there is no simple solution, because both are important . integrity does not mean that we must take the best of each of these worldviews and combine them in an attempt to create a new ideology. alexander zenoviev once noted, on a similar subject, i will quote: the theory according to which it is possible to build an ideal society by taking the good... features of westernism, as he called the ideology of the west, and communism, discarding the bad ones, here is simply an illiterate premise, we are talking about expanding the worldview field itself, about such an expansion that will allow, immersed in this field, to feel, even at first not to understand, but to feel those new principles on which the new socio-cultural system will be built. integrity is opposed

to reductionism, reductionism is a method of cognition that involves reducing the complex to the simple, first a complex object is dismembered, divided into simpler components, this is analysis, then these parts are connected again, this is synthesis. reductionism is the main method of cognition of the new time, on this method. practically all natural sciences grew up, but we are talking about processes social, political, we are talking about man, we are talking about social sciences, about education, in what concerns man, is it possible to reduce the complex to the simple? we are in the darwin museum, charles darwin proposed an outstanding concept back in the 19th century, the origin of species, including the origin of man, this concept

assumed development, progress, biological, due to natural selection, and natural selection occurs on the basis of the struggle for survival, on the basis of competition, the strongest survives. in relation to man, is this true or not. the problem is that back in the 19th century, these ideas of darwin were very fashionable and they began to be used. to analyze the development of humanity, human communities, to analyze the development of man, thus they tried to reduce a complex man to simpler models, is this right? what does it mean if everything comes from a monkey and my mother with papazhli.

dei contained in religion, that's what heisenberg wrote. the correctness of the confirmed natural scientific conclusions cannot be reasonably questioned religious thought, on the contrary. ethical demands, growing from the very core of religious thinking, cannot be undermined by overly rational arguments from the field of science. let us recall the conflict between galileo galilei and the catholic church.

believers, they tried to understand god's plan, while the catholic church did not accept the new model, the new theory, the catholic church was not ready for it, as we see, value foundations manifest themselves even in the natural sciences, and what can we say about the social sciences, an outstanding modern sociologist who recently passed away, immanstein has been talking about this in public speeches and writing in his texts for the last decades, it is necessary to finally make a radical shift towards value rationality. so far this has not been achieved, but this task

is becoming increasingly urgent. true science is not done by reason, it is done by mind, and mind includes reason, and dreams, and fantasies, and mystical experiences and... in front of works of art, all this will always distinguish a person from any very perfect machine, unless of course a person himself refuses this wealth. now let's talk about education, about school education. it is generally accepted that a schoolchild does not need extensive knowledge, that competencies are needed, what is needed is what can be pragmatic, what can be useful in real life, what is needed is necessary, shakespeare's king lear immediately comes to mind,

connect your whole life to the necessary, and a person will be equal to an animal, they also say that now a special dossier will be introduced for each child, there will be entered... all his successes, as well as all his failures, according to the information in this dossier, according to certain criteria the life of the young man will be directed, perhaps this will be done by artificial intelligence, it seems that earlier this was called fate. i do not think that great teachers would approve of such an approach, we are in the courtyard of the leading pedagogical university of russia, this is the moscow pedagogical... state university, and this is a monument to the great russian teacher konstantin dmitrievich ushinsky. konstantin dmitrievich said so, education should not only develop the human mind and give it a certain amount of information, but it must ignite in it a thirst

for serious work, without which its life cannot be either worthy or happy. how can artificial intelligence ignite something, some feelings. ignite in a person, this is the job of a teacher, educator, pedagogue, it cannot be otherwise, and here we are faced with a very serious conflict, a value conflict. actually, there is nothing new in this. 2 centuries ago, velgein von gulbald created a modern university, relying on ancient tradition, reworked, unrenewed enlightenment. and what we see now is a departure from the great communist tradition. we see the triumph of pragmatism, and this

triumph is connected with the fact that education rejects the value basis. as we said before, goal-rationality triumphs, and in... that in this direction the harvest will be small. belgen von humboldt wrote: it is obvious that people cannot be good craftsmen, traders, soldiers or businessmen, if, regardless of their profession, they are not good, decent, regardless of their condition, well-informed people and citizens. knowledge and creation must go hand in hand, this is the pathos of humanism. education. the german intellectual is echoed by the russian religious philosopher, nikolai fedorov. humbalt on this he built his system i quote. the contradiction of rational beings and irrational force will not collapse until rational rational-thinking beings become rationally

