that is, there is no particular problem here , so they will expand this production, especially considering that now the united states, in a relatively short period of time, yes, from 14:00 the production of shells will increase almost threefold, yes, to 40,000, and will continue to increase, therefore, what they can prepare, yes, it is necessary to distribute it among two theaters, among three, but this is not enough here, we must also add, here we must very clearly understand that now it will determine not only... the extensive growth of military production, but intensive, the introduction of new types of weapons, new systems, here artificial intelligence plays a colossal role, because in a year and a half or two , it is artificial intelligence that will become the main, if you like, factor determining success or failure on the battlefield, so now they have imposed sanctions against us, which in theory should limit our capabilities in this area, so we must fight for this all the time now.

to create tension, for example, the arctic has never been, the arctic is now included here basically the arctic will now be still with us as here as, how do you see the arctic, the arctic is clear, there is an attempt to seal it off, it will not work, that is, there are a million nuances, the arctic does not create colossal pressure within society, within society - this is the deterioration of the situation around kaliningrad, that is where they will try to escalate. nato plans the first strike is on

kaliningrad, that is, first of all , the russian exclave is destroyed, but here is the arrival of a new government, for example, in japan, also much more militarized, as much more aimed at confrontation, this idea of ​​an asian nato, it constantly surfaced back in...

china has changed its behavior, in what, first of all, in what way does china's behavior not suit them? well, china, china, if we proceed from the strategic attitudes of the americans, china really wants to unite eurasia, to consolidate it under its, how to say, dominance, this is the first, second thing: china is crawling all over the world, that is, it is being introduced into the system of world economic relations, and the americans should allow this, let's let's look at it differently, yes, china

always conducts its policy very carefully, very carefully, we have seen china somewhere carry out a coup in some state, that is, an anti-american group came to power, what is the meaning, that is, translated from scientific into russian, no, we have not seen, okay, let's look further, even where they had colossal influence, we have seen china show aggression, toughness, defend or... simply write off these losses, no, china, china has its own, so to speak, economic factors and practically i will lead to the russian language, again no, that is, this is also not the case, that is, it is simply our method of solution, and if, if you buy the political elite of the country, what do the chinese do, if you buy the political stratum the main reserves, what do the europeans talk about, where are our companies, well, and where has the purchase of this elite ever led to any action? already more money than

in the american political elites, china, but with no other side of the world will not compare, the most strongly correctly, at least somewhere it is for them helped. china is led and led, not removed, not removed, the most important trading partner is, the most important trading partner at the same time it is interesting how sanctions work, or for example

in europe, yes, colossal investments are now being led, now they are leading additional push against chinese cars, and nothing happens, and in europe, europe is not the most important thing here, of course, who is the most important? with the states, and for the states china is convenient, as you correctly said, despite everything, colossal trade turnover, and nevertheless they would like i wish china would retain its place as the world's workshop, 23 million cars, more than the us and western europe combined, than all of them, that's why they hate it,

a historical view of things has shown that only russia has produced ideas that have turned out to be

their embodiment, destructive for the world system of colonialism, but they look at it systemically, why all the changes in the social structure of modern...

it's us, that's why we are not only an acute and obvious threat to them, but also an existential one, because we have also managed to prove that even when it seems that we have been defeated, we are gone, we are like breathing empires , we are reborn, we are a threat to them again, i say it again, i do not deny that we are a present and clear danger to the americans, no, they just have it written in their legislation, a direct clear threat yes. yes, indeed, because we can destroy them, we can, we can, but we will not do it yet, we can, we can and, moreover, we can write off the entire planet with our nuclear strike, like if it didn’t work out, give us another one so that we act like this

comprehensive power, why are we very close to china now, because we have these two components, together, there are two components, armed and economic. not china, which does not have the first, not us, which has not yet built the second, in this regard, to speak out, the most important thing, well, come on, well, that's it, i wouldn't want to have to, which is about nothing, which does not have its own economy, nor its own real army, well, something

