russian calculation of the iskander m complex was published by the military department. can you get your own magic ink? the main thing is to hurry up. in those ancient times, when... there were no gadgets, people used magic, but beat yourself over the head, and you have a nickname for the right place, that’s what they call me, because i’m not taking you where you fool want, where necessary, he doesn’t need a pen; he who has fire in his pocket, uh, uh, what started, fire, i can’t live. no

travel, soon, got used to watching videos online, stopped working, install, we open, watch, russian channels, all series, movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries, watch, watch in the application or on the website.

new hydroelectric power stations will appear in the far east, the head of the holding spoke about the plans and results of rushydra’s work at a meeting with vladimir putin, including the growth of financial indicators. we’ll find out all the details from maria filippova. maria, greetings, how strengthened are the positions of rushydra? darya, i welcome growth in many indicators, including production electricity, revenue tax deduction. construction of new capacities and modernization of existing ones.

by a large margin the largest power generator in the country, if we talk about types of generation, our holdings include all types of generation except nuclear, that is, we have geothermal, solar, wind, and of course thermal generation, both gas and coal. in 2023, generation increased by almost 4%, the result is more than 140 billion kw, revenue is growing, it exceeded 560 billion rubles in 2023, increased by more than 20% in

compared to the twenty-second year, net profit also went up and reached 32.1 billion rubles, which is 66% more than the results of 2022. roshydra is among the largest taxpayers in the country, increasing its potential every year. more than 108 billion rubles were allocated to the budget. this is a plus of 15% compared to the previous reporting period. the holding also has extensive functionality and geography. for now. the rusgidra holding works, we are not only a generator, yes, that is, we are also quite widely represented in as a design complex, widely represented in our institute has been around the world for about 100 years, and is currently represented in 13 countries around the world, in the field of consulting and design of hydraulic engineering in mineral extraction, hydropower. rushydro

is implementing large investment projects, as noted by general director viktor khmarin, including in difficult climatic conditions, we are talking about chukotka, where the line was put into operation. a new line with a length of 490 km connected the northernmost city of russia pevek and the city of belibina, among the significant projects and the new block of vladivostok tets-2, as well as krasnogorskaya small gs1 in karachaevo-cherkessia. in 2023 , investments in rushydra projects exceeded 220 billion rubles, with plans to increase the figures significantly. if we talk about investment plans until the twenty-eighth year. this is more than 800 billion rubles, of which more than 70% will be developed in the far east. we plan to introduce about 2.5 gw of electrical capacity and plan to build more than 500 km

of power lines. in the future , two new hydroelectric power stations will come into operation in the far east; today they are at the design stage, according to. thank you maria, maria filippova spoke about the meeting between vladimir putin and the head of rushydra. an investigation into the illegal activities of us president hunter biden's son cost a cbs news correspondent his job. katherine harrich was not only fired, but her laptop with recordings and confidential data was also confiscated. the journalist spoke about this in an interview with tucker carlson. about freedom of speech in... the doors of the american elections, trump's debates with his now former rival biden and much more, see our joint project with the carson tv youtube channel. i'm glad you're here again. i'm glad to see you. you

weren't far away. not that far. we worked together, we lived next to each other. marvelous. how do you like your new life? quite good. okay, it's been an adjustment, a spirited few months. what did i say? what did i say? i have to ask you because i also worked in television for a long time, but you worked in the news segment, producing interviews and programs every day for decades. and given your vast knowledge, i just don't understand how the media in our line of work could look at the last biden-trump debate and say, "i just." i think this is a real opportunity to gather more data, to take a closer look at president biden's problem and his decision to seek

re-election. we already have some data, there was a debate that you just mentioned, and people were very surprised by his behavior. and now we have an abc interview. and its full transcript. i think the moment has come when other media interviewed president over the past couple of years, could publish the full transcript of these interviews. i think this makes sense because we will have a broader set of data to assess whether this was an isolated event, as the white house claims, or whether there were signs of deterioration before, whether they were obvious, or whether they were subtle, and if they were obvious? then why were they cut out? i think having this broader data set will really inform the public debate about the president's decision to continue race. and there's quite a lot of data, i mean, i knew biden, i watched him,

i was around biden for over 30 years, and i remember my reaction in 2019 when he decided to run for president, for the fourth time, i think , i thought, this is not the guy who...

maybe he's trying his best to stay on topic. we have transcripts. the news organizations that interviewed the president should have them. it is not customary to publish video excerpts from interviews, but you can.

