analysis, a real, objective analysis of the current situation, we are doing just that, the day before yesterday you spoke to industry agencies, you said something extremely interesting, that we are ready, we can supply our long-range weapons to countries that...

so what we will deliver, when and how? of course, at the same time, i understand that under no circumstances should we do this ourselves, or not, or at least say that we are not doing it, yes, that’s what concerns aircraft carriers, which means you said that, with point of view of solving geopolitical problems as a tool of geopolitics in order to advance... russia

and china have modern hypersonic weapons, they, to a certain extent, of course, lose their meaning, you are calling not to spend money on this, let them spend it, why did you say that out loud, let them. .. at this moment i am turning to our chinese and indian friends, they waste i said that maybe there are geopolitical considerations, but in this sense, it’s not a strategic weapon, it’s just that it has lost its meaning as a strategic weapon, in general why could it be , here in in other countries, let him spend it, why not, and now regarding the fact that we

are supplying weapons, we are not supplying them yet, for now, but we reserve the right to do this, to those states, or even to some legal structures, who are experiencing a certain pressure on themselves, including of a military nature, from those countries that supply weapons to ukraine and call for them to be used against us, against our russian one.

is associated with a whole series of circumstances that in one way or another influence to certain regions of the world, and we must of course think about this. well, let’s maybe now complete the military part of the unpleasant, completely unpleasant, yes, now , well, in order to advance, if we do not very quickly go up the stairs of escalation in the near future, which i insist on.

the current contingent is not enough for us, but we adhere, as i said, to a different tactic, we are pushing the enemy out of those territories that should be brought under our control. in this sense, we have no need to mobilize, we are not planning this, because last year, the mobilization that we had, we called up 300,000 people, but last year, without any mobilization, our men voluntarily, well, our people are so patriotic, voluntarily came to the military registration and enlistment offices and signed contracts with armed forces.

after all, i can only add to this that we see this forced mobilization in ukraine, it is certain, i have no doubt, the age of mobilization will decrease, we reliably know from ukrainian sources that the americans have set conditions

continuation of support by reducing this level of mobilization at the age of 25-23 at 20 years old 18, or maybe 18 right away, this... will be a small increase, as they say, yes, well, you can count differently, now i won’t even name the numbers, although they are understandable to us, therefore, in this situation, when our people come voluntarily, go to

the front, to defend their homeland, well , there is no talk of mobilization, vladimirovich, naturally, i understand your arguments. but i know the history of our country well and i remember the sixteenth the year when we won, but the people were tired, so we will still need to start rushing at some point, and we snatched defeat from the hands of victory in the seventeenth year, now, thank god, because we we started, maybe even belatedly , this...

this is a code of honor, this code of honor is easy to formulate, we know it, by the

way, i have it, we are working on it, it is very close to the ideal of a confucian worthy husband, we discussed it with religious leaders, our orthodox, muslim, they all agree on one thing, this code can be formulated, why don’t we formulate a code for everyone?

the dominant ideologies did not save the soviet union from collapse, it didn’t work out, that’s why the idea of ​​unification for a multinational country, of course, should be, you said that we first lost faith in the tsar of the fatherland, then in communism, you know, well, faith in they lost the tsar, but no longer have a fatherland, first:

and, of course, such a unifying idea, and today’s events show this, perhaps in the best, most direct, but inappropriate way in the sense of this word, patriotism, these are the people who voluntarily come to the front, not sparing their lives and health, the best confirmation of this, this is patriotism, but of course this needs to be done competently, well, thoroughly, beautifully.

a vacuum has formed, so we need to fill this vacuum with fairly certain things, order, we will do, but only this, then you must propose to society, the elite, to make this more or less mandatory, then it will work, by the way, the communist ideology worked for us , which was obligatory for everyone, and which for many years... there was a lot of beautiful things in it, it moved our country forward, allowed us to win

a terrible war, so ideology is needed, you know that i propose not to aggravate our discussion, i have, i am happy i’ll discuss with you, but not only communist ideology, although this was of great importance in the victory in the great patriotic war, but if that were all that united. multinational people, then yes, but then the question is, why did icons, uh, sakons fly over moscow, huh? and why - the church was then legalized, the patriarchate was actually restored? that’s what they say today, our guys don’t have non-believers in our okupas, then it was the same, of course, the communist ideology played its role, for the homeland for stalin, people stood up and moved forward, but

the homeland was still in first place, let’s not talk about forget about the...