acting. that is, until two minds, theoretical and practical, are united, with them and the third, artistic and religious. pessimists, hearing these theses, will say: perhaps this is right, but it will take a long time, a very long time, yes, it is long, and it will take a decade. but it seems that there is no other way, it seems that it will have to be done, only widely educated people, only well -prepared for this people, a society well-prepared for this can respond to the grand challenges facing humanity, facing russia. in addition, the changes will begin immediately, because the atmosphere itself will change, the atmosphere creation, the atmosphere of knowledge, and today's intellectuals in this atmosphere. more energetic their ideas will become bolder, but all this will happen

when the university again becomes a temple. in the constitution of the russian federation in article 43 it is said that everyone has the right to education, and further, the russian federation establishes federal state educational standards. from the last thesis it follows that education is the same throughout russia, but in addition to the fact that higher education.

this is the fullness of education, the education system should teach a person

all three ways of knowing the world, a person has the right not just to education, he has the right to knowledge, the outstanding historian of the 20th century arnold toynbee believed that... the purpose of education is religious, not mercantile. of course, he did not mean the law of god, he was talking about the value foundations of education, a person must understand, navigate in this complex world, he must be able to distinguish good from evil, he must at least approximately imagine those values ​​that developed by mankind over the millennia, science, art, literature, music and religious values. climate change is

now the number one topic on the world agenda. the climate issue is discussed at huge forums, the g7, g20 discuss them, the introduction of solar and wind energy is being promoted, fines for carbon emissions are being introduced, the automobile industry is switching to the production of cars with electric... engines and so on and so forth, however, behind these statements and actions one can often see cynical redistribution of markets or knocking out subsidies from the state. if we agree with the hypothesis that it is the anthropogenic factor that is to blame for the increase in temperature on earth, and this is still just a hypothesis, although many are inclined to it, then the question arises: who is actually to blame for the unrestrained growth of emissions, the answer is obvious, business is to blame, industrial. companies first of all, but it would be wrong to blame only

business. modern sociologist michael mann writes: the climate problem was generated capitalism, with the help of both nation states and individual consumers. unfortunately, they are the three most important actors of our time. and to avoid a planetary catastrophe, their power will have to be curbed, which in itself... is an extremely difficult task. for consumers, the climate issue is too abstract. we enjoy discussing this topic, especially in rich countries with high consumption levels, but are we willing to consume less in order to reduce emissions? business, its desire to increase revenue and profit, business is ready to start reducing production, realizing that its profits will decrease. the problem is that even if someone in business wants

to try to start solving these problems alone, he will not succeed if he wants... the business environment itself does not allow today to work on reducing harmful emissions into the atmosphere. finally, politicians do not dare to announce to their electorate, that is, the consumer, that in order to reduce emissions they will have to.

labor. many also point to the injustice of international division , the inadequacy in modern conditions of the classical economic indicator of gdp, the gross domestic product. and politicians and businesses, and voters-consumers are guided by it. it is believed that gdp should grow continuously. but the question arises: does continuous growth of gdp mean? an increase in the welfare of the household, because the goal of economic policy should not be a formal indicator, but households, specific people of this household. it seems that in these new conditions it will be necessary review those economic indicators that really reflect the achievement of the goals facing humanity and

specific countries. here is a zil refrigerator, it is a famous soviet brand, it is 50 years old, and this refrigerator still works, we are in the mosfilm props pavilion, there are a lot of refrigerators, washing machines, mostly soviet, almost all this equipment is in working order. and what actually breaks down in a refrigerator, a refrigerator is a fairly simple device, a fairly simple unit, if it is made qualitatively, it will work for many decades, like this particular zil moscow refrigerator, but modern refrigerators do not work for long, modern refrigerators work for 5, well, 10 years, they have to be replaced, what is the problem,

now we will talk about cars. here is a volga car, this particular car was filmed in the famous film beware of the car, let us down, we are not on the same path, as you wish. then in those days the idea was to make durable cars, reliable cars, reliable metal, paint, primer, cars it was possible to repair it yourself, which was of course cheaper than repairs now in special workshops, today prosperous families, more or less well-off,

