Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    March 17, 2011 11:30am-12:00pm PDT

11:30 am
support of dcyf. we want these kids to know that they can be credited for using their brain and creativity. by allowing them to be paid to serve as artist apprentices, nurses working a menial job, which many high school student to to help pay the bills, is an incredibly important part of this component. we are offering them the opportunity to learn at the same time. that is a key piece of the financial model. >> i just wanted to comment, i think it is extremely critical, in order to make in long-term, this project a success, that we keep as active as possible in doing the programming. that community is truly lacking in activities for you ith.
11:31 am
we need to stay focused on that and supporting any programming activities in that neighborhood, to the extent we can. >> there have been foundation that have been very generous that have provided key funding. >> commissioner lee? >> so the relationship you now have with the car barn is through an mou? >> we are in the process of creating that now. >> but prior to that, do we have any kind of formal relationship? you are approving expenses for them, but do we have something in place? >> requirements outlined in the grant agreement. i can provide you documentation that was provided to department as part of the grant where we had expectations that the car barn organization would achieve --
11:32 am
>> that we approve it before the commission. >> it was a grant agreement. >> ok, let us see the design. >> again, thank you for taking the time to watch our presentation. how do i transfer over to -- ok. i will be referring to the screen. i am joshua, one of the architects involved in transforming this project. it is an honor to be involved in such a critical project that is so critical to the youth in san francisco. what you are seeing here to my left is the existing building, back in the 1970's, as it started to deteriorate.
11:33 am
more recently, in 2004, i think we should be clear, it is not a full seismic upgrade that would be coming. this would basically keep it from collapsing in on itself. you can see how it has been patiently waiting to be transformed into this medical center that has been spoken off. -- magical center that has been spoken of. this is the powerhouse interior, where muni power was created. you can see the turbines sat in the ground. we will be transforming this into an event space that will be used for weddings, mixed media performances, and the like, for rental. here you can see how we are going -- the goal here is to
11:34 am
restore but also preserve, in its industrial nature, this beautiful building. modernization will come in, but with respect to this great design. this will be the new lobby entrance. kitchen facilities will be integrated underneath balcony's. walking down the halls, you see beautiful old case work and plaster work that will be restored. in the old offices, beautiful bill and case work, again, will be beautifully restored. as you work your way north, where workers would get their assignment for the day, that room will be transformed into a restaurant space. this is the northwest corner, which will transform into a banquet seating.
11:35 am
an assembly room will be transformed into the black box theater. so you are seeing beautiful, dilapidated now, redwood siding that will be restored to its original state. in the attic, which is currently unoccupied mall, we will be creating literature designed rooms, bringing in skylights to create an intimate critiques base. this is a rendering of the exterior of the building in its full use, with the restaurant in the corner, studios and office space in the center, in the power house rental space to the south. again, we will be restoring the exterior to its original state, and this will all be done with lead gold standard with regard to sustainability. here is a longitudinal section
11:36 am
through the building. we will be connecting a ground floor to the main floor and third floor, through this new stairway intervention, lobby space on the ground floor and mezzanine, and where the catering kitchen integrated, as well. the main floor, offices will be transformed into retail. restaurant to the north. the second floor, you see the black box theatre. it will be state of the art. here, the design, literary art studios, with the mezzanine in an attic, will be for the students as well. this is a rendering depicting that workspace. you can see, again, ground- floor lobby, mezzanine lobby connected with the grand staircase, a catering kitchen
11:37 am
adjacent to -- this would be a depiction of a mixed media event where you have projections, dancing, a basic gathering space for the public. the black box theatre has two personalities. in the daytime,, located centrally surrounded by classrooms, but allows breakouts for the classrooms when the seats are retracted. you have a jason audio and visual recordings of the performances where they will be practicing during the daytime, and then in the evening, seating extended. you would have a the black box theatre with the above projector room and recording adjacent. this is a depiction of the critique runes in the attic
11:38 am
space, where you are nestled in and amongst the trestles, with skylights above, creating an intimate atmosphere for dialogue for the u youth. now we will go through a slide presentation to give you a more animated few of the building.
11:39 am
11:40 am
>> unfortunately, you are missing the audio soundtrack. if you have any questions, i would be happy to answer. >> thank you for the presentation. it is quite an ambitious project. i have been involved in excuse projects, restoration of buildings. it is a long journey. we look forward to hearing, after the quiet phase, how the funding goes. keep us posted.
11:41 am
public comment. >> stephen career -- currier. >> good morning, commissioners. we started back in 1998 when muni wanted to tear it down. this is one of two historic buildings in district 11, the other one is balboa high school. i have so many points to cover. this is 12 years in the making. commissioner lee, i appreciate all of your questions, but we have worked so hard in ascertaining funding, not only locally, through the state, but also federal aid. back in 2001, i put together a package for the national historic places, and they do a program every year, the 11 most endangered spaces.
