from the federation, as an independent entity. this is stated in the constitution of 1918, paragraph d, article 49. this means that even before the formation of the ussr, crimea received republican statehood in the form of an autonomous republic within the multinational russian federation, that is. watch carefully: in 1922, crimea became part of the rsfsr. period. in the same 1922. the crimean assr as part of the federal state, the rsfsr became a founder of the ussr. union. soviet

socialist republics from the rsfsr this the treaty was signed by the leaders of all the republics and autonomous republics of the formations that were part of the russian federation, including, this treaty was signed by said galeev sahib gorey, a member of the authorized delegation of the rsfsr. chairman of the council of people's commissars of the crimean assr, that is, this is the leader of crimea, who signs this document as part of the russian delegation, which included kalinin, and stalin, and so on and so forth, look at his signature, this is very important, this is very important, the crimean autonomy was co-founder.

a single union citizenship was established, this treaty of december 30, 1922, here is the document, what does this mean, that when concluding the treaty on the formation of the union of the ussr, the crimean assr had the right to leave the union as part of the rsfsr to retain. its

citizenship, the citizenship of the rsfsr, that is , thus, we understand that the crimean autonomy was created even before the ussr was formed, you understand, this is very important, very, neither the treaty of 1922, nor the constitution of the ussr, the rsfsr or the crimean assr did not provide for the possibility of abolishing the statehood of the autonomous republic. on june 30, 1945, the state legal personality of the crimean assr was illegally abolished. the republic was transformed into a region within the rsfsr. why did this happen? was this decision made? because part of the crimean

population, as well as part of the population of ingushetia, were suspected of collaboration with the german invaders, so these peoples were deported, which is absolutely, so to speak, illegal, completely deported to central asia, thus, the southern part chechen-ingush was transferred to the georgian ussr, other wounds. to the dagestan assr. the crimean autonomy became a region. and the rights and opportunities, as you understand, in the region, were much lower than the rights of the republic. that is, to summarize, in 1945 the crimean republic turns into a region within the russian sfsr. in 1954, according to the breadth of my namesake's soul.

the ussr, it really was united, but it was not monolithic, inside it, like in a matryushka, there were citizenships of the union and autonomous republics, but all together were citizens of the soviet union, to be clear, that is, again, listen

carefully, the residents of crimea themselves never renounced their russian citizenship.

is completely absent, it simply does not exist. let's go further. in the ninety-ninety-first year in the ussr, in the rsfsr, acts of abolition of the statehood of autonomous republics were recognized as criminal

, the rehabilitation of repressed peoples was established by law, that is, the chechen-ingush assr arose again, but. as a subject of the union of the ussr, a participant in the union treaty, that is, taking into account that the peoples the repressed were rehabilitated, and statehood had to be restored, at the regional referendum

the crimean region again became the crimean republic of the crimean assr. in august.

the grounds for crimea being part of ukraine were eliminated, because the republic was liquidated, ukraine became. an independent state, having cancelled all previous constitutions and laws, then it's interesting, look, the proclamation of august 24, ninety-one, the newly created state of ukraine, cancelled all by this act laws and the ussr, and thus cancelled the transfer of the crimean region in 1954, the ukrainian ussr. that is, this bond, this dependence is no longer there, but

nevertheless, ukraine legally guaranteed each citizen the preservation of union citizenship, and for crimeans, union citizenship was citizenship of the russian federation, they continue to remain citizens of the russian federation, that is , i will repeat again, starting.

because crimea made this decision before the constitution of ukraine arose, therefore, therefore, the cancellation of the declaration of state sovereignty of crimea, on this basis, was absolutely illegal, they deprived the people of the right to self-determination, this is a gross violation of all laws, including.

