and the well-known enemy of our people, candaliza rice, she said that the talented head of the russian central bank elvira nabilina smoothed out many vulnerabilities of the economy, walking the tightrope, without having access to 300 billion dollars of frozen russian money stored in the west, well, i'm glad that someone appreciated it, but i would also like, among other things, that every time i read the next scenario of the central bank, the first thing there was not inflation.

they have repeatedly said that our task is not only to win, to create the preconditions for russia, so that they would be such that no one would think of resisting russia with military forces or other forces, as for this meeting, you know, i could not help but be pleased with what was said, and most importantly, the format, look at the participants of this meeting, our supreme, he understands economics perfectly, so he ultimately decided...

to ensure a victorious conclusion to the svo, everything is hidden in this capacious statement, which means both competitiveness and the development of any areas, in finance, production sphere, must be subordinated to one. the only criterion for the application of all these elements in the economy is victory. this means that the availability or legitimacy of the use of certain mechanisms by economic institutions is ensured by only one. if

this corresponds to our task of victory, then you and i must look, and what did the central bank say after that? well, with all my deep respect for the people who work there, well, as far as the economic sphere is concerned, he said enough so that today it could be said about this, that's what concerns svo, armies, victories in svo, well, i didn’t find it, maybe i didn’t look hard enough, i didn’t find it, and with what they say, nothing... they said with precision, like an absolute lack of any information, look what happened next, then the head, the management of the central bank decided to put one of the deputies out, apparently, maybe, that it wasn’t a pity, well, i don’t want to say that, but judging by the statements, of course yes, because well, what does the deputy of the central bank say against this background, that the current policy, monetary policy that corresponds to the current stage of development? it does not create

obstacles to the long-term sustainable development of our economy, listen, it's even somehow well, you read yourself and you start not only not to respect, but not to trust yourself in what you read the day before, because the goal of the forecast development of our economy today from the central bank is to move away from 4.5% gdp growth to one and a half or even 0.5% next year in the twenty- sixth year. that is, the goal of the central bank is a decrease in growth rates, they predict that and this is definitely our central bank, this is a separate issue, then, but their forecasts, then, then it was also said in the form of forecasts, that in addition to this, we are observing with you a mandatory transition to management, then , of supply and demand, look at what the president said, he mentioned a very important thing, that firstly, the coordination of the actions of the central bank, which has been repeatedly discussed here why, yes , because well... after all, even today's

statement by the central bank goes under the title is a single monetary credit policy, well listen, the word single is somehow understood, that probably everyone who is involved in the implementation of these economic tasks, well, are busy with this issue. however , it is emphasized that the central bank still has its own position. and then it goes, again, i would like to quote our president, and the comments of the central bank. our president said, i will repeat these words, he actually recorded that the only mechanism or the correct mechanism for combating inflation is that demand, growth, supply of goods and services that meet demand, consumer demand, investment demand, but investment demand, he also mentioned there. the president, that there is some discrepancy or advancement of development of the financial segment, what he meant was that despite all these actions of the central bank to actually limit economic growth , lending is still growing, well listen, how else? firstly, this phenomenon has several explanations, well firstly, western receipts have disappeared there

financing, so people, well, what can you do, they are looking for something, what is available on such terms, many western companies have gone further, our companies are striving to capture the market, but... developing production they go for these most difficult lending conditions, finally we understand that this process still has, well, an explanation of violence, some violence against economic sense, because many take even these loans, expecting that later financial indicators will cover these costs, well, that is, inflationary expectations, the national bank continues to insist that there are some inflationary expectations, because when our president pointed out further, this is not yours, but this was generally stated at this meeting: economic growth and wage growth have a positive effect on the formation of the federal budget showed that the federal budget for 7 months reached the figure of 20 trillion rubles, while 2/3

of the federal budget is not oil and gas revenues, well, that is, it shows that despite everything, it does not give assessments, at least i did not read it, but it records that yes we... says: but the only, the most effective way of fighting inflation is the central bank for criticism, apparently, the key rate, well listen, they seem to think it doesn't work, apparently he was just absent, no, he wasn't present at the meeting, but well listen.

by 1%, this is zero, this is nothing, and what was the result of this that, for example, if we take the production of agricultural machinery, a double-digit reduction, a double-digit reduction, tractors, seeders and so on, but this is a trend, but it is frightening, because for this will result in there being no equipment,

there will be an increase in the cost price for agricultural producers, and this will affect , excuse me, the prices of agricultural products, that is , we should listen more carefully to the president, not to resist him, because with... a bold central bank in this confrontation, on the contrary, to promote and hear that the combination of the government's efforts and the central bank should be aimed at solving these problems. look what happens next, it is clear that today, against the backdrop of such statements it is very difficult for the president to talk about the overheating of the economy, it is very difficult to talk about the fact that the critical demand exceeds supply, that we are developing beyond our capabilities, well , it is clear, the central bank said all this, now it is thinking, how, well, what else could be argued... they cannot give at least one example, that is, here, and i will say about this, here they are, in fact, the forecast of the central bank regarding our development for the coming year and even years really, well, positively, it pleases me, why, because over the past 10 over the past 10 years not a single forecast has come true for

