Skip to main content

tv   RIK Rossiya 24  RUSSIA24  March 4, 2024 2:30am-3:00am MSK

2:30 am
hello, i am boris sakinov, and i am oleg skepanov, and we, the creators of the russia 2062 project of the headquarters of free thought. together with experts , we are discussing how we can develop the russia of the future in the next 40 years. see you in the future.
2:31 am
investment rating, economics. through concrete stories, we can reach people. we often talk about money, the amounts are serious. in russia there is a clear and clear signal. is russian industry capable of replacing foreign suppliers? all resources must be mobilized. give me the recipe at all this is how to achieve what you have achieved, it seems to you that you are on top of the world, you got up, dusted yourself off, is russia ready to change ? evolution is taking place in any structure, ukrainian, belarusian and russian athletes all live together in the olympic village.
2:32 am
since the coup in kiev, this is the first major public comment by the russian president about what happened and what is happening, this is anti-constitution.
2:33 am
2:34 am
2:35 am
i was not only deceived by the middlemen, i was cynically deceived, but i was not deceived, the entire ukrainian people were deceived. yanukovych has practically already surrendered to his power, he agreed to everything that the opposition demanded, he agreed to early parliamentary elections,
2:36 am
to early presidential elections, agreed to return to the 2004 constitution, you will calm yanukovych there, and we will calm the opposition, yanukovych did not apply how the americans asked us. not the armed forces, not the police, but the armed opposition in kiev carried out a coup d’etat, how do you understand this, who are you anyway, the cameras are not working here, showing certain gestures, yes, but you understand, what gestures i want to show now, that ’s what they showed us, they realized that they couldn’t finally bend ukraine to themselves solely by political means, and they carried out a coup d’état, depriving us of our chance. to build relations with this country in a normal political way, they acted and went, as our people say, excuse my concreteness, by lawlessness, the civil war and chaos had just begun, who cares, why did they have to do this, if yanukovych is already
2:37 am
agreed with everything, it was necessary to go to the polls, and those people would come to power now, only through legal means, we, like idiots, would pay the 15 billion that we promised, and keep gas prices low. they would continue to subsidize the economy, and let's be honest, here are all adults, that's right, smart, literate people, the west supported the unconstitutional coup d'etat, what's next , look, they carried out a coup d'etat, they don't want to talk to us, what are our thoughts, next step, ukraine is in nato, we believe that they tried to talk to us using forces, and that we... it was precisely by acting in this logic that we gave an adequate answer: we did not create this crisis, we were opponents of such a development of events, it was not we who handed out pies to the rebels in this regard, but we understand that there are complex processes there, but they don’t need to be solved in the same way, and where right next
2:38 am
to our borders, but where you are 100 km away, and we are here, this is our land. you don’t know what you want to fight for there, but we know, and we are ready for it, i would never do this if i didn’t think that we are obliged to act exactly in this way , as for the chronology of events, first there was a coup d'etat, the seizure of power, and from that moment, from that moment, our views and paths with the leadership of ukraine... they became diametrically opposed, from that moment we diverged from them, but after that crimea returned to the russian federation, and not vice versa, so the fact that we ruined our relations with ukraine is, in
2:39 am
principle, not connected with crimea, did we carry out some operations in crimea or somewhere else with a normal country with a normal government, no, they never did this, they didn’t even keep it in their heads, but why did western countries support it? how they trained, in what territories, in what countries, who these instructors were, we all know, you respect the sovereignty of ukraine, of course, but we would like other countries to respect the sovereignty of other countries, including ukraine, and to respect the sovereignty , this means not allowing
2:40 am
coups d'etat, who did it, our american friends, and the europeans who signed up as guarantors. agreements between the authorities and the opposition, they pretended that they knew nothing at all, that’s how it all started, now they’re saying, well, let’s not remember about it, no, let’s go...
2:41 am
climbed, well, we got today’s situation, and i suspect , which is no coincidence , they needed this conflict, as a result the united states severed ties between russia and europe, ignited an armed conflict between fraternal peoples, but dealt a blow to its position in the world that the once global leader would hardly ever suffer again will recover. pavel, what is known about the president’s plans for the next week? so our next issue will be interesting again,
2:42 am
strive to change this world, make it better, everything is in your power, the president will talk with participants in the world festival of student youth this week, of course, congratulate women on international women's day, and this is always informal, as long as he is alive , i will pray to them, i will prefer love to another delight, god showed us a woman as a miracle, entrusting this beauty to the world. in addition, the president will continue a series of regional trips. and the brightest details, we’ll leave them first, of course, in zarubin’s telegram channel. subscribe so as not to drown in other similar feeds. well, in the next episode of our tv program sunday you will see more than the rest. thank you, pavel, we will see you in a week. we'll meet the audience after a short break. i'm waiting for you in the studio on sunday.
2:43 am
