everything from there sits jeffrey sachs sat under yeltsin, that's what they did, and what did they do for this for russian citizens, or what, for the benefit of citizens worked, no, they worked for the benefit of the west, for themselves, despite the fact that in september 1993 of the same, anticipating what was written in the main law on... our leading scientists prepared a conclusion, it is dated september 3, 1993. from the point of view of modern biology, genetics and embryology, human life, as a biological individual, begins from the moment of the fusion of the nuclei of the male and female sex cells and the formation of a single nucleus containing... genetic material, it

cannot be likened to an organ or part of an organ of the mother's body, so it is obvious that abortion is an intentional termination of human life as a biological individual. look at how this fetus develops, look, it is a person. the authors of this conclusion, these are the heads of the department.

no, that she simply must at some point allow another person to appear in her body, he grew for 9 months, i cannot imagine this, and i cannot, here she lies down and says: now is the very moment when i will give birth to a person, and in me... there was a person for 9 months, he lived in

me, a living person, small, that is, she walked around with a person all the time, you understand, can you imagine, in a woman there is a person , a living person, not just some kind of organ, but just a living person in you, he pushes there, imagine what happens in a woman's head emotionally, then they give birth and she says, it's him, and you, she takes it, we are familiar in principle, good, good day, and then what can a man do stronger make it cool that a woman gave birth to a person, just, i can’t imagine, nothing, nothing. i really want you to understand me correctly, there is no talk at all about such a ban on abortions, this is not what we are talking about, we are talking about individual attention to each case, if i may say so, especially since we have world experience, very serious experience, abortions are completely banned, for example, in andorra, honduras, nicaragua, el salvador , malta, the philippines, the vatican, in a huge number of countries, abortions. are prohibited, except

exceptional cases, most often these are medical indications, in venezuela, egypt, indonesia, iraq, iran, liechtenstein, micronesia, mauritania, the united arab emirates, algeria, brazil, bhutan, qatar, costa rica, mali, morocco, monaco, libya, nigeria, peru, poland, saudi arabia, uruguay, chile and many, many other countries. these issues are very cleverly resolved in the united states of america, by the way, in the country whose representatives wrote to us in the constitution, as well as with the death penalty, which is permitted in some states, abortions are prohibited in some states, such as alabama, arkansas, louisiana, missouri, oklahoma, tennessee, texas, south dakota and other states. in america, since 2022

, the supreme court of the united states has overturned the right to terminate a pregnancy at the federal level, adopted in 1973. that is , the state, it has abdicated responsibility for this act, that is , it is decided, it is decided by the people living in this particular state, despite the promotion of lgbt values ​​in america in the countries of the civilized world, at the same time, here are those the very farmers who feed america, they continue to live by their own laws, this, by the way, can become a reason for... very serious problems within the united states itself. elder pais and the holy mountain, a monk of mount athos, who in 2015 was canonized in the russian orthodox church , said that when the state takes

responsibility for committing an abortion, then the lord punishes the entire people, when the state renounces making this decision, then... the greek falls on the specific person who does this committed. we do not regulate this issue in any way, despite the fact that, by and large , we are facing a very serious demographic problem. remember, we talked about this in one of our issues. today, russia remains one of the world leaders in the number of abortions. why is that? here is what andrey vladimirovich milekhin, a professor of demography at moscow state university and a doctor of sociological sciences, writes in his report. according to un forecasts, if current trends continue, by the year 200 russia's population will decrease to 112.2 million people,

which threatens the country with an automatic rollback to the level of an ordinary agrarian power, the loss of any chances. to form any significant, sovereign geopolitical contour, that is, in fact, exactly what those who want to destroy our country are trying to achieve, but only without any bombs, without blood, without violence, with their own hands, this issue is already being raised at the official level, listen to what our president's press secretary dmitry sergeyevich peskov says.

migration, and this somehow relaxes us, if you just look at the numbers, that's what this is about alexander senelnikov, professor of the department of sociology, family and demography, faculty of sociology, moscow state university, speaks about this . listen, the extinction of a people can occur

over several centuries, but long before it dies out, its territory will inevitably be populated by people from other countries, where family values ​​are more firmly preserved, and the remnants of the indigenous population will be assimilated by migrants, it is not the indigenous population that assimilates migrants, which is what we hope for, on the contrary, can this suit us? i want to be correctly understood, it is naive to assume that, for example, a ban on abortions can solve the problem. demography, absolutely not, but i am trying to approach this issue from a slightly different angle, because the danger is not in the abortion itself, the danger is in the flow, in the conveyor, in getting used to the attitude towards it as