the central bank, so i hope, maybe, but i read somewhere on the internet, you know, i'll digress a little, there when someone commented on the statement of various representatives of the central bank... said i have this feeling, because there they gave as an example a marathon runner running somewhere, there was a car given as an example, that it goes faster than it is designed for, someone wrote: it feels like there, there is everything, athletes, there are doctors, designers, financiers, not very many, well, in general, i don’t want to offend anyone, but i would like other examples, it’s normal, but today, you know, i heard a phrase that turns out, well, it’s inconvenient against such a background, as the president did in the form of a statement about the development of the economy and prospects, to say that inflation is provoked by overheating of the economy, so they have now come up with a new explanation, that

what is it about? well, because it’s clear that his economy is not about it, that is, not at all, by the way, i wonder if it is under sanctions or not, i'm just curious, how many of the central bank employees are under sanctions, well, that's how i understood it, about the same number as he said that many trends, despite even what was said, apparently by the president, are still pushing the bank, the central bank, to make a decision in the near future that it would be necessary to tighten the monetary credit policy. and bring the discount rate to 20-22%, well, let it

do 100 right away, why suffer, what's 20 times a year, but you know, with these interest rates, with this growth, we have already entered the top ten there from the bottom, that is, the very same ones, but the funniest thing is that you know, the fundamental difference is that those countries that have such a high interest rate, they also have inflation there somewhere off the charts, and we are the only country where inflation is lower by almost two times the interest rate or three times the interest rate. higher, but still, on average , it turns out that the interest rate is almost twice the average profitability in our

country, well, whatever you do, everywhere we somehow the main thing is don't take hold of the handle of the gear lever, don't take hold of economic theory, i'll explain now what i mean, so i was at the front now, we're driving, talking, a wonderful conversationalist, suddenly we're driving a uaz patriot, suddenly such a quiet phrase from the driver: oh, at the moment of switching, the lever remained in his hand. the car is perfectly new, it happens, yes, it happens, i say, it's normal, he says, yes, constantly, that is, he says, tired of driving back, while it costs so much to drive them, their repair, you have to be a real patriot, is this a mockery, now, for example, at the front, what is needed, yes, well, it is clear, tanks, yeah, bmp, no, they are needed in large quantities, electric scooters, mopeds, motorcycles, buggies and of course we have all this of domestic production, here from the cities all

electric scooters are a great idea, there are guys storming there far away from zavdeevka, they say: you will laugh, electric scooters work great, we take them, well, it is clear that everything depends on the area, there are clearly a million nuances, but now any large equipment immediately flies in, everyone sees everything, flies instantly, on this small one, quickly like a consumable, the question is, which of them are domestically produced, or do we count them as domestic? china and how much does it cost, when will everyone finally come to their senses, when they say that we have there, what are we oversaturated with, we have everything oversaturated with china, the sovereignty of our economy is the most important question, and this and if the longer we postpone the solution of many issues, you mentioned china, there are many examples there, for example, today announced that they are already starting to sell their aircraft outside of china.

"sorry, we will comply with sanctions and the financial sector not only and will not be able to supply you with machines, components for what will we do next, the americans have now purchased from chinese factories." for 2 million drones, each of which weighs 7 kg. the question is, where do you think these drones will end up? at the same time , the chinese, honestly say, why shouldn't we sell to the americans? what's the problem? are we ready for such a scenario? we understand, what could it be. don't ask the central bank, we have to work ahead of the curve. and i say again, it's not even a question of

the central bank itself. here's what the president said about there having to be a coordinated policy with the central bank. they don't give us the opportunity, when i was talking there and suggesting, well, look, there is still some contradiction between the constitution and the functions of the central bank, the constitution and the law on the central bank, well, let's not return to this topic, i think we'll return to it later, but if we talk about that, what is written in the constitution is to deal with the ruble, well, the ruble exchange rate, i recently came across figures that if you calculate

the current ruble exchange rate using purchasing power parity, then it is 27 rubles. 27 rubles per dollar, you know, this is actually true, because the facts are given there, that is, it is compared with the products that you can buy for the national currency, if you calculate it, then it should cost that much, i am not suggesting now to drop it three times there 62 kopecks everything is tough, but you understand that well if something is a duty, do it, and then you will probably have enough for everything else, if you prove efficiency here, but i would like to finish with one thing, so that this meeting is preferably held as often as possible, well, or the president himself will determine how often, but the main thing... so that everyone has the opportunity to speak there, including those people whom we sometimes, perhaps, for one reason or another criticize, beautifully, remember, i always speak on your show, after aleksandr mikhailovich and i say partly, continuing his theme, i spoke about this too, i listened carefully to his

