who are you? i, a traveler, a balloonist, jean ivan, and so we are namesakes, what kind of fairy tale without ivan, what began, without deception? without flint, the villain locked me in flint, pen, self-written magic ink, get it, you main thing, vanya, hurry up, so give me a horse, a mechanical one, hit yourself on the head, do you have a nickname, where it is necessary, that's what they call me, because i'm not taking you where you fool want, where it is necessary? i can't live without

travel, flint, he who has flint in his pocket doesn't need a pen, soon!

the idea of ​​freedom, which seems to me, romanticized for quite a long time, brought to the point of absurdity, like any other idea, by the way, like the idea of ​​order, the idea of ​​order leads to another, to another death, so to speak, death in the form of some kind of petrification, the question is that life, life, as if yes, it is much richer, more natural than any such ideas brought to absolutely similar ones, and the current west, so to speak, has actually, so to speak, put this idea of ​​self-destruction at the forefront and is moving humanity towards it, therefore...

in no case, when you or constantly consume pictures, all the time you need to read, so to speak, everything everywhere that is written, or all the time make money, money, money, money, money, or something like that, you need to fill this void of meanings with an endless, so to speak, yes, without crazy fuss, modern technologies, this, this, this is done perfectly, they are all about this kind of thing, therefore the patriarch said completely, it seems to me, so to speak, obviously, even without that, believe it or not, obvious, obvious words, absolutely uncontrolled development of these technologies will lead to the death of the spirit, i... i'll tell you, even to the death of the mind, because cognitive abilities, so to speak, yes, are falling, awareness of reality is becoming primitive, the ability to make conscious decisions is gradually dissolving, analyzing the situation, so to speak , yes, is becoming more and more difficult and more difficult, by the way, we see this phenomenon, by the way, including in our political reality, for example, in the same ukraine, as yes, and so on, because this is also a product of mass culture and mass manipulation, absolute misunderstanding, unwillingness, so to speak, you are being led there, so to speak, to the slaughter, there... they told

you some kind of myth absolutely, as if , not even based on facts, and you have no education, no ability to think in order to realize that this may not be so, maybe it is not true, well , so what, so go there, as they would tell you there, then you will be in europe, there these same euros and dollars will rain down on your head, that is, i mean that all these things are interconnected, it may seem that, you know, all this is poetry, all this blah-blah-blah, i just know , so to speak, even by the number of people, so to speak, who look through, let's say , these things or read there, as soon as you start talking about, you know, such deep meanings, that's it, it's not interesting, yes , in fact, this is not poetry at all, it is so tightly connected and intertwined with the whole, so to speak, with all nature, including the political process, that this must be understood in order to, where it is going, so to say what is happening, because a person without these things, he is blind, so you can really say so, here and there, here and there to steer, about, a couple of words all the same about the situation around ukraine, without this there is no way, yes, although here too the awareness of these truths is extremely important, about the words of the president. to think about limiting

supplies, but again the president knows better, but you will not let us collect, as if in this studio we have spoken many, many times, as if yes, about the fact that this must be done, in the end we... without creating problems for them, again, they have already worn out all their teeth, they say: we will not achieve their understanding of this situation, because if nothing threatens them at all, then there is nothing to be afraid of, yes, we can continue in this format, because this format really suits them as much as possible, and regarding the supply of, so to speak, some critical materials there and so on and so forth, listen,

we gave it to them in vain, we should have done it yesterday, we gave them the opportunity to adapt to the situation in vain, and to solve some of their problems, there, for example, let's say, they have already replaced a number of items - supplies of our raw materials. this is also a problem, i think that here we should not think, but simply act and clearly tell them about it, just like they, here again there was a question here yes, but dmitry, will i be able to read such calm signals, you know, they will be able to read when there is action, when there is action, then the reader will quickly start working, while there is no action, there are only hints, no one can read, nothing in this world it won't, that's absolutely not it. in any case we must understand, after all, at least as if they wouldn't say that like, well, we shouldn't wait for our answers, here's a special operation going on, no , in fact, our actions should be such that the opposing country understands that it was in vain that it went for it, it was in vain that it did it, otherwise, really, it means that these

things can continue indefinitely in a format that is beneficial for them, but regarding negotiations, you know, of course, probably, the negotiation process sooner or later, so to speak, yes, negotiations are possible in the end capitulation means... nazi germany and militaristic japan were also negotiations, yes, that is, negotiations, so to speak, can be and so on and so forth, but in my opinion, here are the talks about negotiations now, at the moment when they occupy part of our territory, as if yes, at the moment when they are in the kursk region, these beasts, as if yes there commit their atrocities, at the moment when we saw, when they, you know, simply deceived everyone, including the chinese, as i said about this in the last parish here, yes, in my opinion , there can be no talk of any negotiations. well, i think there should be no talk, moreover, if something like that happens, they will celebrate success, that's absolutely certain, i would add to this, in addition to the kursk region and other things, the following, there should be no negotiations with this person by the name of zelensky, otherwise, if we allow the possibility of negotiations with him, he

proves his so-called solvency, look, they are ready to talk to me, i did this, they are ready, therefore in my opinion, so to speak, there are no negotiation processes now there are invitations somewhere.