11:42 am
we were number 12 and angel island got in. this is a community, as commissioner bonilla knows, that is really neglected, forgotten. the highest number of children and youth in san francisco, and all of these programs taking place at the moment are directed toward children, youth, and young adults. i am also a board member of the geneva office building. this goes back a long time. we are in the initial phases of fundraising. we are looking at our local community, but district 11, as you know, is a working-class neighborhood. trying to raise funds out of the district is quite difficult because nobody knows -- few people know about the geneva office building. some people that drive by -- why don't you just tear the damn
11:43 am
thing down? this will be a ground rule in our very small tiara. i look forward to any help that we can get from the rec and parks commission, city and county of san francisco, calif. we know we are in a fiscal crisis and this is not one of the important pieces to fund, but in my heart of hearts, i know this is going to get done. the other portion of this is, at the same time that we were saving the geneva office building, we were also looking at the balboa park bart station. it is the most dilapidated station in the system, but the most heavily used, other than downtown. bart and muni came together, along with other agencies to look at a transit village. we were looking at the fruit
11:44 am
vale project. the money ran out. now we are looking at other areas, like near city college. but that is what we were looking at for the geneva office building. so i want to put that package together for you. we look forward to great things on that building. >> thank you very much. is there any other public comment on this item? >> hello, commissioners. this sounds like a great project. catherine howard. you got one page, as of 9:00 yesterday morning, there were no documents for any agenda items on the website. i know this is not the commission secretary possible, because she is the epitome of efficiency. i hope that they will find that missing link, so we can all find out ahead of time. everything should be available before the meetings so people can know about it. thank you.
11:45 am
>> is there any other public comment on this item? being none, public comment is closed. this was discussion only. >> let's go back to item eight. >> item 8. department of children youth and their families. >> almost good afternoon, commissioners. thank you for having us. i apologize for not being here when the item was called. >> no problem. we have a confused agenda today. >> an interesting agenda, definitely true. as my staff is loading up the power point, -- i just want to start the presentation by saying, thank you for having us. secondly, i want to acknowledge -- jenny is here. we have worked with general
11:46 am
manager ginsburg. i keep on calling him director, but i realize he is a general manager. really enjoyed working with him. we have a number of projects that we work on together, whether it is direct transfer of funding from our department to yours, getting people together so that we can have a think tank conversation, so that we can leverage human capital. it has been a joy to work with members in your department as well as direct staff. i just wanted to the knowledge that. we are here today to present to you our preliminary findings from our community needs assessment. many of you know we have been in front of you several times. the last time i was here, regarding any of our policy work was when i presented a year and a half ago our children services allocation plan. last year, we took that plan that was approved by many of -- all the commission that we presented in front of -- as well
11:47 am
as the board of supervisors. we took that plan and created a request for proposal to essentially actualize that plan. we completed that process, and now, according to the charter, we have to go back and redo the planning process. now we are back in year one of the planning process, which is the community needs assessment. within the charter, -- i am not following my power point. within the charter, we are mandated to gather information and feedback from all of the 20 neighborhoods within the city. we took a step further this time and went out and gather feedback, which later my staff will explain to you, from community members, and also did specific focus groups and conversation with parents, key stakeholders, key providers.
11:48 am
we interviewed members of your senior staff and rec and park. we wanted to understand, what were the needs and goals at the community level, resident level, as well as from the city? just a small point regarding the geneva car burn. i live literally up the street from the geneva car barn. i see it every day. it is really exciting to see that there are some possibilities. our department funds the youth program that the geneva car barn runs, and it is also exciting to see that we are bringing some of the arts programs into that area. it is true, it is not run out of that facility right now, but we hope in the future that it will be, and it can turn into a vibrant neighborhood. i want to hand it over to my staff now to explain the data collection process as well as key findings.
11:49 am
>> good afternoon, my name is sandra, a policy analyst at dcyf. where we are currently in the process is beginning the first year of a three-plan planning process. this created the community needs assessment. we are presenting our initial findings from that. those findings will then inform the next year's process, which is coming up with the allocation plan, which is the so what with the data that we have gathered. the third year will be the request for proposals. the point of today is to present to you what we have heard so far in terms of the needs. as maria suggested, our methodology is a mixed design approach, looking at data from different city agencies and demographic indicators. we also had a series of
11:50 am
meetings to gather community perspective on what people are seeing as the needs for children and families. the next slide shows how we gather those perspectives. neighborhood meetings, citywide youth groups, service provider groups. some of the groups that provide advice on a certain service, demographic, population. we had focus groups as well as some survey data that we used to assess what folks not the need for in san francisco. part of our report will include some demographic data. unfortunately, the timing outlined in our legislation does not line and strategically with the release of the 2010 census data, so you might be aware that there was a release a few weeks ago showing the overall population in san francisco has increased by 3.7%. but it looks like the youth population has declined by about
11:51 am
5000, under the ages of 17, since 2000, which is a different direction than the midcourse estimates were pointing to. there was expected to be a growth in europe as well, but the census data does not show that. unfortunately, the only data available for the census is time-limited. we do plan to submit something later, when more of the data is available from the census. this shows that the youth population is declining, unfortunately. you can see estimates from 2002 through 2009 that show the fluctuation by age group, but we will not have any definitive data until the release of the census data. our next slide shows a trend that we have been seeing over the last decade, the population of you is more diverse than the adult population, which is,
11:52 am
again, at a trend of no surprise. on the next slide, we are looking at the change in the number of low-income children by race and ethnicity. again, we are anxious for that census data because we know some of the estimates are over estimating the population. this shows a decrease in the number of asian american and african american low income youth. the next slide looks at some neighborhood data. this is from the 2000 census. it shows how the six neighborhoods in san francisco with the highest number of youths, aged breakout. as mentioned in the previous presentation, the excelsior has the largest in each of the categories. the five other top categories are listed. the next slide shows the huge proportion. the darkest eras are where there is the highest proportion.
