let me remind you that there were also many complaints about trump's speech, all the democratic media declared hillary clinton the winner of those debates, well, by the way, this is also symbolic, considering that kamala harris, she is just a clinton protégé, so in general, approximately the same thing is being repeated, of course, it is not a fact that the election results will be the same as in 2016, but i just mean that, well , this was already around then, somehow like... because, well, in general, of course, the crisis of the debate institution in america remains and continues in general and is not going anywhere and the hosts are bad the hosts are bad that's for sure well in general and the abc channel is so-so and there were huge problems there now regarding this cable agreement with disney that not everything not the whole cable network showed. debates, well in general, the point

is that the audience there i think was of course not the largest, i remind you, in the sixteenth year the most spectacular debates, yes 85 million people watched trump vs. clinton, which is not a small amount, here are the last debates 52 million people watched the june trump vs. biden, which is of course much less, now well maybe they will reach 60, yes, but even 60 million in all of america is not yet, there are no results yet, i think they will be published there tomorrow, well maybe 60 million will be in the best case, well even 60 million yes for... an audience there of the american adult population of 260 million, not to mention the entire population of 340, but this is a drop in the ocean, therefore, strangely enough, yes there at least immediately yes many started talking about the fact that these debates are decisive in nature, here now everything is clear, in my opinion yes, if there was a confident victory of one of the candidates, yes i would also say that really, as if these debates could influence something, well, as the june debates influenced in general that biden was forced to leave the presidential race, now in my opinion yes , there will be an effect of these debates, it will be, yes, but it will not be the most. her lead in august has already decreased

to about one and a half, it continues to fall, here trump is still trying to somehow outplay harris, it may not be on in the space of some kind of small-mindedness of nature, yes, but at least in the space of some kind of program of his own, yes, because haris's program is really complex, here, by the way, i don't agree that...

housing, well, but this program already exists in several democratic states, like california, and so on, well, that is the point that, by the way, i don't agree in this case that it will be used as some kind of means to reformat the entire american financial system, to cancel social security and everything the rest, no, it is clear that the debt credit in washington is also there and it is getting worse, but there will be a final, final result closer to the mid- thirties, when the medicare system will simply croak, well, if the mid-thirties. if yes, before that moment some other force majeure does not happen, but the point is that here and there beskamaharis everything will naturally end, when it will be necessary to declare a default within the framework of this system, and there all payments will stop by 30-40%, there and various social benefits everything else, who, as far as health insurance is concerned, well, actually, that's the situation now with these debates, that's what about ukraine, israel, everything else, yes, literally 3-5 minutes were devoted to this at the very end of the debates, that is, we understand that in general this issue was left on...

position and there, too, there are, as it were, the most diverse judgments, opinions there, from, say, bill burns to some very specific radical hawks like philip gordon, who is one of the now harris's foreign policy advisers. here it seems to me that a very important conclusion from these debates is that the democratic audience, like the television audience, thinks that harris won, the republican audience thinks that trump won. this division, it just...

characterizes what is happening now, in principle, when you look at this, you think, poor country, yeah, well, i'm really saying, well, what is one, what is the other, well, like, well , it's just some kind of last century, please? yes, well, i also wanted to say about the elections, but first still, about the president's speech and the topic of the economy, the sale of resources, why are many asking this question only now, they are asking it quite rightly, well, it is not the president there, not you and me, nor the rest of the citizens in general who are to blame for the fact that we have found ourselves in this big common capital-system since 1991, by the way, in some sense we really wanted it, the people who are to blame for this,

we can afford it without harming ourselves, moreover, in addition to what the president said, well, there is nickel, uranium, titanium, there is there are still a lot of our technologies and resources that, for example, can, say, put, well, european microelectronics, for example, and there are specific companies, in specific cities, we will not prompt them, we will not name them, that produce what they cannot do without today, well, including various kinds of microchips and so on, so on, so forth, all this is there, in this and ...