implies that he does not speak in the style of speakers who begin to shake a finger or knock on the podium he is a runner with his boots, but... offensive, so i strongly recommend listening to what the supreme

commander says, and not the people around, here everything is checked because the supreme one speaks, i would like to say a few words at the beginning about the so-called debates, i carefully read everything about them today, i have such a stable i got the impression that i was at a meeting in my snt, which i go to once...

a belt in dark shirts, this mouth from ear to ear, they write comments there, reuters, they go to discuss at a decisive moment of the war in ukraine, about permission for deliveries, permission for the use of long-range missiles by zelensky against russia, they arrive in kiev, come out already in white shirts, they are met there by ambassadors and ambassadors, again mouth from ear to ear, the question is, well, this is not right, and why should we feel sorry for one of... iskander, i don’t have one, well, but i think that vladimirovich, we must live by principle, you love

bandera, love iskander, that's why we need to take measures here, it won't go on like this any more, why these tourist trips, i agree, yes, as for today's use of drones in the murmansk region, there is initial information that they were launched from the territory of finland, remember, last year drones were... launched in st. petersburg and pskov, are they from there, that means that it turns out that ukrainian special services are working on the territory of finland with the connivance of the finnish authorities and with the participation of british and american special services, therefore, we need to sort things out in finland now, not give them any leeway and talk to them harshly, in general, i want to say, maybe strike the launch site, why bother, of course, i would personally strike, and in general, i want to say about finland, as soon as... this year , an agreement was concluded with the united states on

allowing american troops to 15 military bases in finland at once, that's the first thing. second, in june, three scandinavian countries concluded an agreement on the creation of a trans-scandinavian transport corridor for the exit of troops to border with the murmansk region. all of these are steps to prepare for war. and now pay attention, if earlier. nato reconnaissance aircraft were hanging mainly on the black sea docks, the kaliningrad region now, the gulf of finland, the border with finland, we are now completely surrounded, so in the last drone raid on moscow, 144 or however many there were, they were guiding, there were 144 of them on russian territory, 20 on moscow, but they were now being guided by drones, reconnaissance aircraft, drones that were hanging over the border of finland with russia, that is, in fact, we declared. we have said many times in this studio that russia is waging world war iii alone, a huge bloc, no country

in the world would probably be able to withstand such a burden, if you count it like that, then we have already burned three sets of weapons in the ssu, if it were not for the help of the western world, then ukraine would not have withstood it. now, as for zelensky's policy, he understands perfectly well that he and his clique will not hold on to power for long, so he, like netanyahu, is doing everything possible to drag nato in.

he says, get up, the country is huge, get up mortal combat, and not to conduct these, like we did in sochi, this some kind of trail, there is a war in the kursk region, we have tens of thousands of refugees, killed, wounded, at this time this concert, well, for god's sake, at another time, but not now, then, when there is a war, our people are dying, the situation

in the middle east is settled, there is nothing good there, netanyahu holds everyone by the beard. he is now, as this tail is a baka, he is now managing both biden and haris in approximately the same way. haris is now in an extremely difficult situation, if she criticizes israel on the one hand, then 100%, americans of jewish descent, or vice versa, as they will not vote for her. if she remains silent, then the americans, arabs and muslims will not vote for her, so she of course. what i would like to say, literally yesterday saudi arabia opened its embassy in damascus, 12 years it was closed, commercial air traffic was resumed damascus rryad, today i talked to one of the advisers, your race, yes he says: we have such hopes that saudi arabia arabia will still come to us with investment, with economic assistance, because the country

is going through a very difficult situation, now we have talked several times in the studio about... american military bases in syria and the americans have been transferring weapons equipment from their bases there all this time, they will not leave there, because they are in an advantageous strategic position, iran is nearby, which they control. i would also like to draw attention to the ongoing activity of foreign non-governmental organizations in central asia and the emergence of new ones from among the local ones, which are financed

by foreign funds, this somehow reminds me of the situation that was in ukraine, their goal is clear. to harm as much as possible the economic, military-technical, humanitarian cooperation of the central asian countries with russia, ideally to squeeze us out of there altogether, therefore all authorities should pay attention to this, in conclusion i want to say, for my work i have to travel from china, vietnam in the east and to morocco in the west, and i want to say that there is no better place than russia, we have everything, forests, seas, lakes, good people, and it was not us... who created this country, our ancestors, so if we, roughly speaking, miss this, then no one will forgive us. malik, well , let's continue about the debates that we have already mentioned today, well, here are a few points, yes, today it was said that well, kam or harris, in general it is all the same regarding ukraine, yes, what will happen there, will not happen,

