at our new meeting, but the fact that we need our own closed technological circuit, i think, is now completely obvious. well, in fact , the government is seriously paying attention to this, investing crazy money, special conditions for both developers and lending rates for these companies, that is, there yes and even yes, yes and for specialists as well, therefore the answer to the question, if we have a sovereign internet, well, technically we are sitting on communication nodes, we can, as they say, everything enemy, and where is this bastard, which showed like our tablets, where?

independence the state entrusted him with a crazy tool, it was just technological and as a person, here's how much of a talentless scoundrel, well, such a manager is simply an enemy of the company's company.

to cut off, so to speak, all hostile capabilities we have, to replace it with our own - this is a process, well, it needs to be caught up now, i would record this historical moment, because this could be such a reporting point, when the world will be consciously fragmented along the technological contour, it fragmented before, because of the sanctions war and the redistribution of markets, the chinese appeared there, pushed the koreans and the americans, all this is clear, but now it will be a conscious fragmentation, that is , you will have to look at who is your enemy? definitely not an enemy,

what can you use, this is a rather interesting thing, because in all other areas this fragmentation is happening, in technology, it will start now, it will already be like a certain process, i remember, we had our phone, cities produced in taiwan, it was produced in taiwan, but i i say process, but it was called our city phone produced, what was it called, by the way, yes somehow yes somehow it was just not called, there were several, yes yes, but it is the yotafond groups, creativity, as i understand it.

here valentin ivanina the day before an interesting article, well, there is not an article, there was an interview with her in one of our largest publications, she said about feminism about child-free, this is a very important thing, despite the fact that it seems, well, not a good girl, i do this, since it is quite timely and despite the fact that about feminism before it seems as a eurasian women's forum, but we have the right so to speak feminism and in general as a movement more than 100 years ago it was born with completely different ideas, at the turn of the sixties... seventies, it

pulled away from the normal left idea towards the ultra-left movements quite a lot of attention from such a kind of slightly passionate public, let's call it. so that's why the free appeared, that feminist movement, which later, as it turned out, the people leading collaborated with the cia, a coincidence, i don't think, how do i understand the soviet psychiatrists, there was still a sluggish-flowing schizophrenia, and compulsory medicine is an interesting thing, in fact, it can have quite a practical purpose, even a kind of sparing one, all this today has become not just an attempt to delay from important meanings.

in the world of people who consciously do not want to have children more than those who cannot, everything, have already lived, this is already a kind of movement consciously, satanism, hence the question arises, well, accordingly, to ban child free is not a trick, it is possible by law, and this it will be correct, the question is how to develop in the consciousness, at least of that healthy part of society, this is all, because here tax incentives are needed, and the right economic incentives from companies, and apparently, consciously...

this is, so to speak, the advancement, so to speak, of the american system of short-medium -range missiles already in the north of asia in east asia, and if we say that literally 2 days ago, the deputy prime minister of the philippines said: "yes, indeed, these typhoons that brought us for maneuvers in

april, they have not gone anywhere and will not go anywhere, they will be with us, so to speak, until the next maneuvers, and we ourselves will make a special decision on their withdrawal from the territory of the philippines. then we see that the united states is gradually, consistently building a system of these very medium- range missiles, which, by the way, if in the philippines, we can say that they are directed against china, in goam, most likely they will also be placed there also against china, then in japan, a certain threat to our country itself is already emerging, this is manchuria, northeastern china is actually a threat to our country, and now we are finally beginning to understand why in 2019 trump withdrew from the inf treaty, that is , the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty, which was signed in 1987 and which is generally considered one of the most, so to speak, serious achievements in disarmament,

while many people then said that the americans destroyed 846 missiles, we destroyed 1,846, but the problem here was that these missiles, the pershinkas, which they have been using since 1983 years they were deployed in germany against us, it was not operational-tactical, but strategic weapons, these missiles practically reached our territory, therefore in this sense we were able, so to speak, to somehow eliminate this threat, now i want to say, this threat is starting to return, this is what happens next, if they are going to deploy these missiles, these typhoons with missiles with tomahawks, which they will deploy... yes, let's bang, they will deploy them in germany, then in fact they are returning to the same situation, when these missiles, small, medium-range, they become, they acquire the character of strategic weapons, and you know, the situation is very reminiscent of the eighties, because there too, why did they

start putting pershings, it is because we reached a certain balance in terms of strategic weapons, ballistic missiles, they, so to speak, in order to find, so to speak, an asymmetric response to our... successes in this area, they began to promote these very pershings, now, by the way, seeing, so to speak, the rapid build-up of the armed forces of china, i think, that they are going to, so to speak, move, move again in this direction, that is, they generally like to repeat, so to speak, repeated, so to speak, situations and in this way they get a very serious, very strong lever of pressure on the entire chinese policy, you understand, china so far, except for the statement that it will give an answer, that it condemns, that this, so to speak, as if leads to a decrease in security, nothing real, so far we actually do not see, you understand, but here it is necessary to say something else: well, a very important thing, that of course, it's not the eighties now in relation to us, why? because they are

already placing these missiles in the far east, and as you understand, from chukotka and kamchatka we can, so to speak, have all the possibilities, if we get away from the, so to speak, moratorium, which we , so to speak, still, so to speak, maintain, we will start placing our missiles in these areas, because alaska for them, it only seems that... there is ice, the cold alone makes everything, where everyone lives, there are key missile defense areas, the united states states, there are key missile attack warning centers, there are a huge number of air bases, that is, there is where to shoot, and there is where our landing force can land, and there are opportunities, first we’ll hit, of course, that is, this is not the situation of the eighties, here it is necessary to see it absolutely clearly and... you know what they call alaska, ice crimea, yes, at some point

