i’m thinking about how the, well, let’s say, silent majority of americans will react to this, who now, well, by and large, there is a fairly significant part of the republican electorate, which...

you name it, it could be an advantage or one or the other may be an advantage, but there is neither one nor the other, the main replacement is that there is no second line either, because the second line, trump crushed the entire second line, who then should we talk to, we have no one to talk to, i say, it turns out, we we are dealing with western collective, unconscious, this is very important for us now, for us now, now it is important for us to talk with those people who are not there. no, i’m not talking there to those people who are now refusing to go to bürgenstock. we talk about everything anyway, this is not what we’re talking about. when we say that ultimately any military conflict ends in some kind of negotiation, this is not true. for the most part, these were not negotiations, but capitulations. so i ’m interested in who will sign the act of surrender on behalf of the western world when we, destroying berlin, paris and london.

“we will conclude peace treaties with the state of texas, that’s, that’s what i ’m talking about, california will be free, but if you don’t joke now, they generally understand that with all this rhetoric and everything else, they’re really bringing closer, well, nuclear armageddon, that is, whether they even realize it or not, i think that they are talking right now that they will strike russia, they are literally preparing everything conceptually, because look at what they say, look at what they do." ?

yes, an attempt to strike our long-range stations detection and verification of its own strategic nuclear weapons. is this an accident? no, there are three, three points that we already have.

regarding the settlement of the ukrainian conflict, these are six points, let me remind you that the first concerned the principle of de-escalation, there were three principles given to de-escalation, do not expand the field of action, do not increase intensity, do not carry out provocations, the second point concerned dialogue and negotiations, this is the only way to resolve this conflict, the third point is humanitarian, humanitarian actions, to prevent humanitarian crisis, the fourth point is not to use weapons. mass destruction, including nuclear, chemical, biological, the fifth point is countering an attack on nuclear infrastructure, nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities, and the last point is the counteraction of two

countries, this division of the world into new military, political or economic blocs, this is apparently this agenda, it is being discussed, it is a counterweight. who is asked not to use weapons of mass destruction must have a certain

there is always a platform that you can agree or disagree with, this is a matter of discussion, another object is important to me, is that they married us without us or what? they got married without us, this was most likely agreed with us, no, if it had been agreed with us, our formulations would have been there, our formulations were expressed by our supreme commander-in-chief, which is clear and clear and which completely does not correspond to what is there written, i want to remind you that our constitutional territories are occupied, just a little bit, therefore, the chinese and the brazilians, with all the greatest respect for them, must also proceed from the formulation set by our supreme commander, who says denosification. i explain why these countries, our closest friends, so to speak, well , no, i explain how this is possible, i am

the one who supports us, did not refuse to go to this bürgenstock conference, their consensus, this one, it is not discussed by the west at all.

collects somewhere on a small patch of mountainous land, china has expressed its attitude, zelensky directly disrespected the chinese leadership of great china, yeah, well, they didn’t say that, that he disrespected us, no, they said, well, how did they say that, no, that’s right, it was greatly raised there. brophy there was a retort such that my mother is not on fire, well, when yes, there

was an official answer, there was a very tough official answer, very, therefore, therefore, china, the chinese are now proposing their agenda, in general, we are practically planning , apparently, to hold a new conference in some specific time and exactly what the fact that this hanging was agreed upon with us, yes.

who in russia can agree, who in russia can agree on a document that is in direct

contradiction to what the supreme commander said, i think that the fact that this document is an alternative to what the west is proposing, under no circumstances can an alternative be offered , contrary to the current constitution of the russian federation, the point is the highest law, so to say that someone in our country can agree on rejection. i think they did it because we are famous, well known, our fame, for now,

for now, at least, this is an alternative to the west, this is an eternal game, this is a game to lose, this is an eternal game to lose, the alternatives are there, the west doesn’t care about all these alternatives, the west is pursuing its own policy military

respond in such a volume and in such force, because the first disarming hypersonic strike is delivered to the bases and carriers of nuclear weapons, which pose a threat to you, military experts know this well, then what about? speak some american hegemony if they do not abandon their allies and retaliate? american hegemony ends at the moment of immediate threat and existence; there is no ally that america would not betray. i want to remind you that afghanistan was vneto’s main ally, did this help afghanistan? so i’m wondering, did this help

afghanistan? what difference did it make if they had this status? nato has even more than 17, but there are no guarantees there. since the intention of french president emmanul macron to send his instructors to a special military zone operations still remain on the information agenda, what needs to be said about this from a military point of view, in general, this is one of the main tasks -

the branches of the military or training centers need appropriate specialists, moreover, those with combat experience, and this is as instructors and teaching staff , to send them from the front line, and it is necessary to send a large number to these training centers or spare parts, but the armed forces of ukraine cannot afford this, because this will sharply reduce combat effectiveness all their first-line troops, this is one point, the second point -

and it’s right to replace, for example, ukrainian instructors with french ones, but there are generally a lot of all kinds of pitfalls, firstly, after all, be that as it may, this it is necessary, some kind of concentration of personnel is necessary, either at training grounds, or in training centers or somewhere else, this concentration can lead to only one thing: to strikes by the aerospace forces of the russian federation in the navy, on these objects where the training will take place personnel, let's say with the french.

