at first, their actions did not raise any particular questions; similar hiding places had previously been frequently used by intelligence agencies in many countries, but in reality, kamen turned out to be a means of storing and transmitting information. at a certain time, a person recruited by british intelligence passed by the stone, and data was read from his palmtop computer in a few seconds and saved on a device mounted in the stone. then one of the embassy employees passed by him and read the information from this device. a unique fsb operation the exposure of the british spy activities then lasted more than six months. evening fell over the village of palatovo, local housewives instead of going to watch tv series, begin to cook borscht, pelmeni, pies, all this for the saturday. who are you cooking for? for the soldiers, guys? to the hospital, to the front,

their own products, other volunteers help, the trouble is a small oven, i would like a three-tiered oven, everything is ours, everything is from the garden, everything is made by hand, tro borscht real homemade, and lidiya fyodorovna brings palatovsky uzvar, almost a shelling, we left and our guys are still there, to whom we have to bring food. the west is trying to decide whether it will allow itself to strike targets deep in russia with precision weapons? over the past

few weeks, its media have been whipping up hysteria about permission. it is clear that there were several tasks, well, one of them was to put information pressure on russia, to force our leadership to take emotional actions. but on the other hand, the problem, of course, really exists. that is why the president very clearly dotted the i's and crossed the t's the day before if such a decision is made, it will mean direct participation of the west in the war in ukraine, then. our response will be appropriate. we are in touch with the russian ambassador to the united states, anatoly antonov. anatoly ivanovich, i welcome you. and just now a statement was made by mr. john kirby, who stated that the white house, i quote, takes seriously russia's warning about the consequences of strikes deep into russia. it is clear that the coordinator of strategic communications for the us national security council is a serious person, but nevertheless, is it possible

washington can be trusted in these conditions, what do you think, with such a statement, you know, it is difficult for me, of course, to answer in the way i would like to answer you, because i work here in washington, if you ask me, i think that it is impossible to trust, the americans have proven hundreds of times that they cheat, that they...

ukraine, we firmly know the places in kiev where certain specialists, mercenaries, intelligence officers and so on are located. the history, by the way, of the 16 that was shot down by american air defense, says a lot. the americans, i'm guilty, the ukrainians are not ready to use precision weapons, they lack the knowledge, skills, and ability to handle them, they need to be constantly pulled up and corrected. the same applies to precision weapons, and if a missile flies in the wrong direction, so, of course, the ukrainians need to be kept an eye on, it seems to me that the americans will not stop, i can't tell you when the final decision will be made, when, which can be announced in

the media, but the task of continuing the fight against the russian federation in different ways, it does not change. you know, i am very grateful to you that you began our conversation not with the debates that took place between the candidates, the highest office in america, uh, unlike many of my colleagues, russian politicians, who said that they did not watch these debates, they watched very carefully what the representative of the republican democratic party was saying, and this is obvious to me, because we work here, and it is very important for us which... candidate will win the elections, what can i do the country's foreign policy, when one or another say, it was said by a representative of the democratic party clearly and distinctly, the policy of trying or trying to strangle russia, it will be continued,

they do not see any other option today, meeting many times in the white house, during recent contacts and...

a special military operation and seeking our support, by the way, to the americans, i always say one more thesis: you read the correspondence of churchill stalin and roosevelt, look at what happened during the years of the great patriotic war, as the red army valiantly defeated the fascist hordes, the russian position changed, changed, did not receive, will it not turn out the same with respect to ukraine now, when those proposals that were...

well, i think that in london there is enough russophobic anger with respect to russia in order to make a decision to use their long-range. systems deep into russian territory. anatoly ivanovich, today our fsb, just data spoke about the subversive activities of great britain in our country, and england, it is such, such a shepherd dog that barks at its owner, as it used to be believed, he stands behind in washington and pulls this leash, but is there such a thing, after all, that the tail commands the dog, and britain really is buzzing the americans and...

