our troops are closing the pincers around the coal mine, the most important success on the battlefield, we will tell you in detail, this is the news of the week and i am dmitry kiselev, good evening, look now at the aggression against russia from any non -nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state. it is proposed

to consider it as their joint attack, a correction of the russian nuclear doctrine, so that now in response to even non-nuclear aggression against russia and to whomever, if it has not yet reached, then it will reach, tough battles on all fronts, we are advancing, what is only here in the vicinity you won't find a coal mine,

the failure of the green party in germany, like the failure of green energy in europe. so why are the sun and wind good, but oil and gas are better. confucius's birthday. so who is he? a philosopher, or even a deity? the first teacher of the celestial empire is 2575 years old. but why is his teaching eternal? a moment that will go down in history.

president putin announced the correction of the russian nuclear doctrine towards lowering the threshold. we will tell you in detail about this in the coming minutes about the turmoil in the west too, but first let's look at these ten men who gathered on wednesday for a meeting of the permanent conference. russia on nuclear deterrence, these are the people who practically ensure the delivery of a nuclear strike, the president of the country, intelligence, security, the defense complex, the ministry of defense, roscosmos and rosatom, the security council apparatus, there is nowhere drier. applied composition is already a sign. putin

began by saying that the use of nuclear weapons is an extreme measure to protect the country's sovereignty, and the russian nuclear triad is an instrument of strategic balance of power. at the same time, we see that the modern military-political the situation is changing dynamically, and we must take this into account, including the emergence of new sources of military threats and...

in the area of ​​nuclear deterrence, it is stated in black and white that the decision to use nuclear weapons is made by the president of the russian federation, this is...

russia, then from now on you can run into a nuclear response. we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons. tactical nuclear weapons today are diverse, and russia has everything it needs, from nuclear shells to bombs and

missiles of any power. the task determines application. many people imagine nuclear weapons as necessarily something huge, this is not so: for example, in the photo we see a model of an american nuclear artillery shell for a standard 155 mm howitzer. the shell received the designation w48, was produced from 1963 to 1992. length 86 cm, weight 54 kg, power up to 100 tons spent.

this week russia with hypersonic missiles dagger accurately hit targets at the military airfield of starokonstantin, which is in western ukraine. on friday, another dagger arrived there too. unofficial american, european and ukrainian sources report that four f-16 fighters were destroyed on the ground in this manner. the f-16 is precisely the fighter that can be used as a carrier for launching stormsheidu, why do we need such airfields in ukraine, why do we need such f-16s. this same week, the russian military bombed the infrastructure of the black sea port of izmail, which is in ukraine near romania.

nato military equipment that was accumulating there after unloading ferries was also hit. do we need such a port there? probably not, if it poses a threat. russia and, by the way, if we return to the british stormshade missiles, then military facilities in britain itself, in the event of its missiles being launched deep into russia, will also become a legitimate target for our hypersonic daggers, and the daggers can be armed with either a conventional warhead or a nuclear one, don’t hold it against me, don’t say later that you didn’t warn me, and it would be good if london remembered that on the british isles there is no anti-missile system at all... defense, well, none. the conditions for russia's transition to the use of nuclear weapons are also clearly fixed. we will consider this possibility upon receipt of reliable information about a massive launch of air and space attack weapons and

their crossing of our state border. i mean strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other. feeding devices. a massive launch - how much is that? 10, 20, 100? here putin, in my opinion, deliberately leaves room for uncertainty. then pay attention, because it's not just about missiles , even drones and other aircraft, we also need to think about it, and the decision on a nuclear response will be made by one person, putin, and he has already been provoked so much by the west that at some point the leader of russia may get tired of it. and one more important point: belarus as a 100% ally is under our protection. we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against russia and belarus, as

member of the union state, with the belarusian side, with the president of belarus, all these issues have been agreed upon, including if the enemy, using conventional weapons, creates a critical threat to our sovereignty. a critical threat to our sovereignty is also an evaluative position, than to measure, to weigh. the level of criticality will also be putin. it is clear that the west is twitching, everyone is different. earlier, us secretary of state blinken called the changes to the russian nuclear doctrine irresponsible and untimely. who would talk about responsibility. german defense minister boris pistorius pretended that nothing had happened. there is no need to comment on this at all. tomorrow there will be something else, we are going our own way, we are doing what we think is right. pistorius has

what sergey lavrov recently called childish thinking. no need to think about it, tomorrow there will be something else. we are doing what we think is right. and i can also add that i have cotton wool in my ears, something similar in my head. however, in germany, fortunately, there is an adult. just puke. be careful, to the world's largest nuclear power should be taken seriously when it comes to using its arsenal. yes, putin has publicly considered using nuclear weapons frequently since the start of the conflict, but just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it's becoming less and less likely as time goes on. especially for those who say that putin has drawn red lines many times and nothing. short memory: in late 21, early 22, putin