is rebelling, running, cutting, but a few, a very small number of people appear who say something, suddenly, slowly, gradually, but after several centuries everything collapsed, the whole building of the great roman empire collapsed, by the way, the neighbors also changed, the power of an idea, yeah. that's the power of an idea now the only one who can generate, which covers the whole world, they are afraid of this no one denies the power of ideas, and the roman empire collapsed there are many more reasons, besides ideas, an additional reason, the main thing is that they were worn down, and then ask yourself the question, and what states, with what ideology came to replace the roman empire you started the program, so that with that, to show two... very interesting characters who talked about our people, and during

the discussions it was said several times that they are slavs, and the west has set its goal of destroying the slavs, i think that maybe our viewers don't even know that the west's attitude towards the slavs as such is very clear, because the english word slave is derived from slavs from slav, that is, they call slaves slavs, i think this is quite an understandable cultural paradigm of thinking, which is simply, apparently, our people do not allow these comrades, whom you showed as comfortable, to treat themselves like that, but nevertheless i would like to dwell on them, because interesting theses were voiced, first, as for, i will start with this pole, i do not know what our vacationers did to him, with whom he encountered in italy, i know how our vacationers can behave in italy, in many places, apparently, he suffered very much, since he has such painful memories and he still

cannot forget russian tourists in the italian pizzerias, but if you look at it seriously, let's take this phrase that he said, that you imagine that you are sitting in a pizzeria, and next to you are russians with their culture and their behavior, and let's replace, say, the word russian with blacks and imagine that such a phrase was said by someone in the united states. on the same day, mass riots will begin, cities will be burned, there will be anything, replace it with any other ethnic group, and this will be perceived as an absolutely animal manifestation of nazism, fascism, all other prohibited ideological dogmas, so it turns out that you only define russians as an ethnic group towards which you can allow yourself to say such things, it seems absolutely obvious to me that it is unacceptable. we need to stop this, just discussing it here, each of these thugs needs to

be subjected to very harsh obstruction, so that they understand that they can no longer behave like this. as for this neurasthenic from the czech republic, who was twitching there, splashing something with his spit, there would have been very interesting theses, the main thesis for me, which i heard which i paid attention to, was the following, he says: can russia, he says on... the possibility of being with us in some other model of relationships, very simple, when we do not exist, and in order for us to cease

to exist, we must cease to be an empire. in principle, for us this should have been clear for a long time, but for some reason for fairly large layers of the population here, this nevertheless remains a big mystery to this day, and the empire is confused with forms government, then with regimes, then with something else, not understanding that in our case the empire is our essence, that if we are not an empire, we are not russia, that it can be anything , but we will not be able to exist absolutely definitely, and the empire is what, in our case, specifically in...

to fit some theories, something else, under this, but each time on the path to the satanic domination of some anti-human force , each time this people stands, which is capable of uniting around itself the most diverse peoples, religions, and so on, and here then the key question is the following, that an empire is not only institutions, there is a coat of arms, a flag, an anthem, other things,

this is what you said, an empire is first of all an idea, you can't be a powerful great... world empire that fights against the dominance of these globalists, while being in their intellectual slavery, this is excluded, we must have an ideology, we must have an idea that is extremely understandable both within the country and beyond its borders. my personal point point of view is that any attempt to take and artificially invent, write some dogmas, that is, norms, principles, start to memorize them and that tomorrow morning everything will be different, it is doomed to failure. here our history shows that even an attempt to take a very systematically thought out, brilliantly founded, detailed ideology in the west and try to implement it in your own country, this is still a failed path, because several decades pass, our people begin to adapt it to themselves, to their

value guidelines, principles, institutions, social and so on, and in a couple of decades this ideology is already definitely. doctrine, which was thought out by our ancestors and it was simply formulated by them, but it was not invented by them in the 19th century, here count uvarov, in my opinion, most succinctly formulated that russia, as an empire, is based on three foundations, these are orthodoxy, autocracy and nationality, we just need to comprehend them a little in a modern connotation.

