as for the statements of ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky that everything is going according to plan, let us just recall that, starting from august 6, the military-political leadership in kiev has changed its point of view on the events in the kursk region several times. mykhailo podolyak made some assessments, then volodymyr zelensky himself made other assessments, and finally oleksandr sirsky said that an attack on the sumy

region was expected from there, and we thereby prevented it, that is, to say that they adhere to some kind of uniform order of actions in this regard, well, probably, it is not necessary, well, then, after all, with some final judgments the same supreme commander-in-chief, which is vladimir zelensky, well, here it is necessary to exercise a certain caution, why because well, all the time remember. the great, who sent a victorious report about the victory in the battle of gross-egersdorf, already sent, sent a victorious combat report to berlin, here it is, what came out in the end, his shot-through hat is still in one of the museums of st. petersburg, that is , you should never rush to final conclusions, because after all, armed struggle, well, so to speak, is an unpredictable matter. now, as for the actions of our troops. for now, for example,

judging the scale of those counter-offensive actions in the kubor region, the combat and numerical composition of the forces that are involved in these events, well, in my opinion, is somewhat premature, here is the only thing i can say in this regard, that they are linked with all the other actions of our connections and associations in other areas of military operations on others.

there is poseidon, excuse me, in this regard , i somehow don’t even quite understand this zeal, i would also like to ask, returning to the question and the strategic defeat of russia, in particular, the political leadership of great britain, but i would like to ask him a question: what, in fact, are you pursuing the national, vital interests of great britain in resolving this issue, please name them point by point, first, second, thirdly, we will strike, for example, at the lower one. well , since you insist on this so much, i mean on strikes at targets deep in russia, since you are showing such diligence and zeal in resolving these issues, then maybe, well then, everything i will say further is reasoning exclusively from the rubric, if i were the director, if such strikes begin from the outside. that for us this will mean

de facto the entry of these countries into a direct war with us, well, in my opinion, again reasoning from the rubric, if the director if i were you, i would involve you in a strike on targets on uk territory, with conventional weapons to begin with, air- and sea-launched cruise missiles, i would strike, for example, three targets, these are the production sites of the mbdak concern, which is engaged in the production of storm shadow missiles, this is... if my memory serves me right, bristel, this is stevensh and this is bolton, this is where the production sites of the bda concern are located, for these purposes i would involve, for example, the eleventh and twenty-fourth divisions of nuclear submarines

submarines of the northern fleet, 201 heavy bombing of the air division, the strike would have been carried out at night, in order to avoid - to minimize casualties among the civilian personnel of these enterprises, it would have demolished these production sites, well, to ground level, for example, but since you are so eager to strike our territory, then you will have to pay for everything in this world, well, naturally, what could have happened after this strike, well, in terms of hypothetical awakenings, for example, well, right away, no, this strike must certainly be at night, why at night, i'll explain now, in the morning there are meetings, meetings, how is it possible, we became victims of aggression, we need to respond immediately, we need to use article 5 of the nato charter, we need to punish those people who launched a missile and air strike against us and the navy. in this case, first of all, i will remind you that, uh, the newly-armed forces of the russian federation have a system

of strategic actions, there are forms and methods of using armed forces, and there is such a section, it is called demonstration actions. what does demonstration actions mean? this is first of all launches, single launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles with conventional or nuclear warheads, these are demonstration nuclear strikes on deserted areas of the world's oceans and uninhabited areas of land, these are finally nuclear explosions, high-altitude nuclear explosions of low power already directly on the territory of the enemy, but again a warning to minimize the damage so that it does not happen at all at this stage, but simply to warn. therefore, as soon as they begin to sit, so that the discussion is directed in the right direction channel, in the right direction, a demonstration nuclear strike, uh or, for example, in the northern part, again, i apologize for the tautology of the north sea, or - in the areas of the atlantic ocean directly

