that she is not simple, magical, again i had to spend the spell from the book, fairy tales are all, i need a soldier in the palace, how to light a spark in the heart, but also lights in the eyes, whoever is scared is defeated, you can't do without a flint here, well, soldier, let's fly for all the money, i asked you, don't touch anything, i know, try from the inside, lights.

notice that he, what he said, we must draw conclusions, so, the first lesson, security does not come for free, yes, for russia, unfortunately, it turned out so, we also thought that everything, we only have nuclear weapons, it will protect us, everything else, let's disband, the brigade method of the west we will take everything, we have always fought, you remember , my conscience is clear, my comrades too, and they told serdyukov there that this is the wrong way, here... he says that for them too this is the wrong way, then he says, the second lesson, freedom is more valuable than free trade, isn't it, to this day, when i see businessmen running around in the negotiating group, including in ours, i doubt that for us freedom is more valuable than free trade, and we must do this conclusion for myself, yes, indeed, for us now there is freedom, you just talked about connecting to electricity or gas, or you talked there...

there was military power - this is a prerequisite for these negotiations, we, until we increase this military power, have nothing to talk about with this west, and this was shown in the twenty-first year, on the eve of the twenty-second we offered them negotiations, we offered, right, and moreover, we wrote everything down on this paper, our security, how let's ensure it, let's do all this, they said, yes we won't even talk to you, or to lavrov, or to putin, we won't talk to anyone, because we woke up in peace,

the negotiations are over, we signed some peace agreement, which they chatter about every day from the west, from the east, and now in the united nations, and what next, alexander mikhailovich just spoke, and did we leave the wto with you, tomorrow, what, did we, did we close our market, like the chinese? we closed it, what, will we again trade in this gas, oil, titanium tomorrow, and they all they will come running again and will produce cars, machine tools, microelectronics, pharmacology for us, will we continue to work like this, or will we follow these principles, which even the west has already understood, that you need to rely only on your own strength, and i hope that we understand this too, i always knew that marxism came from the west, and ours are drawn to it. and where else

, look, i have karl marx, well, from the west, here is stalin nearby, here is a young lenin, or a person similar to him, right? well, and what if we did not break with the west, but now the east china follows some communist traditions and communist mukha don't laugh here ha-ha, no, but they postulate that they follow communist the question is how they them, how they interpret them, by the way, who supported, that this is a dogma, i don't mind, i'm speechless, who supported karl marx all these years, well, the second marxist, yes, let him be a manufacturer, but also a marxist.

wait, he shouldn't have built a single stall, reproach semyon arkaevich, reproach semyon arkaevich with panamar is ridiculous, because i remind you, panomaryuv just came out from the communists, his grandson, he is also his grandson, i called his last name, i said his party, i want to remind you, it is not his party, in your party

there were actually agents of khodorkovsky, who financed your party for many years. marx, do you like marx or not? marx is a genius who created the greatest theory of political economy, which was absolutely fair for that period of development of production relations, in the 19th century played a decisive role, read marx, not six people, we all read karl marx the power of our profession, thank god he did not build kiosks, if he had to build kiosks, he probably would have written a book of capital.

the situation for the beginning of the ground operation, the first liquidation of the hezbollah leadership, first of all hassan nasurly, who was the leader of hezbollah for 32 years, did a lot. hezbollah before him in the ninety-second year was also liquidated in the predecessor, by the way, yes, by the way, the israeli press also wrote: that's it, the end of hezbollah, but in 32 years this man made hezboud much more powerful. by the way, now most likely they will lead hezbollah, his cousin and son-in-law of qasem soleimani. so, hashim safindin, he is more radical than, so, hassan nasrallah, has a lot of experience, he is the chairman of the executive council of hezbollah, this is the government of hezbollah, and the person whom nasrallah has been introducing into the management system in recent years. at one time, 5 years ago, hassan

nasrallah, speaking at a meeting, said: "the time will come when they will kill me and my closest associates, for this we must prepare people who will lead, so, hezbollah, this is apparently the time." such it has come, the second, that is, the connection between the hezbollah formations has been broken, this is a perestroika replaceable story, that is, the third, that iran under no circumstances, under no conditions, will enter, that is, into a war directly, that is an obvious thing, it became clear as soon as a certain new, i diplomatically, administration was formed, a new one after the death, that is, after the elections and after the death of the president of russia, now... the weather in foreign policy, that is, that is, determines, i call him the shadow gorbachev, this is muhammad zarif, former foreign minister parirukhani, a man who worked with the current president under president khatami in the 2000s, and who generally does not