orthodoxy, as a tradition, as our commitment to tradition, of course, in two in hypostases there is orthodoxy as a religion and religious culture, the fact that russians are orthodox, and historically it has developed this way, gave, it gave them the opportunity to unite around themselves the most diverse religious, confessional groups, without violating their rights, but orthodoxy in a new connotation, as the commitment of the peoples who live in the country, to the preservation of their tradition in opposition to the most diverse ideological movements that are trying to destroy... centuries in its traditional understanding, when we talk about autocracy and, therefore, our population, many, think that we are talking about absolute monarchy, as a form of problem, this is not what we are talking about at all, and uvarov did not even mean this, autocracy here is a synonym for the word sovereignty, it just sounds like autocracy in russian, it is a translation from the greek word

autocracy, autocrat, as someone who makes decisions himself, we already... and in the triad this is the third, but maybe it should be the first, this is nationality, nationality for us, this is, of course, the source of power in the state, that's all. understandable, but in a deeper philosophical understanding there is nothing in russia, except its people, that should be the goal setting for its

policy, its actions and everything else, not a single , that is, elite group in the world, not a single desire to be part of civilized humanity, not a single globalist principles and movements can be more important than the interests of one's own people. moreover, i will say, we have such, it seems to me, a slightly distorted perception, when we, yes, we even at school, when we study, we always study history through the prism of our leaders and the leaders that the country had. i am deeply convinced that in russian history, the main subject is the people, always, because we had periods with very different political regimes, very different forms of government, there were periods when we had no statehood at all, but our... survival was possible due to the subjectivity of the people, which in the case of russia, these people sacrificed so much in order to preserve the state, gave everything that they had

there is, in order for us to have the greatest country in the world, this is the achievement of our people, and it should be at the center of our this triad, we just need to rethink , find ourselves in new conditions, i want to call it something else, you can call it something else, but for thousands of years, our people, our state, no matter how you look, we can take the soviet period, this is initially one ideology, marxism, very timely for its period, very, well, i can say, breakthrough, but in our conditions it has passed just a couple of decades, we still came to the conclusion that the soviet union advocates for the protection of traditional values, just in its own understanding, against the rampant immorality and other things in the west, what does the council mean...

we don't do all this now, we integrate there, now we are looking for ourselves, but for some reason we are again carrying out our search for ourselves through western ideologies, yes, we need them,

as soon as we become what they have been used to seeing us for a thousand years, there will be no problems with them, they will see the russian tsar, it will become absolutely clear to them that there is no need to twitch anywhere else, they will see the russian empire, it will become absolutely clear that this is their only path to salvation, when we are ours, yours, we are like an empire, but you know how it is very... i want to make films for the imf and degenerates , just make colonial education worse than that of the natives, then i think these people have corresponding questions, we just in conclusion, i will say it again, no one gives us a choice to be an empire or to be a national state on the same scale and to be a state like everyone else, no, we are offered either to be an empire and fight for it or to cease to exist in the historical process of the world.

empires of regional development, then just the north american and european have always been empires of sucking out all the juices, that is , colonial by their nature and by their

essence, yes. not in this, they, if they could, if it were true, that fool dunda said, they would have done it, this is what we must understand, if they could, they would have done it, they can perfectly understand what the answer will be, they tried to do this in the fall of 22, let's be honest, there was such an attempt in the fall of 22, when we deployed a russian-belarusian group as a result, there was this attempt, they had these plans in

23, how is it...

someone is making statements everywhere, he has said a lot of things, this is simply his loudest statement, in fact, it is indicative once again, well, we need to talk about this, because when we talk about processes in the west, they are all personified, these are not just some abstract processes, these are people, ideas that exist, develop, degrade, they all manifest themselves in people, this is the kind of dunda - this is the typical zelensky regime, mark kruet, the new nato secretary general, look.