the tenderloin and central city residents will not support this project unless cpmc addresses our concerns. this will be no project without community support. thank you. >> thank you. >> good evening, commissioners. i am a resident of tenderloin. i am here today to express my opposition about the proposed cpmc cathedral hill hospital. the proposed hospital must also

serve the needs of the poorer because it is a non-profit. the ratio of charity care to patients is very low at .94%. i realize -- rely on my medi- cal. i went to cpmc emergency room to find a doctor specialist for my sickness. they found out i was on medi-cal and told me to go back to my primary care doctor. no wonder cpmc has the lowest ratio, less than 10%. how can they explain this to the poor people like us, if they are in non-profit? the tenderloin community does not want this hospital on the

cpmc provides their share of medi-cal care. we need a hospital that will except seniors and low-income families. we want to make sure that medi- cal patients can avail love the cpmc facilities. our community will not support this project, cpmc addresses our concerns. we demand that cpmc signed a benefit agreement for our community. thank you. >> thank you. [reading names] [tone] >> hello. good evening, commissioners.

i volunteer for a senior center. i am a resident for more than 10 years. cpmc's new hospital is not here to serve the community. it is for profit. i am an uninsured patient dependent on free clinics and charity care. i would not receive this care from cpmc. i'm sure of that. cpmc provides little charity care, despite making some much in profit. -- so much in profit. we do not need hospital in the tenderloin that does not serve tenderloin people. what we need are more community- based clinics that are

dedicated to serving our diverse population. centralizing hospital service does not make sense. hospital like cpmc are known to be hospital for the rich only, and for high profit. this will have an adverse affect of marginalizing the residents. lastly, hospital that does not cater to economic realities of this population's constituency must rely on medi-cal programs

will not serve the public. [tone] president olague: thank you. after the final bell, the two minutes are up. >> [reading names] >> good evening, commissioners. my name is gloria and i have lived in the tenderloin, for the past 20 years -- tenderloin for the past 20 years. i am here today to lead to know that i am concerned about cpmc's plans for the hospital. i am a senior and under medi- cal. i rely on health services for low-income. cpmc plans to make this new

luxury hospital and it gives me great concern. first of all, i will not be able to use the new cpmc hospital. currently, cpmc -- secondly, i would like to see my doctor. i feel that i deserve a hospital with quality health services. great health care is not just for the rich. cpmc -- please do not approve this project without a complete plan for serving low-income patients like me. thank you very much.

>> lorenzo. >> and good evening, commissioners. my name is lorenzo. my family lives in the tenderloin for six years already. i am here tonight to express my opposition about the proposed cpmc hospital. cpmc said a while ago it has poor performance when it comes to serving our residents. it has served more people outside of san francisco. cpmc is one of the most profitable hospitals in san francisco, earning millions of dollars, but has the worst record in providing charity care, despite being a nonprofit hospital. cpmc's ratio is below the state average.

in the pay your profile, it attests to this disparity. how can us, the residents, support this project, when cpmc, for the record, does not serve us? cpmc should keep act -- keep equal access to us, to the poro. the tenderloin community does not want this project, cpmc will open its doors to us. all of you, honorable commissioners, we ask that you reject this project unless they support us. thank you. >> [reading names]

>> my name is sue. i work in tenderloin community. tonight, we come here. we hope cpmc will provide the circus for the low-income families -- provide the service for the low-income families. cpmc supports us, we would like to support cpmc. have a site in the tenderloin community. thank you. >> thank you for coming out, everyone. president olague: did you all want to stand up?

