support of condolences vladimir putin receives reports on the provision of assistance to victims of a missile attack on crimea and victims of an attack by criminals in dagestan. will be transported. in the capital's clinic , more than twenty victims of the ukrainian armed forces attack will be sent to moscow and sevastopol for treatment. how do the wounded feel and what assistance do they receive? three days of mourning in dagestan. how is the investigation into the terrorist attacks in makhachkali and derbintia progressing and who may be behind these crimes. a series of powerful explosions in ukraine. early in the morning it became known odessa authorities announced cases of detonation in the kharkov area and a little later about explosions. what consequences? added intrigue. donald trump promised to name at the debate.

vice presidential candidate biden is consulting with aides, how are the rivals preparing for the on-air duel? vladimir putin monitors how assistance is provided to victims of the attack on crimea and the attack of criminals in dagestan, and reports are provided to the president in a timely manner. this was announced by the press secretary of the head of state dmitry peskov. the president expresses deep condolences to all those who have lost theirs.

rocket, that it is not ukrainian, who provides these launches and so on, this is all perfectly clear, by the way, here we can probably turn to you, as representatives of the media, just ask my colleagues in europe, especially in washington, the press secretaries, why is their government killing russian children, just ask them such a simple question. the capital’s clinics are preparing to receive victims of the ukrainian armed forces’ missile attack on sevastopol; 21 people will be transported for treatment. 11 of them are children, this is the solution received by moscow doctors who arrived in crimea to help the wounded. our correspondent in the region, oleg smernovo, has all the latest information; he is now in direct contact with the studio. oleg, hello, first of all, how are the victims feeling? hello, yuri, indeed, the first information finally arrived today from doctors who arrived in sevastopol at night in order to examine the victims, and they examined absolutely everyone, adults, and children in sevastopol hospitals, where they were... promptly delivered, and

moscow specialists also assessed the amount of assistance that sevastopol and crimean doctors provided on site that night, and as a result of a medical consultation, the following decision was made, after all, medical evacuation is required, but the number is named - this is 21 victims, of which 11 are children, the rest here are adults, and there was also information, commentary about how... these people feel, what their current state of health is, i remind you that they suffered as a result of the disintegration of fragments from the atacoms rocket, which exploded in the air on the northern side of sevastopol, near uchkuevka beach, the day before. and here you go, a direct quote from a specialist who is assessing the state of their health now. all patients, here, they are in satisfactory condition, even if they are. also

evacuate. the timing of the evacuation is not specified, the only thing they say is that it will be carried out when all the patients are ready for it due to their condition, they are being prepared by doctors here in sevastopol. there will be casualties transported by the ministry of emergency situations, accompanied by employees of the ministry of health,

was our correspondent, oleg smirnov. and today, in connection with the attack on sevastopol , the russian media expressed their opinion to us ambassador lintra dmarsh; for this, the head of the diplomatic mission was summoned to smolensk square. the ministry emphasized washington. in fact, became a party to the conflict, supplying the kiev regime with the most modern weapons, including missiles with cluster warheads, which are aimed at the target by american military specialists. the department noted that everything this suggests that the white house is equally responsible for the atrocities along with the kiev regime. russia will take retaliatory measures. three days of mourning today in dagestan. according to the latest data , the attacks in makhachkala and derbint resulted in deaths.

interfaith world, here are representatives of judaism, christianity and islam, this terrorist attack is aimed precisely at destroying, causing a split in society, destroying this world, this is exactly what sergei melikov said, again today in derbent, he met with the clergy synagogues, and the orthodox church, they examined the condition of the churches, the footage shows, of course, that there is serious damage, the synagogue suffered the most, half of them. which burned out, however, probably, the destruction does not compare with the victims, there are those who died in the synagogue, this is a guard who was killed on the spot, and the priest nikolai kotelnikov, of the orthodox church. sergei melikov again stated that material assistance would be provided to the victims, and of course,

right now, at these moments, all measures are being taken in order to establish possible more participants, in addition to those who have already been eliminated or detained. makhachkala is also coming to its senses today, where an analysis of the circumstances is also taking place in hospitals to help all the victims, state flags are lowered not only over the government building of the republic, but over the spiritual administration, the ministry of internal affairs paid tribute to the memory of their fallen colleagues, put up portraits, laid flowers, well, laying ordinary flowers townspeople, parishioners of churches, here in derbent, makhachkala, at the synagogue, at churches, including here at such a beautiful monument. sarkher magomedov, salikh salikhov, abdulla magomedov, vesti dagestan. tucker carlson interviewed american writer and lawyer glen greenwald. one of his key statements: american politics is built on a lie that is forbidden to doubt.