the west, trying to put russia in front of a strategic dilemma, is going to great lengths. on the one hand, they continue to say that they do not want a direct confrontation nato with our country, as if macron’s rhetoric, the introduction of troops into ukraine, is part of the election campaign.
2:44 am
2:45 am
this is reality, we will wait for the strike on moscow before we say, oh, really nato, or say, no, well, it wasn’t nato that hit moscow, well, the taurus arrived, but the germans controlled them, the germans did everything, but this is not nato is at war with us.
2:46 am
with napoleon’s campaign in russia, everything else was already agony, that’s who broke the back of the greatness of france, russia, and that’s where this whole glorious and short-lived, by the way, chapter in
2:47 am
the history of the french people ended, so what? next, do we think that the british will come to their senses, the poles, the dutch, even the italians, who in theory should have been grateful to us for a lot, in particular for help during covid, and they are trying to stab us in the back through meloni, oh , and of course, confirmation of the direct involvement of the western military in the conflict with russia was made public by negotiations between high-ranking german... officers who discussed how best to carry out an attack on the crimean bridge. germany doesn’t even try to refute anything, they confirm that yes, these are real negotiations that yes, this is an interception, that yes, it was, yes, this topic was discussed, reproaches scholz for continuing to justify his refusal to send long-range missiles to ukraine. the west itself has already become entangled in this
2:48 am
verbal idiocy; in fact, it is purposefully preparing for a big war, but it is doing so. but i understand that for these people logic is a pseudoscience and a corrupt girl of socialism, and not the bourgeoisie, as they taught in their time, the truth is about another science, about genetics, but still, let’s give some sense to someone there let’s bring you to think about it, yes, it’s leaving a nature that has gone crazy, i
2:49 am
often formulate it, the minister of defense of the united states...
2:50 am
that is, it’s just that he, being a deeply sick person, wants to die not alone, but for all of humanity to leave with him, well, okay, oh okay, so we’re saying, you don’t understand in the west, but i understand that it’s difficult for you, it doesn’t fit in your head, it’s really hard for you, although donald trump, he somehow feels something, he still- he’s a business man, apparently he wants to live, that’s what. trump says. and we have a man who is completely corrupt and is the worst president in the history of our country. he is mentally disabled and unable to lead. and now he... is dealing with relations with russia, possibly a nuclear war. this will be a third world war, far more destructive than any previous world
2:51 am
war. because of a weapon that no one even wants to think about. yes, it will be a big nuclear war. they are not impressed by the tests of our ballistic missiles. a nuclear response in the event of a central threat is still considered bluff. in mid-february, putin told the french: do you understand what this will lead to? they don’t understand, they just really don’t understand it, but you are westerners, i know that you hang on our every word, well , look at the footage of the state test cosmodrome plesets, where the crew of the yashkorodinsky missile formation carried out a combat training launch of a solid-fueled intercontinental ballistic product iyar. mobile-based, equipped with a multiple warhead, i would conduct
2:52 am
such a test, well, a mock-up, i would land somewhere, let macron choose a city in france that he doesn’t feel sorry for, warn the residents so that they quickly leave, and so that they understand what this will lead to, although, if i understand correctly, then one such product is enough for the whole of france.
2:53 am
2:54 am
here's what senator ron johnson says. i think one of the real things that we 've had to face that we don't acknowledge. even if you support ukraine the way i support it, even if you consider vladimir putin an evil criminal, as i consider him, then the reality is this. vladimir putin will not lose this war. the chairman spoke about victory over russia.
2:55 am
there is, but we don’t have people to shoot from it, i don’t like this reality, it ’s terrible, but still not 155, but 152, well, to clarify, what’s important, it’s important that they don’t understand what’s happening at all in fact , they simply don’t understand this, they invented a world for themselves in which russia wants to conquer ukraine, nowhere, never, not once, our supreme commander-in-chief... did not set or formulate such a task, nowhere and never, why do they say this to hide it a crime they committed 10 years ago, provoking
2:56 am
a coup in ukraine. geopolitically in no way, these are completely different theaters of military operations, but i want to draw your attention to strikes through or in the waters of the gulf of finland, do you want us to simply say, well, it flew through so far , or ask the current finnish authorities what happening there? i don’t know, but nevertheless there is a fair survey, now the russophobe who came to power is already saying that
2:57 am
well, we need to... reconsider, we have possibilities, what kind of non-nuclear status this is, or maybe. meet the popular moscow writer nikolai rebinin, your brother is in the donbass , you need to go there, you should go there just so passengers can ride here, i’m not a fighter, i came for my brother, will you go there in a couple of days?
2:58 am
i didn’t intervene, i betrayed him, now i have to find him, there is still hope, there is always hope, soon.
2:59 am
we watch to learn about the world, educational programs and documentaries. let's watch, watch, for free, without registration. in the application or on the website.
3:00 am
do you want to stretch russia across several fronts? well, we had such experience, there was an intervention , troops were landed in different directions , we did not have nuclear weapons then, but there was the main thing that always led russia to victory, the russian people, when they say , putin will win, yes, putin is supreme.

18 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on