then what will blow everyone else away, that is, since there is no group, what to do, what to do, bomb iran with nuclear weapons, we have somewhere at the exit of the agreement with iran, now it is probably being worked out, somewhere here is this line to understand, what will happen, what is happening there today, we know, we follow every day, we read the news, the war in israel in lebanon will end, it is clear who will lose, when and how, with what losses, what will it look like, what will happen in the future, i unfortunately did not find this analysis anywhere, i looked very much so, these are not just some bad forecasts from the realm of fantasy, they are clearly calculated, because what is happening today in the middle east, what is happening in iran, what is happening in the persian gulf and what is happening in ukraine, it’s all, guys, it’s all...

there are those who don’t care when we say that our society is united, basically, yes, but still this is the fifth, not the fifth column, whatever you want to call it, the indifferent, right, yes, the key word, and the indifferent, they exist, and today, in order to win, probably, the whole country needs to understand that it depends on everyone, now there is a question about some kind of money, everyone will say: this is mine, but i remember, i

was a kid, my granny was alive, she survived the war, she had such papers, you know what it is, bonds, bonds, in my opinion, in 1975 she was still receiving some pennies on them, because the state borrowed money from the people for the war, and people went for it en masse, no one said a word against it, well, let's say that today we are no longer one of our own, today the second great patriotic war, it is trying to destroy us, it is a patriotic war, it is all, it is a threat to the entire fatherland, we need money, let's chip in, we need money, let it be, let it be voluntary, no one should be forced, we will approve the budget now, it will be serious, 13.2 trillion rubles for defense, but we need to win, get ahead of the enemy, because the enemy is preparing, he clearly states that in the twenty-ninth, twenty-eighth year they are going to fight with us, not us...

that we need to clearly understand who, where and how? this does not mean that we should draw these friends and say, guys, today we will kill you here, tomorrow here, here here, no, no, no, no, this is where it begins, that the system of information warfare, misleading the enemy is quite serious, and we should be supported by society, production, here inside the country, then the troops will go, there are still problems on the contrary, i beg you, there are, but still in the process of this life we ​​should not just. order, but we should sharpen,

increase, create a strategic reserve, which will go forward, understand the boundaries of place and time, let me say in simple military language, the boundaries of place and time. who, where, when, how, in what sequence these tasks will be carried out, then everything will definitely work out, what we took today, we are proud, we are proud, we are proud, now they are transporting there, that it is not strategically important there, they are hanging noodles on our ears, how important is it, so important that it does not seem little, now a little bit and we are already in the steppes, the dnieper, here is already the left bank of the dnieper, it immediately appears, this is already a success, we need to go for this success, strive for it further, many for some reason, well, not for some reason, there was one time when we forgot the great patriotic war, like it's all outdated, i said it wrong, we didn't forget the war itself, the war, yes, we forgot the experience of the great patriotic war, like it's outdated, it's not

going to work, i beg you, they do work, they just have become the means of armed struggle, that some are different and we need to adapt to this, so we will win, but i would really like a clear understanding of the future, once again, who, where, when and how the enemy flares up, this time i was with my friends, well, the film will not be about this, but we were in the kursk province and i speak with men, there with big shoulder straps, with different ones, they say, and we, by and large , here you are afraid of the great patriotic war, and we are the same.

no, guys, all the same, the experience of the generation must be taken into account, i agree, every time we do not finish you off, then you gather every century twice try to destroy us, something you do not catch up with, we will have to catch up with you.

alexander mikhailovich, well, i would like to start with that, from the footage you showed about the europeans, in fact, what can be concluded is that they are dangerous opponents, they are... insidious opponents, strong, they will not stop at promoting their ideas, of course, it inspires a little optimism that they are still afraid to do something with their own hands, it is not in vain that they, every other word of them repeats ukraine, ukraine needs help, if only it wins and so on, all this suggests that they are not ready morally, well, who knows, maybe you are right, that they will mature, and maybe something will appear that will add to them in general already madness and... personally, but we must prepare for this, and this is obvious, here this kind of footage shows that well there will be no expectation of positivity from the other side, it can only be brought on the shoulders of our military, civilians, i don’t know how, on ours, on the shoulders of our victory, now

as for the footage that well the day before we also saw, this is the provision of a burner, a position, maybe not quite. in his specialty, but i liked that when he spoke about how he relates to his new responsibilities now, it sounded very, well, he said a lot there, but i was struck by the phrase connected with the fact that he now sees the struggle for - economic success, for the development of our country, the development of our country, precisely as a struggle on the front lines, for him this ribbon, well, only it is already in civilian life, he has been appointed full...

