it is obvious that israel is deeply indifferent not to the people of israel, but to the political leadership. hostages, because i am even afraid to imagine that now after everything that happened they will make a hostage, but notice, again, treachery, because the blow to the leadership of hazbala occurred at the moment when the whole world was told that everything, here we practically agreed that there will be a twenty-one-day truce, because this was declared from very high platforms, like everything, relax, everything is fine, at that moment a blow was dealt, somehow to me...

without an explicit or secret blessing from the country except turkey, and the weapons that are used, let us remember, are by no means of israeli manufacture, most of them, therefore here we must understand, we must respond harshly, paralyzing the will, there are no other options, all these attempts at appeasement are completely pointless, yes, we have a different political culture. our president has said more than once that how is it possible on the territory of a third state, here is how the americans eliminated the high-ranking general ksir of iran on the territory of another state iraq and vladimir vladimirovich said that well this is absolutely unacceptable, i understand, the same time, that is why this is our attitude to what is happening, for example, why we do not strike at the territory of ukraine when the leaders come there.

russian commanders, but everything that we see around shows one thing: there is no crime that the west would not forgive itself, and there is no such thing is fair. security it became clear that if it is necessary to use tactical nuclear weapons for this purpose, then they will be used there and then, when the need arises without paying attention to the squeals and squeaks of various representatives, various communities, that is, this is a decision that

should be made by professionals, based on the tasks set by the supreme commander-in-chief, idiots in the baltics, in england, in poland, in ukraine, should now... think, just think, not before blurting out something, but before doing something. alexander mikhailovich, well, i immediately want to develop your thought regarding the fact that on the battlefield, yes within our country, in the economy, we probably will not be guided by the opinion of the west or their proposals. i am sure that the military-political leadership understands that initiatives, if the time comes to that, they will move away from us, therefore. i think that the decisions that are being made today, they are formulated based on our potential of military-political capabilities, including. and as for the economy, since this is a component, an integral part of our common victory, i would also like to say that the president also demonstrates a clear understanding, if after the meeting on

the doctrine on the use of nuclear weapons he dotted all the i's for today, then in the economy he continues to very clearly and distinctly formulate russia's position, well, firstly, let's start with a meeting devoted to a very important issue, this is the export potential of our country, based on the fact that we need to increase and improve foreign trade operations, he pointed out the need to increase efficiency in the creation of financial financial infrastructure, transport infrastructure, logical infrastructure, allowing us to create such cooperative links within the country and beyond its borders, allowing us to orient our economy, including towards export potential, but he also said that it is necessary to create conditions when russian enterprises can independently enter the foreign market, with high added value with products where high added value is embedded, that is, he clearly says that it is necessary to develop not sorvoe, not energy exports, it must be recognized that over the past decades we

managed to achieve significant results and increased exactly this kind of export fourfold, and we must understand that there are examples, the same china, to which we often appeal, we must understand that... it is there that approaches to supporting national producers oriented towards export have been formulated, i think that it makes sense to analyze this, and we understand that there is colossal support there, not only financial, organizational, administrative and so on, there are not only interest written off, there is the principal, loans and so on, well today the president pointed out the necessity of these steps, and we understand perfectly well that this will be done, right there at the energy week, which took place in moscow following this meeting. the president’s equally important words were heard regarding the fact that the west is making maximum use of the entire infrastructure, both organizational and administrative, associated with the existence of such an energy bloc for political purposes, well, purely speculation on this

issue, and i showed you that since this is happening, the west is demonstrating its weakness in free competition, he is not ready for it, he is looking for any way to prevent it, therefore... the president's words are very simple, but we will not try to convince the west here, we will create our own, everything, namely , financial infrastructure, our own perimeter of mutual settlements, insurance, there are exchanges and other instruments that allow our exporters, not only in the energy sector, but in general, to freely enter this market, and i think that the tasks set by the president to the government are to increase the planning horizon, including in the energy sector up to... a year says that he understands how important it is today to invest in areas that go beyond 5-10 years, he understands that both the development of a field, and the construction of a power plant, and there the construction and renovation, power lines, all these are

colossal investments that go beyond the horizon of 10 years, then he pointed out the role that many of our companies play today, in particular gazprom, well, it is clear that today the west has done everything to... limit gazprom's export potential directed to europe is nothing new projects are being developed there, but even while they are being developed, implemented, the colossal volume of domestic consumption is growing, i he pointed out... the need not only to complete social gasification, but also to build deep oil and gas processing chemistry and spoke about the need to actually reach that resource that gazprom could implement within the country, having increased consumption enormously, having reoriented production from the outside to the external market, to the domestic market, but here for all this we need money, money, here i would like to focus our common attention, because... speaking often about the financial block, we still often hear that there is some, to put it mildly,

