it won’t be the same as before, this was vladimir putin’s warning when putting forward a new peace initiative to resolve the ukrainian conflict. russia proposed peace on new principles; part of the news of the week program was devoted to this global, at the same time very specific initiative last weekend. we bring to your attention a repetition of this fragment. russia is putting forward a fundamental peace plan, both... for ukraine and for all of eurasia. eurasia is the largest continent on the planet, home to 5.5 billion people, more than 70% of the world's population. thus, putin offers peace to virtually the entire planet on new principles. putin’s plan is very original, if you will, personal, although it is understandable that it is being put forward by all of russia, but it is personal and original because it feels like the president. sketched it,

wrote it himself, it not only traces a characteristic recognizable intonation, but deepens and details the entire logic of rejection of the predatory violence of the west, which putin has revealed in the international arena in recent decades, alone at first. so now everything has been formulated in a solid message to the world. in which the russian president spoke on friday, addressing the leadership of the meade. the immediate goal is to outline the conditions for the cessation of hostilities on the fronts of the northern military district, in general, to propose a new security architecture in eurasia. at the same time , putin called the actions of the west impudent and noted the collapse of the euro-atlantic security system, which simply does not exist today. we are talking about...

in the foreseeable future, to formulate on the eurasian continent outline of equal and indivisible security, mutually beneficial, equal cooperation and development. what needs to be done for this , on what principles? first, it is necessary to establish a dialogue with all potential participants in such a future security system. and to begin with, i ask you to work out the necessary issues with states that are open to constructive interaction. with russia, that is, putin not only proclaims principles, but also gives direct instructions to our diplomats. further, speaking about principles, putin develops his idea addresses europe and the nato countries there. we are still open to cooperation, which is vitally important for you too. second, it is important to proceed from the fact that the future security architecture is open to all eurasians.

wants to talk, we shoot down british and french missiles, burn leopards, that ’s the whole relationship, here putin extends his hand and tells it like it is. the danger for europe does not come from russia, the main threat for europeans is the critical , ever-increasing, almost total dependence on the united states, military, political, technological, ideological and...

if europe wants to maintain itself as one of the independent centers of the world development of the cultural and civilizational fields of the planet, it certainly needs to be in good, kind relations with russia, and the main thing is that we are ready for this. as a third principle, putin calls for intensifying dialogue between the existing multilateral organizations in eurasia: the union state, the csto. eac, cis, sco, and fourth, it’s time to discuss a new system of guarantees of collective security within eurasia without participation external forces, that is, american military bases away from the mainland, why is this an occupation,

well, fifth, we are ready to work in a common broad way. fifth, an important part of the eurasian security system. and development, of course, there must be issues of economics, social well-being, integration and mutually beneficial cooperation, solving such common problems as overcoming poverty, inequality, climate, ecology, developing mechanisms to respond to the threat of pandemic crises in the global economy, everything is important. each of the above is a huge topic: connect. russia and china, as the core of security in eurasia, are already here. at the same time. during a recent visit to the people's republic of china, we discussed this issue with the president of the people's republic of china, xijenpini. they noted that the russian proposal does not contradict, on the contrary, it complements and is fully consistent with the basic principles of the chinese initiative in the field

of global security. very good. thus, russia has an evergreen project that reflects our idea of ​​beauty in... the vastness of eurasia, already at such a time putin’s design includes our specific peace initiative on the terms of the cessation of hostilities in ukraine, but unlike the fundamental initiatives on eurasia, these proposals need urgent consideration. they have a short shelf life, since they are made under specific conditions at the front. since the situation there is fluid, it is our initiative. may expire, that is, in a sense, we are dealing with a perishable product, but as long as it is fresh and bright, these are our conditions for instant the cessation of hostilities and the beginning of negotiations, there are only two of them: the first is the withdrawal of the ukrainian armed forces

from our territories, and so these conditions are very simple: ukrainian troops must be completely withdrawn from... the lugansk people's republics, the kherson and zaporozhye regions, and i draw attention specifically from all over the territories of these regions, within their administrative boundaries, which existed at the time of their entry into ukraine. the second is refusal to join nato. as soon as they declare in kiev that they are ready for such a decision, they will begin a real withdrawal of troops from these regions, and will also officially notify of the abandonment of plans. joining nato, from our side immediately, literally at the same minute, an order will follow to cease fire and begin negotiations. i repeat, we will do this immediately, of course, and at the same time we will guarantee the unhindered and safe withdrawal of ukrainian units and formations.