we do not need to cherish any illusions that no matter who speaks, clearly and distinctly, the

upcoming elections will not change the negative background, the negative situation in russian-american relations, we must rely only on ourselves, on our partners from the global south gradually, albeit not at such a fast pace, but to move towards the creation of a polycentric or multipolar, as we say, system of international relations, here, by the way, they react extremely negatively to all of russia's efforts to develop brics, they see in this structure a certain counteraction to the american-centric system that exists, i think that in general the question of what we want, how we want to solve economic, political, military-political problems... in the new system of international relations, they deserve our deeper, more attentive

relations in the future. yes, of course, this is a very difficult situation, because the brics countries, yes, they have a common idea, but they also have serious disagreements among the participants, which theoretically can be resolved with good will, or they can not be resolved, but we hope that we will. you know, i have another question, i don’t know, maybe it’s not really for you, but i’ll tell you honestly, for some reason i had an idea, just recently. and that all this hysteria around long-range missile strikes and so on, this is in the fact including, we already remembered brics, timed to coincide with october 22, when there will be a brics summit in kazan, because very respected people will come, but it turns out that theoretically these missiles can fly there, it turns out that this is an attempt to disrupt this summit, which promises to be very important, in brics, there will be considered, well, according to the plans, certain things. here is such a comment, maybe this is also fantasy, i, alexander anatolyevich, i am

a supporter of the chinese philosophy, to go to victory in small steps, as deep, as far as you swung, now, of course, to say it's difficult, i can't rule anything out, and what 's missing, for more than seven years of my stay in washington, is the complete lack of predictability in the actions of the americans. i can't tell you what could happen tomorrow, they are so unpredictable, i'm afraid we won't have enough time, i was amazed that the american military began to conduct simulations of a nuclear war, you've probably heard about this, about what will happen if the war in europe escalates, agriculture will suffer, this is an order from the pentagon for an analytical company, yes, that's it that's what you're talking about, absolutely, yes, you're absolutely right, what amazes me is something else, we 've said 100 times that

there can't be a nuclear war between nuclear states, especially the us and russia, there will be no winners, there's some kind of illusion here that if there is a conflict, it won't spread to the territory of the united states of america, i 'm constantly trying to convey to them one thesis, that the americans won't be able to sit it out behind the waters of this ocean, this war will affect everyone. that's why we constantly say, don't play with this rhetoric, by the way, we are accused of brandishing weapons, in this case, such commissioned studies.

from your words it is clear that the americans are unpredictable, theoretically, after that meeting that you just mentioned, looking at your watch, and they can still announce a decision that they are supposedly allowing the ukrainian regime to strike at distant targets, and you do not rule out such a decision, i do not rule it out, aleksandrievich, i do not even rule out such a situation that during our conversation with you, urgent the news is sown. fox news or abc about the fact that the president has made this kind of decision. i want to emphasize that what vladimir vladimirovich said yesterday is a clear signal, do not play with fire, be careful with russia, do not disturb this great bear, who can answer for the attack itself, it is necessary

to think about how to find a solution to the existing problems, you know, alexander anatolyevich, when vladimir vladimirovich came up with a proposal on how to quickly resolve the situation in ukraine, this happened in midiko, on the same day, literally the americans responded with huge arms deliveries, and i said in the white house, how is that possible, we are extending our hand to you, and you are responding by adding fuel to the fire on ukrainian soil, because there is only one task, to kill more slavs to enjoy this smell of blood, this is a very terrible situation, but there is no other, no other way out of this situation today, except that we must win and we will win during a special military operation, i have no doubt about this, and anatoly ivanovich, in conclusion of our conversation, so as

not to keep you for long, because there will be really important information now , as you said, you should follow all this closely, after all, this is about what we talked about at the beginning, the strategic defeat of russia, are there any discussions in washington, are there any political forces, congressmen and so on, who say: guys, maybe we will somehow get out of this situation, after all, everyone understands perfectly well, there are healthy people there, we do not pose any strategic threat america, can this rhetoric somehow change under some sauce in the near future, one or two people. on the capitol, who talk about the danger of a global nuclear war, one or two people who talk about the need for a conversation with the russian federation, have repeatedly, especially recently, constantly raised the issue that we would need, i would not like my words to make

valentina vanna, matvienko smile now, contacts are necessary, conversations between parliamentarians. eh, but here russophobia is so strong on the capitol that one simply cannot expect anything positive here. moreover, articles have been published recently about how to make a european security system based on the philosophy of containing russia, when i speak with smart people, retired officials , and note that, friends, well , your theses are interesting, of course, but i have not heard a single word about the need to take into account russia's national interests, it is impossible, it is impossible to build a european security system only taking into account security issues or concerns about the security of nato and eu countries, what about russia, go back to the documents of 221, which were