misunderstanding, so i would like to talk about those phobias that exist in the minds of many economists, and i would like to focus attention on one of them, on this phobia associated with the fact that emission generates inflation, yes, we understand perfectly well that the period of the collapse of the soviet union led to the fact that in the minds of those who lived through it, and even more so moreover, those who did not experience it, but heard from stories or read books, there are magazines, articles and everything else, he got the impression that that period was connected with the fact that the colossal mission led to hyperinflation, that's when , appealing to us, he says, don't you want a repeat, well, do you really want a repeat of the nineties, scaring us with this, i would like to say that i specifically focus on this, what happened there in ninety -second year, here i will simply give the figures, ninety-second year 2.600% inflation, ninety-three year 850% inflation. but

starting from ninety-nine, when inflation reached 36%, we went into a period of about 10 years and came to an inflation level of 6%, you know, this speaks about what, in fact, yes, we must be very careful about this, but the hyperinflation generated by those events, it was a man-made process, liberal. we must understand that it was then that a situation arose when prices in just one month

they grew by 375%, and in one ninety- second year, these are the prices on average for goods grew 26 times, but the problem is that at that very moment the money supply began to shrink, that is, if prices grew 26 times, the money supply grew only seven times , the process of shrinking real money began, which is, who lived in that period, remembers that there were periods when you had to pay for cash. a special special premium there, because there was a shortage of basic cash, and i would like to say that the key moment at that time, at that period was that it was not the emission that gave rise to inflation, it was the lack of money, the money supply, the deficit of money that was the reason that provoked all this, uh, all this economic horror, and i would like to give an example further. that when it happened, it came in the ninety-ninth year, well, in these periods, the government of pryamakov and moslyukov,

with which they began, with an increase in the money supply, starting from that moment our, our economy developed due to the fact that every year 45% of the money supply was poured into the economy, but the money supply increased by 45%. in 10 years, well, a little more than 10 years, our economy has grown, real incomes have grown ninefold, gross product. in cash , the domestic product has grown from 200 billion to 2 trillion dollars, at that time everything was calculated in dollars, we are actually talking about a tenfold increase, that is, the solution to the problem was not that there was no emission and we should not be scared today by emissions that can lead to inflation, to hyperinflation, hyperinflation has never been of a monetary nature, it was associated with events of an extraordinary nature, those which were connected with the destruction of the soviet union, therefore today we can say that if hyperinflation gives rise to... precisely this kind of destruction of commodity-money circulation and the financial system as a whole, then

inflation is generated only by an imbalance between goods and money, and inflation itself will not lead to hyperinflation, but since one word must be added goods and services, goods and services, that is why this phobia today immediately repels a large number of economic politicians from decision making on the need. do you want to live with the illusion that private public partnership will solve all the problems, no, everything that concerns serious infrastructure projects is financed by the state at the expense of new money, colored, there is no need to be afraid of this, today the government demonstrates its competence every day in matters of control over this and over this mission, and only this path, and not the use of budget funds, will allow us

to solve all these problems, and i would like to say that what i gave as an example, which was connected. not only with the government of primakov moslyukov, but also with further steps demonstrates that our country experienced this period, we must not forget it, moreover, we must turn to it, we must try, i say this so softly, to abandon this phobia and recognize that in addition to this there are also others, but this is the most important, and we must not be afraid of the appearance of new money in the economy, allowing us to come to the implementation of those tasks, after the implementation of which we will be able to demonstrate real sovereignty to the west and calm these hotheads from the fact that - they made it up for themselves, powerfully, beautifully, directly, leonid, i understand that your heart was filled with joy, well, not just joy, i support alexander mikhailovich not because we are colleagues or comrades, because he says really obvious things, only

when he talks about primakov and moslyukov, he doesn’t finish saying that gerashchenko was also there, therefore when... they usually talk about this government, they talk about this trio, by the way, before appoint this government, which made the very decisions that mikhailovich spoke about, at first there was moslyakov's candidacy, but yes, but the decree was not the head of the central bank, no, well, i say, when they talk about this, why do they say the government, because formally the central bank was never part of the government, then there is no need to talk about maslyukov, no, no, and the lawyer was just part of the government, moreover, as you correctly said, initially the offer was to him.

