that trump was also targeted here, but vance reminded that his senior comrade did not start the distrust of the results of the american elections in the united states. hillary clinton in 2016 said that donald trump won the election because vladimir putin stole it. the russians allegedly bought advertising for half a million dollars. that was a long time ago, we must respect the election results. it was a threat to our democracy, we have never seen anything like this, all because of trump's inability.

with a friend focused mainly on political disagreements, as for ratings, vance won by a slim margin. it may not matter now, but trump isn't around forever, either, so for the rising star of the republican party, this could be a great investment in his own campaign as early as 2028. the debate illustrated what presidential politics might look like after donald trump leaves office. on points, vance may have won by a small margin, but he did it in a way that's unlikely to matter much, if at all, to presidential race. the race itself, one might say, has rolled out to the home stretch, there is exactly a month left before the us presidential election. it was america, all the best to you.

together appetite dad will help dadmaybe only dad will tame dadmaybe dadmaybe true appetite sausage will help, we transferred the pension to vtb, and you can choose an increase in a savings account or deposit, a discount on a loan or cashback on everything vtb, everything will work out at the megamarket cozy sale, thousands of home goods at bargain prices, for example, a black out curtain for 899 rubles, mega zatirki

tsirizit, a wide range of colors, reliable protection from moisture and mold. the ideal solution for any tile. lei izotirki tsirizi. this night our friend has already had to get up several times to admire the stars. buddy, if you get up at night more than twice, afalaza. at the first symptoms from the prostate - afalaza. afalaza is a modern drug for early treatment. did not have time to buy an apartment profitably, we make a discount on the fact that you did not think about it at all, and then found your other half and decided on a new life, on cian a 4% discount on a mortgage on secondary, one of my friends is trying to be a good dad, why is nothing ready, have you forgotten who i am, dad, our internet will run out, and minutes too, dad will now connect you to mega to share minutes and gigabytes. combine up to three numbers

for free get bonus gigabytes every month. well, who is number one here? megafon. discover avita mall. new avita section, where. sellers are real pro with a good reputation and a rating of 4 and a half, everyone has delivery and return, verified, buy new products in avito only from pro, verified sellers on avito, barnaul, st. petersburg, yehola, this is not how cities are played, this is how cities are won, participate in the magnit promotion, collect cards with cities in the application without leaving streaks, with depsil technology it penetrates deep into the fibers and fights complex contaminants,

once persil, always persil, new siberian oper, try the new product, and part of the proceeds will go to forest restoration. transfer money to sber by phone number without commission, open a deposit in the application, a deposit is the best percentage, the most profitable! suitable vacancies on avito work, there are many vacancies, and i just chose the best, the sweetest! you will find not just a job, but your place! let me ask you, i am so grateful that you are here, jaydee vance, of course, senator, tim walz

is running with former senator kamala harris, much of the discussion revolved around what is happening in congress, where you have worked for a long time. at one point, tim walz described the so-called bill. borders on immigration, which was not passed, as the toughest of ever existed. were you there? what was this bill? everything he said was untrue. again, tim walz is either lying, meaning he knows the truth but isn't telling it, or he was lied to by someone else and didn't bother to do his homework and fact-check. first, the crisis along our southern border is entirely due to the fact that this administration refuses to enforce the laws as they already exist. the biden-haris team has done a phenomenal job of pushing lies. the lie is this: we wanted to solve the border crisis, we just couldn't. so we had to change

the law to make sure the border was secure. the republicans didn't agree to that, so sorry, we can't do anything. it's all lies. the existing law allows them to solve the problem.

including the united states to facilitate migration, to simplify it, and to provide legal services, i'm not kidding, legal services, so that paid lawyers can represent. it seems like there are limitations in our law, it's just president biden manipulating our legal system to find a way around

the law. that's the biggest flaw in this security and border bill. first of all, it's a bill we didn't need, and second of all, it didn't have what we republicans were asking for. i don't know why it didn't include our demands, maybe mitch mccone didn't set them out as a minimum standard for negotiations. i wasn't there when they were talking, but i think that's a problem, i think that somehow so senator langfort got the message from mitch mcconnell, don't worry about coercing joe biden, because that's what this bill turned out to be. why would the top republican in the senate want a bill that would promote illegal immigration, that would provide lawyers for illegal immigrants at taxpayer expense in our impoverished country, why would mitch mcconnell want that? look, it's obvious. "i can't speak for him, i can't get inside his head, knowing mitch mcconnell, i doubt he would

thought about it, maybe he didn't realize what effect it would have. my understanding is that mitch mccone in these circumstances is much more focused on doing everything he can to fund ukraine, to send more money to ukraine, he wanted that, so if he could find some way, who cares about our country, we're at war in ukraine, yeah, yeah, yeah, let other people worry about that." let langford negotiate something while he can , then we'll get our funding for ukraine. everything will be fine and we will live happily ever after. look, i don't work in the senate, i'm just watching, but it sounds absolutely plausible to someone watching from the outside. what do you think it is? is focusing on ukraine like a religion? yes, it is, it's almost like a religion. some of my colleagues actually get teary-eyed when they talk about ukraine. it's like they're talking about their beloved elderly

brother who's going through something terrible, look, i understand that ukraine is going through terrible things, and i deeply sympathize with the ukrainian people in their plight, however, there is a much more sinister motive here, whether people realize it or not, but those who have become involved in this have become part of the military-industrial complex, and they are ensuring that no matter what, we can pour a lot of money into this, let me explain what i mean. sometimes you can tell what people think because they say when they advocate something. many of my colleagues, especially republicans, support sending money, now the amount is close to 200 billions of dollars, for a war that is not ours, they will say something like this. most of this money will actually go to the us labor market, it will go to...

