>> district 8, 3.58%. >> the blocks east of the solid black . i would be cool with moving them from eight to seven. >> what are tehe blocks east of the current boundary. what is the population of those? >> this is the current boundary right here. which blocks would you like to have selected? >> east of baden. >> that block is west of baden, south of joost.

-- east of baden, south of joost. the others in the light green color. >> that is a population of 371 people. deviation for district 72 -3.2% and a deviation for district 8 to 3.07%. >> one more time. >> this is a population of 371 people. it would bring the deviation for district 7 to -3.2% and the deviation for district 8 to 3.07%. >> if you tell me the street boundaries of the highlighted

area? >> the red highlighted area? that is joost, circular, hearst, and baden. >> inside the current -- you do not have to answer. can you zoom in? that does not help with the streets.

>> the block no. -- north, is that joost?

>> the population would be 580. >> 7 would be 0.2% -- -0.02%. >> i would not propose that last blocked. >> can we deselect that block and can i suggest that move? >> would you like to hear the population for this area?

that is rendered 71 people bringing the deviation for district 72 -0.32% and the deviation for district 82 to [inaudible] >> let's take it one piece at a time. 371. d8 becomes their 3.87. 0.32. thank you. commissioner tidwell: yes. commissioner schreiber: could ask -- could i ask [inaudible] >>

commissioner leigh: no. chairman mcdonnell: yes. commissioner melara: yes. commissioner leigh: i thought we were talking about the possibility of putting the conservatory back in district 8. this is going the other way. i appreciate the boundaries of the neighborhood have been submitted and everything, but we have not had much conversation about this and it seems like it is quite late to be entertaining new proposals that could have a serious -- serious impact. this is sort of like glen park

/sunnyside type zone. i am uncomfortable with not the general concept, that would have been fine to discuss it in an earlier stage. given where we are to move this into out of district 8 into district 7, i am not comfortable with that. >> can i first line? >> you sure can. >> i thought we were talking about the conservatory, not the rest of the neighborhood. that is glen park, actually, yes. i would say no. i change my vote. >> i will start over. i lost my place. commissioner tidwell: yes. commissioner schreiber: yes. commissioner pilpel: yes. commissioner mondejar: yes.

vice-chair lam: yes. commissioner melara: no. commissioner leigh: no. commissioner alonso: no. chairman mcdonnell: please make this change. >> can you go back in for a moment? >> eight? >> yes, please. commissioner leigh: could i also ask and ne -- that needle that goes down, circular, is

there population there? >> those are freeway parcels. >> 27 people. >> i take it back. >> we have got 27 people that are on a severe peninsula. >> it is not -- >> that may be 280. >> san jose becomes 280.

>> we could do a satellite overly. -- overlay. >> 280. when we click on it, it comes back at i-280. >> the border between 7 and 11 ought to be to 80. and stuff that -- to render aid. stuff that is north of the freeway in that area ought to be in seven. i do not know where there are actual people in that zone, if there's a house there i missed or something. or homeless. the center line there really ought to be 280.

[inaudible] in that area. >> i wish we had not made the move we just made but we just did it. i do not know what else to say. >> are you proposing the needle? >> where is it now? >> in eight. >> i would propose to move that to seven. >> give me the population deviation. >> 27, a deviation of district 7 would become -0.28%, the deviation of district 8 would become 3.04%. >> thank you. commissioner tidwell: i will

abstain. i do not have a preference. i am not voting. whatever the group decides. commissioner schreiber: yes. commissioner mondejar: yes. vice-chair lam: yes. commissioner melara: no. commissioner leigh: yes. commissioner alonso: yes. chairman mcdonnell: please make this change.

ok. >> can i ask , are we taking the question of the conservatory of the -- off the table? it would be tough to do given what we just did but to have the sunnyside conservatory remain in district 8? that was one of the public speakers, the point of view she raised. on monday night we moved that line to baden, taking the conservatory from 8 where it is now out in the world and we moved it to seven.

ok. based on the map, it would be non-contiguous a that would not be possible. i am puzzled by the fact that was what i thought motivated our interest in having the conversation and now as results -- as a result of the move we just made, we precluded the possibility of having that conversation. >> i do not think we have precluded any conversation. what i interpreted from the public comment is there was some concern that came up today or recently about the conservatory. the question was, where was it? some issue landed on the supervisor's desk because that is the supervisor who has that area where -- if it were in district 7, the concern would be routed to that supervisor and they would deal with it.