i don't meddle in your middle eastern affairs, i i don't know, i was doing a decent job, i worked in a work collective, and you're here, and you're here in moscow at that time, you know, jokes aside, that time, if they hadn't let your provincial yeltsin in, it would have been good, that's really it. moreover, he's far from an example, and gorbachev is not a muscovite either, in that sense, as a liberal, there's avin, yes, he wrote in his book, that's what you 're talking about now, it's so obvious that no decisions were made before the default by dubinin and the team about printing money, that's why the default and happened, and i remember very well how it

all happened, how the officials who were sitting at the trough grabbed it, they took these 4 billion dollars from... the usa, then through the gko, through those same 300% per annum, they put it in their pockets, well, no one sat down, by the way, yes, that's absolutely right, together with the americans, who didn't give a damn about it, well, we're talking, we're talking now, i really like him, i know him, yes, a very smart economist, dean of the faculty of economics alexander auzan at moscow state university, recently there, quite recently, a week ago he gave an interview, where he also spoke on this topic, he always praised it. he, he treats it very well, well, actually, who among economists does not treat it well, but he said, you see, we will not sell shells, they need to be made, tanks need to be made, armored personnel carriers need to be made, and at the same time they raised salaries to sell, this is a real increase in salaries for the population, for workers, this is a real increase

today by 10%, and what can we offer them to buy, they will buy shells, right, will the armored personnel carriers burn there? some, some will remain there, something needs to be offered, including to absorb this money supply, but there is nothing to offer for the very reason that it is necessary to borrow expensively, there is no money, now, why is there nothing to offer, well, it is necessary to provide the services that you mentioned, i do not want to offend anyone, we have grown territories equal to four territories of crimea, well, yes, and this is where there is land and much more, and why not offer people land? well, that too, and because for economists of that wave the land cannot be touched, it must belong oligarchs, so even they do not consider such an opportunity, so. stop, it is someone else's, yes, someone else's, then what do they do, there are no, there are no goods and services, what do they do , i am talking about this, for the tenth time, they raise prices,

here i am looking at the federal antimonopoly service, the week before last it began to pursue those who produce counterfeit goods, counterfeit adidas or some clothes, think about it, the federal antimonopoly service counterfeit, the real thing was made only. the opposite in germany, everything after that this is already some kind of a fake, everything is a fake, so if we interpret it freely, here's the question: what was the antimonopoly service created for , to monitor monopolies, and i say, okay, tell me, we have a record grain harvest, for many years now, the company abibas, yes, but why is our bread not going down, it has grown by 30%?

and i don't understand the principle itself, what does it mean to charge money for connection? well, you don't understand, this is the same stupidity for me, then let's charge money for a visit to a gas station, just like i did for supermarket yes, but that's nonsense, well of course it's nonsense, but it's never for connection, in soviet times and you still pay every month - okay, well i gave you an example, in some way you know, like a man gets on a tram with a glass and a bottle, you don't know, he looks at you attentively , a woman talks about a ticket talks about a ticket,

like we made a law for the dpr, lpr, just think about it, for all 30 years you could be russian and go there to become germans, for example, to remain in two citizenships, well if there

the germans didn't forbid it, or to israel, israel didn't forbid it, on the contrary it was impossible, impossible, for the ukrainians it was impossible, for the kazakhs, how many times have we written these bills, no, the government says, no, no, no, it's impossible, it's impossible, it's impossible, it's only a few years ago, we finally made this breach, lavrov supported me, we... there actively on this commission on the dpr, lpr it's possible now, then they opened everything to ukraine, then others, and why can't the germans? latin america, america, look, yes, there were two countries, which showed an example in this regard, besides israel, there was ireland, which said, if you have our roots, you receive our citizenship, but if they have russian roots, let them be there from the first wave of immigration, absolutely right, it was impossible, volodya, the word repatriation, which is the same.

the russian emergencies ministry warns: protect your home, install a fire alarm. safety begins with you, the russian emergencies ministry. yes, continuing this topic, vladimirich. by the way, primakov, we just talked with semyon arkavich. he is not, i would not say that he was. he was not a communist, he was directly in the cpsu, i invited him to the voz automobile plant, sometime in the late eighties, when 100 people from the cpsu were nominated

for the congress. now no one remembers this, i invited a lot then, he was the director of the institute, there were a lot of people there, well, no one counted eighty there as the sixth, a cart of people's deputies, and there was a quota from the cpsu, no one, probably, because he was the director, he was the director of the institute where i studied as a graduate student, i entered under yakovlev, and then he was replaced by pryamakov, and i was already a postgraduate student at...

for the country, it is actually a big danger for both america and europe, as you and i know, but there is a need to make a serious decision, a decision on work visas, on patents, and not to fix this legislation, as it is customary to fix in some offices, up to now, we have already passed several dozen laws, yes, but the main thing is to make a decision on work visas, on patents, then all the issues of health care, education, everything

else, it will come out according to the organizational recruitment. only i agree with these conclusions for russia, i am not lucky in life, not a soldier, he is a mummer, impudent, just like me, i have a bad feeling, and although he deprived my mother of her will in the fires of the place, she is not simple, she is magical.

again i had to spend a spell from a book, fairy tales are all, i need a soldier in the palace, how to light a spark in the heart, but also lights in the eyes, who is scared, here is defeated, you can't do without a flint here, well, soldier, let's fly for all the money, i asked you, don't touch anything, i know, someday i know, try from the inside, medic, flint, have you lost it? ah, miracles, you win, you go, soon.