today is actually a historic day for us, look at the visit to fashion, this is actually a historic moment, because for the last few years, at least the last three years, and i have repeated and many others have repeated that our policy towards india has been weak, ineffective, in fact we missed out.

that india’s relations with china are not easy, there is no need to exaggerate their problems that exist there, this largely played into internal politics, but nevertheless, the conversation that was now between putin and fashion, then let’s just say, well, let’s call it a rapprochement or a new level of relations between the two countries -

the connection between russia and china threatens india or threatens everyone else, it’s precisely the violation of this balance, it has always led to destabilization, when it emerges again, judging by the personal relations between the two countries leaders, this primakov rig, russia, india, china, which is, well, the skeleton of eurasian security, in principle, this is a very serious statement for us, this is the first.

asia yes, but india is the cornerstone total. and the latest news that we have is when the decision was made, moreover, india says, let's russian companies.

to rule over someone, when we have balanced relations with india, no one can ask such a question. in this sense , i believe that over the past 2 days there has been a historical breakthrough, which we have not had since the times of the soviet union. and why? i think that's what i mean, right? i think logic, i think the logic of development, yes, but who are we anyway? what if? look from the perspective of western political economic thought 4.5% yes we are in terms of level gdp, hello, you are hard to see, we are , with all due respect , less than 10% in population than these countries, at the same time, these

countries communicate with us not just as equals, but sometimes even almost just shoulder to shoulder, back to back back, but also a completely different level of relations, while we... countries to answer the question of what is the significance of our india and for china, in addition to the traditional reference history to philosophy, the significance is that... we are not afraid to take take responsibility, resources, warheads, well, we are not afraid to take responsibility, but we were not afraid to betray, we betrayed everyone in the nineties, well, objectively, of course, i also always argue that it was not us, well

, excuse me, it was us, no matter how bitter it may be, but we must realize that we are our traitors , which is why it was a betrayal, but they were in power, so it’s unlikely that it was old man hunaker or... but we surrendered the entire eastern bloc, we surrendered countries in africa, we surrendered countries in asia, we surrendered our traditional soybeans happened no, we handed them over, we were the senior partner, they looked at us, they verified them.

what kind of disrespect is this in our own country, if some western intelligence services could bring us leaders who grew up inside, that gombachev was really brought from the cia, or was appointed by andropov. that’s right, we have grown all this nasty stuff inside ourselves, when we speak now, these are proteges of the west, did they install yeltsin?

i would like to return to the nato summit in washington, we are already here, or rather to the organization itself, which celebrated its seventy-fifth anniversary in april, we have already said a few words about the political, military dimension of this organization, here’s a little about the diplomatic dimension of this organization, in fact, it did not begin...

dictated an agreement in finland, respectively, where its neutrality was dealt with, so to speak, as they wanted to do, yes, therefore, when the brussels pact was signed, five leaders immediately turned to washington with a request to support them, and what washington did had quite a geopolitical defense meaning, yes, five more were added to the original five countries of the brussels pact, and there was not a single extra one there there weren’t, there were three countries, iceland, and there were two

flanking countries, norway and italy, so actually, even at the time of the creation of nato , of course, it already had an openly anti-soviet or anti-military significance, and from the point of view of the confrontation with the soviet union, and by the way. the formula that was voiced here, lord ismay, regarding what it means to keep the americans inside, the soviet union outside, to put pressure on germany all together, after all, it was initially an onion in all three positions, so mikhail mikhailovich, maybe he’ll correct us, of course, probably , general staff officers planned an attack through the fulish corridor on luxembourg and paris, but politically such a goal, well, it was definitely never set at the highest state level, i can’t talk about it until the end of my days. well, as for the united states, the united states created nato,

of course, they didn’t need to, they didn’t need to be kept inside, they were nato itself, said elder fyodor kuzmievich, if i lie, the heavens will shake, i’ll tell the truth, the earth , yes, that’s what concerns germany, accordingly, no one put much pressure on it, it was said beautifully at the beginning, germany initially felt great in this union, so that’s all... isma’s formula was initially crafty, by the way, in the nineties, because when they forgot about it , another formula appeared, shorter, but more aggressive, it was called: nato should go out of array or out of business, nato should either look for applications beyond the fifth article, that is , literally all over the world, or it should break up either outside or out, and that’s what happens after that - this just a search nato yourself. here in relation to the conflicts with russia and yugoslavia in the same trend,

but now obviously china, two comments about nato, which seem to me to be of such a fundamental nature, firstly, nato is one of the first, or perhaps one of the first examples in the history of a long-term military alliance without any clear goal, well, you can probably remember the entente, between the creation of the entente and the first world war. well, 20 years have passed, but in principle, world history knew much more about the military alliance, there was louis there were four large ones and many small ones of all sorts , they also began to be created on the eve of the military...