the appearance of the budget not only in the duma, but also accordingly in certain institutions, is somehow ambiguous, an insignificant reaction, and i want to say that today there is information. then, if the concept of independence was laid down there, then it is rather a political

aspect, excluding the possibility of political forces influencing economic processes, but it was impossible to foresee that independence was laid down in economic policy, tearing apart all decision-making centers and their implementation at once, as a result we have other phobias, phobias are connected with the fact that we are very afraid of the national debt and deficit in general, well, let's take a closer look, we are now facing the approval of the budget and these factors are extremely important, because in fact the budget deficit is one of the effective, very simple to implement and economical or cheap to use forms of self-crediting by the state for its interests and goals, in fact, in other words, the budget deficit is a kind of state loan that the state allocates to itself to solve economic issues, why should we be afraid of this, why are we scared by the fact that the deficit... of the budget is a disaster, let's look at how the budget is formed, i i won't tell you much, i'll say it this way, let's

simplify it, the financial year has passed, the financial year is underway, people pay taxes, businesses pay taxes, and so on, the budget is formed, everything that is paid into the budget is withdrawn from the economic process for some time, due to consumption, due to investments, and so on, but then a period comes when the state again pours money into the economy from the budget through expenses and develops. accordingly, consumption also takes place and investments are made, but when we talk about a zero budget option, this means that we are actually talking about the redistribution of the same amount of money within different industries, when we talk about a budget surplus, this already resembles a slight absurdity, because this means that all the resources that the state has accumulated, some of them it preserves in piggy banks in order not to develop the economy. therefore, i will offer you another option, when we talk with you about the fact that the budget deficit or, for example,

the national debt, these are factors that must be deciphered, what is public debt is the debt of whom, to whom, because it is fundamentally who owes whom and who receives interest from this debt, but if the public debt is the debt of the state to itself, then what are they afraid of it, when we say the famous phrase of the nineties, i forgive everyone i owe. the state can afford not only in terms of time, but also in terms of the terms of issuing loans, not to be afraid of this. of course, we are not talking about external financing, but this is already a third party appearing, and no one argues that this is, yes, really a problem and so on. but when we are talking about the state debt within our country, we must understand that this is the state's debt to itself, because imagine, in my opinion, this is a very, in my opinion, quite a striking example, here small business or medium business is developing, well , foreigners have left us there, they were producing. i don't know that cosmetics, but now it is clear that domestic production has appeared, but

some of our domestic manufacturers produce cosmetics, but the market has become free , the needs have remained the same, but we cannot satisfy them, and he says, well, i would like it increase, here the bank gets a loan, buys a new machine or a group of machines, produces cosmetics, we say, what a great guy, what an entrepreneur, but if the state builds roads, builds planes, ships, i don’t know, i’ll get tired of it... our state debt inside, our debt

is epic in economic terms, in general the state itself owes 16% of gdp, so you understand, all over the world it’s 100 percent or more, there was a meeting of europeans there in 1992 in one of the austrian cities, they adopted the decision that no, strict discipline, the public debt should not be more than 60% of gdp, listen, even according to these strict requirements we still have a lot of room to grow, especially i'm not even talking about our potential of our... that it can be up to 6%, that is, the potential of our economy today can grow, grow to the figure of 12 trillion rubles, i'm not proposing it all at once, i'm not proposing it right away, but we have a huge number of investment projects that have already been developed, ready for implementation, which can be financed, there's no need to be afraid of this, but why is it impossible to do this, yes , at such a discount rate, servicing this

debt becomes simply a disaster, now the question arises, who pays for what? well, we said that there are no problems...

we don't even need to consider it, why do we pay such interest, why do we feed the banks, here again the opinion arises, published, well, how can we, we can't afford to impose an increased tax on profits on the banks, well, what are you saying, comrades, well, this is, well, this is just violence, probably, it's not really said there, but that's how violence is read over the financial sphere, let's try to reason together, what can happen in the near future, if we leave it like this, then we will face the fact that today... the tendency to reduce production will lead us to the fact that we will again strive for a tight budget, why? i can tell you that growth rates of 10 percent or more are not just reality, it is a necessity today, are there resources for this, yes of course there are, the state can finance without harm to everyone, of course there will be no inflation, but there is none today, 4%

