to be the most suitable ideology for cementing a multinational country, an ideology that unites all its many peoples with one goal, building the most just society, an ideology that is not interested, or at least , which should not be interested in nationality...

there can be no universal equality initially and never, one is high, the other is low, one fat, another thin, one smart , the other, alas, not so much, there cannot be economic equality, and as soon as the communists in the ussr began to lie to themselves, strive, at least officially, for universal economic equality, understood as equality of poverty, so one lie raised another. and the path to the fall has begun, there cannot be universal equality, but everyone must be equal in receiving the most necessary things for life, ensuring equal starting conditions and a standard of living worthy of a person, for we, humanity, must be glad

to see the light of any human individual and must provide living conditions. independence from his physical and mental abilities. undoubtedly, if a person wants to survive and exist further on the planet, then this will lead him to attempts again and again to change the existing order of things, built on the law of the jungle, on naked violence, the rule of the strong, only. but what happened happened. as soon as... the ideological component that held the country together, the ideological state, was removed collapsed, it was a victory for our historical opponents, who understood that it was impossible to break russia from the outside, but they did it from the inside, not without success, practically repeating the technique that destroyed the russian

empire in 1917, and they also acted through decomposition. the ussr. why did the ussr collapse so easily? he was betrayed by the top leadership of the country. but where was his unchanged army, the super-powerful kgb, oops. all of its law enforcement agencies were aimed at destroying external and internal enemies, but not at counteracting its own supreme power that is destroying the country. therefore, they, accustomed to following orders from above, remained inactive. after the arrival of vladimir putin. what did the end of the nineties era mean? a departure began from the liberal structure of the state subordinate to the west, but formally its structure did not change; the same constitution written by liberals, the position of the central bank, and the same economic and state structure continued to operate. the modern russian federation, as a typical

multinational state, strives save. according to the constitution of tatarstan, it has its own hymn, flag, coat of arms, president, but most importantly its land history, and democracy, that is , the elected government under such a federation structure, is forced to be somewhat conditional in nature, when using

unrestricted democracy of counteraction of various states, that is people are now lily... it took the remarkable efforts of president putin to preserve the state of russia, in fact, the howl that arose against putin. from the liberal media, which essentially their anti-national and express anti-russian interests, have only one reason: putin did not

allow russia to fall apart. moreover, he expanded it, and this is why he will remain valuable in the history of russia, regardless of what he has done and will do, but energetic actions to consolidate a multi- national state rest largely on the personality of this statesman; it is worth replacing him with a less powerful one leader, and we again may find ourselves faced with the collapse of the state, naturally, this is not what we want if central power is allowed, so -called sovereign democracy begins. its author

, vladislav surkov, defines it as a way of political life, a society in which the authorities, their bodies and actions are chosen, formed, directed for the russian nation, in all its diversity and integrity, for the sake of achieving material blessings and freedom of justice by all citizens and social groups. the meaning of this stream of thought is to disguise the authoritarian structure of the state, but such a state is held together by a strong, central, authoritarian power, the supreme ruler, because it is not strengthened by anything else, is, in fact, almost feudal. you can joke.

the conflict is growing between the past structure and the necessary new structure of the state, allowing it to be stable and strong, without

supports in the form of an irreplaceable tsar-father, the national guard and the central election commission. due to the uncertainty of the timing of the end of the special military operation and the deteriorating economic situation, in which he admitted that he hates russia all russians, called for reprisals against the turnover of a billion rubles, recorded a video, citizens, as well as against participants in a special military operation. it seems that the appearance of this phenomenon... is not accidental, and the recent events in magachkala, in my opinion , are from the same series, i repeat, if

a special military operation is defeated, or its end is not even very clear, the collapse of the country, secession may begin national subjects with catastrophic consequences for the population of these regions, the war must be won, this, in my opinion, is the first and the main condition for the future of our homeland, after which we begin to develop new conditions of existence.

must be reflected in the structure of the state, and this lives on among the people, and it is no coincidence that some wars during a special military operation raise red flags as a sign of the victory of justice, because once again, the collapse of the country is impossible, it is not beneficial to anyone except the scoundrels, but precisely because the collapse of the country is not conceivable, it would be necessary... to bring the structure of the state in accordance with the changed political and historical conditions. the possible meaning of these changes is the transformation of our country into a unitary decentralized state, which does not include any state entities that have elements of sovereignty, and where the components of administrative-territorial units, regions, territories, districts, provinces and the like are subordinate to the central

authorities, but... japan, indonesia, spain, italy, a lot of others. in any case, a review of the constitution and amendments to it is necessary. but serious there is no better time for changes than the current ones in order to change the constitution after our victory, especially a military operation, but victory will be ours, that ’s all.

almost one and a half hundred terrorist attacks have been prevented in russia since the beginning of the year, fsb director alexander bortnikov stated this at the final meeting of the national anti-terrorism committee and the federal operational headquarters. according to him , also during the year the activities of seventy-three secret terrorist cells and 180 criminal groups that participated in illegal... bortnikov also said that the accounts of over 400 citizens involved in the financing of terrorism, totaling over 110 million rubles, have been blocked. the head of the fsb noted that the number of terrorist crimes has increased due to the intensification of the ukrainian special services.

the number of sabotage and terrorist attacks has increased significantly. united states of america and great britain. the number of shelling attacks on our territory using unmanned, aircraft and sea vessels has increased significantly. the main targets were military, transport, industrial, energy, nuclear and social infrastructure of the central and southern regions. districts, ukrainian special services do not hide their participation in the preparation and conduct of terrorist attacks against representatives of russian authorities, public figures, journalists and former ukrainian politicians who openly criticize the kiev regime. almost 900 thousand calls and more than 320 sms were received. call center

for week results