second, i say, okay, but how many hours does it turn out to be, these 18 hours are not enough, that is, he will receive some pennies, they will take him on half-time, and what is this topic with pedagogical education, i am also saying now, why is that? i worked in a school during the soviet era, i studied in graduate school at the same time, i did not have any pedagogical education, all of them had former officers teaching mvp, that's how much i studied, all nvps taught, these were former officers, well, yes, i have.

so if you look at this tool, how it works now, it works differently, before we judge our policy, let's see how and why it works differently. firstly, the war that is going on now has become not just hybrid, that is , multidimensional, it has also become creeping.

it is documented, confirmed that we no longer have a strategic threat from the west. the second goal on our part is to ensure that russia enters normal development in the coming years. this means that we must position ourselves in this way, from the point of view of.

therefore, at any cost, we must do so that this system has survived. and for it to survive, this system must not have any challenges from anyone else, this means that all other players on the international field must either be accountable and controllable to it, or they must be, as they say, some petty troublemakers who in reality cannot influence the system.

a world that would be understandable to us and would not work against us, this, by the way, undermines their own positions, because from the point of view of china, from the point of view of india and the invasion of kursk, the kursk region, threats of weapons strikes

long-range only consolidates the entire global majority around us and gives this. global majority a real argument: who is the west. now, if you look at it from the point of view of the work of the central bank. this work of the central bank, again, on the most important question, does it consolidate our country or does it destabilize our country? i have a feeling that it definitely does not consolidate it, because... it definitely does not consolidate the economy, it definitely does not consolidate our financial system, it it definitely does not consolidate, even if you look at what people say, the confidence of our citizens in the future, because they still do not

understand, there is a government that does one thing, and for some reason there is a foreign agent called the central bank, not accountable to this government, which for some reason does everything else. people just cannot understand this, how is this possible in such a state, well, probably the last thing that can be said, the media space, and now from the point of view of consolidation or destabilization, where are we? we are we consolidating more, or are we becoming more unstable? well, from the point of view, we listened to simuna, yes, in the external circuit there is such a feeling that our work is bearing real fruit, and even if we distract ourselves, i am not a journalist and do not fully, so to speak, understand how these

mechanisms work, but in terms of the result, globally, this majority that is around us, it has not run away anywhere, it does not say, the russians are lying... you do not listen to the russians, yes, no, it means that something is being done correctly, well, from the point of view of our internal, let's say so, if not to say propaganda, that is, internal information, which we have been talking about in this audience for a long time, something has changed in the last 2 years, we have somehow become sergeyevich peskov admitted that it seems that military censorship is still needed, that is, no steps will follow after this, but the very fact of his statement is so interesting, plus i realized that a number of bloggers have a crystal ball, yeah. because they , having looked into the crystal ball, immediately investigate

any situation with wild speed, even before the commission has completed its work the ministry of defense, that is, they immediately make decisions without knowing anyone, just without having visited those units, they instantly make their own, phenomenally fair decisions, and then, like a bang, the nkvd’s fins went to sell themselves, snort-snort-snort-snort flew, and whether it’s true or not, well... now it will suddenly turn out as a result of an investigation that the information is not accurate, i wonder, they’ll come to them, they’ll say, excuse me, but you’re being charged with defamation, well, i’m just curious, well, i’ll talk a little about that, although yes, i forgot, in our country only the court can find guilty, right, bloggers are above the court, they feel it in their gut, in their gut, and if we approach the question again, are we consolidating or are we destabilizing? we are consolidating, and some are destabilizing, that's it, that's the question, that's the question, what

has been done about this in 2 years, that 's what has been done specifically, yes, that's what we talked about, we have, for example, a situation center that would deal with just the rate, we have a rate, a rate, yes, and with it there is an information rate, well, maybe there is, i just don't know anything about it, i'm just a little tired to ask such questions, because i am not a professional.

this is long-range, and by the way, we have an agreement with north korea, an attack on the kurdish region unties our hands completely, that's why on kursk, yes 1,200 korean volunteers, 300, 300, 300, 300 is better, i suggested 3,000, otherwise the road won't hold 200, but 300 will hold, it will simply be similar to the number of chinese who fought, according to some sources, in the red army during the civil war, yes, yes, there was such a thing, after all... edmund kiosaen's film the elusive placers was filmed based on literary material that was changed, that is, in our

case it was the gypsy boy yashka, and there was the chinese girl yu, i’m just saying what it was called in the literary mother, that is , that’s why they are like that, that’s why i suggested 3000, well, great, but that’s what i’m talking about, let’s ask ourselves the question constantly, that’s what’s happening, whether in the media space, whether in the central bank, whether in the economy,

it’s impossible, how is it possible, god forbid, what will happen, it’s good if we raid bases in romania, in britain, in germany, in poland, in france, what what will happen next, nothing will happen, well what will be the answer, that's what they will do, no answer, well even if we assume the worst case scenario, what they will do, they will strike at us, they are already striking at us, at all. and what next? i think that the rates should be raised, and in the most brutal way, this is a simple game, they are sure that we will not be able to, so to speak directly, here it flies.

