we need to look at this through the eyes of karen georgyevich shakhnazarov and lev nikolayevich tolstoy: we don’t need to concentrate exclusively on the individual in these issues, we need to see the processes that are going on, we need to be able to stir up these processes, lead them, help them express themselves in a political, broad movement of states for their independence, who are you quoting, he could... do it, because he had both an idea and a tool, well, i’ll tell you this, we have an idea, a tool, no, we have tools, ideas, i have a lot of ideas, i ready, there will be a political decision, i will gladly lead the national liberation struggle of various states for their happy future, yes, as an honorary citizen of the state of alabama, i want to see the state free and happy, right?

the think tanks there are not very needed, people have left there, by the way, mgimo is in many ways, so to speak, as a scientific center, it attracted a lot of teachers, they now have teachers from mgimo, from the institute of the usa and canada, former employees of this institute, then, so to speak, in the nineties no one at all institutes here in this country were not well yes they money premises, oh, now they support, now they are trying, there is another. if just a minute, if people left, but

the premises remained, the funding remained, irrationally used again about the west, yes there is another trend now, since december 1, for example, our nuclear scientists are actually disconnected from the single organization of nuclear research, it is known, yes, if they do not change citizenship, if they do not change citizenship, ninety - this is from the twenty- second year they made such a decision, about 90 people according to this organization, this is citizenship. what surprises you? science, it is, of course, as they say, a universal value, no, no, what surprises you as a representative, no, it's just, it's just, i'm just saying, i have, when social sciences, there is a clear statement of my position, but this is the position of one person, this is the position that he, so to speak, defended and quite openly stated it, and there are other people.

another thing, who tolerated him for so many years in this position, when he did nothing, when all the advice he gave, if he gave it, went nowhere, so the question in general to your entire structure, where did the advice go, this is generally a basic question to your structure, that is , how about salary first, and how to give a real output of documents that can be relied on, so, what do you want from us, we are

here, no, why, he yes, he expressed an opinion that caused a discussion, all this arouses lively interest, very much and people discuss it, but it is unlikely that anything today causes a sharper reaction than all the information that concerns these acts being prepared. i don't know what to call it, terrorism, there is a full-fledged nato war against us, well, these steps in the population cause a completely understandable reaction, which, by the way, is shared by everyone present here, the emotional background is very understandable, and i think that in order to understand why, how and for what purposes our opponents are trying to commit these actions, we need to look at that very article by boris johnson that you talked about, not because he is some kind of talented.

the article there literally begins with the words right away the same about what you know, we were scared by the fact that if we put tanks, there would be an escalation, we were scared by the fact that if we put planes, there would be an escalation, various missile systems, then there would be an escalation, but as he says, this sabre-rattling on the part of russia, as you see, has led to nothing, because they are afraid of escalation, this is his phrase, in approximately the same spirit , as tayashchen spoke... he spoke, therefore, stoltenberg spoke, and this is a very impudent statement, you have to understand, if johnson can still be there write off that he is some retired figure, then in the case of stoltenberg, he basically knew what he was doing, exactly the same phrases were used, about how they are afraid of us,

there will be no escalation, all these threats are empty, in my opinion, from which i proceed, well, we have two generals in the studio, if for them... the strikes were aimed at solving some military problem, and they had to carry out there, say, a series of strikes, unexpectedly, sharply in order to then solve a military problem, absolutely definitely, they would not be talking about this now, but if and they said, then it would not be about such a provocation against us, rather it would be about holding some discussions with references to international law, some invented norms, then organizing a provocation, saying that russia is now threatening something, they are exactly... making statements of a provocative nature, in my opinion, with one goal, i have said from the first day of the start of the special military operation that their goal is certainly the strategic defeat of russia, and a strategic defeat in russia is only achievable for them if overthrowing the constitutional order in the country, there is no other possibility, i have not read