and finally, i think the transcript allows expanding on the edited version you either publish or broadcast is correct, because then the public will be able to see the sections of the interview that you have cut or changed for clarity. right, so, i know i haven't thought about it enough, but i know. that in 2015 or '16 the new york times editorial board met with trump, they published an apparently unedited transcript that was chaotic, he has a slightly confused speaking style, characterization, yeah, not consistent, but you know, it's it's common knowledge that i think he's much better in front of the camera than he is on the transcripts, but whatever you think about it, they put it out there, i don't remember in the last 4 years... any news organization putting out a transcript of an interview with biden , and you?

you know, i don't remember, but i didn't actually check them all. but what is the reason? i guess what bothers me is that everyone is acting like it's a shock. it wasn't a shock to me, i don't have any special knowledge, i have some, i immediately made it public, but every time i saw him it was it's pretty obvious there's something wrong with this guy. how could this shock journalists? why? can really add to their work, i think that's important, i can't say what their motivation is, in my case i felt

it was important to post the transcript to let people see all the work, and it's also hard to look at my own transcript because you look at it and say: oh, i could have focused more here, or i should have continued here, or i missed this one small news, i should have gone into a little more detail, or i should not have interrupted the interlocutor here, you see some shortcomings and the whole process. but this is about the honesty of the interview. you know, when you make edits, you do it for clarity. sometimes you do it because you need to compress information because you only have a certain amount of time to broadcast. but this is a very fine line. and you shouldn't, for the sake of clarity and conciseness or condensation of information, cross that line to, you know, clean up after someone. it feels like that this is indeed the case. "i don't want to judge others too much, i once deleted something from an interview with someone, i can't remember

ever doing it again, but i wouldn't do it now either, but a few years ago who -said something in an interview that was so weird that i didn't want to continue, like i don't even know what the hell you're talking about, and i asked the editors to take it down just because it wasn't relevant to the conversation, it was weird, so it doesn't matter, i did it, i did it, but if..." you're interviewing someone and the other person seems strange throughout the interview and you're trying to hide it, then maybe you're a liar, what do you think? i think when you're talking to the president of the united states, you instinctively want, to keep him looking as good as possible, i understand that, but if there are signs, i don't know if there were, but if there are signs of poor health or he's really having trouble answering a number of questions, that's important, isn't it for those of us? missed the cbs report, tell us what

this tax investigation is about hunter biden, in the end he was convicted, in my personal opinion, of a completely ridiculous crime, illegal possession of weapons, who cares about that, but there are other potential crimes, tell us about the tax investigation, i would say that in the case of hunter biden there are two parts, the first is a weapons charge, the second

is documents that your accountant confirmed, i think it's important to understand in this case that all of this happened after he got sober, right, because during whole tax season, he was a heavy drug addict, but as he told the state court last year when the plea deal

fell apart, he had been on the hook for some time, so how many alleged offenses had occurred? a period where he was drug-free, and this is important because sober people have no excuse, but it just speaks to your state of mind, right, aren't these mistakes? yes, i think that any jury wants to understand a person who has gone through addiction, they sympathize with such people, because it's a daily challenge for them, and i think if you know at what point they were able to think clearly, it helps you understand their point of view of the evidence that... actually, i think that's right, so what is the status of these charges? i'm not following this as closely, but in the fall, i think the case will come to court. it's interesting, it's relevant right now, and i don't think it gets talked about in detail very often when talking about what joe biden is going through right now, and so there was a debate recently, people

were shocked, it seems like the democratic donors are shocked, i talked to one of them who was really shocked, he didn't know that... you don't have to jump to that conclusion, but it's a significant fact that he's facing these charges, a significant fact , and i think what's come to my attention is that over the last couple of years, the white house has made a lot of attempts to distance the president from his son, especially on the business side, but now

apparently they're really kind of inseparable, i don't know for sure, but. .. you know, these are completely different circumstances, so he faces, and this charge potentially carries with it a prison sentence, right, yeah, guns and taxes, guns, right, interesting, so why do you think something important happened, it doesn't seem such a big deal, you reported on it, but in general it's not talked about very much, i think i would say that i

was very proud of working at cbs for the investigative journalism that we did, whether it was whistleblowers or a laptop and i put in a lot of effort to get data from this laptop that had a very clear chain of evidence that i learned in my investigation was a mirror image of what was turned over to the fbi and i felt it was important to understand the integrity of the data given that this laptop. .. was described by a group of retired intelligence officers as a russian fake, right, and we went to great lengths to have one very respected group... conduct a forensic analysis, this group had no political affiliations, was outside the establishment. on