actually, this is already peace, peace as the absence of hostilities, but putin goes further. russia doesn't need a ceasefire, but...

kherson and zaporozhye regions as subjects of the russian federation. further all these basic fundamental provisions must be recorded in the form of fundamental international agreements. naturally, this also presupposes the lifting of all western sanctions against russia. it is interesting that ukraine, at the same time, remains as an independent state, a subject of international law. yes. establish relations of trust and good neighborliness between russia and ukraine, and

in europe in general. russia has always wanted and now wants peace. the proposals are serious and stem from all our previous experience interaction with kiev, when ukraine was still part of the ussr, disproportionately more was pumped into it than into other republics, from roads, gas pipelines of nuclear plants to... russia continues economic cooperation with ukraine and in parallel subsidizes it directly and indirectly with hundreds of billions of dollars. the west is seducing kiev with maidans and ambassadors. orange revolution and soft coup through an unconstitutional third round. further more,

a bloody heap and usurpation of power by ultranationalists in february 2014, the americans are fully in, russia is not intervenes, works for the world, but runs into insidious deception. putin says something he has never said before. today i will say more about one more important fact, which also had not been publicly stated before, namely, literally at the same hours, on february 21, a conversation took place on the initiative of the american side, then a conversation with my american counterpart, the essence was as follows: the american leader unequivocally supported the kiev agreement between the opposition authorities, moreover, he called it a real breakthrough, a chance for...

it was not we who invaded donbass with military force, but russia, without yet sending troops there, helped donbass push back the ukrainian armed forces and supported the minsk peace agreements. as it turned out later, the only one who did it was sincerely. all the rest, the kiev regime, france, and germany, later admitted that they supported the peace agreements in the hope of shamelessly gaining time to resume the war. at the same time, the united states and nato were developing the territory of ukraine, realizing that russia would definitely not give up ukraine to them peacefully. in december twenty, russia offered the west in writing equal security and refusal to accept ukraine to nato. answer: no. the shelling of donbass is increasing, a new war is literally on the horizon.

the minsk process was buried, but then russia took a step towards peace. again they offered peace through negotiations. our formations were indeed in kiev and the military departments, the security bloc had different proposals on options for our possible further actions, but there was no political decision to storm the city of three million, no matter who said or speculated on anything. in essence,

it was nothing more than an operation to force the ukrainian regime to peace. troops they were there in order to... push the ukrainian side to negotiations, try to find acceptable solutions, and thereby end the war unleashed by kiev against donbass back in 2014, resolve issues that pose a threat to the security of our country, to the security of russia, and oddly enough, as a result, it was actually possible to reach agreements that, in principle , suited both moscow and kiev. these agreements were put on... the paper was initialed in istanbul by the head of the ukrainian negotiating delegation, well, that means kiev the authorities were satisfied with this solution to the issue. putin keeps returning to the istanbul agreements; before the russian president’s speech at mfa, the text of this agreement was not published anywhere, remained secret, although russia sent it

to berlin and paris by our then partner, but i have at my disposal exactly the same text that , as he said... putin was agreed to be initialed, that is, pre-signed by the ukrainian side. look at its volume, dozens of pages. each article is detailed in detail. here is the key page, on it handwritten initials and surname of the head of the ukrainian delegation, mr. david arakhamia. this is how it is traditionally labeled. the negotiator does not have the right to put his signature on the agreement, this is the prerogative of the head of state, but...