later, that the head of our central bank read milton friedman's textbooks on macroeconomics and extrapolated their policy in ours, the thing is that in the west, well , at least in europe and more in america, in recent years there has been a figure of 2%, 2% inflation is good so that people, realizing that it still exists, do not keep money under the pillow, take it to banks or invest, but at the same time 2% is still not a big enough inflation and people do not get upset. from the rise in prices, as far as i understand, the central banks decided that well, we are not europe, so let it not be 2-4%, then the logic is the same, they did not just forever stick kasyanov's 2%. yes, well, well, well, it's just that, we we definitely live in a different era, and not these figures, by the way, the figure of 2% for them and four for us, this is the consensus of scientists, they could,

i don’t know, drink tea or something else, with a different figure, and we would live by it, that is, here itself...

the government should think about sanctions against, using our three export resources, enriched uranium, titanium and nickel, and this is an interesting step, because until now we have basically played second fiddle almost all the time, starting with jackson vennick, magnitsky, after 1914 we have there was a very bright, but unfortunately, short moment when the russian federation introduced counter-sanctions on agricultural products. measures to support agriculture, which did not allow the ideas of the central bank into the area of ​​financing agriculture, but well, still, one of the elements in the development

of this policy was precisely counter-sanctions, now we have started. the program or today's program with a question about great britain and those actions that the russian foreign ministry and the russian government took in relation to the british, as if diplomats. the thing is that great britain, as far as i can judge, is a rather weak link in the chain of allies of the united states, in 2013 great britain clearly let the united states down when they were preparing to strike syria, i will remind you that then david cameron , on a completely fictitious occasion, announced that great britain would not participate, that is, a vote was invented in the house of commons, which did not take place, but nevertheless cameron threw up his hands and told the americans: no, no, we will not go to syria, as a result obama had to lose face there, to wind down their operation, then all this did not happen, it seems that the americans have such a mistrust or quite a strong

mistrust towards great britain , so now it is just very interesting the last. weeks the americans and the british are literally walking hand in hand, the head of the central intelligence agency took the head of mi-6, they spoke together and published an article, the minister, secretary of state blinken took david lemmy by the hand and took him to kiev so that they could adopt some kind of starmer program together, the british prime minister was just in washington, in a week he is going to washington, that is, such a policy to strangle in an embrace. i would like to, in any case, communicate closely with great britain, because great britain is really quite a weak link in terms of military power, but as for cynicism, er, the use

of russia in the diplomatic sphere, they were painful for us, and we did not react for a very long time, let me remind you that there, for example, in the eighteenth

year, as part of the skripoli affair, the british expelled 23 of our diplomats, we of course responded, and we of course responded to those cases, when our diplomats expelled or we caught a foreign diplomat here in russia, they also expelled, but the case that was made public this week is very indicative, firstly... this is close cooperation between the ministry of foreign affairs and the fsb (fsb) provided information about this directorate and its activities and its goals further, and the fsb did not provide us with any data on their specific destructive activities, we took a principled position: if there is a department within the british ministry of foreign affairs whose goal is destruction or russian statehood, a threat to our sovereignty, then the very fact of belonging to this. department is a pretext for expelling these diplomats from the country or, in any case , creating unbearable conditions for them, so here are the changes in russian policy in

the sphere of sanctions, it will become more proactive, these are the actions towards the country, and why do we need the british ambassador at all? no, well, no, well, in the sense that why, why not lower the status, it is an unfriendly country, absolutely frankly, interferes in internal affairs, that is, its... employees perform another, why not lower it to the level of a consular mission, because we want to keep vacancies for our people there, but i think that this is hardly an important argument in the work of our diplomats, who understand well what time it is, not only that , they are physically threatened there all the time, that is, they work in the most difficult situations, why not show that you can all get out of here, the last 6 years in the russian-british relations situation

television and radio broadcasting company with the support of the ministry of digital development, communications and mass media of the russian federation, the administration of the governor of the perm territory, invite television and

radio journalists. another new issue of the author's program besagon tv, which will be called " you can't lie", and what can you? i hope it will be interesting, i look forward to seeing you at our next meeting.

mom, why do we need these letters? for a fairy tale. in the three ninth kingdom, the three tenth state.

for the sixth time i invite representatives central bank to come to our studio and politely explain your point of view in a conversation not with me, but with my guests, so we are very, very much waiting for you. ginna tigranovich, can i congratulate you? well, once during the program you started to get angry that in russia there is no systemic understanding of russian political thought, my colleagues and i thought that you have so many concerns, what more do you need?