after decades, when the external environment changes, it was difficult, well, in fact, hence the problems associated with the united states. and the second, second problem, it is also very serious, science does not know the answer to it, about what a military alliance, a nuclear superpower is, so if the soviet union and the united states faced this problem, so if you enter into wars with a nuclear superpower , what does this mean, you are also becoming a bit of a nuclear superpower or you can make some statements on their behalf. i think that much of what polish, latvian, lithuanian, or estonian politics allows themselves to do now comes precisely from this, but we see that in practice this phenomenon still needs to be studied and understood, now, i i mean, what is a military alliance with such a power as the united states or the russian federation,

now russia, india and china are developing a new rule of relations, where there is no word alliance, today they said partnership, right? strategic interaction is precisely about the fact that a state, especially a major nuclear power, is of course not ready to share its sovereignty with anyone, and the united states, for all its, well, frankly anti-russian behavior, nevertheless also very clearly shares ours nuclear capabilities, that's all the rest, and by the way, here 's your discussion regarding, so to speak, what a conventional confrontation could be. russia of the west, well, in general we must understand that with all our resources we still live in a world where not china, not india, especially not china will not allow a military defeat of russia, because for them this is such a final curse, and from a security point of view, that’s why they won’t allow it , well, here there must be a specific conversation, intelligence assistance, i’m just a

very pragmatic person, so time plays a role, so...

which is absolutely correct, how many, how, what, at what time, that is, everything, so far there are 40 of them . no, no , well, in any case, everything should be considered. yes. and i also wanted two questions touch on very briefly. firstly, regarding india, today we are indeed present at a historical event. i would only pay attention to three short stories that were aired today. the first of these concerns nuclear power plants. russia has already built it. india is also interested in them, the second thing is oil, russia really supplies gigantic volumes of oil and deputy prime minister novak

said that we would like or are planning to conclude a long-term agreement, in this situation, probably... diplomacy, we can set ourselves the task of achieving more favorable conditions for our business in the indian energy market, so we know that rosneft managed to get a small piece in the chinese market and for oil refining, now, if we enter the indian market in such conditions when we we guarantee large volumes of supplies to india, we could reprimand or stipulate the right for rosneft, maybe for gazprom neft, lukoil, the opportunity to build oil refineries. because it is of course huge very very attractive piece - here, can i show you directly, because novyk gave a comment to pavel zarubin, uh-huh, alexandrevich, i mean, do i understand correctly, what? india has actually become for us, well, probably the second market for oil supplies, and india has become the first market, and i want to note that in the energy

sector today india is one of the key partners for us, based on the results of last year, for example, if talking about oil supplies, they amounted to about 90 million tons, this is 40% of india’s total needs, what this is growth when compared there with the twenty- first year, for example, huh? exactly twice in 2022 it was 45 million tons, in 2021 only 5 million tons, if you compare with the twenty-first, it turns out that the increase was almost 20 times, deputy prime minister alexander but that’s the official name of the position, that’s why here we have great prospects, but our diplomacy needs to be tougher, and apparently talking about such opportunities, one more comment, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow a parliamentary forum is meeting in st. petersburg brix, and we talked a lot about the fact that brix has a wonderful future and a global mission, russia is investing large resources in brisk, political, diplomatic,

the prospect of institutionalization, this is one of the most important goals, and brix is ​​one of the main goals of russian foreign policy, but the fact that brix is ​​gaining a parliamentary dimension is precisely a very serious step towards brix turning into a form of a more serious organization in the future, judging by this. not only leaders, but states, have not yet appeared, but what the forum is taking place, this is no longer the case, why is this just an appearance, that is, it has not appeared, we are appearing, this is a process, not yet, unfortunately, it is not the first this parliamentary forum, unfortunately, we still have to do it in kazan everything in order to somehow formalize brix while we still have it.

trump in his first term would have had a personnel reserve, perhaps there would have been a third, we don’t know, and what will happen to it now is also quite difficult to say, but the first coup, of course, took place in 1940. it really paints him as very lazy, very pro-soviet, this is not entirely true, he was so pro-union, he was pro-roosevelt, that is , the concept would really be implemented - so to speak, there would be four or five policemen,

that is, there would be a real him, that is, when we say today, a centric picture of the world, we don’t call the center the wrong thing, the center never existed at all, it existed from forty-three to forty-five, hello, that’s what stalin, roosevelt, constantly imprisoning churchel, seemed to create together, why is there no nato, no soviet union, no warsaw bloc, what to do next? and then william clinton came, well, he’s a friend of bill’s, who said, it’s

stupid economy, which means one of the...

but the main thing, so to speak, of their residence for at least the seventy-first year and until this day was connected with the fact that that they received almost free financial resources from the federal reserve, that’s what they lived on, because the nuclear strategic probe of europe came in a compartment with this very mission, that

’s how it was... what it actually was design, that is why they were so concerned about raising rates, inflation in the united states there and so on and now, of course, no matter how the situation of the next coup in nato happens, nato will not be made into any global bloc, because nato does not exist, there are united the states and places of deployment of american money and the military machine, well, if this is so, then what is global nato, that you must take part in the attack or, so to speak , give back against the chinese asia-pacific bloc. the last thing, guys, well, we have something what’s left, even if you dismantle the highways, give everything back, we gave it to ukraine, we have a lot of goals, give it back.

it's easy to get caught up in the facts when you only see part of the big picture. in pursuit of views , entire locations are changed, and it’s easy to create a deepfake.