hide his american, that is, such orientation, by the way, he graduated from three universities in the united states, has close ties in the united states and so on, he has always been an opponent of qassem soleimani. when qassem soleimani was killed in iraq at a certain moment, he even expressed, i will not be afraid of this, a feeling of joy about this, he has always advocated abandoning these allies of his, whatever you like. call them like hazbala, ansaral and so on, yes, he believed that they were in competition with iran, they are not needed at all, that is, a person of such experience, and he is now determining this policy, therefore iran will not enter into this under any circumstances, unless of course a miracle happens, this is inside iran finding enough radical force, first of all the concentration of the islamic revolutionary guard corps and therefore the special ring will not be convinced somehow, but i strongly doubt it, i doubt it, the third thing is... the internal political situation in lebanon, in lebanon the situation is this:

a large, large group of different parties and movements of a so-called opposition nature are against hezbollah, these are christians , first of all, maronites, and not only maronites, and orthodox christians, and so on and so forth, yes, this means there are even shiites, and there are druze, sunnis, they are directly saying: hezbollah must disarm, they said this before, they are saying this especially now, because in 2005 there was a resolution of the organization united nations, which assumed the disarmament of all. at one time, the palestinians were allowed into lebanon, they blame them for the fifteen-year civil

war, which the palestinians provoked, not without reason, i will say honestly there, but in general it was, yes, all these circumstances say that under these conditions israel can go for - as they call it a ground operation and achieve a certain success, but i will express my opinion that yes, all this takes place, if a civil war does not break out in revan, and this is quite really, because in israel they also think about it, why not give weapons to these formations, they have something there, which are against hezbollah, then the worst thing will be that they are afraid of lebanon at the same time, there will be, therefore, a civil war, where everyone will fight everyone, i will give you an example, in lebanon there is a large armenian community, 5% of the population of lebanon are ethnic armenians, they are represented in parliament, in the government, there are everywhere, everywhere, so out of the three so- called traditional parties, one is in the bloc hezbollah on march 8, and two against... then of

course israel's headache will go away and its northern front will not exist, because it will not be up to israel, however, if it is possible to avoid it, i do not think that it will be an easy walk for the israeli army, hezbollah's potential has been preserved, field commanders on the ground have been preserved, somehow adapt communications, then they will not be able, they will show, they can dignity of resistance, finally, the main thing, let's say, the israeli army, the israel defense forces has achieved its goal. they have such a task for now is put: they pushed hezbollah back beyond the litani river 15 km, but they will not hold this territory. in 2000, they themselves could not hold this territory, they left. in 2006, by the decision of the un, the lebanese army was brought into this buffer zone. the lebanese army, where it is not, there is hezbollah, that is, sooner or later they will return there. hezbollah cannot be destroyed. this, this, you see, this is not only some kind of military organization, it is a powerful octopus, yes, so to speak, in the economic, social, god knows, in anything, banking, any system that

is there, another matter, the position of iran, yes, if in the second lebanon war in damascus a special headquarters was formed from representatives of syria and iran, who were engaged in, assistance, transferred weapons to hezbollah, then kasim suleimaniyah was alive, then now on what volume will this be carried out, yes here is one interesting point, in the second lebanon war the aviation means... israel immediately struck almost the first second day on the beirut airport, now they do not strike, they act very competently, that is, they say: we are not against lebanese, we are against hezbollah, their planes, considering, well, there really is no air defense there , yes, and that means they fly around the airport of beirut and say, please, let it function with the exception of planes from syria and iran, which can introduce, that means , appropriate military military assistance, so the situation is not closed, so to speak, and ... if somehow hezbollah, ansar allah will receive some weapons, that will

mean the war will continue. now ansar allah is starting to strike tel aviv and so on and so on and so forth. by the way, i didn't understand, ansar allah said that they fired 23 missiles at the us warships , three spanish ships. 23 missiles, i just didn't understand, did at least one hit anything or not? no, i'm just not in the air yet. well, well, we're laughing in vain, no, i'm not laughing, i just didn't see an answer from the other side. they struck, they say, at the territory of the bengurion airfield, when the plane with netanyahu was landing there, was this missile shot down or not, well, listen, let's put it this way.

