some serious blow to those objects that maybe they are not planning yet, what are these objects? well, except for the nuclear center in the negev desert demon, which means that they have now published 35 objects on the territory of israel that can be subjected to a blow, there are power plants, ammonia plants, this will definitely be a catastrophe for small israel, oil and gas fields, well, and military bases and much more, yes, the second object that they are talking about is oil and gas fields. that means various types of oil refineries and much more, but they have such an island of kharg, now they kept a large number of tankers there, which they refueled, now they have driven the tankers across international waters, so that they, but there remains a huge amount of this really matter, so there is such a province of khuzzistan, where 48% of the entire oil and gas and refining petrochemical industry of iran is concentrated, these are the objects, by the way , the majority of arabs live there, not persians, by the way, sunnis, so well, the point is not to play, that is ... there are enough such objects on

the territory of iran, naturally, these are objects military-industrial complex, objects - military units and much more, therefore , uh, now - unlike the first strikes , you still won't win the war with one strike, no, it will be a retaliatory strike, it will grow, grow, not in terms of what there should be an understanding, here one strike will not lead to the end, it is impossible to destroy the huge iran, and iran is 1,600,000 km, 90 million population, well, you, listen, well, yes, but our account will be done differently. which we do not always talk about, the calculation is made on the fact that such strikes can lead to instability in the country, that is, naturally, there are many, so -called opposition-minded people, as they are called in the west and in israel, so to speak, they can destabilize the situation in iran, including actively using separatist groups, so there are many separatist groups on the territory of iran, it is a mono-national state, especially dangerous are the kurdish belush separatists, this is also being counted on, one blow - yes, a second, a third, but people will start, therefore,

to be indignant, which will lead to destabilization of the situation in iran with the most serious consequences, any destabilization in iran has always historically led to a major civil war with huge losses for iran and so on. this is what is being counted on. let's translate from official language to understandable. everything is not so scary if there are instructions.

it is easy to get confused in the facts when you see only part of the overall picture. entire locations are being changed in the pursuit of views. as for lebanon, here too i am more confident that the military-political leadership of israel is betting on inciting a civil war, here they are now they announced, they have, since the ground operation stalled, they say: 110 villages, this is the bka valley, this is the east, which means, and southern lebanon, the population from these villages, must. where do

you, they never say, go somewhere there, they take everything there now in the mountains in the druze there, they have to go somewhere, which means, everything is already packed there, so to speak, yes, that means, and ... you need to clearly understand that they live there not only like this, there is no such thing, here all the shiites live, there is no such thing, here the bikala valley is like that, shiite village, christian shiite village, christian village, different christians, yes, that is why their people are also naturally unhappy, and when they leave, they have drug plantations there, well, drug disease , mad drug business, one of the main centers for drug production in the world, the third most important, so in the valley of beka it grows , it is not customary to say, well, so there, so, yes. i will not dwell on this, i can there, well , i will not, there, so, so, there are functionaries, they will spoil them very modestly, if the rich one is so some mansion, a drug dealer lives there, they don't touch him, they take tribute from him, well, why touch him, he's a piece of cake, well, that's a detail, so any partisan movement,

any so-called revolutionary movement, no matter what the name of the movement in the world, it always feeds on, take luck in colombia, there are others everywhere like that, well, you can't get away from it, but i... i'm interested yes, that somehow all the blows are delivered so carefully-carefully, so as not to set the plantations on fire, god forbid, and that means somehow during wars the drug business doesn't suffer, like in afghanistan how carefully it is, i don't want these details now, i well now israel, for example, could take and strike a blow at - a drug center, why what is it holding back, why not burn down at the same time - a den, no well firstly, drug drug defense against israel is not fighting, they are fighting. for the first time in russian, god willing, that everything is written there all this, i described everything well there, so, here they are, so what they want is clear, what is it, my book is coming out, they are in lebanon, they are now, if it is true that

they have already struck tripoli in the center of beirut, then they would also be for israel the way out of the situation is to start a civil war in lebanon, in lebanon i once again go many are dissatisfied with ezbollah.