so she kind of memorized the methodology, her they say, well, in fact, i just wouldn't separate the ukrainian agenda from any other. she basically doesn't care about anything, and actually, at the debates, she was asked questions about why she constantly changes her views, there are internal american issues that really worry the audience of voters about migration, and at one time she spoke out for amnesty for illegal migrants, now she doesn't seem to speak out, even there we heard some statements from her about how maybe she will somehow finish building the wall that trump didn't have time to build, and the same goes for fracking, producing suvansovo oil, suvansovo gas, and so on, that is, as if a person is in a certain agenda, yes, when it was profitable for her, she presented herself as such a stern prosecutor who fights crime, when it became profitable for her, she already presents herself as such... 1.0, that he is such a stern prosecutor, punishes all criminals there at the same time,

illegal immigrants, well, supposedly punishes, those who threaten america, and at the same time punishes donald trump in these debates, yes, whom, in general, the harris headquarters directly calls constantly in their materials, mailings, campaigning and so on, just a criminal, sometimes even as if they don’t write the name and surname, just well , this criminal said something about us, so we answer him, well, well, the point is that, as if kamela harris is such a product of political technology, and there and as for ukraine, israel and everything else, he will take the position that, well, as if her advisers are now consider it a win or not quite a loss, she will declare it, that's what concerns the debates, yes, we see of course an attempt to present these debates as such a confident, strong, powerful victory for harris, well, from this point of view, i probably agree in part, but not entirely, yes indeed, of course for harris - these debates ended positively in the sense that she exceeded expectations, which is always important, of course, yes , this is exceeding expectations, because the expectations were quite low, and we all know that harris has problems, that's it

problems during her public appearances, well, either she's nervous, she's got some kind of jitters, or she just doesn't have the ability to be a public speaker, but often when she needs to say something impromptu, answer questions, she either comes up with a variety of verbal words, or she just blurts something out of place, then she has to justify herself, well, she confuses south korea, north korea, and so on, but here , after all, she was really prepared for these debates, and i think that in fact in fact, it is not so important to even discuss this conspiracy theory with this earphone, which was or was not, that is, maybe they whispered something in her ear, but i remember i admit that she simply learned and memorized the material that was prepared for her very well, that is, she really rattled off the manual, and sometimes it turned out that she did not quite understand the question or did not want to answer it.

victory and something more, that is, will it be possible now, for example, to interrupt the trend that we have been observing for the last 2 weeks, namely the trend of kamala and harris's ratings is not going away, i'm not sure that her gap, which she formed in august from trump, is now shrinking, we'll see, for trump these debates did not end very positively, that is, i probably don't agree with the assessment that he lost them there to smithereens, no, he performed, well , probably at his average level, which is what trump has now, yes, but probably those who really expected trump to go through with a steamroller, while they were mumbling, they didn't see it, well, and there, at best, for trump these debates ended with nothing, probably, this is not the result that trump was counting on, yes, that is why we saw

trump throwing himself around right after the debates, yes, when he ran to fox news to justify himself and say that well , well, of course, it is obvious that this is not because of a good life, well, and the latest information is coming in that trump's headquarters, in general , refuses to hold new debates with harris, although harris's headquarters would not be against it, well, here i think that... two reasons the main ones, yes, why trump is now refusing to debate, the first one is connected with the fact that these debates, probably, would be more needed by haris and not by him, that's because haris needs to show now that she is a strong, promising politician who can become president and can exercise presidential powers, that's what many americans doubt, trump basically doesn't need to prove anything, yes, he seems to have an upward trend now, so everything seems to be fine, so he doesn't want to take risks, that's the first one story, well the second story, of course, is connected with how disgustingly these debates were conducted, yes, we discussed the june debates on the cnn channel, which jake teper hosted, by the way, a pretty good host, they were conducted really perfectly, yes, there was no instigation there, the host really

approached both candidates, both trump and biden, very objectively, asked good questions, there was no playing along, yes here the playing along was of course on the part of both hosts, and not in in favor of trump, in favor of kamela harris, and actually, well, this probably also confused trump, well, basically, like all the attacks that harris... arranged, and that is, we basically saw, yes, that these same presenters tried to constantly check, recheck trump's statements, both true and not entirely true, well , of course, there was no such attitude towards amali harris, well, and harris herself tried not to talk at all about what is happening in the united states now, tried not to say anything about her program, which in fact practically does not exist, tried to concentrate on one thing, namely, on the demonization of trump, and there on the constant endless attacks on trump,

as if nothing so bright was undertaken.

mom, why do we need these letters? for a fairy tale, in the three ninth kingdom, in the three tenth state.

this is not the sixteenth year, when trump was a slightly different trump, and hillary clinton is still a person, but she looked better, younger, prettier, well, that is, purely visually, from the picture, trump was familiar, as if i ask for forgiveness, there was trump's main feature. in that biden looked like a crumbling old man against his background, they replaced him, that's the first thing, the second, very readable, he is of course, a real firecracker, so to speak, but in principle they are very simple, it is not difficult to compose and compose semantic blocks against them that will beat them, that is, for no, it is obvious that this is not a repeat of the june debates of trump against biden, no one argues with this, but i have of course, there was still a strong feeling that these were the first or second debates of the september 2016 trump

vs. hillary clinton type, i remind you. so-so and there he still had huge problems now regarding this cable agreement with disney, the fact that not all, not all cable networks showed these debates, but in general the point is that the audience there, i think, was certainly not the largest.