adjacent to the territory of the british isles, well, so that everyone could see this flash, the entire population of great britain, politicians and the military and uh came to the conclusion, aren't we too much... getting too excited with these missiles, somehow so that they would come to this conclusion. and finally, dmitry lanatovich said about the possibility of great britain being immersed in the waters the atlantic ocean. but in general , nikita sergeyevich khrushchev had already spoken about this earlier , when he said in response to various initiatives from great britain: "two or three thermonuclear strikes, your unsinkable aircraft carrier will disappear forever into the waters of the atlantic ocean. but in this regard, what i wanted to say is that there is no need. probably , it is better for the british leadership to show such persistence in lifting restrictions on the combat use of these missiles. it would be best for the british leadership to think about its own national interests and whether this decision corresponds to the deep interests of the broadest strata of british

society. and the abyss swallowed it up. i can relate to your train of thought. i would really practice on the cats first, i would demolish them to hell. quarter of kiev, well, anyway, i don’t understand why kiev is needed, i really don’t understand, in this form, klyachko has already buried the entire infrastructure anyway, we will rebuild it better than it is now, much better, evgeniy, well, klyuchko, in fact, as it is considered quite legitimate in kiev, unlike many comrades, today, today it represents still, some threat even for the ukrainian authorities, in case of possible. behind-the-scenes actions, what we sometimes talk about possible coups and so on, but in my opinion, now an important moment is happening in the information war, for example, the kmis published sociology on telegram, so i don’t know the threat as

a global threat, let the military decide, and according to this issue, more than 60% of ukrainian citizens believe that telegram should be banned or restricted, that’s what is very important in the information war,

in the same ukraine, again, according to the same data from misa, more than 70% get information, people, get information from social networks. in my opinion, this is important, i just draw attention to the fact that in principle in the current ukrainian society, that is, if a ban follows, then there will be no restrictions or any protest in society, as in fact on other, on other issues, well , at the beginning of the broadcast we talked about the fact that there are elites, there is a population that may think differently...

these will be republicans, that they will be more to address internal problems, but again this will not save us, it is simply their

internal problem, we can state that there are quite a lot of tasks that we represent, it seems, that american society will have to solve, and as for, say, other, say, countries that are concentrated in europe, how do they view the future of ukraine, you mentioned about the pranksters who said that again i will cite sociology, that is, facts. well, when i said that there were 140 countries in the conversation this sekorsky said, they said no to russia, well, again, ipsos conducted a study recently, the majority, emphasizes this global study, there are many countries, just asia, europe, america, here are the top five problems that interest the world community, in first place - this is inflation, poverty, crime, unemployment, there are no problems that are discussed in europe, that is, i say again that if you look closely at ... even the position of many zhenya, and why should anyone care about ukraine in world? you know, she worries, no, just

really, if you look, yeah, well look, the level of violence of the conflict can't be compared to the israeli-palestinian one, well , you just can't compare, that is, why should countries worry so much, you know, there are some, yeah, well, emotionally, it doesn't affect them, you know, in fact, these are things that sociologists can't get to, they can get to them indirectly, in fact, there is a problem. china and india, what's going on there, where some white people are fighting, there are white savages fighting each other with a friend, and not particularly intensively, and without much bloodshed, without any special victims, because let me remind you, the number of civilians who died as a result of these years is incomparable with the number of civilians.

well, the indians look, well, listen, america fought in iraq, fought in afghanistan, then again in iraq, libya, syria, well, what, well, okay, well, and now something is happening in europe, yes. europe bombed yugoslavia, so what? why should it bother you? america invaded and then the list of countries goes on latin america, operations in africa. and they say so, well, what's so extreme about zelensky running and puffing. he says, why weren't you puffing and puffing when there were problems in iraq, in afghanistan