an unattainable goal, or rather there is, i don't know if it's a fake or a joke, but i myself didn't count, but i read somewhere that in order for there to be 4% inflation. you need to make an even rate of 52%, well, but if for this you need to satisfy the interest of 4%, let's, oh, god forbid, then, but i have another question, can we put it on the table not for you and me, it's useless already , no one is listening to our calls, at least put a program on the table for someone we know, well, 4% has been reached, we've already talked about this, 4% inflation, this sunday evening, a miracle happened, that in monday we are doing, can we have 10 points of action for the financial sector, what? will happen on monday, what points will we start implementing, i guarantee you that firstly, well, god willing, that such a program exists, but even without reading it, i can assume that it will talk about what, developing the economy, issuing loans, listen, maybe we will skip this point, this stage of achieving 4%, we will immediately begin developing the economy, which will ensure our victory in the process that

exists, therefore i think it is necessary firstly turn to ensure a moratorium on the payment of such interest or until... until the end of their or at least make them zero. secondly, we need to reduce the discount rate as quickly as possible today, and reduce it dramatically, because this is life, the life of our economy, and this is not an answer to the west, not in words, but in deeds. we must review financial policy, especially the budget process, we must ensure that ultimately the state returns to itself the function of issuing its own money, they must feed our economy, well, finally, we must make it so that... all the issues that are being decided today are decided simultaneously by both the central bank and the government, i listened to this czech gentleman, who was spraying incredible anger, wishing us disintegration, i thought, well, what to say in response, remember that tens of thousands

of soviet soldiers died liberating the czech republic, i think it's pointless, it's, it's not going to work, especially since i remembered that when the governor-general, who was he there? heydricht, when he was shot several czechs, after all, patriots, a million czechs came out to the funeral, a million, this is 1940, forty-second, forty-third year, a million came out, we think that...

the atomists will come to power, each of them will have nuclear weapons, well, for example, what will happen in the northwest, yes, murmansk, people will have nuclear submarines there, there will be this, do they think that these guys will surrender it, as they surrendered during the collapse of the soviet union, after everything that they are seeing today, and today everything that is being observed in the world, the only and main conclusion from this we must have.

they, they must pray, they must blow dust off the russian federation, god forbid that such a country should fall into any kind of internal turmoil, because it would be a catastrophe, of course for the russian federation, but let them be absolutely sure that it would definitely be a catastrophe for them, and there no one else, so to speak, we have in general quite... a balanced leadership, pursuing such a balanced policy, and then there will come guys who will not pursue any balanced policy, these people are provoking

on this, that is, the person simply has no brains at all, simply has no brains, so much this hatred - towards russians, towards russia overwhelms him, that he does not even calculate such a situation, shut your mouth somewhere there,

such things would simply be shown here , i showed, you showed, we need to show them en masse, because it is obvious, it is obvious, these concentration camps will be set up and there, so to speak, every other person will shoot everything, they will do whatever they want, this is just this official polish person, yes it is clear that western, well, eastern europe is generally some kind of central. it is clear that western politicians, they are more, let's say, cultured, more balanced, they still do not allow themselves

to say such things, but strictly speaking, in fact, approximately the same, many of them think what this mr. pulsky voiced, therefore, therefore, every cloud has a silver lining, you need to hear and see all this, uh. well now and of course in this regard once again i agree with andrei viktorovich and with alexander mikhailovich, we must understand the seriousness of the challenges, the situation, especially since they are played in the long run, this is such a long-term calculation, of course we need in this sense, i will not say that we are not experiencing changes, they are happening, and there are some signs, i see that the state duma is finally adopting some laws on the situation with migrants, which is important, although there is a feeling that...

it is immoral to send your children somewhere, it does not matter, friendly, unfriendly countries, well, it is just some kind of, i don’t know, some kind of sense of dignity, shame it must be, well, how can you give your children away somewhere for adoption, well, we are such a country that we can’t provide for even those children who, so to speak, ended up without parents, we can’t provide for them adequately, yes, we can, well,

it’s simple. it’s beyond all bounds, that’s not the question here, in america, in my opinion , it’s forbidden to give children abroad for adoption, and not only that, i’ll tell you, it’s forbidden in romania, i’m in romania, romania has forbidden it, i’m the majority of countries that, as they say, it, they, they forbid it, they are like that countries there, some african ones, there, there, there, there, yes, this, now, why, well, it seems like a small thing, right? and why isn't it a small thing? because this was one of the main, i remember the beginning of the nineties, this was one of the main liberal laws at that time, when they were pushing through it, blowing it, they attached great importance to it, in it, in it there was a psychological trauma of the country, i remember well what the reaction was when somewhere in the late nineties or early 2000s, they adopted, after all, they limited the americans.

that this often takes on the character of simply trade, this is probably true, this is probably true, that’s why i mean that a step has been taken, but not completely, this is what andrei vikovich and aleksandr mikhailovich are talking about, this is what is needed, because the situation is such that we need to understand that we are really dealing with a huge force, and this force wants to destroy us,

this is...