speech, as you rightly said, you have to listen carefully, you interrupted his speech there, of course, the president must first of all sit down and listen to all sides, what you said about the constitution, the law on central banks, this comes from the nineties, it was written specifically to separate the two structures, the government and the central bank, it already led to a kulapsa once, when dubinin and the others did not print enough money, it was necessary, and it led to that very crisis

when we said that we couldn’t pay people anything, especially in the nineties, and now... it’s written about this, you mentioned china, i’ll tell you straight, like i sometimes argue with you on the show, and recently my wife and i were watching a film about shanghai, she was so excited, well, you’re a politician, well, why isn’t it like that with us, we’ve got another, you know , turmoil started there, and i said, why isn’t it like that, well, because all the nineties now, you ’re right, we’re moving now actively 4.6. so development yes for 7 months, increase in wages, right, without taking into account inflation 10%. but at the same time these are only the last years and we are moving very slowly, because if i recall pre-war stalin, you recalled now and after the war, i specifically do not take the war, because it was different there, then our development rates were 13

more percent, 13.8, 13.6, 13.5, for 15 years, china did not dream of this. about something else right after a short pause.

so says the lighthouse, yes, yes, and continuing this topic, you are right with ... giving an example of the price, uaz, we just sent another communist, already 100 there, 30 or something, i forgot to even count the convoys, there are four uazs, several motorcycles, i think, yes, i can imagine what words your driver used there, the one you were traveling with, but at the same time , mind you, we collect uazs from everyone, our communists cost more than a million, more than a million in the most basic configuration sometimes , which means i know very well what to do with them, this is the second part of this meeting, which i always talked about, the second part of this meeting, he probably gathered everyone there, i saw everyone there, from the minister of economic development to all

the deputy prime ministers, where are our tariffs going, where are our prices, you're right, a projectile, it seems like all of our smart guys are talking, but our military-industrial complex is developing due to this 4.6%, in order to produce a projectile, we need steel, we need additional metal, all this needs to be done additionally somewhere in... with someone at magnitka, somewhere else, that means we need to produce ore, we need to mine and so on, paint, well, off we go, that means, that's all drags industry along with itself, but at the same time drags prices up, huge prices for metals, increase, huge prices for electricity tariffs, for gas, for electricity, well of course, because they need to expand, in order to expand, they need money, that they need money, you go for loans, crazy loans to hire people, there are not enough people. right, we now have competition with the armed forces, salaries there have become very high, which means, accordingly, here we need to raise salaries, then the question arises, we need to bring people to work, and at

for some reason, if they bring a person, they want him right away, here you go, citizenship, with what joy, complete idiocy, this is what medvedev said, by the way, i have to, well , let's listen to seychevich, so that you continue, let's listen to anatolyevich, there is no very simple solution here, like kicking everyone out to hell, it's impossible, because...

then just get rid of them immediately, don't give them some kind of probationary periods, if you don't do something, get out, i would just like to clarify, let's create two at the state level separate ministries, one deals with the affairs of compatriots, because i was talking to a nice woman, our compatriot from greece, to come here from greece, it's a madhouse, she's a russian , she raised children there, a madhouse, endless. i see how they bring in a wild number of people, it's unclear where from, without any russian language, they immediately have russian passports, a labor migrant who came here, he

doesn't need to become a citizen of russia, he doesn't need to drag his family here, but there are examples different countries where it's all brilliantly organized, well, why be smart, then copy, take, well, probably, there is a plan, that's the point, not such a plan for citizenship, there are corruption schemes, if the respected alexander ivanovich bastrykin is not at home there.

how many i say under this law you have recruited, we have created medicine there in uzbekistan, we accept the language, we look at the profession, 100-odd people, why - he says, and because your employers do not go this way, it is easier for them to take in russia and those with patents arrived and then not pay them extra, for them not to answer, not to send them away, not to pay for the return ticket, then i suggested, and we all

suggested, well... they all live somewhere in some hostels there, yes, so, returning to this meeting, finishing with it, why do i also place great hopes on it, because the unresolved problems that exist in the ministries in the central bank should be solved first of all, so maybe a president like ours, he most likely gave it to the closed part, we, you and i will go now to the eastern economic forum, we will talk with

with all of them with the deputy prime ministers. in mariel at kazankov's or in irkutsk, i'm not even talking about the sovkhoz there grudin, the salary has been more than 100 thousand for a long time now, well, why free kindergartens, they even provide free housing, children's food, well, this can be done, so let's do it in these enterprises , let's help them, i say, and of course, this is what government policy is needed for, they don't drag this profit into their pockets, like many others,

they don't raise tariffs, so that they... run around with these passports, and as soon as something happens, let's protect him, yes why, we have to protect him, now they 'll drag all the former vice-premiers, they're all secret carriers, they'll all go to the cia there,

here, there, somewhere, and so what?