11:53 am
you will see some differences in the presidio, which has a small population in general, so it seemed like a higher proportion of youth. the next segment looks of families living in poverty. again, this the data taken from 2000. we are anxious to see what has happened in the past decade. our last slide is a snapshot of how public school students kindergarten through 12th grade, how they are doing on academic achievement. the darkest eras are where the scores are the lowest. again, the southeast sector, lots of similarities with poverty statistics as well. i am going to move quickly through these next few slides and highlight thing that might be of interest to you so that we can have time for your feedback and questions at the end. generally, we are organizing our
11:54 am
needs assessment looking a different age groups. the first one looks at ages 0 through 5. what we heard from community input in this group is that finding quality, affordable, accessible child care continues to be an issue for many families in san francisco. there is also concern around mental health issues, early screening of those issues with children and youth of these populations. we also heard concerns around parents concerned about their children being ready for school. what can parents do to increase their child's readiness? how can i find qualified preschools? we know that enrollment is increasing, things to this city and district working together, but it is still an issue. only 57% of students entering kindergarten in the public schools are considered to have school readiness skills. moving on to the next age
11:55 am
population, ages 6 through 13, kindergarten through eighth grade, a lot of what we heard an hour sessions was focus on out of school time. after-school and summer programs continue to be a priority for this age group. some of the data we gathered city-wide show about 94% of students who would want access to an after-school program, there should be a slot available for them. it does not mean that the family would be satisfied with the allocation, but we feel there is a substantial amount of after school programs. however, community input and input that we are gathering paints a bleak picture. only 52% of students of this age group would have access to a publicly funded program. we are working on the many programs that do not receive public funding to understand the need there more.
11:56 am
more need for summer programs, especially those that meet the needs of the day working family. there were types of activities, strong emphasis on academic support as well as a peer relationship building, physical activity, science, math, and reading. we also heard this age group wanted more safe, open spaces for physical opportunities and other sports. skipping over to the next group, the older youths, ages 14 through 24. in this age group, our department focuses mostly on the 14 through 18 population, high school. in terms of the older, our focus is on those who are disconnected. those who are facing a challenge that may pose a threat to their successful transition into adulthood. in this population, one of the biggest concern we heard was around the employment opportunities, job readiness
11:57 am
opportunities. we have some data that shows how many are supported through office funds. we know 70% of families surveyed with high school students said that they are facing some sort of barrier to accessing these programs. whether it is location or cost. we also heard a loud and clear that these people now live out of school program, whether it is athletics at their school, club, other activities. 70% of high-school youth are participating in some kind of extracurricular activity currently. this population also voiced concerns around mental health services, and related to that, concerns around violence. there were quite a few parents, school and administrators, community members, who talked about the stresses on this population as they transition into adulthood, as well as the factors of living in an urban
11:58 am
environment that really drew out the need for mental health services as well as activities and intervention that would help to prevent violence. our last session focused on families with children, looking at families as a unit. one of the take away from the data continues to show families of almost every income level continues to struggle, due to the high cost of living here. it looks like from recent data, and the idea of family fight or flight is leveling off, but if it is continuing, it is affecting those families most with children of the youngest ages. we're hoping that the census will help us understand those trends clearly. we did hear from parents and community members that they were in more -- in search of more support for parents and skills as well as healthy lifestyles. we heard from parents that they sought out services such as support groups, parenting
11:59 am
classes, workshops that help them manage their children's behavior, helping their children prepare for school, and that they were seeking more access to information that was not dependent on computers, and that was in multilingual formats, to know what their resources are and what is available to them. in terms of supporting a healthy lifestyle, many different things on mental health, access to healthy food. also, families were desiring more open spaces for recreational opportunities as a family unit. lastly, we heard concerns around violence. one of -- community violence. one of the themes that came up in these sessions was parents wanting access to open spaces that were safe for families to concrete and the safe from any community violence issues.