a natural thing, to the lack of respect for that very life that has not yet appeared in the world, but it already exists, it is given by god, that is what we are talking about, in this there is, in my opinion, precisely disrespect not only for someone else's life, disrespect for the to ourselves, how much... families beg god, doctors, shamans for the opportunity to give birth to a child, for some reason they can't, at the same time, having received this opportunity, we have the right to lose this opportunity in a completely everyday way, that is, to stop someone else's life. let's see who is really promoting this magical right to preserve

absolute freedom for abortions in russia, for example, listen to what tamara edelman, already well known to us, says, how she tries to convince us of what needs to be done. in 1936 , abortions that were done on the initiative of a woman were generally banned. well, i had a relative who died as a result of a criminal abortion after this law was passed. well, we see how today completely barbaric propaganda is being carried out, and propaganda against abortions, which is actually quite meaningful, but it is carried out in wild ways and is not accompanied by proposals for any other alternatives, that is, the only alternative is to simply give birth, give birth and give birth, he explains... how good, this is, of course, your main goal in life, and if you don't give birth, it will be terrible, how wonderful, how

wonderful, then it turns out that it's diapers, that it's sleepless nights, that it's problems everywhere, from the moment of birth from the maternity hospital, where they bully you, yell at you, god knows what antediluvian methods they help you give birth and then, then, then kindergarten, school, problems, problems, problems, and there's no talk about that, because they created tame veterans, constantly telling about what's happening, having long

forgotten how it really was, you know, i i would do such an artistic experiment, for example, i would elect tamara edelman, and leonid gozman, and evgenia albats, yuria latynina, ekaterina shulman, ksenia larina, tatyana lazreva to the state duma, i would elect them to the duma, give them an office each, and it would be written that such and such a deputy, so some draft law appeared and immediately sent to their office, so if they said to adopt it immediately, then it must be forgotten forever, and if they don’t say so, it’s a disaster, we can’t touch it, it must be adopted in three readings at once, that’s just it immediately, automatically, and you will notice what posters are used...

the theme is clear and correct, men defend their homeland, their parents, children, they are our heroes, and how will a woman, a mother, perceive this picture, today save the child, do not have an abortion, and tomorrow he will go to war, so what is this, a mistake of the performer or an order, and who benefits from it, and do we not feel some specific very psychological impact on... such a subconscious level, as if by chance, as if, as if by accident, as if even nothing

special, this is what we talk about all the time, this is what is about those who are ready to open the gates of the rebuilt fortress from the inside, and you listen to what the doctor of the university of toronto, the scientist writer ian garner, writes about our country, three cute white children, another one is on the way, icons on the walls, dad serves in the navy, russia is full of this terrible, ethno-nationalist, fascist and... nography, i know that what i just said is bleeped out, but i have no other words, that is, think about it, a happy family of three children, the wife is waiting fourth child, father serves in the navy, orthodox family, judging by the icon on the wall, all this together, this bastard named

ian gardner calls fascist iconography. that is, mockery of the last supper, at the opening of the olympic games, transgenders who grimace in front of the government officials of all the guests invited to the opening of the olympic games in paris, men calling themselves women in the boxing ring who beat up real women, swimmers who hide their genitals because they stick out anyway further, this is all normal, and a family with white children, with a pregnant wife, and a military father icons - these are fascists, that is, you understand to what level the hysteria reaches about us, among those who do not want us

to exist in this world at all, and i will prove it to you once again now, pay attention that ... the interest is precisely only in us, in russia, not in brazil, not in poland, where the laws against abortions are much more serious, so to speak, precisely in russia. why? this is exactly where we return to the question that i asked a little earlier, because even the war that is going on in ukraine today, it follows the testament of, you know who, and the fuhrer's personal secretary, martin bormann, who... said the following: the slavs must work for us, to the extent that we do not need them, they can die out. the reproduction of the slavs is undesirable, they can use contraceptives and have abortions, and the more the better. and, isn't that the answer? that is precisely why,

after stalin issued a decree banning abortions in 1936, they were temporarily resolved, you know, when during the great patriotic war in the occupied territories of the german administration, it was the nazis who put this issue on the conveyor belt, to decide who should live, who should not live, who is needed, who is not needed, who is important, who is not important, listen to the interview with inna yambulatova, she is the secretary of the hippocratic medical forum. unfortunately, due to the timing of our time, our time, we cannot show it in its entirety, so we will show only fragments, but i highly recommend watching it in its entirety. well, there was such a man with a mustache, who believed that poor ugly schizophrenics should be sterilized, or better yet killed, and those they conceived should be destroyed in

the embryo, as he said, well , actually, do you like this kind of morality, it was his fight, it was the third reich. yes, it was adolf hitler, it was the t-4 program, by the way, a very serious program, t-4, which was ideologically justified and actually implemented. moreover, we encounter the first concept of surrogate motherhood in t4, when m forced insemination of a woman, there one gives birth, the other transfer for feeding, the third for education. and so i am not sure that many who are broadcasting today, should we pay poverty, that they...