prefer to buy cars often, if of course, money allows, once every 5 years. or even once every 3 years, and some families have several cars, car companies , in line with the consumer, offer new models in the same 5 years, supposedly new, often this is an imitation of the obsessive, the problem is also that these cars today are much less reliable than old cars, and 5 years is just the period after which cars begin to... break down and it becomes more expensive to maintain them, a symbiosis is established between consumers who want new cars and manufacturers who are trying to extract more and more profit from these... ever-increasing sales. this symbiosis leads to excessive consumption of resources, energy, metals, plastics, rubber, which in

turn leads to increasing harmful emissions into the environment. meanwhile, modern technologies allow to produce cars that can drive for 30 years and travel a million kilometers, while the price of such cars will be slightly higher by 30 percent, well, this increased price will be easily compensated by the increased service life, two questions arise: how to distract consumers from consumer rage, because a person, having bought such a car, will drive

it almost his entire life. and the second, even more difficult question: the profitability of the automotive industry is already low, and if car manufacturers produce several times fewer cars, where will their profit be? and what will happen to the welfare of the household? will it fall? no, it will rather increase, since this household will spend less money on a car or refrigerator and will be able to spend it on something else, and what will happen to the gdp indicator, most likely it will decrease, since the volume of production of the automobile industry will decrease, and here a number of problems arise for economists, how to reduce consumption without losing the quality of life, is it possible to do this? without limiting the rights of people, how to transform the economic system for this purpose, so as not to lose entrepreneurial incentives, this is the only way to overcome the resistance of capital, finally,

what will happen to employment in those industries that have switched to such an economic regime, if employment is reduced, what to offer the released workers. so far, only one thing is clear: the vicious consumer circle must be destroyed. the outstanding russian soviet scientist, nikita nikolaevich moiseyev, proceeded from a planetary, global view of the ecological system, moiseyev believed that the era that began about 12 thousand years ago, with the invention of agriculture and cattle breeding, is ending, moseev wrote so, we now live within the framework of so. yes, the civilizational paradigm that has arisen with the continuous growth of needs for preserving the original ideas about nature as an unlimited

reserve that allows these needs to be satisfied. moiseev believed that humanity will either degrade or find the strength to change social nature itself, otherwise the ecological crisis will not be overcome. in the words of peterim sorokin, humanity must find a new socio-cultural system. it seems that it will not be possible to solve the environmental problem exclusively by technocratic methods, by increasing emissions taxes and a green economy, by stimulating new energy. people's lifestyles themselves will have to change, they will have to reduce consumption, but in such a way that the standard of living does not change, and in such a way that people do not become poorer. the problem is that it is primarily rich countries that have to get rid of consumerism, accustomed to a very high level life and those who do not want to take on the costs

of solving environmental problems, and here again the solution to the problem, as i said, is not in the technocratic sphere, the solution to the problem is again in the sphere of values, we again must solve the problem in terms of values, rationally, and a new methodology is needed, a new... approaches to solving the environmental problem, what wallerstein said is important, but something else is also important: russia has preserved the foundations for an integral type of culture, the russian duality of europe and not europe. community and individualism, the state as a service and the state as a sacred institution, this duality is often proposed to be done away with,

but... i believe that to do away with such duality would mean to do away with russia itself, if our country has existed like this for centuries. on the contrary, such duality is not a threshold, it is a huge unique competitive advantage of our country. the two-headed russian imperial eagle looks to the west, to the east - this is a symbol of a country that is spread out halfway across eurasia, so it is commonly believed, but the russian eagle looks not only to the west and to the east, he looks to the future and to the past. russia has adopted the sensory culture according to sorokin's five-times. the state is modern, technology, art. but russia continued to carry within itself the idial, supersensory culture. this is the great duality of russia. here is not only the west and the east. here is the age-old connection of times. today

the world is at a turning point, we need intellectual advantages, reason and spirit, which will allow us to create a new project, and whoever creates it will become a leader, the people of this country will gain meaning happiness.

mom, why do we need these letters for a fairy tale. in the three

ninth kingdom, the three tenth state. let's translate from office language into understandable language, everything is not so scary if there are instructions.

this is russia 24 and we continue to tell you about the main thing for today: a major accident occurred in kuban, one person died. more than twenty were injured, a regular intercity bus was heading from stavropol to krasnodar, a truck crashed into it, which drove into the oncoming lane, a fire started, it was not possible to save the truck driver, this was reported in emercom. there were fifty fans of the gunball club on the bus, the injured, including three children with injuries and burns, were taken.