the west has staked on russia's strategic defeat, and lost. the internal problems of the us and european countries have led to the throwing of their leaders, who are stuck in a swamp of their assistance to ukraine. they threaten to destroy our country, calling for their missiles to be fired deep into russia, and then they roll back, realizing that they are losing the trust of their electorate. the democrats are losing points to the us, macron

has to make a deal with the party of marie le pen, schulz, the liver sausage is looking for a core, a core, he decided to become a peacemaker, today he is developing his peace plan, russia will talk to the western world only on its own terms, which is what the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, sergey lavrov, spoke about today at a press conference in arriada. the west does not want.

one of the initiatives floating in the political space does not mention, that's when we will see a serious readiness to defend those very human rights that the west always proudly carries on its banners on any issue, but not for this reason, when we see such readiness, i am convinced, we will easily agree on the place and... time of the meeting, but first

we need to understand what we will discuss, we protect people, everyone who in one way or another shows interest in facilitating the settlement should understand this, make it a direct part of their practical work. i always considered scholz a fool, but he proves it time after time, here is what he said in an interview with zdf or cdf, as it is correctly recognized, cdf. i think that now is the time to discuss how we can quickly get out of this military situation and achieve peace. this means that there will be peace talks, a peace conference, there will definitely be another peace conference, ukrainian the president and i agree that russia should be there. hitler and mussolini

discuss what is absolutely necessary at the peace conference, stalin should be invited, you don't get it, let me explain it to you so calmly, westerners, don't forget to translate, europe, a colossal decline in industrial production, a very smart italian friend, who was even once a prime minister, originally a banker, wrote a report. in which he simply calculated: your friends from america, the europeans, have deceived you, you are buying gas at four times the price it costs costs an american, your oil costs are twice as much, based on this, the competitiveness of europe is destroyed, your industry, which europe has been famous for for centuries, has found itself in a position where it is simply not competitive. your great

automobile industry, as you have positioned it since its inception, there are the greatest names there, has reached a state that has never been seen in... the history of the auto industry, well, it has never been this bad, and there is no chance of revival, you have lost the markets of russia, you have deprived yourself of the chinese markets, you have become unattractive for investment because the cost of production has grown enormously, what to invest in, you have isolated yourself, and the americans' capabilities. they are simply making fun of you, they have destroyed their main economic competitor for 2022, they simply deceived you, what did you get in return? an army of refugees from ukraine, on which you have to spend money,

an eternally dissatisfied person who demands that you always give him money, a political elite who...

strategic defeat of russia, ukrainian german troops in moscow, division of the country into 190 small states, the most disappearing nuclear weapons, that is, what is it, as you see it, here you enter the territory of the russian federation and begin to control what and how powerful nato troops jingling with varnished bells. will run to do what, here in a modern war it will look like? no one even tries to answer this question: we will defeat russia, how? we see over the past 30 years that not a single military victory has been achieved by it, not in

in the case of iraq, not in the case of afghanistan, not in the case of syria, not in the case of libya, countries with all due respect to them, incomparable in their.

year of war, he still thinks that he can outwit the west, that the west does not have enough strength. one of the most important tasks of the west is to prove that it still has strength. ukraine is a test that will show that it has strength. do you think there is

hope that this terrible conflict will be resolved. this hope is one of the themes that runs through your whole book. yes. because i think that in the end everything will understand that this conflict will not end like the first world war or the second world war. ultimately , we will come to some kind of agreement. the main thing is that we must strengthen ukraine so that when he understands that he cannot achieve his goal, the ukrainians could make a decent and reasonable deal, that is, he contradicts himself, and most importantly he does not understand what this is interested in, and since this is traditionally, by the way, british arrogance, to know nothing and to understand nothing about your opponent, that is why britain...

