commission has the point -- choice to toss out the whole thing. and you manage to hold it in violation of human rights over the past few months. at that time, some labels would not carry, but at this point they do. despite that, i really resources, energy, especially in the conduct of these hearings. thank you. >> hello. i am supporting ross mirkarimi. very simple, please reinstate ross mirkarimi. stop wasting public resources for this case. at the end, please let the

people decide, not the mayor. thank you for your efforts. >> hello. my name is from the perilbrenda. of work and public health and work in a clinic for women are abused. he admitted he did something wrong. he admitted and own up to it and confessed to it, but i have patients that have been thrown out of windows, done all kinds are allowed to work. they did not take a livelihood away from the has been so they cannot the of the things that were done in the case and the level it has gone too are outrageous. for the people that want to fight for those women -- i know women who really need to be fought for. he did not hear about their

case. it is not in the press. they suffer in silence. and the same people are here attacking ross. i do not understand it. it should not happen. i hope you guys do the right thing. the wrong thing would be to allow this witch hunt to go on, the political which front -- which front. -- which htch hunt. we all know it. for whatever want him gone. in my opinion, it is the mayor that has been a moral. he has not been honest, and he got away with it. [applause] >> good morning, commissioners. i am also a commissioner and serve on the commission on the status of women where i now

serve as the senior ranking member of the commission, having been there for a little over a decade. i currently chair the justice encourage oversight panel, which oversees the collaborative efforts, the multi agency effort that includes all our local law- enforcement, leaders, chiefs to come to the table and attend to the issues of domestic violence policy. you have heard in other commentary today in terms of the numbers we have faced here in san francisco and continue to face with regard to domestic violence. i will not go over that again. i-çr trust you all understand te severity and the gravity of how the sheriff's position relates to that particular process,

which becomes a national model. we certainly do not want to go back to this. this is not in remarks to mr. mirkarimi personally in terms of what we need now to move forward. this is an issue of governance. it is an issue of public trust and our ability as a city to make sure we provide to every single citizen, the utmost trust and confidence in all of our officials. us he undergoes a week-long treatment program, we certainly hope he can focus on that, and right now we see it is untenable.

bnv>> am i able to put this her? >> dear commissioners, and thank you so much for your service and rep -- service for all of us. i do not support a domestic violence. i do support share of mirkarimi and right to fairness, redemption, and chance. others have been given chances. for instance, the san francisco fire chief. i one share of mirkarimi reinstated. please rememberq4é the burden of fairness. it is a tough decision i know that you have to make, and a trust in your decision. again, thank you very much for your service.

>> i did not mean to do that. thank you for your patience. i wish to raise a question to the jury situation with regard for testimony by the city attorney's. you cannot infer that intervention by the share of one had, and that he should have intervenedlp, and the paris ris. -- paraphrase. as a standing member and officer of the court, that he should have confessed and thrown himself of the mercy of everyone else. that is a contradiction that in my opinion indicates of bias and lack of for a tidy -- propriety.

thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am executive director program called the clear project los -- located in the southeast part of the city. today are they to take the opportunity to thank you for your due diligence in reviewing this matter. we have an opportunity, learning moment. i am here to say i stand with my sisters who have been strong voices for the eradication of violence, domestic violence, bui here to also point out while we will continue to work together, this is an inappropriate response to what i think is a family and personal issue. i would like to extend my apologies to the family, because the response has been much more

severe. i want to say(yi that from the streets, we are asking do you to use a little more common sense. we have a burgeoning crisis of homicide, and we say to you please look at the collateral damage in terms of whatever resources being directed in the situation in which the voters of the city actually have an opportunity, should they feel ross mirkarimi is inappropriate in his seat to recall. thank you very much for your consideration. my apologies on behalf of part of san francisco to mr. mirkarimi and his family. thank you for your consideration. >> my name is george evesheeman. qséi have been working on police

practice issues since the 1980's and political campaigns all my life, including since 1995 our work on the campaign with moss -- ross mirkarimi. and i heard someone earlier say that he should be treated like everybody else, and i have heard that statement all through this time, and please, i agree. he should be treated like everybody else, and he is not being treated like everyone else. i have never seen a misdemeanor case treated like this. i have never seen anything like this. i know police officers are not generally treated this way when they are accused of misconduct and that sort of thing. i am getting phone calls from out of state and my home county. people say what are they doing to this guy? is this political?

well, you know how i would answer that probably. even gavin newsom, no political friend, was quoted as saying they're piling it on him. he said i should note, because it has happened to me, so i know how it feels. other people -- is that two minutes? >> 30 more seconds. to >> i was going to say some other things, but the voters, hundreds of people work on the campaign, tens of thousands of people voted for him. if you waiver or questioning your decision, think of the will of the people. it is paramount in this country. thank you.