from the ottoman empire they appeared on the russian market, that's the paradox, they appeared, that is, this is not some incredible story, well yes, it is carried out crookedly, but it turns out to be trade with the enemy, unfortunately, well, that's how the economy is arranged, that's how life is arranged, and with the soviet union everything was a little simpler, because everyone hated it, so they didn't trade with it, perhaps, by the way, it could have established some trade relations with other countries, i'll remind you that now we'll note how much it turns out... against the soviet union, they declared them back in 1917, but so that everyone from 1939, the soviet-finnish war, these are the first such total sanctions of moral embargo, which were also economic sanctions, on the other hand, absolutely all

countries helped finland, that is, great britain and germany are in the same boat, and france and all the rest, and in general this is very similar to the current situation, there is nothing so incredible here. right, it is they, it is our culture to explain everything in words, and i agree with sergei alesanovich, that they understand exactly how it is, they need to be hit in the forehead, then they understand, but this is our culture, we explain to them, we want to trade, we want to interact, we shouldn’t do this, let’s continue, you are behaving

incorrectly, unfortunately it works, well, how can i say, not even every other time, but once out of ten, in this sense of course here, well, speaking about some, so to speak, the sensible text of the report by mario draghi, which we have actually been talking about for the last few days, it is very interesting, it gives the correct diagnosis, it does not say who is to blame, it does not say who guilty, but there is a very interesting point there, he kept saying that these are russian energy resources, from which europe was

disconnected and that is why everything is like this, that is why there is a difference in the cost of electricity, the cost of gas, and in general we are lagging behind in labor productivity and so on, so on, so on, the migration issue, he says all this: there is a key point there, and what european consumers have today in the form of savings, 1.700 billion. in america today it is about.

that is actually what i am getting at, well, and russia is clear, it is a huge territory, it is huge resources, they have always been coveted by all the latest, well, i don’t know, well, 150 years, the concept that it cannot be in one hand, but it is in the heads of people who, let’s call them certain elites, to their number, to the number of these elites, of course , neither kamalo harris nor donald trump belong, although donald trump is generally not a poor man and so on and so forth and even well , there, conventionally calling them frontmen of certain. this is also a certain stretch, to be honest, i agree, boring

elections, i agree that this is some kind of circus with horses, but in general it is still important to watch in order to understand, well , there is no truth in this sense, democracy, and this is exclusively a show technology, a beautiful show, well, it can sometimes be successful, sometimes unsuccessful, for some reason i like conspiracy theories, i believe that this is an ear and so on.

about money in these very regions, so this is corporate fascism, and these guys, will it be

trump, this will be one branch of the development of corporate fascism, there will be democrats, this there will be another branch of corporate fascism, and quite rightly, sergey alexandrovich said, well about, about money, about money, about technology, this is a new form of capitalism, technology will now be the main golden calf that will allow controlling the world. for me, here is a mystery, for me all this can only recall the well, and the famous

fragments from the film 300 spartans, this is sparta kicking down representatives there, that is, what is the point of inviting them here, please explain, here the situation with cross-border payments with china is not easy now, and why can our customs data end up anywhere, how should we understand that the americans? what companies should be subject to sanctions, and why do we even use financial instruments that are transparent to the west when carrying out such transactions.

who in soviet times so wittily renamed the vladimirsky tract, well, if someone does not have enough brains to understand that we are actually at war, well then they should have enough brains to understand what way to pull three qataris, everything, yes , there are no other options, maybe two words literally, this is... we are talking about the fact that we do not accept a world based on rules, this is the rule, of course, we must in the end, we say, no, we do not accept a world that, so to speak, is based on the american, and we live, so accept it, when blinken arrives, when he arrives with his, so to speak, stooges, you do not touch them, because they are untouchable, when we need

to participate in the imf, when we fulfill, so to say, all the conditions, this is the rule, this is so to speak blah-blah.

made an impression on a certain audience, well, if we take, for example , trump, i have absolutely no doubt that maris ravel wrote for him, this is bolero, an absolutely clear bolero, a sheet-rolling mill that begins with some small steps and then reaches, reaches some crescendo, this is trump, but only he was not given the opportunity or he simply did not have time to reach this very peak, he has...