they will lose their population and their land, in 10 years there will be nothing left of ukraine, thanks to these people, how do they manage to be defenders? absolutely right, they have good reasons to be indignant at the american people, especially those who contributed to the ukrainians. yes, that is exactly why we deceived them, because when we appeared on the scene, when we started

spending money, now the amount is approaching 200 billion dollars. we have excluded the possibility of peace for them, in fact in the first months of the war there were peaceful solutions, especially in the first year of the war in 2022, they were excluded when we started pouring all this money into it, and yes, if i were a ukrainian, i would be deeply outraged by the actions of the us government, we prolonged the war, made it more brutal excluded the possibility of peace, yet they put themselves on display, as if they are driven by.

and by the way, i do not even condemn them, i just say that this is a fact at a time when people, who couldn't afford to run off and buy a bentley in dubai were killed in a war that we created. a lot of foreign aid is poor people in rich countries being forced to give money to rich people in poor countries. so you 've seen all sorts of indicators popping up in the media.

first of all, if you see democracy as the end goal, i think it's not for them, but just follow my line, if they see democracy as the end goal, pure democracy, so pure as possible, then the constitution itself is an obstacle to it. the constitution is designed to be counter-democratic in its operation, it is designed to be a kind of intermediate filter between pure democracy and... the rights of the people. in fact, the only purpose of the constitution is to limit the power of government so that it does not abuse the rights of the minority. that is the constitution and its purpose in a nutshell. if the democrats are so fond of the idea of ​​pure , unlimited democracy, i do not think that that's an accurate explanation of their intentions but if

that's what they wanted it would make sense for them to try to trample the constitution dare to challenge the assumptions of the ruling elite it's the constitution that prevents them from implementing their marxist inspired far left radical progressive policies but if you 've used the word treason quite a lot over the last 8 years but if you attack the constitution is that treason? yeah i think it is yeah look we all took an oath those

who hold public office are required by article 6 of the constitution to take an oath, and if you break that oath, i do think that's treason, so these people are taking an untenable position that could fairly be called treasonous. how widespread do you think it is in washington, d.c., that the problem is the constitution. but i see some troubling trends. democrats are much more assertive, much more outspoken. sometimes you can sense that some republicans are frustrated with certain provisions, but the republicans will at least back them up with words, and i think with some degree of sincerity. what i see now, i've been in the senate for 13 years, when i first got to the senate, no one in elected office would dare

utter a phrase that could be construed as disregarding the constitution, and now you regularly hear members of congress, democrats, calling out provisions of the constitution that are incredibly problematic, like the electoral college, they hate the electoral college, they hate it deeply. despise, they will despise the senate as unrepresentative, as some sort of disenfranchising form of inequality, because the whole point of the senate is that it includes equal representation of all the states, even if you amend it so that each state has a different number of senators, not two. article five of the constitution, which governs the amendment process, will prevent you from doing that, it's patently unconstitutional, you can't change the principle of equal representation,

they hate it, why, because many of their voters are concentrated in a handful of states, densely populated urban centers, they think it's grossly unfair that small states like utah or maine should get.

more contempt for the first amendment, including not just the protection of free speech, but the protection of religious freedom. it's chilling to think that there's a major political party in america that's still taken seriously that hates the constitution. i understand how many people are caught up in the fast-moving maelstrom of the big government and consolidated power, because we've all been brought up, every american.

are fundamentally unconstitutional. the progressive vision is to concentrate power, to hand it over to so-called experts, even at the expense of the democratic input of the people. but more and more people are waking up to the problem. and the fact that the problem is inextricably linked to our departure from the founding document that i tend to believe was written by wise men inspired by god, which is the u.s. constitution. i think more and more people see this every day. do they know constitutional doctrine or not? they know there's something wrong with washington because by its fruits you shall know it. and the fruits of washington

are such that the american people are getting poorer. the people are less free than ever because they live under a government that passes laws with impunity that would make king george ii blush. it's true. we don't have to have a revolutionary war to change this because our law already protects us. we you just have to know what the protections are, and that the whole point of the constitution is to make the federal government less powerful and therefore less prone to abuse, but people hear that every day. donald trump doesn't always use the same words that i do. he doesn't always use the terms federalism, separation of powers, and... not always, structural power sharing, but he gets it, he gets it because he cares deeply about the american people, and he sees that people are suffering under oppression.

governments, that's why...

mom, why do we need these letters for a fairy tale. in the ninth kingdom, the thirtieth state. russian troops took control

of the settlement. a unit of the southern group of troops as a result of active and decisive actions liberated the settlement desired by the second donetsk people's republic, inflicted a defeat.