europeans recognize hezbollah as a terrorist organization, right? yes. so from their position, it is completely legitimate. we do not recognize hezbollah as a terrorist organization. so we have a completely different view, but this is a feature of modern international law. that is, if you recognize someone as a terrorist organization, then any actions towards him are justified. how do we kill terrorists there in different parts of the world, well, as it was during. the second chinsky, who were responsible for this, wherever they were, and us for this was condemned because those countries considered them freedom fighters, that is, this coquetry, when the world cannot determine for itself who are terrorists, who are freedom fighters, and leads to these eternal discrepancies. now, as for the continuation of further military actions, in order to carry out a ground operation, at least to reach the line of the ilitani river and ...

occupy the biqa valley, to interrupt the connection between hezbollah and syria, an israeli contingent of at least 50,000 people is needed, now they have 30,000, that is, this is not enough, they they mobilized more, but they mobilized only three battalions, they were able to, now yesterday you were talking on the program that it appeared, yes we found it in the newspaper it says, on june 15 it appeared yes, that there is a recruitment abroad, jews from all over the world are being offered, including from...

i gather here to go fight i defend cyprus and yes yes that's why i can't wait and i think they can arm it themselves someone from those who fled there will take a grenade and go fight izboloe oh they can i just feel in the worst case they will be applaud advertising.

if everything is like the wild west, then there is only one law: shoot first. competition of ideas and money. there was a sensation, and what a sensation. tension inside america, beyond its borders. what is the remaining intrigue, why do we need to watch now. this is america, a program about a country that is difficult to understand. it is easy to get confused in the facts when you see only part of the overall picture, the pursuit of views changes entire locations, it is easy to do, we will expose all the fakes. we watch to know everything about russia,

the best historical series, we watch, we look, in the application or on the site.

territory of the population, israel is unlikely to feel its hands tied, including for the use of nuclear weapons, it may well go, if it feels a threat to the existence of the state in israel, go. 5.8 million people of the population of iran, this is according to approximate data, no one knows exactly, but now a million are refugees and forcibly displaced, today 100,000 people have left lebanon for syria, these are ilivans syrians. yesterday i talked with colleagues from

damascus, asked, how, they say, we don’t know what and how to feed them, where to place them, we have a lot of our own problems, that’s why the un representatives are already howling. what should we do? and what do they need from you? if i understand correctly, there are a billion muslims in the world, well, we talked about this topic, if exactly 800 million. if i understand correctly, again, i don’t want to offend anyone, some of the richest countries in the world, muslim countries, and what humanitarian assistance do they provide to these people?

the regime, and we saw it, actually, during this trip to the usa, there’s a lot about this they said that in general this is material, this is not

a subject, this is an object that manipulates, they can create such an illusion, or sometimes the americans create such a propaganda effect of a certain zelensky, omnipotent, none of this exists.

they analyzed the situation, the third is the far east, around china, each of them is fraught with the emergence of a nuclear conflict, here are all our euphemisms, that the third world war is already underway, this is a proxy war, this is a hybrid, the real third world war

the scenario is described, this is a nuclear war, the third world - this is when there is a nuclear war and when practically no country in the world will be able to avoid involvement to one degree or another. in this nightmare that can happen with the start of a nuclear conflict, a lot depends on politicians, what is happening in europe, what is the responsibility of politicians, because such...

that's all for you, but she said this before she lost in the same way before, and then she lost, but i think she hasn't changed her point of view, because she came out here, olaf scholz under pressure from the social democrats somehow tries to maneuver, also talks about some kind of fair world, about the fact that next year the german budget will not have so much money to help ukraine, and annalena berbo says: no, i hold a different point of view, we need to take a tougher line, johnson, but if it is true what the times published regarding... johnson's upcoming memoirs, you john kerry and jim carrey were talking here, but boris johnson, he

was definitely a comedian when he was prime minister, because these are not memoirs, but mockery, that is, a person writes as he settled scores with macron, that is, he believes that macron, envious of the british and personally disliking boris johnson, created a migration crisis by transferring refugees. to britain, when boris johnson suggested to macron to build a bridge across the channel, well, as they call it, a canal, in order to connect the two countries, macron answered categorically no, which offended johnson, and johnson believes, well, i will not use the word frogs, yes, that these french, they were afraid that their sparsely populated country would be resettled more highly developed englishmen, this is in all seriousness. is published in the english press, how he treats the american president, this

man was the prime minister of great britain for several years, he says: he gave me and my son a bicycle, and i tell him in response i gave him a picture of an american writer, a fighter against slavery, which was printed from wikipedia, and how cleverly i did it, saved taxpayers' money, can you imagine such memoirs, right? here is churchill, who wrote the history of the second world war, a brilliant, in fact, english writer, artist, artist, artist and artist, well , you're already tearing me away, they didn't give him the nobel prize in literature, that's what a real colonel means, for a science fiction novel, absolutely, he received the nobel prize for this, he didn't receive it for being an artist, he didn't draw illustrations for his book, don't belittle the greatness of churchill, then johnson on this...

part of our theory is such a conspiracy, as they call it conspiracy theory, about the existence of a deep state, as if justifying these

ruling circles, that these clowns are not in charge, and there are some cunning, wise, big ones, i don't know who the billionaires are, some closed clubs or something else, who control all this, i just have some kind of terrible premonition that these johnsons are really controlling, no, they just showed the main sponsor or...

