supporting these three items to note once again that the resolutions node to get involved. this is the issue we have had for many years. it is hard to know what information is not available. we require the name of the consultant to be in this. elementary arts money. those things change sometimes. i want to know for years, congratulations for anybody who worked on it. we got rid of the j resolutions

even though we rarely read them. their allocation, do we node to do this. some lawyers have opined that we do this are ways to do this. when somebody gets it together and they are not very clear about focusing once we have give

especially that school the peace allocation and the follow up of what is in their school plan. approving these is not the same thing. they have the budget, we approve them spending it on the school plan. if the legal requirements makes it more difficult making it in response i'm sure we could have a standing ovation for every school in the city. that would be a great idea. this takes a lot of time to dub

it into site plan that is is proved. believe it or not, there are places that do that. i do think it is possible for tuesday be able to do that. especially in budget times like this where staff cuts are everything. it would extend the hours. we have 50 or # 0 of them in every meeting. the teacher that did show up. teachers are waiting months and months and months. >> i would be thrilled. my concern is that we are approving services already rendered. what i see here is that.

i'm happy. this is why we do site-based budgeting. we only ought to see this if they were in the plan. some of the following lisina of community-based organizations and then they decide to change that. not whether they hire this organization or that or get it in this wook or next week. can we do that? thank you. roll call please on items 1, 2, 3. >> we are voting on k 1, 2, 3. >> i say yes. thank you. roll call.

that's 6 ayes. item q on 114 h 12 sp 1 authorize to grant the thomas edison charter academy. i have one spoker on this. i don't know if they are still here. aid rean. >> correct. we are back. most of you remember we have requested to be heard again.

all of our budget appeals for the rest of us. the appeal coming before you again you vote on 26. >> clarification for this. this item is coming back for the next meeting. thank you. >> i thought i saw a

correspondence. >> my memory the budget committee had at the email with five keys and the budget review. >> it was suggested. just on this. i read the same email that suggests that the analysis be done outside the committee. if the expectation is that this item come back to the second meeting, there will not be a budget committee that takes police before now and then, it works fine. >> if the commissioners are ok. we are fine with that. it will not go to committee. it will just get heard on the 26th.

we'll have a discussion with the staff recommendations then. ok. did we vote on that already? >> sorry. we don't need to vote on it. thank you. item r, board members proposals. >> we have been allowed to move the second proposal forward. our very dear city libel rarian has been sitting in the office

>> thank you. i need a motion and second for form al introduction. roll call, please. i don't need that. a reading of the resolution. all of you have read this. i want to highlight some of this. this is in support of the first card program literacy is important to the future of our city where we are