means that the residents of crimea, who were and were citizens of the russian federation, were prohibited from having their own citizenship, crimean or any other, they automatically became forcibly citizens of ukraine, that is, all these actions absolutely destroy the

level of state development that the crimeans wanted for themselves and transform... crimea, into a dependent ward territory, subject to all laws, a state, ukraine, but the ukrainian people still live with the illusion that the collapse of the ussr is nothing to worry about, that we will be friends, we will live together, listen, we will do it this way, one way or another, independently, we will press. no ties with russia will be interrupted, we will still be together with russia, but we will simply somehow proceed from our republic, and what do you expect from independence? well, naturally, more freedom, economic freedom and improvement life, of course, and what will be the relationship with russia? at the very best level, but there can be no other, we still need to stick

together, you have already voted today, so for what? for independence, well, and how... do you think some controversial issues might arise? no, listen further, in december 1991, the verkhovna rada of ukraine addressed the parliaments of the peoples of the world and announced that it considers the 1922 treaty on the formation of the ussr not only invalid, but also void, therefore... with all disputes, with all the stretching, shouting and emotions, crimea was transferred from the rsf, to the allied ukrainian ussr, but not to the state of ukraine, the state of ukraine, crimea was never transferred, that's the whole point, that is,

that is, on the one hand. the ukrainian government and leadership consider all laws from 22 to be invalid, but for some reason they consider it valid that in 1954 they got crimea from the rsfsr, where is the truth, where is the logic, just think about it, that is, on the one hand , these laws do not exist, they all invalid, that's how to say it, how, it seems like it happened, well, okay, could this suit the crimeans, what do you think? could they disagree with this? no, never, therefore the will of the multinational people of crimea to be a full-fledged subject in a union state with other peoples, republics

of the ussr, sfsr, was consistently expressed in referendums and... january 20 and march 17 and december 1, 1991, and of course march 16 , 2014, which radically changed the fate of crimea. and you yourself understand that maidan absolutely, so to speak, decided the fate of crimea.

documents, decrees, constitutions, orders, look at the people, these are the people who got their way, how can you not believe this,

so, the referendum decided the fate of crimea, but as we see from the documents, it never... left russia and not a single referendum was needed, if, if we followed the letter of the law, what our western partners demand of us, we don’t need a referendum, neither the first, nor the second, nor the third, nor the fourth, crimea has always been according to the law, according to the documents, it has always been russian, well and in general, if we speak in general... ukraine lives with an absolutely split consciousness, well , here it is, it is split, look, on the one hand, russia is an aggressor,

the molotov-ribbentrop pact is a crime, just a crime, but if it is a crime, then give back the regions that ukraine received from poland under this pact, give it back to her, everything will be fine, that is, on the one hand , the molotov-ribbentrop pact is a crime, on the other hand, the fact that ukraine received in the region from poland in connection with this crime, it seems to be fine. another very interesting fact that andrei medvedev, a journalist, found, i found it interesting, that's what it means not to try to delve into history, to immerse yourself in the history of the creation of this, that, the third, the fifth. here. andrei medvedev found a very interesting document about the origin of the ukrainian flag, the yellow-blue flag,

that's how it came into being, listen carefully, in 1848 an uprising began in austria-hungary, the poles in galicia rebelled, the local russians, the ruthenians came out. on the side of the authorities, against the polish rebels, was a russian regiment of 1,500 men was formed, which behaved very heroically, bravely, steadfastly, and so on and so forth in battle, and the governor of galicia, count stadion, presented the russians with their new regimental standard on behalf of the emperor. the standard was accompanied by a ribbon on which the empress... wove the words: loyalty leads to victory, and the standard was a two-color yellow-blue position, well, this is where the flag

of ukraine originates, and few people know about this, i think practically no one knows that the flag of ukraine is the flag that the habsburgs gave to the ruthenians for their courage, who never considered themselves... ukrainians, and this flag became the state ensign - of the republic of ukraine. well, you must agree that there is much in this, in all of this, much of something that is not real, something so false and high-flown. but, i want to finish with another proof that the greatest happiness for... for the crimeans is that they ended up in russia and did not remain where they were, how

can a person feel in a country where a deputy of the verkhovna rada, nikita baturaev, without a moment's hesitation, can say out loud to the public pronounce such words.

let's learn not to shout, not to scream, not to push, but just to talk, listen to each other, hear, look at documents, delve into them, know history, then we will not be threatened with becoming a country with an unpredictable past and the question of whose crimea is will not arise, that's all for today, and as our mechman, a clumsy man, said, we leave one by one, if anything, we are geologists, all the best, i'm waiting for you at our next meeting.

at the beginning of the issue to the news from france, where the day before was detained. the founder of the social telegram networks. journalists lemont believe that this act. paris is creating a world precedent, given that 3 years ago pavel durov received french citizenship, presumably through a very rare procedure of honorary citizenship. we learn the latest details of the high-profile arrest from our european correspondent regina sevastyanov.