here i would like to share some things that have happened recently, which actually relate to the war of meanings. well first of all i will state, and condi rice wrote, thank you very much, a good article, from which i conclude that their understanding has not changed at all during this time, this is very good, there are no new ideas even on the horizon...

she, of course, saw in ilvira nabeulina the woman who can join their ranks. i have no doubt about it. another good thing, which can be stated, that, for example, candace rice still had, how can i say, the conceptual potential to write such an article. i just can't imagine.

and there is no need to think that it will develop at the pace that we need now, there is no such potential, we have calculated everything. they believe in this, now further in the space of meanings, let's take durov, what was it about, well , we must save a father of many children, it was a tragedy, they are still all on him for the elements, now now thank god, at least

at least from one wife of information, there is called child abuser, yes, and there is more, but i have such a feeling, after all, why all this?

to survive to close it will not work, that is, this is not durov, this is a representative of a very large digital business, who says: and we do not consider it right that you are a state, which we by and large choose to appoint at the expense of our technologies, that you now want to climb into our souls to take us by

the throat, and the west is making a very serious mistake, because in the space of meanings that we are talking about, they have always had one trump card, they could always say: we are the defenders of freedom, i remember the soviet union, yes, we had nothing to counter, in fact, they had more freedom for people, and for the media, and for everything, now this is not the case, but they still have this residual influence, and if they destroy this residual influence, everyone will laugh when they speak, and we are for freedom, all ha-ha-ha-ha-ha, like a camel, and the rest of the world will speak about itself... look, this will already be a very serious shift, when from under their propaganda, in fact, will completely knock out that foundation on which it has practically sat for centuries, yes, and if you take there they wrote a wonderful article that well durov should understand the difference between impudent

authoritarian demands and fair requests of democratic institutions, well, by the way, i suggest, here we are, here we are also somehow somewhere forming our media space little by little, right? if we are already talking about accusations, well, excuse me, if you take the head of some military concern and ask him the question: if durov, sponsor of terrorism, and who are you? maybe when you leave the house, the police

should quickly ask you a question, and how do you sponsor the murders that are happening, well, that's all. today is the 120th anniversary of the founding of tas. which is, after all , our everything, of course, authorized to declare, tas is authorized to declare that it is 120 years old, yes, finally, but this raises a very serious question: we have a state agency tas, yes, but very, very recently, where did the information come from to our ministries, for example.

okay, candida rice is smart, of course, she can probably write an article, but

she won't become president, kamela harris will become one, and what's more, imagine kamela harris in a worn leather jacket, a red headscarf with a mauser in her hand, when she enters congress, maybe, wow, that's her essence, she's a prosecutor and a livka at the same time. nothing has gone away, another thing is that she's a political weather vane, that is, now she's openly denying what she said and that there are recordings, they exist, i will help, please give us trump, who clearly says between whom and whom is the choice now, just a confirmation of andrey's words, this election is not a choice between democrats and republicans, it is a choice between communism and freedom, that 's the thing, your candidate?

wait, but the last 3 and a half years of this decade fell on your administration. i am talking about the era that began about 10 years ago. then there was.

has not governed for a long time, biden was a figurehead, kamela was behind all the actions harris, of course it's not true, it's far from true, but they have differences in roles, well, if i always considered biden as a clock hand, there is a mechanism there, then kamala is really a weather vane, but for kamala it is very difficult to run a campaign now, but any vice president who runs a campaign under his boss, who is still here, it is always difficult for him. has this ever happened in the history of america? well, of course it has, of course it has. when was the last time? well, please, he was running a computer , but no, he was already killed by bush, and he was also leaving. no, there was no such thing, no such thing, no such thing there was no, when he left, the outgoing president, nixon was leading, and he was also leaving, senkhaur had been

leaving for 8 years, from yes, there was practically no such thing, but still it is very difficult for her now, she is responsible for everything. here they are trying to write off the company, they are leading it very competently, i am waiting now, but she refused, the headquarters of the democratic party on september 4 refused to hold debates on trump's terms, i am waiting for the tenth, in my opinion, this most likely may not happen, that is, they will find a reason to avoid direct debates between kamala harris and donald trump, but trump is being prepared by tuls and gabr. that is, a former democrat, a former representative of the democratic party, who beat harris in 1919. let me remind you that at the second democratic debate in july 1919, harris beat biden then, quite seriously, she battered him, but tuls and gabr battered him, battered her, so the fact that they are preparing for this, well, she will go

to them, a friendly channel will not go, but all the same, these statements about the fact that let's not turn off the microphones...