"i feel that a bright future awaits us, we will elect a new president, that she will lead the country honestly and fairly, i will become this president, yes, please, her predecessor, or rather her current boss, communicated with the other world, so what? why not communicate with a ball, but as for strategic defeat, i

certainly do not agree, because strategic defeat, they see the complete destruction of russia, its collapse, of course, and what is this, and this has already happened, this is the collapse of russian empire, strategic defeat of the russian empire, no, the empire has disappeared, this state has disappeared, the second is the strategic defeat of the soviet union, this state is also gone, that is, there is a constant geopolitical contracting. disappeared , the soviet union appeared, yes, but the soviet, the soviet union has also disappeared, this is a strategic defeat, which is calculated for the long term, now that's why i keep saying that this is a cold war, which is necessary, i understand, this is carthage, which has disappeared, this is a strategic defeat, strategic defeat, the disappearance of the state against which they are waging.

they did not finish off the enemy, they began to divide the skin of the bear before it was killed already in the nineties, believing that, well, yes, remember the articles of the nineties, yes, russia is a dog that does not bark, the world without russia, in general, in short, the country was written off, but we had to degrade further, well, this is just proof that you are wrong, that is , strategic, because the strategic defeat was not inflicted, somehow it did not it was, well, if it had been inflicted, then there would not have been a country that was reborn.

that is, the continuity is left, that is , it is no longer a strategic defeat, the nuclear potential is completely preserved, what is meant by strategic, strategic defeat, the complete destruction of carthage, strategic defeat, the complete destruction of the roman, yugoslavia suffered a defeat, the state as such, its political system and so on, new states arise on the territory of this.

i am talking about the fact that paul i generally considered almost like a prusak, i say.

in the political structure, in many other things, yes, that's right, the soviet union, i say again that this state, you were born in the soviet union, you were born, here in our state, in which we were born, no, you and i now live in the heir, the successor

of the soviet union, which at one time, at one time was the successor, respectively , the russian woman in the russian federation, the main thing is that money reproduces for it the natural forms of itself, organization and management, and does he does it for god's sake. but it means a little bit different thing, yes the russian people reproduce, by the

way, one of the problems that we are facing now is reproduction, natural reproduction of the russian people, the russian people, as a state forming ethnic group, by the way, that's why they are also working, because by the end of this century, now, now, now, yes, yes, what was our population, i want, i want to remind you, yes, mendeleyevich believed that we should have half a billion there by the forties. yes in 2000, he considered the year 2000, but if you look at it like this, say logic, and our ethnic composition has changed dramatically throughout our history, it’s just that this needs to be researched, but it has changed dramatically, in 1612 we made a choice, we moved away from monoethnicity, along which, say, the poles went to conciliarity, the russian people are a conciliar phenomenon, now the question is that the population...

treated badly, they sent to us, and sent away from us, they wouldn’t give a damn about it at all, that is, against us, against us they even close, they sent them to us so that we

could detain them, they sent them to us, this was already a question for us, not for them, but something else is important, it is important to understand very clearly that as a result of this picking off they got their main enemy for decades to come, what kind of idiots do you have to be to abandon the russian empire, which, by the way, the americans adored in the 19th century.

firstly, when the bolsheviks came, they did not know who they were anymore, many did not know then, i will turn around, they got the soviet union, which was a much greater threat to them, than tsarist russia, yes, they initially considered the soviet, well, okay, they considered the soviet union as the main threat, because the soviet union was isolated, well, stop it, they didn’t just consider it, it was like a white side for them.

so you won’t succeed, i’m talking about the fact that a strategic defeat is the disintegration of russia, and according to the models that were in the 20th century, so they will wage a long war, and the main element is now already quite clearly manifested in them, a change of power in russia, softly speaking, they say putin will leave someday, this is so, judging by russian history, after a very strong leader, yes, we have, well, let's say, after stalin khrushchev, no matter what brezhnev was, then gorbachev comes, this is what they are counting on, that the strategic defeat of russia, it is not now, it is necessary to create conditions under which the russian federation will be weakened, this can be military pressure, economic pressure, they will press with whatever they will, well, now they are pressing with ukraine, but this is not pressure at all, from they are reconciling this pressure, we are, well, what

's good, yes, we are waging a war. because the american economy is growing, because the european economy is growing, they have begun to live better , there hasn't been such a decline in personal consumption in america for 30 years, it's clear that there hasn't been one now, now they are switching to other foundations of existence , well, what other foundations of existence are there , well, stop it , there hasn't been such a systemic , deep crisis in america as there is now, in fact, it's been a long time since the thirties.

it's just that my turn hasn't come yet, yes because the concept of strategic defeat is a military-political concept that is not limited to philological sophistication, but is based on a clear analysis of the remaining possible resources for their implementation.

tiksov, i, a traveler, aeronaut jean ivan. and so we go out teski, what a fairy tale without ivan, eh, what started, without deception and without flint, i was imprisoned in flints to lie down, pen, self-written magic ink, you will get it, you are the main thing, vanya, hurry up, so give me a horse.