that's why i tell them, i tell them for this is what i am telling, explaining, from my point of view, this is the perception, this is exactly afenbach, by the way, who was born in cologne and whose father was isaac afenbach, so here we also find part of a conspiracy theory that fits all this very well, for me... this is absolutely a clash of two such sides, on the one hand, a dry, tough, tough approach that was not fully implemented, on the other, on the other hand, an attempt to present all this differently, somewhat light, yes, light sharpening, which, by the way, is very common in germany they love, so maybe it explains why in germany, after all, haris enjoys more,

more popularity, these are trump's german roots, trump's german roots, but afenbach. yes, yes, well in the sense that trump has german roots, trump's father came from germany, yes, of course, he has, as we call him, friedrichovich, in my opinion, yes, fredovich, fredovich, yes, fredovich, well, fredovich, he has his own this this side, of course, it seems to me that these debates were initially a losing one for trump, because in today's world of the united states of america, the world of new values, it is very difficult to speak out and try to win. against a woman, everything that has been hammered into people's heads for all these years will definitely come into force here and there will definitely be a feeling, well , this is a woman, she... there must be some advantage over the minority, and the whole world is now for the minority, well, plus to everything, it still seems to me that trump has preserved and has a concept of male, male

dignity, when he probably did not use some arguments precisely because of the fact that, that there was a woman standing opposite him, and he had to save himself somewhere and somewhere not express everything, not somewhere not not pronounce everything, although if you remember the past... with women, everything was completely different there, but here it seems to me, this was clearly visible, in germany they treated it, well, exactly the same way, as a matter of fact, the debate hosts, harris is going with an advantage, and even other comments about trump, in general, practically do not exist, all the time everything is concluded on harris, yes-yes-yes, and as for trump, well, they only remembered his quotes about eating animals, there there's still something there that ishe doesn't know what he meant,

a lot of symbolic things happened that it's impossible to pass by: a bridge collapsed in dressdan, and the bridge that connects the old and new parts of the city, and the bridge that is the main one, the main highway, not only for trams, not only for cars, there are also heating pipes there, and 100 m of the bridge simply collapsed into water at about 3 am, at that moment, fortunately , no one was there, but a decent part... throwing out some theories, yes, maybe it is

sabotage, well somewhere there carefully, they talked about russians, then all this fortunately went away, they stopped talking about russians, a new version arose that in fact it was the most ordinary corrosion, the bridge, which was built back in the gdr times, that those concrete supports on which he insisted were located. said so that if now to choose some symbol on some avatar, then probably this collapsed bridge is the symbol of today's germany, but here under this there is another sub-meaning,

a very serious one, yes, by the way, from the fact that there were other theories like there was some video in arabic where september 11 was mentioned, but then it quickly disappeared, this theory went away, returning again to this bridge, and the fact that the eastern bridge is falling. literally in a week there are elections in the land , in fact, in a few days we are already brandenburg, dresden, that is, if we talk about war, then probably the most famous city. here

the bridge is falling, this is a very serious sign for germany, i think that, of course, they will bypass it, trying not to connect it in any way today's political life, but it is impossible not to connect, because scholz, who 2 days ago announced some kind of peace plan, he not only announced it to... germany, to the whole world, that he has a plan, that this plan is ready, prepared together with zelensky, zelensky today speaks out and says: i don't know anything about scholz's plan, i don't know anything about this plan, he says he has some other plans prepared there, there is nothing, blinken comes to kiev and resolves issues, i think that these... issues have long been resolved, that it is allowed to use long-range ones there will simply be a stamp on that, missiles, scholz on the one hand is being set up, on the other hand, this is what is happening

exactly like that, on the one hand...

the amendment to the constitution guarantees freedom of speech, you gave an absolutely accurate definition today, this is already a fascist tyranny of an imperialistic nature. now advertising, after it we will continue in a new composition.

it is easy to get confused in the facts when you see only part of the overall picture. in pursuit of views , entire locations are changed, it is easy to make a dep fake,

change. dear friends, i suggest you watch reruns of our besagons from the golden collection of besagon tv, while we are on vacation, i hope that you will be interested in remembering what we talked about, i am waiting for you at these screenings.