in particular, as for military censorship, what we it must be done in the most severe way, simply the most severe. by the way, lebanon is experiencing the most massive exodus of citizens in its history from their places of residence as a result of israeli bombing, about one million people were forced to leave their areas of residence, said prime minister najib mikati after a meeting of the country's interim governors. the total population of lebanon

is 5,300. well, no one knows how many people there are in lebanon, the last perfe was in 1930, that is, 7 million, that's not the point, of course, people are fleeing from the war, then keep in mind that on there are a lot of syrian refugees in lebanon, what year was the last one there, the thirties, in the thirty -first year, the year, it is not carried out, so as not to upset the religious balance, in the thirty -first yes, therefore many syrians, there are many syrians among these refugees, they simply return to syria, this is of course a catastrophe and many in lebanon do not want this, therefore the situation is actually such a peaceful? died during the destruction of the top of hazbala, listen, this means that the blow was dealt to the krovartal, called dahiya, this is shiite district in the south of beirut, so to speak, yes, that means there were 80 aerial bombs, each weighing 910 kilograms, well, a ton, 80 tons at a time, yes, that means anti-bunker

missiles, yes, there are seven-story buildings nearby, such big storey buildings, six buildings... at least they demolished, how many died, who knows, well, if less than 4000, then we remember the american response that well, this is a small price to pay for democracy, as the americans said, they are telling us that we are waging a cruel, what a nightmare, and they still cannot say how many people died in the riot whose fault, which sergey vittorovich lavrov, by the way, once again stated from a high tribune, but here the americans say, well, what's the difference, well, like, so what...

to the action in the gaza strip, then, the first mobilization affected 300,000 people, then, when the iranians were preparing to strike, they mobilized 70,000 people, mainly anti-aircraft missile specialists. then, when they were preparing for the lebanon war, a plan for military action against lebanon was approved, the commander of the northern military district and the chief of the operational department general staff, finished another 50,000 people, if not enough, then how many more are needed, i just want the editors to find where they got this news about the idf? in this way they are trying to hire, because it surprises me, i don’t remember what happened, this is a navros under the numbers on there is also a question about mercenaries, which israel does not perceive in this regard, there should be national, then on the numbers on hazbala, i will not have time to say no one this is he took up time, no, you pounced on him, so on

khazbala, he attacked himself. i still want to say a few words, last week there was a meeting of the permanent conference on nuclear deterrence, by the way, for the first time

the existence of such a permanent conference in the security council was made public, there were a lot of things that had simply not been reported before, why yes, the open part, and i must say that it is quite substantive, because of course a decree is being prepared, i don’t know... what the president said that was important, firstly, the president once again emphasized that the use of nuclear weapons are an extreme measure, protection

of sovereignty and territorial integrity of the russian federation, that the nuclear triad is the basis of our military power, and that russia is committed. so to speak, a list of cases of use of nuclear weapons compared to military

doctrine, military doctrine 2, here was added, firstly, a confirmed launch of ballistic missiles, an attack on the russian federation and its allies with the help of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, an attack on the russian federation. allies using conventional weapons, when the very existence of the russian state is threatened, the defeat of state and military facilities, or rather an attack on state and military facilities, the defeat of which could disrupt the retaliatory strike, what's new in this , what the president of the russian federation announced, firstly, in no document before this have we ever...

proceed from the fact that if the united states, great britain, france supply weapons , weapons of destruction that will used against some objects, well, all this against the background of course of this discussion about... this is another question, but in what was said by the president, strategic ambiguity was left here, yes, it was left, it was not said there that on the territory of ukraine

it is not. that's exactly why i am saying, i just want, why are you saying counterproductive, well, please, let's, well, we will use on our territory, wait a minute , wait a minute, about our territory, not our territory, the question is so specific, for example, dirty nuclear bombs are being dragged in for installation on the f-16, and we know at what airfields they are based, well, yes, yes, based on this, is the use of tactical nuclear weapons at... this facility justified or not? in principle, of course, it is, no, well, the strategic ambiguity is the question is not about using tactical nuclear weapons, say, against a large city, but against a deeply buried, protected facility, why is this necessary, vladimirovich, therefore there is another point that the president said that it will be the list of threats that, so to speak, are a reason for using

nuclear weapons has been expanded, i am confident. well, not that i am confident, i assume that there will be an attack on nuclear power plants, there will be, uh , possibly, this dirty bomb, which, so to speak, but zelensky directly asked when the weapon, he said, he could have immediately struck the kremlin, like just give it to them,

they are being hit in the cosmogoria, the english nation is in shock, if the english had not managed to hold the line here, then the germans occupied bakae, it turned out that the allies can also hit germany.

we watch to learn about the world, educational programs and documentaries, we watch, we watch in the application or on the website.

if he had a dirty nuclear bomb the ability to deliver it to moscow, he would have struck long ago, yes, by the way, uh, speaking about the fact that nuclear weapons can be used against a non-nuclear state, thus, if in general everything, the whole complex of changes in this document should be considered as a lowering of the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons, which was much talked about, and we had discussions that we need to lower this threshold, this is a clear lowering of the threshold, of course.