but it is unlikely that this fact would lead to the beginning , let's say, of the third world war with the use of nuclear weapons. because i think that the training flight of the tu-95 ms was carried out, so to speak, not equipped with missiles with special warheads, well this is my personal opinion at this stage , after all, this is in terms of improving flight training, skill, this is not a flight for combat use, now, well, since we started talking about nuclear weapons, what should i say here, everyone has been somehow concentrating lately. more on the political side of the issue, doctrinal guidelines, but in fact there is also the military-technical side of this issue of use, and there, by and large, nothing has changed, everything remains as it was, that is, the issue of using special ammunition is just a few minutes of actions by a well-trained crew, that is, the commander receives a signal

that the use of nuclear weapons is permitted, the second signal is a command to unblock, he gives the crew a command to the kbu, the code of the blocking devices, they dock their equipment to the product, remove the blocking, the commander's banner lights up, the blocking is removed, the launch is permitted, that's it, literally a few minutes, by a well-trained crew, and there are no worries in the crews, no thoughts about what...

years, why in soviet times these facts were consigned to oblivion? in general, the story is quite simple, it is only necessary to recall that before the war in kiev 40% of the population were jews, 40%. in lvov it was about the same, in the destruction of the jewish population, that is kiev and lvov, including, the most active part was taken by ukrainian nationalists, and the first secretaries of the central committee of the communist party of ukraine, but they almost knelt before...

in the united states, by and large, because no one is talking about the plan for victory about this anymore, right, and not a single point of this plan was voiced, what's here? probably it should be noted, i personally think so, because - after all, this is the information that, well, let's say, reaches the media - newspapers, television, other

sources, well, this is probably here, we discussed the crime of nazism right away, that is , here we fought against the nation right away, but really, for the sake of political contingency , we tried not to bring some particularly, well, sensitive to the political situation, stories to the surface, despite the fact that they do not hush it up, but not before, just like, for example, the terrible story of the return of the kiev jews after the war in the city of kiev, there , to put it politely, they were not welcome, because their apartments were occupied, and there was a lot of things, either terrible pogroms, which were, including, by the way, of the german population, yes there, that is, with poland, yes, what was on the border, and... more than yes, yes, yes, that is, there was a lot of things, terrible jewish pogroms, what with the germans in the same sudetenland after and the poles, that is, there were a lot of such

politically active moments at that time, therefore, talking about all the horrors and crimes of nazism, they tried to not specify some questions, yes, that's how it was, yes, well, and then, when the 60s began, yes, the whole truth was already heard in full voice, returning to... zelensky's plan for victory, probably, it should be noted, probably, it was so unrealistic that when the ukrainian president suggested that joe biden consider it, the father of american democracy looked at the whole thing and said: "my god, how far you have detached yourself from reality, this is my assumption, but on what basis did i i think, since the advisor to the office of the president of ukraine mykhailo podalyak spoke relatively recently.

well, as far as the military component is concerned, the end of the conflict, for example, is far away, and i think that it was in terms of victory, it is thought of in the following way, the withdrawal of the armed forces of the russian federation from the occupied territories, this is the beginning, so to speak, this is the first condition for the implementation of any agreements, this is far away, but i think it reflects the mood that is still prevalent there today, it is prevalent not only in the office, but in the president's entourage. the second point, the second point, some kind of meeting, almost of the victorious countries and the presentation of some reparation demands to russia, the payment of these reparations. and, finally, the third point

that he voiced is the extradition of war criminals by russia, not in all, in all your policies, in the ukrainian, well, political class, has there ever been any realism, yes, they believe that this is an absolutely realistic plan, they look at... the fate of yugoslavia, they are basically doing a tracing of the fate of yugoslavia, well, again, it is necessary to be tied to the place of time, the same ours, why, they are unrealistic, they think that they are translators of the will of nato, they saw how in the center of europe not long ago nato destroyed the leader of the non-aligned movement, which was yugoslavia, and how everyone came to terms with it

. yes, a significant part of the equipment is not involved, we understand that they have many

more aircraft than was officially declared, while, as we understand, there is a line there, apparently, already swedish and french aircraft are also present. north africa linked britain with its entire asian empire. the soviet canal was an extremely important artery. musalini believed that the italians should expand their sphere of presence. moreover, there was a project for italy to dominate the northern part of the african continent. the italian troops were not in a very good moral condition. from the point of view of the german command's plan, well, how to replace the italians here on the battlefield, make them a junior partner, 150 tanks, they are being hit in the cosmogorje, the english nation is in shock. if it had not been possible the british here to hold the line, then the germans occupied, it turned out that the allies could also beat germany.

mom, why do we need these letters? for a fairy tale. in the three ninth kingdom, the three tenth state. for stalin, june 22 was a shock, when you get acquainted with real documents, a completely non-media image of steel arises, when the members of the politburo arrived, they , on the contrary, said, you must pull yourself together and return to governing the country, if there is a war, they will get it. our cause is just, the enemy

will be defeated, victory will be ours, speaks of it is either in black or in white, of course, it is impossible, but the fact that he made a contribution, a big one, will remain forever in history - this is an absolute fact.

russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia , russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, russia, 24.

we see from what is being supplied to them, that missiles are being supplied for these planes, we understand that they need long-range ones precisely in order to disrupt the first. if possible, the brics summit, strike then precisely at kazan on moscow, well at least on the airfields, the second is to drive away our aviation, as you yourself have said many times, according to nato standards, any offensive operation is possible with the establishment of dominance.