she will remove him, she has her own other preferences for this post, but the fact that it was accepted by sidzenpen is also a very important element for me, especially remember, if

on may 23 china and brazil announced their concept, as a consensus of china and brazil on reconciliation, ukraine violated all those six points that were there, but nevertheless, here are our partners, expecting what is, especially said... support for this, that nothing happened, here politically and and such a psychological situation, the country continues live in their own regime, and there are military

actions going on, yes, these military actions are causing losses and everything else, but now we have two very important, legally important levers, the first is that they have weapons, it is confirmed by the shooting down of this plane. the recognition of all parties involved that this instrument, this platform that can carry nuclear weapons, is on the territory of ukraine, it was shot down on the territory of ukraine, it fell, it hit, it doesn’t matter, everyone recognized that the f-16 is there clearly, the second thing, an attack was made on the internationally recognized territory of the russian federation, kursk. this is not donbass, they do not recognize it, but they recognized kursk as an internationally recognized territory, therefore, from my point of view, we now have a completely free hand

to transfer the conflict from the state in which it is now, this is an operation to force peace, full-fledged military actions against the enemy country, and accordingly this gives the opportunity to strike at any. objects, not only infrastructure, but, for example, on objects of political control, which is what the ukrainians are actually talking about, why do they need these missiles, not only energy structures, not only military objects, but also objects of political control, that is, on the kremlin. now these two factors have untied our hands, and it seems that in the current situation we need to move on to more active actions, using all the opportunities that our country has. i think that if we observe the actions of our western opponents, then they certainly have some very

a certain scenario that assumes constant qualitative changes, development, but the information mechanism that they use to promote it, it has been repeating itself for 3 years already, first it says that the russians are winning, everything is clear here, it won't last long, then it says, yeah, the deadlines actually turned out not to be... a method, and where is humanism, and where are you doing what? and zelensky says: no, it is absolutely necessary and give me new missiles so that i can hit russian territory and allow it

to do, the americans are resisting this with all their might, but nevertheless zelensky does not listen to him, and for greater credibility they also release the moral monster josep barel, who says: but we are fine with this, the americans are kind of against it, they doubt it, no specifics, but the european union ardently supports it, does not see anything bad in it in order to shift these accents, and by the way, sergey viktorovich lavrov also spoke about this, that the americans are trying to create the impression that they are, they say, for escalation are not involved in any way, they are outside of all this, and this is very easy, by the way, to connect with his second thesis about the fact that the americans are always saying: of course, we do not want a third world war, there will be no europe left, as if they would stay there, there will only be... the future of europe is in great question, these two facts are interconnected, if we look at the speech of josep barel, of course i agree with this.

i am very sorry that the man is leaving his post, because in the conditions of his existence as a political figure, the need to explain to our population, to tell them to what extent the scumbags are on the other side of the barricades from us on the part of the european union, this is the need to strive for zero, because you can simply turn on any of his speeches and a normal , sane person will draw all these conclusions for himself, what is the essence of these last ones?

members of the european union, so that they allow the use of european weapons against the russian federation on its own territory, then the question arises: who are you, if you put pressure on those who elected you? it's about the same as if a deputy of the state duma of the russian federation said: i put pressure on my voters so that i can do what i want, it doesn't work that way, so it turns out that the member countries of the european union, which are directly involved

in the process, supposedly yes, participate in the process of appointing the top diplomat of the european union, in fact, nothing depends on them, it is he who puts pressure on them, it turns out that he has no idea member countries of the european union, that the main interested party for whom he works is the united states of america, because in this scenario it is absolutely obvious what the americans want, an endless escalation between european countries, the russian federation and... where the national intelligence services, which are not even their countries ' governments, which are also corrupt, which are also agents, therefore they represent, which are absolutely pathetic, good for nothing and do not represent their own population, leaders, but even when they have a slight opportunity to say no somewhere or step aside somewhere, at that moment the euro-bureaucracy comes into play, which , with its statements, actions and various

kinds of...