it was necessary to return to the native lands of the coast, now they are very scared, when an entire division with khybers and all the rest landed on the lyubov islands of course they would be scared when they left these on the oliud islands to go to alaska and you will just be left around it is a good topic, good, well, in general, this is the nervous reaction of the americans, now there were six-day maneuvers of the russian and chinese fleets, and such a nervous reaction, what do i actually want to say? i am leading to only one thing, that in this whole situation of these gathering dark clouds, we must be more decisive, we must be more firm and understand that the missiles from chikotka from kamchatka will reach alaska, and the united states should understand this. okay, i would like to return to the issue of peace in ukraine, which our president discussed with the brazilian president today, well, of course , they primarily talked about purely russian-brazilian relations, but... they naturally touched on the ukrainian issue, so our president is discussing this issue with

the president of brazil, with the leader of china, with the prime minister of india, with anyone, but note that not once in the last few years has he discussed this issue with any of the european leaders, with those people who really determine the policy of europe, and this is very much with biden , or what, the policy of europe is determined not by the european. i mean the european leaders, yes, yes, but in europe he has no one to talk to about this, and this is really an absolutely, well, incredible, so to speak, development of events, that even three centuries ago no one could have imagined, three centuries ago everyone, everyone, everyone, absolutely everyone from extreme communists to extreme liberals, were sure that now after the collapse of the bipolar.

worse, europe is now turning into a region that is losing its international

subjectivity, it is no longer a subject, but an object of global big world politics, well, that is , it is like the middle east, where, so to speak, there can be all sorts of israeli-palestinian , so to speak, perturbations, but we know that everything, so to speak, the main processes there are determined by non-regional players, large and small, starting.

us, it's just that our traditions turned out to be tougher, the people, the historical memory of the people saved us, and the spirit is greater, i have said this many times and i will not be lazy to say it again, we were saved by the immortal regiment. family memory of the great patriotic war, when we refused to believe these imported narratives about how terrible we are, how terrible our ancestors were, how terrible the soviet government was, we refused to believe this conditional yeltsin center of moscow, family memory won over these

imported narratives, not in europe, well, let the nazis get what they deserve, it's not a pity. now an advertisement, we will continue after it. every time i hear about a peace plan, about a peace initiative, i have a question from zelensky, what is he smoking, well, what

is he sniffing, we know, yes, that is , we understand that it is always a deception, we understand that it is always nonsense, we understand that it is always about nothing, we understand that, as a rule , he voices some thoughts that, well, everything that was before this was unrelated, talentless, inorganic, everyone needs this. but it is very dangerous, very dangerous, because behind him are people who need war, if objectively speaking, there is not a single force that would be interested in there being no war, the anglo-saxon world is happy, the slavs killing each other, ukraine, which thinks that it is interesting to someone, ukraine is interesting only because through ukraine it is possible to hurt russia, even such a dumb beast as igor masyachuk, and even the west understands this. it gives us as many weapons as we need to resist, plus or minus effectively, but not to stop the war or win, and

how do they give them? well, ask nicely, give it to us, or better yet, ask us, we will give you the r-16, or better yet, we will give you the ataval, or better yet, maybe we will allow you to strike somewhere there, somewhere, that is , they... are interested in the war going on, the ukrainian nation is being utilized, we are like coal when russia is being roasted, i will tell you again, i don’t give a damn about the russian federation, but i don’t want my people to be used as coal to roast, that is, when roasting someone else, good or bad, it’s the same for me, not for my people, the main thing is, i’m interested, but for the ukrainians, he understands that they are on nobody needs them in the west, that in fact the west can't tell a russian from a ukrainian, that's why when ukrainians suddenly imagine something and

come and say, excuse me, such a bad question, well, of course, russian culture is well known, please ask, but is ukrainian culture known to the west? well , let's just quietly and calmly draw this picture with our broad brains.

you know the english, at least there is english, my dear, of course, i settled on hungarian, that is, i'm not against it, but this is this well, there's no escape, it's not good, it's not

bad, it's just the way it is, when you ask what you know about ukrainian history, nothing, but there's a set of fabrications, and everyone knows russian history, like it or not, but everyone knows it, so when ukrainians try to explain something, well, well, well, stop fooling around. he's ukrainian, we don't have any problems with ukrainians, we have problems with political khokhols and ukrainian nazis, as well as with russian fascists and russian

nazis, who are there in the rdc

now he has some kind of plan, well, when americans hear about the plan, i advise you to listen carefully to the ex-us employee, metaho. it feels like i'm reliving one of the worst events in my life. when i was in the state department in the iraq desk, in 2005, i helped put together what was called the plan for a u.s. victory in iraq. it was.

refused to negotiate, putin will suddenly agree to negotiate that will benefit you because you hurt him. i don't understand that logic. if someone offers you terms and you refuse in a crude way, then why do you think that later, when you're worse off than you are, you're going to get the same terms you got before. plus, you're so crude about rejecting those offers, and you're also lying

about it. you know, nobody thinks you're going to have the same opportunities you have now, but this has been a core component of american military policy, our militarized foreign policy for decades, and it's a story about winning, because there's no other option. diplomacy never wasn't an option until it was too late. who are you? i, a traveler, a balloonist, genre ivan, and so we go out namesakes, what a fairy tale without ivan, eh, eh!