died during the release of hostages, who himself served, no, everything is clear about netanyahu, he is a warrior who stands at the head of the state, who considers this his destiny, this does not make him right, no, absolutely not, well, he is some kind of the same fanatic as his opponents,

honestly, yes, this is a person of this kind and he is ready to go to the end, he tells his soldiers, they want to destroy ours, ours state, and therefore we will fight to the end, therefore any... reconciliation is impossible by definition, so this is a war of extermination, who will destroy whom, please, yes, i would like to return to the conversation about the united states, about why the threat of nuclear about the role of the united states in the israeli conflict, about why the threats of nuclear war are becoming more and more real, and here a it seems to me that we can turn to the developments of the school that is popular in the region, to neo-marxism, by the way... yes, donald trump recently discussions accused kamala harris of being a marxist because of her words, let's show how donald trump treats a marxist. you know, i always sleep badly because i always think a lot. i think about

the country, i think about china, i think about russia and other different things. by the way, the enemy is within us among the crazy madmen that we have, fascists, marxists. like russia and china, if you had a smart president, you would do a great job of dealing with them, well, her father was actually the first black professor of economics at burghley, taught a course marxism, so neo-marxism in the 20th century, it seems to me, gives a good justification for why the phenomenon of hegemony arises and why this hegemony at a certain stage can lead to a world war, antonio gramsci, a famous italian revolutionary, who here in moscow. spent quite a long time in the early twenties, communicated with lenin and developed the basis of this neo-marxism, he

went beyond the framework of classical marxism, which explained everything by class struggle and explained that in reality the phenomenon of domination at a foreign level in international relations, is associated with the assertion of hegemony as a means on the one hand of open pressure using control of production of means of production and control.

it is necessary to support cultural hegemony according to the american ambassador's council in 1965 and for this there are several instruments actually distinguishes three firstly, this is the ability of the hegemon in this case the united states to produce some common goods public goods in particular such historically has been the ability or willingness to defend allies the us from its opponents. well, really.

about this, this is to propose the idea of ​​a state, yes, a welfare state, if we talk about international relations, this is to propose some doctrine that may not be very convenient, but nevertheless the allies will still agree with it. here is a typical example - this is the brezhnev doctrine, yes , in the eighth year brezhnev goes to poland and reports to his eastern european allies that guys, you are of course a sovereign state, but as soon as something happens to you not so, this will worry us, because the unity of the socialist camp... will be violated, the united states is doing the same, maybe not so directly, and by the way, this doctrine does not have a name, but

nevertheless it is clear that thousands of people and the state department and the cia control the elites in this sense , political processes in other countries, well, finally, the third very important justification for the dominance of the united states for many centuries, and this is a situation when it seems that there is no alternative to this dominance, that this regime... in all these three key provisions of non-military, so to speak, non-material

dominance or maintaining hegemony for the united states, here is a complete failure, in this sense, in a situation where i have no military superiority over the russian federation, and even less over china, this understanding of the hopelessness in achieving the goal, maintaining its hegemony leads to the conclusion, should lead, may... lead to the conclusion that nuclear weapons probably need to be used, now at the end of this week in ramstan a group of friends will gather in in quotes or maybe without quotes for someone at...

we'll have to see what happens, but by the way, on the other hand, at the next brics summit in kazan, there will also be a very important question, it's clear that everyone is unhappy with the american hegemony, and sooner or later, or rather even sooner, it will scold, but what instead also raises a question, because if everything that is not hegemony is multipolarity, such a scientific explanation, it generally does not suit, of course it is very important for us to agree within the framework of the brics summit: how exactly the world order will be structured, at least from the point of view of what place in this, in this system the united states, the current leader, will occupy. the russian federation, of course, does not see itself in this system, on the contrary, we are trying to create, well, if not a parallel reality, a parallel world economy without the united states, then we are forced to do this, but with china or