>> thank you. our next speaker is paul. >> good evening, commissioners. my name is paul. i am of ukrainian descent. i am a resident here, of the city and county of san francisco. i'm a client of jobs that cpmc has offered me. they offered me the services for free. i merely have to go to their door. i open it. considering they have offered me plenty of opportunities more

than i have asked for, as well as what i have asked for, i support this expansion of cpmc. i support the new location. it could be a new location for myself and anyone in the surrounding areas. it could be convenient. more convenient. i do support the expansion of cpmc in this way. it can expand all the trades simply building it, the medical facilities, the services that i have gotten, they have given the opportunities and let me too many doors, but i opened the

myself. most of the time, that is what most of the world as told to do. we leave you to the door and you open it. that is the way my opportunities have come to me. i do support that in that you move forward with the expansion of cpmc. thank you very much. >> we have another senior. [reading names]

>> good evening, commissioners. my name is denise. i'm a resident of the tenderloin. i have lived there for the past 23 years. at last's september's planning commission meeting, i stood here and voice my concerns about the cpmc project. as a community member, i did not believe that the cathedral hill hospital would benefit the tenderloin. since last september, i have seen changes made by cpmc. the community has many serious concerns that need to be addressed. we do not want to see this project bill, cpmc will agree to serve the community -- project built unless the cpmc will agree to serve the community. they must provide charity care to our community. cpmc service provider it tomedi- cal patience is proportionately

low compared to other san francisco hospitals. according to theimp in 2007 -- the imp in 2007, twice as many patients were seen from knob hill as opposed to the tenderloin. i am a low-income tenderloin patient with many severe health problems. i suffer from diabetes with multiple health conditions and also a e manyye probl -- also many i problems -- eye problems. i do not want to see a project to build without community support. thank you. >> good evening, commissioners.

thank you for allowing me to speak to you. [tone] [laughter] there we are. last year, i spoke to you and i did so against my dr.'s advice. i had just come out of the hospital. i am in great shape now. i care for the most vulnerable people in our city. i believe that the proposal to rebuild think luke's hospital is appropriately sized. i listen. i am not a health care expert, but i am a lerarner.

a technologically advanced hospital is the very best way to provide care today and in the future. i believe we have found that for st. luke's. it is my concern for my city that we have seismic beds. one is that they might fall down. five is services continue. the building may stand, but the services may be disrupted. we need those. i think it is right. i speak as a community leader. i think it is right that people push against cpmc on charity care. it was the st. luke's doctors and nurses that led the push

against cpmc originally. i believe that was correct. st. luke's provides a great deal of charity care. we need to keep it in the city for our people. st. luke's has improved and cpmc is improving charity care. thank you very much. president olague: maybe you heard your name. >> thank you, presidents, and members of the health and planning commission. my name is kenneth. i'm the medical director of nebraska medical services. it is a non-profit organization. a lot of them do only have medi- cal. we have four clinics in san

francisco. it is my pleasure to offer support for the rebuild. contrary to the testimony, which portray a very different picture of what i know of cpmc, cpmc has been a good neighbor to our community and our patients. we have received numerous donations and grants from cpmc to help us take care of patients who have never had access. we are the home to a quarter of healthy san francisco patients in the city of san francisco. cpmc provide the emergency and in-patient care for our health feet san francisco patients -- healthy san francisco patient. a number of people who are only on medi-cal are delivered on an annual basis. close to 100 receive a free care

at cpmc. cpmc has made efforts to hire more bilingual staff and translators so patients can go comfortable. they provide culturally sensitive selection for our patients. on behalf of the community, we support rebuilding cpmc. we ask that you will do the same without delay. thank you. >> good evening, commissioners. i am dean of our school of public health at berkeley and had the pleasure of cochairing the blue ribbon commission with bishop anders. i am pleased to be in front of you again and speaking in support of the plan. it is the kind of integrated system of care that this city needs and that this country needs, particularly in this time, in the challenges we face.

there has been considerable community input. i think what you have heard tonight is right on target. the citizens have spoken in terms of the need for charity care. hopefully, health reform holds up and we will have more citizens in this city have some health insurance coverage, and can get the care they need from st. luke's. i follow cpmc's response to the blue ribbon committee's recommendations. i am pleased to say that they have largely been responsive. they are putting two and $50 million into the facility and they are going to do it with a -- $250 million into the facility and they're going to do it as part of an integrated system. i personally have worked with

the president in reforming our nation's health care system and creating the integrated delivery system that cpmc is planning for the city of san francisco. in conclusion, i want to urge your very careful and continued support of this project. i'm sure as it goes along, it may be able to be improved upon. we should certainly do that. thank you very much. >> as we call your name, please be ready to speak. [reading names] >> my name is jessica and i have been a nurse for 33 years at california pacific medical center, 25 years in labor and delivery. cpmc is planning a huge