really a reliable group, a great group, they did some amazing forensic work, they concluded that nothing had been changed in the copy of the data that we had. other journalists got their data through third parties, and i think that probably somehow... tainted the data, but i had absolute confidence in our data. i think our story came out at the end of '22, and you know, i have a reputation for carrying out complex investigations quickly and efficiently. it's hard to believe it took me 2 years to confirm the authenticity of this data. what does it mean? i think that? with all due respect to my former employer, i think there was an opportunity to confirm this story earlier, i think that's all i can say, well i verified the data on the first day because there were

emails from me and no one knew that i knew hunter biden so i knew it was true, no one would ever fake all your typos, plus i lived near hunter biden so i knew him, i just lived in washington like you , so that it's not so strange if you live in a small town everyone... knows each other, but i knew that no one knew that i knew him, if you're putting together a fake laptop, you won't put letters from host fox, it's too weird, so i knew right away that it was real, and i'm just a little surprised that it took you so long, so what you're saying is that there were actually obstacles, i just think that i the reputation of a person who carries out work quickly and efficiently needs to be confirmed, yes, but... this story took, took 2 years, i'm glad that it did, yeah, because i think it really changed the discussion, of course, i wonder if you felt,

did you feel that there was no want you to do this, you know, i've always tried to treat my former employers with respect, and i told congress that there were tensions with the biden investigation. i'm sorry, you don't have to, i'm not even talking about cbs specifically, it's so bad it's funny because that's not a reporter's job, cover up politics, right, i'm just clarifying, has it ever occurred to you how small our world has become, you work 30 years or more to get more? actually , i know how long, but i'm not going to be long, and you become, you know, probably the most famous investigative journalist in the united states, i'm not sure about that, but i would say

it's true, or of course you in the top two or three, definitely, but you'd think every news organization would say, "oh my god, katherine harridge is available, let's hire her, but you're independent." journalist, this is simply amazing, but it was my personal choice. i know, yes, but really, nbc in a normal world would have said, hey, we're not paying $3 million a year for this job that you do, but they didn't say, isn't that weird, i think that's an indication of... how much the market has changed, yeah, i think that's the biggest indicator for me, i didn't really realize how much change has happened in the last 4 and a half years, when you start looking at the numbers, you see that... these large corporate organizations are no longer the essence custodians of information, yes, there's a lot more of it on other platforms, and i, i truly

believe in my heart that there is a place for investigative journalism, people are just hungry for it, and one investigation that we did, it got about 3 million views , this is a good, healthy figure, our next... the project will be dedicated to immigration and border issues. and i don't want to give everything away, but we have a lot of good data on how the department of homeland security violates federal regulations every day , and creates, i think, a significant security threat to many american citizens. and i think this really deserves a thorough investigation. yes, and this is a story i can actually tell.

and is this really true, if this is really true, then why is it true? who's really losing in this equation? will the country become less safe or not? i don’t know the answers yet, but these are quite natural questions. and how does our bankrupt country pay for all these services? i, yes, there are many questions, i absolutely agree, but you is focused on the question of whether the federal government is violating its own laws, federal employees, and... based on your investigation, are you close to an answer? i think, judging by our reporting, everything points to this, it seems that this is exactly the case, so my question is: you know, who was punished, who was suspended, who was fired, who was demoted, and i believe that the answer is no one except those who reports the problem. really,

don't make me reveal things like that, i want to stop you right now, i'm in shock, i mean, you know, but i think that 's the kind of story you want to see, right, i just think that news consumers in this country have always encouraged me that they really understand the message of accountability, they want to see it, they they expect it, they demand it.

well, we're rooting for you, we're rooting for you, catherine harridge, thank you very much, it's very good to see you, have you ever thought about what would happen to us if we didn't have bread, bread is the world, the most what is sacred to a person, what is in every family, bread created our civilization, contributed to our evolution, technical revolution, and is the future of humanity. human history is a universal language. over the past 200 years , our attitude to life has been shaped by the power of our country, its strength and power. every day i take a piece of black bread and it always makes my life happy. when confronted with bread, a person is literally transformed. this is what our distant ancestors thought, and we really hope that you think so too.

another crime of the armed forces of ukraine, shelling of donetsk in a residential area, the kiev regime is beating nato weapons, there are dead, wounded, waiting. reporting from the scene of the shelling. battles near avdeevka. on the most tense section of the front, the enemy rotation was disrupted. our military is knocking out the local self-government from its strongholds. we will also tell you about the situation in other areas. investments 800 billion rubles. this is for the next 4 years. and two more new hydroelectric power stations in the far east. report from the head of rushydro to the president. footage from the kremlin. construction of international.

airport in khabarovsk