once again outlined the red line, the inadmissibility of ukraine being sucked into nato and turning it into a military base against russia. then the west preferred to simply brush it off. as a result, we have what we have. putin came to action. and now it will not be possible to ignore the kremlin. however, in the west in general, and, for example, in germany in particular, there is still an awareness of the new reality. this is how carlo masala, professor of international politics at the bundeswehr university in munich, assesses the correction of the russian nuclear doctrine. this doctrine is not means automatic action. if that were the case, we could predict what russia would do, but it wants to remain unpredictable for its potential adversaries. this should be a signal not to. allow ukraine to fire long-range weapons at russian targets. in

the us, the reaction to the turn in russian nuclear doctrine can also be meaningful. here is what former aide to president regen, duk bandal, writes. the us should avoid unnecessary confrontation with russia, a major power possessing nuclear weapons because of interests, which the kremlin sees as vital. putin has proven that ukraine is worth fighting for, when the us did not before and does not now, with washington poised to go to war, moscow cannot afford to back down, which would make it a second-rate power, having survived the cold war and avoided a nuclear conflict during the cuban missile crisis, the us should not risk everything over an issue that was never considered important, much less vital. new york tymes on the occasion penetrated the depths of american intelligence. american intelligence believes that russia will certainly give a decisive response to america and its coalition partners, including deadly

attacks, if they allow the ukrainian armed forces to use long-range missiles supplied by the united states, great britain and france to strike deep into russia, officials said. however, in their assessment, american intelligence doubted that even if they received the permission they were seeking, the ukrainians would have enough long-range missiles to radically change the course of the conflict. one way or another, the moment is acute, and the context is complex from the usa, our special correspondent, valentin bogdanov. the steps of the un headquarters are covered from top to bottom with cheerful stickers of the future summit , or old posters, or those very good intentions that pave the road to what no united nations can protect humanity from if those who want to divide and rule do not calm down. the west not only does not remember the global cooperation that our secretary general advocates for, openly in his doctrinal documents harshly accuses russia, china, belarus,

the democratic people's republic of korea, iran, of creating threats. to its dominance. with regard to russia, the declared goal is to inflict a strategic defeat on it, almost as london and washington planned in may 1945, developing, even before the end of world war ii, an operation called unthinkable to destroy the soviet union. at that time, it was kept in the strictest confidence, but current anglo-saxon strategies do not hide their plans. while they expect to defeat russia with the hands of an illegitimate neo-nazi kiev regime, but is already preparing europe to plunge into a suicidal adventure. i will not talk here about the senselessness of the danger of the very idea of ​​trying to fight to victory with a nuclear power, which is russia.

there are always many who want to thank sergey lavrov for his frankness. now, after the speech of the russian foreign minister on... neither the west nor the secretary general, why is everyone silent, when - so many initiatives are floating around now in approaches to the settlement, the problem of security from the point of view of from the point of view of the inadmissibility of ukraine joining the north atlantic alliance, or any other military bloc, and the problem of human rights, it is

not about territories, as zelensky asks, give us the territories along the borders of 1900. ninety-one, we are not talking about territories, we are talking about people who lived for centuries, developed these lands, built factories, built roads, ships and much more, these are the real reasons. there is another point: ukraine formally forbade itself to negotiate with russia, zelensky forbade it, or rather those who are still in charge of it. for biden, for example, more trips to the un in a limousine.

they signed the usv-1 treaty with brezhnev, this is the great-grandfather of the current start-3 and the treaty of the prop. 72 - this is the height of detente, when the leadership of both superpowers is growing confident that the nuclear race is a race to the next world. biden, if he looked back, would see only ruins behind him now, but he freezes in his tracks, peering into

the ukrainian abyss. the world is faced with a choice, let's continue. the air has been let out of it, as if, why not want negotiations with russia, explain what the problem is, talk, call, my

question to the head of the kiev regime was not rhetorical, it demanded an answer, because in the un security council, which the westerners specially assembled for him, providing zelensky with another platform, he again burned bridges. this conflict cannot be resolved by negotiations. actions are needed, russia can only be forced to peace, and this is exactly what is needed. it was planned to force with the help of what was loudly called the victory plan. without further ado, its essence is that to fight it is proposed not only to the last ukrainian, but also to the last european, and maybe even to the last american. the allies were clearly not ready for this. the polish president remained silent. do you support zelensky's plan? the nato official mumbled something incoherent.