structure in a higher-density area. this area already has many large hospitals, as was discussed. this will overwhelm an already highly congested area. in my 40 years as a nurse, i have never worked at a hospital that has had enough parking, no matter how many spaces the project and provide. this will add even more congestion andincreasing safetyr pedestrians. patience, visitors, and staff will be particularly vulnerable at night. as a labor and delivery nurse, i am concerned about the distance my patients will have to travel and delays that may arise having to get to the hospital in an emergency. i feel the move will further isolate and already underserved community. even more distressing is the thought of one of our patients delivering in the street or on a bus, trying to get across town

to our facility, the new facility. concentrating services in one part of the city also poses a significant risk in case of a disaster such as an earthquake. if van ness is blocked, the hospital will not be accessible. i want to work in a earthquake- safe environment, but feel other options should be explored to serve the community as a whole, rich, poor, the uninsured, and the injured. thank you for listening to me. >> thank you all for coming. >> good evening, members of the planning commission and health commission. i have been a registered nurse for the past 30 years.

for the past 13, i have worked cpmc's labor and delivery unit. i am concerned about the plan to downsize st. luke and concentrate specialty services at cathedral hill. whether than improving patient outcomes, this would take away convenient accessibility from patients who lived in the southeastern part of san francisco. this would cause a delay in getting to the medical facility and potentially poor outcomes. cpmc's analysts claim looking specialty services in one place improves patient outcomes, but this is unclear. for example, as a labor and delivery nurse it is extremely rare to have a liver patient who has cancer. the oncology physician would be readily available to come to our facility for" and management. prioritizing this rare occurrence over many patients' access to care does not make sense. i propose that st. luke's remain

a full-service hospital, with expansion to include some specialty services, and that the grand plan for cathedral hill be downsized. thank you for your time and consideration. >> good evening. i want to read a statement from mary, who had to leave because she works. my name is jane martin. as a nurse working at st. luke's hospital for more than 35 years, i would love to tell you how it is to work there. currently, st. luke's hospital represents a segregated form of health care and feels like a third world country when you walk through the halls. we take care of people struggling with drug addictions, alcoholics, and people overwhelmed with psychological issues. there are no resources for these patients. consequently, there are limited resources for staff to care for

them. we do our best, but many times it does not feel like it is working. i still love with a specialty service located at st. luke's hospital, would have a better player mixed to provide better care for all our patience. it just seems fair to me. i want to say she has been a wonderful advocate as a nurse and has come under fire for speaking out at hearings like this time and time again. it is amazing that she continues to do it despite the harassment she experiences. >> our next speakers are [names] please all three come up to the side. >> good evening, commissioners. i have been a cpmc employee for

over 30 years. i am a member of the union. i supported the cathedral hill building because it will help put service workers like me to better fit our patients. the current facilities are outdated. they are too old to handle the proper cooking equipment needed to feed hundreds of patients daily. in recent years, the patient population of pacific has grown a lot. we now serve 200 to 350 patients every meal. we need to install more grills, a steamer to do the job. as union shop steward, we have asked cpmc to upgrade the equipment, but they cannot because the kitchen does not have the necessary ventilation to support the new equipment. as a result, food service

workers struggle to serve food on time to patients. in the last four months, we had to make food trays 1300 times because food was too cold to eat by the time it reached the patient. that does not make patience happy at all. as food service workers, we pride ourselves on delivering good, healthy meals to help patients heal their index. i believe with the new cathedral held project, we can do so more consistently. as a union shop steward, i will make sure to meet with the management regularly to ensure that we do that. we have formed a food and nutrition committee to review the issue regarding the food- service department to provide the best for our patients. please do not allow an

opportunity for access to health fadeaway. >> good evening and thank you. i am a registered nurse in post- acute services at cpmc for over 15 years. last september, i spoke to the planning commissioners to outline the current shortage of beds in san francisco, and described cpmc's proposal to cut a% of -- 80% of sniff beds. they said they will include some 100% more in the final plans. we feel like the foster child for many years now. we have enjoyed live notices,