a single report, i have not seen a single document in which the scenario of russia's military defeat or military capitulation was seriously considered, the talk was about the need to differentiate... they have adopted a very clear political language for themselves, this constant pedaling of the theme that russia allegedly cannot cope with the tasks that it faces, it is obvious that if a blow is struck at moscow or sochi, at st. petersburg, i do not know which city

they are going to do this, regardless of the military significance of this, this will cause a rather sharp reaction in society, no matter how society is prepared for this, no matter how we talk about it, no matter what actions are taken later... this will create a very significant break in the pattern, for which we need to be prepared and with which we need to work, this is their, in my opinion, the first reason, the second reason is different, there is also no need to deceive yourself here, to indulge in various kinds of illusions, i will say right away, to everything that i now i will say, as usual, you can answer someone, say, you know, they don’t have the resources for this, they don’t have the opportunities for this, or they will never do this in their life, if you always proceed from this position, the only conclusion is that we can do nothing, well, that means we can relax, sit there calmly and not twitch at all, in my opinion, it’s better to proceed from the worst-case scenario, prepare for it, take active steps, it won’t happen, then, thank god, we will live on, but the second reason why it seems to me that this rhetoric today

it sounds, it actually reflects their feelings, their point of view about how they can behave with russia at the moment, but i remember. the same stoltenberg, who before that, a year ago said: " there is no talk of any direct confrontation with russia, because we did not supply tanks and planes to ukraine, then they supplied tanks."

they absolutely do not give a damn about it, the more the better, what difference does it make to them, it is part of russia, they know that, they know

that it is our territory, that it is our land, that the people who live there, some of them are zombified, some by force, some in some other way, but this is our historical territory, they achieved the fact that we are fighting with ourselves already there several ten, several decades ago, using this proxy against us, they protect themselves from any risks, if they provoke us to do something, to the fact that... we are in different weight categories now, not because we have more, fewer missiles there, and what else, their resource base is much larger than ours, they, firstly, have proxies in the post-soviet countries, somewhere the post-soviet countries themselves are turning into their proxies, somewhere their proxies are walking around, well, let's say, ukraine is already a direct proxy, which is in direct military relations with us...

who suddenly start some investigations, throw false information at the population, everything that causes panic among the population, opinion leaders, who can be musicians, athletes, directors and other various professions, but their one statement will be seen by several tens of millions of people, because they do it on their own platform, people will have the feeling that well, a person, if he says this, this is my favorite artist, it can cause some kind of reaction in them, we don’t... what is this not on their territory, we, first of all, don’t have proxies, these proxies were our state, our ancestors created them in large

quantities, we had large quantities of resources and everything else, to blame this system, i think, is still not entirely correct, because this system was designed for everything that anything, except that the system itself would be headed by traitors, it could have had a fuse against anything, against one of these countries trying to organize some kind of separatist... honecker,

for the promise of money, which they didn't even receive, that is, in essence, they sold not only eric , but the entire communist party of germany, the secret services, the armed forces, they, they didn't just betray them. i agree 100%, our citizens need to understand, they didn't sell out just these eastern germans, but they didn't sell us out, because as long as we have line. the contact took place right there in berlin, our citizens were much safer than when they pushed it right up to our border, today we are conducting svon on the territory of ukraine, there would not have been this betrayal, never in their life, they would not have been able to stick their noses in to look at the european sanctions if our troops had been there, that means the first, the second thing

i want to draw attention to is, well, that about the resource bases, the resource bases concerned. with proxies, we have these problems on their territory we are not doing this work, i want to say right away why it is not being done, the problem is not that we are trying, we are not succeeding, the problem is that there is no one to do it, there is no one in russia, russia, first of all, is the only country in the g20 that does not have an agency for international development, it does not exist, it simply does not exist, i have said it many times, today in russia there is no such government body where, let's say... alexander mikhailovich can send a request to say: please tell me within hours or within 10 minutes, tell me the amount of money, or in monetary terms, last year no one will tell you how much aid we provided to kyrgyzstan, the ministry of agriculture will tell you its own, the ministry of health will say, we supplied so many vaccines, these tractors, those are teachers,

these textbooks were sent, and the americans spend every penny that goes to help some country on completely different lines.