india in a completely different situation, china is quite satisfied with the current american-centric economy, it... earns, yes, chinese diplomats, they will make jokes, our diplomats react to any attacks from the united states, but at the same time other structures of power in china are completely exploiting this situation and it is absolutely not worth waiting for china to help us build real multipolarity as anti-hemony, unfortunately, approximately the same thing is happening in india. thus, the next 2 weeks will show a lot from the point of view of the future of american hegemony,

by the way, antonio gramsci and other neo-marxists, too, after all, they also moved away from marx in the sense that classical marxists believed that the state, well, it is a projection of class struggle, it is such a historical phenomenon that sooner or later will recede, unfortunately, marxists say, without the state there is no way, no one will force contracts to be observed, no one will force order to be maintained, in this sense it is clear that the world will remain approximately from the same players, but here is how to do it, i have a sovereign...

here is an understanding of what will happen, what will be the next step, which means, for example, we proceed from, here we have said millions of times. "the west is not pragmatic, but deeply ideological, i argued with my friend alexander viktorovich millions of times when i told him that the tefton spirit will be revived, nothing can be done about it, you still have to understand that the deep cultural, if you like, roots will still give their shoots, and we will see the reproduction of the same models of behavior over and over again, and we see them now, how they manifest themselves in all parts of the world. you don’t have to deceive yourself that now everything will resolve itself, it will be as before, nothing will be as before, and i have not seen that our here they really showed, we have a wild number of some academic institutes, we have some endless forums, have you seen somewhere a coherent explanation of what might happen next, here are the forecasts, and what will happen next, well,

just in 2 years, in 3 years, and what will happen in germany, and what will happen in france, and what will happen in england, and what?

our payment system has fundamentally changed, understanding, i am not taking into account only the army now, personnel training, how we consider these personnel, migration politics, we say the same thing a million times in this studio, with a wild creak gradually by half a step, and why? and because over 30 years such a comprador elite has formed, which has learned to paint its lips in the colors necessary at a given moment in time, but by and large, which sometimes suits ...

they will have nowhere to put, so they have closed their eyes and are waiting for everything to end and they can go out, we will live here, we will endure it, i ask, well, i probably will not speak in our swamp, i am still working, so i am better, maybe you can safely clap, there was such a joke, i can also go out to red square and shout reagan is a fool, but they were saying now reagan is not a fool.

this is absolutely accurate, because society is in the very period of transformation, in the period of transformation it is very difficult to really develop some specific ideological values, and

not vice versa, i think that they develop ideological values ​​lead to the transformation of society, they are developed by life and are brought to the end of the transformation of society, when it stands on its own the basics, therefore the best and you say that a marxist, no, sir, no, not a marxist, it is expected. what the americans did not find? the united states, if we take history again, the british at one time found a paradigm for the development of mankind, it was industrialization, an industrial revolution, you can not

dominate, you can lead, so they proposed a system of leadership, we are leaders in this area, and accordingly we proposed a paradigm of development, what can they do, what is the difference? no, hegemony is usually forceful, hegemony is achieved by force, based on...

under a foreign flag, it's not really you, the english usually fought with the hands of some europeans, the english company, no, that's another matter, it's the century, they conquered china, of course, and india, but they didn't conquer china, they had its so-called, wars, they were a little different, so that's what's happening now for the united states, their degenia is over, it's completely obvious that

they're collecting more and more with their own armed forces, over the past few years they've destroyed their main economic competitor, which was europe.

so says the lighthouse.

if everything is like the wild west, then there is only one law: shoot first, competition of ideas and day. there was a sensation, and what a sensation, they were tense inside america, outside of it, what is the remaining intrigue, why do we need to watch now? this is america, a program about a country that is difficult to understand.

europe has always been under their thumb, so to say that they have now squeezed everything out, this is not true? the main auto industry, they simply zeroed it out, why the competitor that he had was german , actually, here is american hegemony, i think, so to speak, it is becoming a thing of the past, they couldn’t find a paradigm, but somehow they let china out with us, where, how where, are we the brics there?