the moves we just made unified this sunny side neighborhood and put it in seven for better or worse but at least the conservatory runs with the past rest of the neighborhood rather than being separated from it as it sort of is now. >> all i am pointing out is the community member who provided feedback that motivated -- got this issue on a list for us to discuss, this is not responsive to that testimony. that is all. >> i do not hear -- remember

hearing testimony from the public about this move. >> that neighborhood has very little in common with district 7. >> thank you. is there a proposal? commissioner leigh: we will consider our proposals. >> ok, let me give it a try. i propose we take the blocks that we just moved from district eight to seven. restore this back to eight and include the conservatory and move that back to 8. can you give her a direction to highlight it? >> including this? >> that is the population of 390

people. the deviation for district 8 would be 3.58% and a deviation for district 7 would be -0.83%. >> to add the block that includes the conservatory? >> that would bring the population to 540 people with the deviation a 3.77% for district 8 and for district 72 - 1.20%. >> i will make that proposal. commissioner alonso: yes. commissioner melara: yes. vice-chair lam: no. commissioner mondejar: come back to me. commissioner pilpel: no. commissioner schreiber: no.

commissioner tidwell: no. ok. we will make ththat change. commissioner mondejar: yes. >> we will make that change. thank you. we will move -- to the 911 border. >> we are not doing that unless we do the overall rotation. that was what that was part of. let's go to 610. >> that is the mission bay, right? >> that is the block on the

center right there. the zero population changed. restore its the way it is. -- zero population change. >> that is mission bay? >> yes. it is south of 16th, where they're building a hospital is what i am told and it is the black -- the block east of third. where is the oil. this is one where i screwed up. it would restore the boundary to where it is. this is what it would do. i believe it is 0 population. quex the>> the other element of

mission bay hospital would be disconnected from this, correct? >> i do not -- yes, but i am not sure. i am not sure which things are north of 16th and which are south and what is being built and all that. i would advise that this area is more connected to dog patch and potrero hill than mission bay proper and there was a request to keep this with district 10. i was advised the opposite. that is why we're here. >> population and deviation? >> this is your population. >> we did get a handout on this. >> the division is 0.91%. and for this 6 -- district 6,

0.7 -- 0.87%. commissioner schreiber: no. commissioner melara: yes. chairman mcdonnellcommissioner . commissioner alonso: yes. chairman mcdonnell: we will not make this change. thank you. >> this was the 610 corridor. >>commissioner melara: i am

wondering sometimes when we say no to something based on the fact there was no real population in the area and we have ha a community testimony on that change that we go against it, i would like to hear the rationale against that. sometimes we're making changes for populations. when we're not exchanging for population, i am confused. i would like to hear it because we could be here all night and saying no to certain things that make no difference. >> it is the ucsf campus. it is all in six currently so i do not see a reason to move that

portion where they're moving the site in tutan. -- into ten. >> all right. thelis list we started with we have completed. the 911 border, seacliff, 49 people and corner of 16th street. >> please remind us of the

deviations? >> district 1, -4.99%. district 2, -4.91%. district 3,-[inaudible] district four, district 5, 2.12%, district 6, 0.87%. district 7,--2.8%. district 8, at 2.304%. district 9, 4.84%. district 10, -0.91%. district 11, 4.94%. >> thank you. >> could i go back to 7 and 8? >> give me the population

related proposals before we go to non-population related. >> can i propose something? if not -- is not a proposal to

change anything. i am looking at our numbers. unless there is an urgency to add or delete something in some neighborhood, i would say that we probably want to just stop because we are within the numbers we want to be in every district. and so i am afraid that if we move something we will end up living something else and restoring some of the things we're already -- we had put on the map and people had believed we were going to put it. and leave it there. i am concerned about that. >> i would ask we take a 10 minute break to collect

ourselves and insure there is nothing else we want to do. que>> if we are -- if that will create a massive ripple, problem among ourselves, i say stock. any move will make anywhere is going to require a move someplace else -- any move we make anywhere will require a move someplace else. >> are there any other population related proposals? we will take a break before we go to non-population. so again, while we can never say never, this means we will move

forward with non-population. we will also ask carin and jaime to walk through the line. with those two steps, we will be at a place of conclusion. anyone not good with that? ok. we will take a two-minute blake -- break. we will go to non-population but a at a a

>> thank you. with that, we will resume our conversation on mapping, number three, just a restatement just prior to the break, we will consider non population proposals. we will then go to our consultants and have them walk us through to see, and that will be the last piece of are concluding at