it was under false pretexts that the wars in vietnam and iraq were started. at the same time, russia can and should be condemned in the united states, but it is forbidden to criticize israel’s actions, as well as corruption in the biden family. read more. in our joint project with youtube channel carlson tv. there are so many questions, but i want to start, what frightens me is that i never liked the people from the american civil liberties union, i would not sit at the same table with them, but i, like you, have always admired and bowed to their commitment to principle , but you know, i’ll lay down my life for your right to say what i don’t like. i loved it. and i still adore it, it was the principle of the left, and this is the best thing they have, well, in my opinion, their anti-war orientation, but this is no longer the case, now it increasingly applies to the right, and conservatives, to my delight, are talking more and more about freedom of speech, but then, as well as criticism of government surveillance in the united states,

surveillance aimed at trump, there was a kind of inversion, but then six months ago, suddenly, people on the right are like, no, that’s exactly what they are words, this... wrote articles even before october 7, even taking into account my rapprochement with conservatives who like my position on freedom of speech and my criticism of government surveillance in the united states. many people, like you, said that they used to trust the nsa and the cia, but then the data from snowden came out, and even all these political

abuses against trump, so these people realized that i was right, so among the right i had these new, not so much allies, more admirers of my work. i have always known and said that in their worldview there is this blind spot on israel, since even before october 7, long before it, when right-wing speeches were censored on campuses, which i then... spoke a lot about, but one of the most common censored topic on campuses, and indeed in the united states, is criticism. israel, professors lost their jobs because of this, you could get fired, there was norman filkenstein, who was hired at depaul university, and alan derschewitz launched a whole jihad to destroy his career, he succeeded, he made him unemployed, in in '14 there was this professor at ilinois, steven saleisha, who... they hired him there, they found his tweet criticizing israel for bombing gaza in '14, and he

was fired, the university of ilinois had to pay him a million dollars, it turned out pressure from sponsors, groups of jewish students, said that they did not feel safe on campus next to someone who was so critical of israel, so this has all been going on for a long time, this is not something new, but since october 7th, and you you know, i have quite a few jewish friends who were quite skeptical about israel, but they radicalized dramatically after october 7th. israel has been out of the spotlight for a long time, so these contradictions have not been particularly noticeable. but if you now listen to the israeli rights, then they sound, and this is not irony, not a parody, not a new cunning strategy, they sound exactly like the left-liberals, whom they themselves mocked so much.

they said that they hate this tactic, where all those who disagree are accused of racism, this will happen to them instantly, and these same people are the only tactic, as soon as you ask why the united states finances israel’s wars, because this is not only in vietnam, but also millions israelis live better than millions of americans, you immediately hate jews, you have problems with jews, it’s the same the very tactics, and you were told this, constantly, if you yourself are a jew, then this in no way protects you from such accusations, zero protection. are you an anti-semite yourself? what? is this just

crazy? yes, it's the same thing. what about black people? here's an interesting point. i debated alon dersewitz in manhattan. video coming soon. the debate was about whether the united states should bomb another enemy of israel - iran. but then it turned into a discussion of all these non-conservative dogmas, and he generally wants regime change. voting took place before and after, and 70% of the audience agreed with me, which is strange since this is a top west site, but those 30% who disagreed were the loudest during the debate, as i was leaving, i was surrounded by two dozen of them, shouting insults, yelling they tried to intimidate, their main argument was: how can you be a jew and say such things about israel, and i tried to explain that being a jew does not mean supporting certain ideas in foreign policy or another state and... what is most curious about this what was before it was always like this: when a liberal saw

a black conservative or a gay conservative, he immediately called them uncle tom, said that they have mental problems, that they hate themselves, how can you be a black conservative, how can you be gay -conservative, as if being part of a particular demographic means you must have a corresponding political ideology, as if there is a connection between skin color and political ideology, and the right always says: why, if you are black, then you must to be a slave of the dem party? but now so many right-wingers themselves say: if you are a jew, then you should unconditionally support israel, but what if i don’t, if i think the israeli government is wrong? come on, from my point of view, as an american, i believe that you can have any opinion on israel, it doesn’t really matter to me, personally i like israel, god bless him, but the red line for me is my country, and freedom of speech - it's my birthright, it's right.

no, there is no such thing here, and if you now suddenly start, and these are not just conversations, they pass laws. i know? greg abate issued an executive order saying anti-semitism, and anti-semitism meaning anti-semitic speech or ideas, is now illegal in texas. i don't know if you've seen this video, but there was a video this week where a school administrator walked up to pro-palestinian protesters and said, "i want you to know, if you shout from the river to the sea, palestine will be free or a world

intifada, then we will call law enforcement, we will call the police, and you will be arrested." on legally, in texas it's now a crime, they passed a law, that's all it really is, yes, yes, yes, the whole point of greg abate's order is to ban any anti-semitic speech in texas, you can speak out against black people, you can speak out against muslims, against whites, you can speak out against whites, but you can’t be anti-sem, these students were told that if they... shout political slogans, no violence, no damage to buildings, nothing illegal, the slogans themselves, the ideas themselves will be considered illegal. so, as you said, you don’t have to hate israel, you and i always talked about this, that at every pro-israel rally in the united states, you could hear people saying: destroy all arabs, raze gaza to the ground, gaza belongs to israel, we