created, developed on the instructions of vladimir vladimirovich and simply touched on my wound, this is a sore subject , talking to the so-called partners in the white house, i always say, what are you doing, why are you encouraging, you see what is happening in... our settlements, villages, but they are killing ordinary people, in fact, this is some kind of a repeat of the great patriotic war is intolerable for us, listen, when

tanks with fascist symbols appear on the territory of the russian federation, and even on ukrainian territory, nothing happens except horror, rejection, surprise, unity, greater unity, patriotic unity around our president, for us it is obvious and... they should not just be pushed out of our territory, they simply need to be destroyed, these beasts, especially considering how they treat us, the americans do not want to talk, a conversation on this topic is unpleasant them, they say that they do not govern the ukrainians and so on and so forth, to which i am left with a sarcastic smile in conversation with them, they are not ready for a normal conversation, they think that... as i said, behind the equilibristics of words, you can try to deceive russia, then we return to the beginning of our conversation with you. yes, anatovich, you, anatoly ivanovich, you are absolutely right,

it is impossible to deceive russia, it has never worked, thank you very much, i hope that we will have another opportunity with you talk, i also feel very emotional about this, because the americans are making a fool of themselves, really, and although the situation is extremely tense. anatoly ivanovich, special thanks from our program, all the best, nothing, thank you, everything, let me remind you, we talked with the russian ambassador to the united states, anatorii antonov. the united states still does not allow, allegedly, kiev to fire long-range american missiles deep into russian territory, this, as i already said, was stated by white house spokesman john kirby. he noted, the us takes it seriously.

how concerned are the us about this? i'm not going to go into hypotheses. i'm not going to go into a discussion of domestic politics.

it's hard to assess the seriousness of the perception yet, but the same kirby reported that the us has not changed its approach to limiting kiev's use of american weapons for strikes deep into russia and does not plan to announce changes today, that is, when joe biden meets with british prime minister keir starmer, who, like his predecessors the listrasses. what difference does it make whose hands are making the changes flight missions, and the french, the british, this is a trap they are driving themselves into,

all the same, nato members, so proud of the same umbrella of collective security with the americans, called the fifth article of the charter, but under a leaky umbrella everyone will be wet, and some will even be washed away immediately, the west is slow to allow ukraine to strike deep into russia long-range. in the west , they fear that the conflict will spread beyond ukraine, in particular to poland and latvia. there are also purely technical problems. british stormshadows are already in ukraine, but their little, the american atacoms stocks are running low, and the piggy bank itself is empty. about $6 billion in aid transferred to ukraine by the united states will run out at the end of next month. if congress does not allow the pentagon to supply kiev with weapons. its warehouses, will congress follow, and the lower house is the republicans on the lead of the completely lame duck biden, biden has 4 months to go before dembel, and

to sort out the mess, if anything? with salvation and will allow ukraine to succeed, such a softened glove, but still slapped the state department, the cia and the nsa are joining in. in while the us state department is more receptive to the arguments of ukraine and many of its western allies, the pentagon and the us intelligence community are warning against using long-range weapons to strike deep into russian territory. it’s not that the pentagon has suddenly become a dove of peace, it’s just that there are still those there who

are looking half a step ahead, that it’s not the first time, but if in afghanistan or iraq they got away with it, then in ukraine playing with matches threatens to cause global fires, a strategic dead end from which there is no way out. steroids can't get out, the journal emphasizes. biden's administration strategists are awfully similar to the recipe for another endless war,

since it is not capable.

for a while, this sounded naive, especially about 24 hours, but now, perhaps for the first time, not from outside experts or allies, but first-hand from trump's running mate jade vance, we can hear about the details of this plan. it probably looks something like this: the division will take place along the existing front line, ukraine retains sovereignty, russia receives guarantees of neutrality from ukraine, it is not joining nato, it is not joining.

to officially announce that strikes deep into russian territory will be carried out by western missiles, is a special kind of cynicism, to take a step towards world war iii on the platform of an organization that was created to avoid such a war. valentin bogdanov, ivan udkin and evgeny kononov, news from new york.