aspect of migration, but it seems to me that we are faced with a task, and this is not only a task, but an opportunity, to begin attracting, massively attracting qualified migrants from abroad, climate migration will begin, value migration will begin, there will be crisis migration, it is already underway, by the way, we just missed a wave of very interesting people who could come to us from afghanistan after they fled from there, after there they arranged this, the americans arranged what they arranged, so, shouldn’t we modernize our concept of migration policy, i read it a few years ago, it is amazingly unrealistic and liberal, and

at the same time it is allegedly pretending to be. life of the police department, maybe create a body in the government that would engage in, generally regulate all these issues, create a modern concept of migration policy and deal with attraction and restrictions, including hard migration, we now have such a policy no, well, there’s nothing for you... object, you’re right, however, we need to think about the possibility of interesting people coming to us from afghanistan, we now have a lot of interesting people coming from other countries, so, but, but you’re right, of course, the fact is that we have not yet built such a meaningful migration policy, we once had a single body,

it was later submerged into the ministry of internal affairs for reasons of security issues, is there effective work there or not? a big question, we are discussing this with colleagues, i set the task for the government, for the security council, to return to this issue as quickly as possible, one cannot see that the problem does not exist, it does exist, it is necessary to attract migrant workers, this is obvious without this with such an almost minimal.

in some cities of siberia, where the salary level is decent, of course, we need to do a lot in this area, i completely agree, let me just say it now.

it is still taught in most of our universities, and you are a living example of the fact that there is an alternative, correct and effective economic policy, but my question is a little different, you are a relatively poor country, you need to attract investments, including from you there is even a transcontinental canal planet.

would achieve development using our natural resources, in this sense, bolivia is open to foreign direct investment according to

a model where the largest participation of foreign investment is greater, if it concerns natural resources, this is first of all, of course. in relation to bolivian state-owned companies, the state, but there are, of course, completely other industries, such as tourism, agriculture, and so on, where natural resources are not so occupied; here, of course, there may be any foreign investor, if this is not strategic.

find the best lending conditions, and of course, taking into account such international alternative solutions, such as bank bricks, this is a great opportunity to attract foreign investments from foreign investors, to participate in some similar investment projects,

the host country of the brix summit, in which three countries in africa, i think there will be other countries, but what do you want from brix, in what direction should brix develop from your point of view, what kind of institutions should it create to , let’s say, help, and then maybe

be to involve such. countries like zimbabwe, maybe a fund, say, the brix food fund, or the brix mineral fertilizer fund, maybe the brix agency for emergency assistance, there is no such agency in the world now, our countries can, probably, by pooling resources, by the way, you won't need any additional resources for this, maybe something you'd like brix to do? thanks a lot. zimbabwe is currently participating in the sadiq organization.

a meeting of this will be held in august of this year. association, for this we will build a new city, we believe that we will finish it by the end of august, in september, together with other states, unification, now, regarding the unification of briggs.

from states, and for this we need to create infrastructure, because in order to carry out such a level ourselves, it is necessary to create infrastructure, so we are now in a very difficult time, we hardly sleep, we are creating something new, a new city, so in august we we will hold a summit of the southern african development community,

from the point of view of holding summits, because what will come with them, technology will also come, such a summit cannot be held if there is no equipment for communications or the necessary premises, infrastructure for such summits,

we in our region, it seems to me, are only still preparing for such a challenge as holding a regional or even. .. now there is a russia-africa summit, there is a china-africa summit, there is a summit in spain, africa, and it seems to me that in the future there should be a summit in russia and zimbabwe.