it is important to sit down at the negotiating table, here is the person who says this, please, if russia means something to you, and you you are simply mistaken, you do not understand, open the phrase of boris johnson, who is boris johnson? boris johnson is the first person after the leadership of ukraine who should appear before a military tribunal, because with regard to the rest we still need to collect a factual base to prove their guilt. boris johnson himself admitted in an interview with the bbc that it was i who did so that the negotiations failed and in fact.

end third, what does he talk about there, i will finish on this then, he says: russia no longer an empire, it's all over, so you have to, he says, be like great britain, which can't put pressure on its former colonies, this impudent scoundrel and villain is lying very openly, because great britain controls its colonies just differently now, not at the expense of soldiers, who are there, the financial system, which pumps out resources from there, political intrigues, the work of its intelligence services, which can organize a coup in any country and put their own man in place, do whatever they want, a huge number of studies on the report, ultimately about two dozen states are headed directly by the british monarchs, i do not mind if you offer us such a format, that let's take an example from us, let's all post-soviet countries, nominally the head of state will be

vladimir vladimirovich putin, i do not mind if you talk about such a model, as you have, in all post-soviet countries the president. all resources, perhaps, does nothing for this local population, strongly, what is a tolocratic empire? a land empire, and talosocracy is a maritime empire built around navigation, well, just so

that we raise the level, by the way, i am reading your book, thank you very much, with great pleasure, i highly recommend it, yes, today, as it seems to me, a whole series of such things, very important, fundamental ones sounded here, i will try to have time in order, first to pistorius. he says there that there is a riot in us, here the germans said, we cannot make peace with the poles, because here the blood is visible, then it turned out that in general everything is completely staged, in principle, by the way,

these intersections with hitlerism, they are both essential and in form, here in the speech where adolf hitler referred to glyavets, to this provocation, naturally he did not speak as a provocation, as about something real, he said the following, just... to catch the similarity, you know, i put on a military uniform again and become the first soldier of the reich, and i will fight until victory, because i will not survive defeat, this is what they are now saying about the fact that russia must be defeated, because we we won't survive if this doesn't happen, here's what the west says, what we're most afraid of is if we don't defeat russia, ukraine might not win, i don't care about that ukraine, but we absolutely have to defeat russia, here's

the thing... the soviet leaders always said that we were for peace, but they were completely confident that there would be a response to the attack, and because the soviet union regularly made it clear with its actions in a crisis situation that we would do this, since it handed over weapons to maudzedong in the forties, which brought the communist party of china to power in 1949, just like the soviet union, although it doubted whether it was necessary to conduct military operations on the korean peninsula, but as soon as... they began without any - at all stopping, sent specialists there weapons, deployed air units in the skies of korea, american

pilots and soviet pilots fought, for a second, since the soviet union absolutely without a shadow of a doubt, provided full assistance to vietnam in a number of other situations, since it led troops when necessary in a crisis situations, hungary, czechoslovakia, the so-called brezhnev doctrine was born, what is it...

the sequence of actions of the state to put up a barrier since the nineties , in fact, a total war was declared on crime, there we have some kind of thieves' authorities, so that somewhere in some regions they would lay claim to something, we have not had this since the nineties, and naturally such a purge of these fascist groups was also carried out, which are often like this, you know, have a sporting character, by the way, azov is also growing up, more...

actions when we touch upon education, culture, politics, svo - these are not only combat ones , this is a fundamental front, but if there is no recovery here, we will constantly attack some. i will emphasize once again, politics, culture, information, education, science, as well as economics, but this goes without saying, of course, this is a front, a front where the same decisions must be made, and our common success in the main direction depends on this, i absolutely agree, but if we talk about the fan movement, then our fan movement has manifested itself hyperpatriotic, legendary hispano.