like the french ones are the same, before they arrived, the french instructors say: no, we will deal with this matter only on the territory of ukraine, but before they did, a number of military personnel were trained in western european countries, the participating states need to, why can’t they be sent now? , well, because, firstly , send at least one brigade to remove them, they will scatter, well, they took it off the tongue, this is

one point that many will not be able to be returned to the territory of ukraine, the second... it is designed for a certain capacity, well , like, for example, at most, for example, you can conduct tactical training from a combat drill, well, no more than a regiment, here is a brigade division - this is already a big difficulty, but the most important thing again: as soon as these instructors appear, it is possible that the training will end there, because after all , these places will

be identified by all means of reconnaissance, the appropriate blow will be applied to them, but when emmanuel macron announced that he was ready to send these instructors, people began to join him there are other countries there, like lithuania, we will send our instructors, other countries there say why they want to send them, let’s better come to them, yes. there is, there is such a moment, but again, for me personally , this still arises, but what are you, strictly speaking, going to teach in general to an army that has been fighting for 2 years, what skills, abilities and abilities will you instill in them ? all the other necessary elements, that’s what you can teach them, by the way, an excellent question, i don’t know how to dance, i’m not afraid to admit it, then there is only this they may not, but weren’t you a good gentleman? soviet, well , i also have big doubts, again, because in order to teach something, you must do it yourself, you must be able to do it yourself, if you want to teach the battalion to behave competently in

a combat situation, to attack, to redeploy, to commit some maneuverable actions, but you must be able to do it yourself perfectly, in order to tell and show how you can do it without it, well, well, what can a french instructor do in this regard, that’s a good one question, is this correct?

a group of half a million, they went into the war, and they killed many, many americans, as well as many vietnamese. so it's always the same story, this is an escalation for you, this is a spiral of escalation, we are playing with fire, this is an argument that i find completely unacceptable when we are told, we have set a red line, this is sending offensive weapons, we have sent step on the weapons, it passed, then the tanks passed again, then the planes, again everything... normal, now they say: we allow fire on territory of russia and you will see that nothing will happen to us. the problem is with those red lines, the last lines that shouldn't have been crossed before everything went wrong.

the fact is that we find out after the fact that it was the last one. so i think it's extremely dangerous and i think it deserves a big national debate at this point. excuse me, but the president of the republic has the right to send troops in an emergency, when france is threatened. but there are none here, and there is no emergency. this is not sending command to free the hostages, the people must speak out about what can take us very, very far, and is already taking us farther and farther. this is henri gaino, former adviser to president nikolai sarkozy, former deputy. of course, there are smart people there, another key phrase was said, we won’t get anything for this, but if you send it, it will be so that it won’t seem like much, but they don’t believe in it, this is an amazing feature of europeans, they always judge by themselves. dmitriy. yes, i'll continue from here, that's pretty interesting thing, as it were, because many now understand and it has leaked to the western press, too, that instructors are instructors,

trainers are trainers, all kinds of people who go there, but surprisingly, when they even come to the ukrainian army, they understand that they have to train these there’s nothing special about people, well, it’s clear that there are people there who have just been mobilized, that’s all, but the commanders who fought there, who, by the way , have... in general, this is such a rather curious, curious situation, they thought that they had all this, they have military universities, they have a military-industrial complex, but this is not the russian military-industrial complex,

this, this is not this. equipment, this whole organization, it all comes to ukraine, all this is on fire, that is , in fact, this is how it happens, and, let’s do it, this is all happening not only in ukraine, let’s remember the red sea, an aircraft carrier strike group was brought there , back and forth, that means they are protecting the aircraft carrier there, but they can’t restore order there, andrei said, but now andrei doesn’t say that, but the houthis are doing something wrong here.

everyone got caught so quietly, but they didn’t hit, of course they didn’t hit, but just in case the aircraft carrier left, although they didn’t hit anywhere, well, where did you go lavanochka, nothing happened, after all, my obediences, they ended, not all of them, forgive me, lord , but you still have hope. completely wild guys, this is your obedience , you will save yourself, i only save others, there are no former disobedients, what did you want from me, a miracle, akhalay-makhalay, because i would know how to put this together in 5 seconds, without my own demonstration we'll figure it out, pray, black, it’s also a sin to cheat on your lads, it’s time to pay.

they really were extremely careful about the offense, because they didn’t know what kind of forces and means they had there, that ’s not the question, the question is that america said, guys, i’m the hegemon, we have problems there, because driving through africa, well, guys , well, it's

expensive. the operation was called, let me remind you, guardian of prosperity, that is, we, as guarantors, the americans talk about all the time, freedom, here is free trade, and also freedom of navigation, that is, shipping, world trade on the ocean, who controls, us navy ships, everything, they don’t control anything there, the task is to restore shipping, right, slipper, yes they restored it, i’m more than sure that they dress in sandals specifically for photo shoots, right? well, now it turns out that in this kind of military crisis, which is still seriously tied to the organization, then what they have always been proud of, so to speak, is money, and, as it were, the efficiency of using money, technology, and generally how would be that this is western values, in general the west is so effective, in this crisis they did not seem to demonstrate any advantages.