, when there were problems, why were n't you running and puffing ... that's it, i don't agree with you in this regard, for the world - this is still a big conflict, which involves tens of millions of people in fact, this is a conflict, which we ourselves say here on air that the question of russia's survival is on the map in a big way and for them too, whoever decides this problem. in shanghai they watch tv and what do you know, here there is a completely different picture, the

same thing in brazil there was the second world war and light bulbs, they didn't even know that this existed, well, it exists and it exists somewhere there. well, in fact, if you think about it, that many people really don't know, but at the level of, you know, such rumors, such communications, sociologists still measure how you feel, who you support more, russia or ukraine in the conflict, the same questions are asked in india, for us it is extremely important to understand, in brazil it is not like that, i don't want to offend you, but what percentage of people in india do you think know at all, well, i suppose, no, there are quite a lot of people there who know that they are far from relevant.

the world is not completely right belgrade no well how many 20 years ago 24 yes they bombed that someone freaked out or something well in theory he should have gone crazy well of course the world doesn't give a damn the world all life lives in war the thing is that most of the world watches global global i emphasize mass media this and now what they present they present differently they present that bad russians tell us that everything is not so very linear. there is nothing linear at all, the tragedy is different, for us it is important, that's why they look at zelensky as an idiot, because that when zelensky jumps out of his pants, starts saying something, he says, and who are you anyway, why should the whole world suddenly deal with you, a fool, why do you come to china, start pointing your fingers at china and say that it is unfair, you, who stole several billion from china, and

the chinese say, you are in your right mind, everything is fine with you. in our information war, it is important that our position is communicated to the majority of citizens, what is our position, which is here, generally decides brilliantly, our information war comes down to the fact that we have the most effective weapon on planet earth, these are personal contacts of vladimir vladimirovich with the leaders of key world powers and a system of relations with both the leader of china. with the leader of india , fantastically and what for, here you can argue with this at all, probably there is no point.

well done, you do it, yes, well to yourself, but to whom else, i am ready to give an interview to whomever you want to interview, now you are very beautiful, all this from experts is also something

it depends in this country, well i'll tell you this, a lot depends on the experts, for example there is the brilliant karaganov, when he started asking tough questions, everyone suddenly started raising, of course, the brilliant symes, who asks questions and understands this, a lot depends on the experts, but for this... experts should be immersed in understanding in general what everything is leading to, because the most amazing thing is when some people say, i have such a question: and who are you anyway? you know, like uncles, and who are you? are you really experts? they like to write, especially because of the us institute and canada? well, i hope, not in our case, not in this respect community. no, no, they do not come here, i think, with the plan of mikhail mikhailovich we need to agree, we urgently approve the work.

that we have been studying, analyzing the behavior and reaction of ukrainian politicians for 10 years, then we can involuntarily consider ourselves practicing psychiatrists, so let's still go through the thesis, at least what i said, because within the framework of one interview there are so many contradictions, to be honest, i have seen, but i have not seen anything like this at all, that is, he has already surpassed himself, well, the fact that a couple of days ago there was some chancellor of some germany

, first of all, i want to ask a question: where did you get the idea that china and brazil owe anyone anything? you see, what is important here is that the person has no idea that in general there are some sovereign states in the world that, based on their national policies and their national interests, are capable of making some political decisions, you see, he is like a dog, everything is in black and white, that is he, he, well , he has no other perception of the world, he doesn’t understand that big... politics, geopolitics, it’s not as simple as it seems to him, well, in his ideas, how it all works, yes, now further, the thesis:

we are fighting on our own land, of course, i apologize, i don’t know, kursk region - what is this anyway, well, if he had said this before, well, there could have been a discussion about this, but now you’re doing this after you carried out the kursk operation, and you’re telling the whole world, no, well, we we are fighting on our own land, yes, that is, what you...

transferred all powers, management, sovereignty, army, destroyed the economy, your people fled abroad, you did all this only in order to improve their negotiating position with russia, that's all.

it turns out teski, what a fairy tale, without ivan, uh, uh, what started, without deception and without flint , don't go to flints and steel, you've sharpened me, pen, self-written magic ink, you'll get it, you main thing, vanya, hurry up, so give me a horse, mechanical, but hit yourself on the head. you have something, where it needs to be, that's how i they call me because i'm not taking you where you, idiot , want me to go, but where i need to go, i can't live without traveling, flint, he who has a boot in his pocket doesn't need a pen, soon!