including, strange as it may seem, i draw your attention, on the demilitarization and denocification of ukraine, and here, too , at the start of a special military operation, we succeeded find complex solutions, they are complex, but they were found, namely, it was meant that the ukrainian law on the ban would be adopted nazi ideology of any of its manifestations, everything is written there, in addition, ukraine, in exchange for... international security guarantees , would limit the size of its armed forces, undertake an obligation not to enter into military alliances, not to allow foreign military bases, not to host them and contingents,

not to conduct military exercises on its territory, everything is written on paper, for its part, russia also made compromises, we, for our part, also understanding ukraine’s security concerns, agreed that ukraine, formally, by joining nato, it would receive guarantees almost identical to those enjoyed by members of this alliance. this was not an easy decision for us, but we recognized the legitimacy of ukraine’s demands to ensure its security and, in principle, did not object to the formulations proposed by kiev, these are the formulations proposed by kiev, and we generally did not object to them, understanding that the main thing is... to stop the bloodshed and the war in donbass, and also a compromise on our part, not good food for the horse. on march 29, twenty

-two, we withdrew our troops from kiev, because we were assured that it was necessary to create the necessary conditions to complete the political negotiation process, to complete this process, and that it was impossible for one of the parties to sign such agreements, as our western colleagues said, with a gun to their head. okay, we agreed to this. however , immediately the next day after the withdrawal of russian troops from kiev, the ukrainian leadership suspended its participation in the negotiation process, staging a well-known provocation in buchi and abandoned the prepared version of the agreement. i think it’s clear today why this dirty provocation was needed, in order to somehow explain the rejection of the results that were achieved during the process. boris johnson, who

came to kiev with a cartoonishly long light green tie and literally forbade zelensky from any agreements with russia, because later, he has to fight, now the west will help, the negotiating positions for ukraine will become much better, a scam. johnson is no longer there, just like there is no lost peace, here is another attempt at a peace agreement in russia and another option for a compromise that russia was ready to accept russia. putin talks about the visit of then israeli prime minister navtali bennett to russia. now in this audience i would like, perhaps, to make one more episode public, also about this earlier. did not speak publicly, but some of those present know about this, after the russian army occupied part of the kherson and zaporozhye regions,

many western politicians offered their mediation in the peaceful end of the conflict, one of them was on a working visit to moscow on march 5, 2022 , march 5th, and we his mediation efforts were accepted, especially since during the conversation with...

connection with crimea, that is, kiev must guarantee the so-called easement, the legally formalized right of russia's access to the crimean peninsula through the kherson and zaporozhye regions. this is a major political decision. and, of course, naturally, in the final version, it would not be adopted individually, only after consultation with the security council and other structures. of course, after discussing with.

citizens and the public of our country and primarily with the residents of the kherson zaporozhye region. ultimately, we did this, asked the people themselves and held referendums. and they did as the people decided, including in the kherson and zaporozhye regions, in the donetsk and lugansk people's republics. but that’s only later, after this peace plan was rejected by kiev and those who...

defense minister belausov at the ground forces command center. he was informed about the organization of combat duty; also among the main topics was personnel training, interaction with defense industry enterprises, what conclusions have been drawn? the new su-34 was handed over to the russian military, the car has the most modern navigation communication systems, where front-line bombers are produced and how the final flight tests were carried out before shipment. a difficult day, exactly 10 years ago our colleagues, correspondent igor kornelyuk and

a sound engineer, died in the lnpr. the building of the vktrk is carried by saints at the troekurovsky cemetery a memorial ceremony no results at the so-called peace conference in switzerland and the diplomats themselves in bern recognize the connections between the meeting and peace in ukraine, no, while svr director naryzhkin reminds that if the west refuses russia’s new peace proposals, the following conditions will be stricter: will moscow hear? and in india, a passenger train collided with a freight train. there are dead and wounded, what is now at the scene of the emergency? if the west refuses russia’s new peace proposals, the next peace conditions will be more complex and harsh for ukraine. the director of the foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin, stated this in an interview with tas. let me remind you that we are talking about vladimir putin’s proposals for a settlement ukrainian conflict, which he spoke at a meeting with the leadership of the meade on june 14. they provide for recognition of status.