constantly talk about bombing this or that country, we have always advocated violence against a certain group. no, let me tell you something, because i hear this argument very often from many conservatives who realize that they are slipping on the prohibition side, they try to justify it by saying they are only doing it because the left is doing it and we can't allow it, i've heard that argument, i hear that excuse all the time, but the point is, it's a fallacy, as i mentioned earlier, that these

protesters were fired, that those who criticize israel have long been censored, to give one example, it was... it said, if you are a contractor working with obama and trump, they passed a law that says, by the state, then now you must sign an agreement that you don't support and don't you participate in a boycott against israel, and i once interviewed this woman, she was a speech therapist. texas, her specialty is children with speech disorders. what do you mean you can't boycott? you can't refuse to buy israeli products? yes, this is a movement, this is how in the eighties there was a movement to abandon south africa, to boycott south africa, not to travel to south africa, not to buy their products, to end the apartheid regime. there is a similar movement called the sanctions boycott movement, which calls for not investing in

israel, don't go there and don't buy their goods in order to end the occupation and give the palestinians their own state. in the united states, in 24 states there is a law that says that you cannot get a contract from the state until you sign an agreement not to support this boycott and not to participate in it, that is, you swear an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, only one, that’s what’s interesting , you can boycott any country in the world, you can boycott peru, boycott south korea, you don't have to buy norwegian tova, you can boycott south dakota, by the way, or wiskoncik, andrew koma, who passed an order saying that... six months before and six months after, he issued an order calling on government employees to boycott the state of north carolina, as well as the state indiana in the form of a protest for their bathroom laws, the law that you must

use the bathroom of your biological sex, so not only can you boycott your country and... cause economic harm to citizens of other states. but andrew koma actually ordered boycott american states at the same time prohibited everyone from boycotting israel. this is the only country that has such privileges. the theft of democratic party emails and personal gmail account of john podesta and leaked them to wikileaks. and they blamed russia for everything. from day one i assumed that this was not true, but what is the truth in all of this?

everyone was so sure turned out to be an absolute lie, and what still drives me crazy and isn't talked about enough is when the new york post came out with this report based on documents from hunter biden's laptop on regarding their affairs in ukraine in china, then all the media said in unison that this was russian disinformation, although this data was reliable and it had nothing to do with russia, it was not disinformation. so many times something was stated with such confidence that later turned out to be a lie. one more example. the question is how these documents got into wikileaks, and naturally, wikileaks claims that this has nothing to do with russia, maybe this is true, or maybe the russians

did it through someone, an intermediary, yes, so, maybe wikileaks says the truth or believes that he is telling the truth, but this does not mean that russia was not there, but the problem is that there are many people who will not say this publicly, but will tell it to you personally, and this is...

an evidentiary persecution that has taken over the whole our politics, but what really worried me was the existing agenda of blaming russia for all the troubles to such an extent that americans again began to perceive russia as a mortal enemy, when even american diplomats could not communicate with russian diplomats in washington, everyone was afraid to meet with russians, as they would be called russian spies. you are talking about a country with the largest nuclear arsenal, and i am convinced that there is a direct connection between the lies. we are pushing the world towards nuclear war. even joe biden said

that the world is now much closer to a nuclear disaster than during the cuban crisis in 1962. but for some reason we are willing to take this risk, which even joe biden calls the serious risk of nuclear war. scientists say the doomsday clock is getting closer to midnight, that... when will america be free again and an honest country? i think there are a lot of

encouraging signs, even if they seem to be negative, for example, i like the fact that americans hate and distrust the media much more than they do anyone else, maybe with the exception of pedophiles. i think this is well deserved.

where the threat comes from is always trying to destroy it or control it, that’s where all these phony disinformation experts came from, like these people understand disinformation, all these groups for detecting disinformation and further... its censorship, all this is aimed at eliminating dissent on the internet and the desire to present political censorship under the guise of some kind of expertise or science, security measures, yes, online security experts or online disinformation experts, where did all these names come from, it’s all fake , like this nina yankovic, an expert on online disinformation, you heard her talk, would you trust this woman to evaluate the truth of anything,

much less? act as an arbiter of truth and falsity with the ability to censor what she will call a lie is what happened: in 16, western liberalism experienced two traumas: the first was the decision of the people of britain to leave the european union, which was a very serious event for this country, and then a few months later donald trump held back a very traumatic event for liberals victory over hillary clinton. it was real. psychologists said they had a flood of neurotic patients who could not come to terms with the reality of hillary clinton's loss. that's all it was. and they, the western liberal elites, decided that they would no longer can afford a free internet because with a free internet they cannot control what people think or how they vote. and from there you can already trace the emergence of this well-funded disinformation industry that was

created to establish control. over information online, and for me, as long as there is a free internet, and you see this throughout the western world, people will trust institutions of power less and less, and for me the decrease in trust in institutions of power is the most encouraging thing. glenn greenwald thank you, yes, it was nice to talk to you, thank you.

let's return to the main topics: in connection with the terrorist attack in dagestan, the president of tajikistan sent condolences.