which was received from the former ambassador of the united states to the soviet union gariman on july 18, 23, 1955 in geneva , a meeting took place between khrushchev and the leaders of the west. the united states was then represented by dwight esenhower, england by prime minister anthony eden, france by prime minister edgar faure. at that meeting , the western partners blew out. a number of demands to the soviet union in order to establish relations with western countries, the three most important ones are the reduction of armed forces, condemnation. stalin's activities, lifting the ban on abortions, and as we remember very well, all three demands were

met, and the key demands were: the reduction of armaments, that is, the weakening of the country, condemnation of stalin, that is, condemnation of the one who was the leader in the victory over nazi germany and... the extermination of the population through abortions, this is what we had to do so that we could sit in the hallway of one of these three countries, and note that these countries themselves, they were in no hurry to regulate the issue of abortions, for example, in great britain abortions were allowed in 1967, in the united states in 1973, but... in 2022 this law was repealed and allowed only in certain states, and in france abortions were allowed only in 1975,

look, what an amazing coincidence, so who demands that khrushchev in 1955 allow abortion, who writes our constitution in 1993, in which the protection of human rights... begins with his birth, but not before, and it is very interesting, how do they justify, say, the absence of children and the unwillingness to have them in today's world, to breed poverty, bad conditions, nothing to live on, which is largely fair, but it turns out that this is not the only reason, look,

personal life at the expense of the life of another, this is the desire of today's man to have everything at once, this is the artificiality into which

our whole life is gradually turning, artificial intelligence, artificial meat, artificial men, artificial women, artificial distance learning, you can exist in this artificial world and feel great, i want to remind you: one small episode from our film a few days from the life of oblomov about naturalness, look, his life is subordinated to the goal, work, not a single unnecessary action, step, unnecessary word, here he is healthy, rich, at 60 years old he looks younger than you, and why, andrey, at 60 years old you need to look 60, not 35, right, only then at 35 you don’t need to look 50 years old, like you? ah andrey, well your gold miner will live another 100 years, earn another 100 pieces, but for what? everyone

thinks only about how to eat, what is harmful, what is useful, what doctor to see for treatment, what waters to go to, everyone thinks only about how to live, but for what, no one wants to think. and this is a wonderful common phrase: to live for yourself, but what does that mean? isn't this the very thing we often talked about, when the quality of life is determined by the quantity and quality of pleasures in this life. remember aisan sergeevich pushkin, who wrote at 35 these lines: it's time my friend, it's time, the heart asks for peace, days fly by and every hour. takes away a piece of existence, and you and i together assume to live, and look, we'll just die. didn't pushkin live for himself, creating

his... great works, including these strict ones, because living for himself, it turned out that he lives for entire generations, and for centuries, well, okay, look, for example, students who are studying to be obstetricians and gynecologists, they are taught to perform abortions in the sixth year of sub-residency, this is a mandatory stage of training, absolutely right, because there are circumstances in which they must be able to do everything, but with everything...

and dmitry mendeleyev, who was engaged not only in chemistry but also in demography, he predicted that by the year 2000 there should be at least 600 million citizens in russia, he died in 1907, i could not imagine that in just 13 years, in the twentieth year , abortions would be allowed, from this year to ninety-one , 180 million would be killed, plus their children, and how many great regiments could there be among them?

a woman who came in, a sudden birth, premature pregnancy, she is from central asia, so she does not have any compulsory medical insurance, insurance policy and all that, she was not registered, she ends up in the russian hospital, the child is born alive, a live birth, the team starts saving him, golovach comes a day later and starts accusing them of saving this child. then they come to the fact that one of the teams that arrived, who were called from the center prenatally, asks her: but how do you deal with these children? she filled a syringe with magnesium and killed this child. so that's what was proven by the court, the court sentenced them to a serious article by prior conspiracy, a group of people, and what did the doctors who spoke in defense of the doctor say? they

said: yes, he's not fit anyway. yes, some tajik, yes, you've seen these freaks, you understand, yes, these were the words of people who are called to save lives, they spoke about human life in this way, really, that is , look, a certain professional deformation occurs, when this becomes a stream, it becomes a convert, it becomes habitual, it becomes natural, that is, the naturalness of abortion is equal to the naturalness of birth. but its activity is aimed at saving someone, and not at killing, there is a small difference here, although practically from the point of view of physical actions.