more and more countries in the global south are uniting in their opinion on the need to support peace and create conditions for a peaceful settlement of the ukrainian crisis; the more weapons are sent to the conflict zone, the more difficult it is to achieve the goal of a ceasefire. china and brazil recently came up with the idea of ​​a new platform for the settlement of the ukrainian conflict, but zelensky immediately began to rock it, saying that there is no chinese-brazilian. i was just leaving the room of the russian delegation during

the general assembly, our diplomats occupy the premises of the trusteeship council, which was once created so that former colonies, with the support of un forces , would move towards independence faster. russia has never had colonies, great britain did, and the writer ourail is also from there. "i tell the russian representative that i am here as a black man whose ancestors were taken in shackles from africa at gunpoint to be enslaved, whose ancestors rose up and fought in the great captive rebellion. imperialism, i know it when i see it, and i will call it what it is." this week, as i talk here with other partners from around the world about our common future and the future of the un, russia is trying to take us back to the world of the past, the world of imperialism. what are they hoping for? all this high-flown talk, it became clear when the tolerant western media began to unanimously ridicule the president of haiti, who found himself in an awkward situation. mais javenel, apparently out of

excitement, picked up not a glass, but a carafe of water standing nearby. as for russia, what else, if not because of its uneradicated colonialism, the country that was the first to conquer space, on an equal footing and with all due respect to its partners. even signs documents like these: a joint statement on not being the first to place weapons in space is signed. the global south, the global east, the contours of a new interaction are being formed here now. this is the hierarchy of the hegemon. russia interesting and small island states of the south pacific, cooperation with african countries and long-standing friends in latin america. bolivia is now looking closely at. and turkey has already applied for membership in early september, president erdogan gave a comment after returning from new york. brics and osian are structures

that offer us opportunities for developing economic cooperation. participation in these structures does not mean abandoning nato. we do not believe that these alliances are alternatives to each other. those who tell us: do not join brics or any other structure, these are the same people who make us wait for years at the doors of the european union. part. obviously, what has been done so far by the international community, europe, to resolve this conflict has been absolutely unsuccessful.

jungle, ready to turn even the pink lawn of the un headquarters into the territory where, according to the rules, accredited journalists can work freely during the days of the general assembly, as in a mixed zone, the german delegation headed by the minister of foreign affairs frg annalena berback establishes the very laws of the jungle. are direct negotiations with russia's participation necessary? don't touch me, i am a un correspondent, don't touch me. meanwhile, the german foreign ministers are surrounding me. if you want to start a press conference, stand there. however, it is no longer possible to approach berback from any side. this is how annalena berback's representatives behave, they do not allow me to work as an ionov correspondent. we are an officially registered un press. we have accreditation. they push me away. and they simply do not

let us work. that's it. what are you doing? i just want to ask a question. here's a person who doesn't let us work, such behavior, it was useless to butt heads any longer, and berbak, who is offended by everyone, she and her greens also lost the local elections in germany that day, and she tried to lecture us after that, here at the un general assembly, a place where the pulsation of the world is always most clearly felt, this is obvious even in such trifles as press conferences, if you are not ready to follow the rules, then the world or statements to the press can get out of rhythm.

the temporary berbak lays claim to someone else's lawn, israeli prime minister netanyahu, right from the podium of won, just goes and divides the entire middle east into the bad and the good. this is the map i presented here last year. this is the map of blessing, it shows how israel and its arab partners are creating a land bridge connecting asia and europe. now look at the second map, this is the map of the curse, this is the map of the arc of terror that iran has created imposed from the indian ocean to the mediterranean, the malignant arc of iran has blocked international waterways, it is cutting off trade, destroying nations from within and causing suffering to millions. those whom netanyahu had cursed had not yet sat through this, the arab delegations began to leave their seats as soon as the israeli prime minister was invited to the podium. having finished with

verbal attacks, to combat operations, returning from won, netanyahu gave the order to attack beirut directly from his hotel on manhattan island by phone, bringing the world another half-step closer to a global catastrophe. can we say that we are now at the brink of world war iii. well, we are very close to it, we are in a period of war, and i think that ukraine and israel are pushing for an even wider war, and this is extremely dangerous, the task of the american president. the united states weighs so much, costs so much and moves so fast that it does not notice anything in its path, it will happen, it will not notice the american president, it has already happened, valentin bogdanov, ivan utkin and gleb napara, vesti nedeli and the un headquarters.

there are many children's cards, the most advantageous is one. free children's card of alfabank. with it, children receive up to 7,000 rubles. cashback for purchases and money in games. not childishly profitable, alpha profitable. are credit card debts attacking? i'll show you a couple of tricks. we collect all credit card debts on one holva, we conveniently pay off. 24 months, and also do not forget about purchases in installments. holva - simple installment techniques. there is a discount season at the megamarket, millions of products at bargain prices. buy dry dog ​​food, brit premium for 3,715 rubles. megamarket. rolfultra oil, created using innovative gtl and pao technologies, provides maximum engine performance. rolfultra - a new era of motor oils. to

earn on their own i open a deposit in deba.