>> please, sir. the " good morning. -- good morning. i think there is an injustice being done and it is being railroaded. if he would ask for a jury trial, he would never been convicted because it is a very weak case. i see a lot of people that are trying to condemn them, but the majority of the citizens of the city voted for him, and i think that should be considered and respected. instead of going after him, we should go after the people that are enslaving people and the prostitution trade and openly against the will through threats and intimidation, and i think this city has shown it is a

recognizable one. a lot of people, even the people that do not like mr. ross they ask me what is going on. they say this is unjust. i urge you to consider, because it is making us look very bad to the rest of the country in the world. thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am a 37th mayoral candidate for san francisco. i was not allowed out of the box. immediately after asking for protection i was called off -- hauled off. my campaign papers thrown in the dumpster, and my life has been a living hell. a lot of it has to do with the facts. i was nearly killed 1 million

times. he was put back on the streets and allowed to go free after a 145 that fell on me. i have been held body with three holes in my head being a seizure victim by a sheriff. and another 300 town sheriff punched me in the head. i have had my private parts hurt. i have had everything under the sun done to me. the sheriffs have not been supervised. they have been,'p taught torture techniques. i have come forward on a regular basis that we need cameras, supervision. law enforcement has been illegally hired. i found the man who did this psychological profiling. he was 500 pounds.

it is not ok. when i stood up in san francisco and said 98 percent of our police and law enforcement, if there were dogs, we would shoot them and are not accountable for their time brought standing ovations. we did not have equality, justice, and we cannot have it until we have transparent society, until we have equality and justice for all. i do not have any criminal record, but i have been arrested 55 times. i've been choked and stabbed. >> thank you. >> [inaudible] >> thank you, commissioners. i will be brief, but you might consider appreciative the line outside. i just want to say first our

criminal justice system is broken. we lock people up and throw away the key. the thing that happens, or one of the results of that is the u.s. has the largest incarceration rate in the world. the leak of voters supported him because he is committed to oçvchanging that. it is brutal irony to watch the super tie warrants -- the zero tolerance laws applied to this case. we're very uncomfortable with the democratically-elected official being unilaterally ousted from office by political opponents. we are disturbed by the reports that the mayor committed perjury in his testimony. we ask that the ethics commission recommend that ross mirkarimi be reinstated as sheriff. we do not believe he has committed official misconduct and we ask the commission to fully investigate the mayor's

perjury charges. thank you. >> thank you. just a couple of things. my name is [inaudible] i have been here in this case for the past several months. [inaudible] [inaudible] i am sorry with my spanish. t([inaudible]

>> good afternoon, commissioners. i am sorry i cannot stand and see all of you, but ross, i have known him for at least 20 years i worked with him. i worked in the d.a.'s office for a very long time. he is a very respectful man, and very friendly and nice to everyone, but the thing i want to tell you, he was the supervisor for district 5. i live in district 5. i want to tell you everything that happened in district 5, whether it was a car wreck, a fire, shooting, a fight, arguments, he was there. i do not care what time of night it was.

i do not care where it was. he was there. he came in his pajamas. you could see the pajamas under his jacket to come and see about a child that got killed. he was very much concerned. where i live that, if it was not for him, and i cannot thank him enough for what he did for marcus garvey, fighting for us for two years to get the funds to renovate, we cannot thank him enough. i am speaking for the people and the addition that could not make it. i was going to come if i had to crawl. he is a good person. and he is going to be a good share of. i will tell you why, because he

has the heart for it. he is compassionate, but he is strong. he do not take no crap and knows when you're pulling him in working around with his mind. he will not allow that. and [applause] >> thank you very much.

>> good afternoon, commissioners, and thank you. the mayor's charges of official misconduct against sheriff have results in an excruciating demonstration of the abuse of public resources to justify an unwarranted decision by the mayor to undo a democratic election and destroy a family. did the mayor not consider these extremely serious consequences of the action or in fact intend to cause these results? yet, he made the decision without the most minimal investigation. he failed to even speak with miss lopez. after taking this action his of justification in evidence. the charges repeatedly fluctuated. the only evidence is that he pled guilty to false imprisonment, and for that he is serving his sentence. there is no evidence of what the situation. the city attorney wants you to believe messages and communications constitute

witness persuasion. of which witness? their only evidence of a very upset lopez deeply purred trade -- deeply betrayed by her neighbor. who would do otherwise in that situation? december 31 incident was addressed through the criminal justice process. none of which would interfere with him during his job. he did perform his job throughout the media service at criminal justice proceedings. should he have chosen different words or made different choices during this entire time, maybe so. but any of those occasions when he might have chosen a different sentence, the the amount of official misconduct? i am sure you cannot possibly arrive at that conclusion. by the way, the mayor should have made other choices. if we believe the domestic violence crisis work, and why

would we hire them if we did not believe that, we must believe in rehabilitation. >> commissioners. i am a native san franciscan and have followed the hearing. the attorney told you to interpret common sense when the chairman asked him how he should interpret is as and part of experts tell you. allow me to offer comments. does not rise from the removal of elected office. in response to the actual charges, the share of reached a plea deal. he is played guilty in diligently engage in real

politic their bait every sense. -- engaged in the bill would of therapy ever since. as for persuasion of witnesses, there was innuendo, but no evidence to the contrary. moreover, the mayor's case rests on a witness who did not appear, did not get cross- examined and whose council told the witness minimum exposure. despite her planning to involve the police chief sir and gavin newsom, which is a clue there was a great deal of political under current behind us. by contrast, most ordinary citizens like myself interpret lying under oath as serious. especially when someone as important as the mayor might have done it. lying under oath by an official is official misconduct.

if one interprets the allies as going to motivation for removing the sure from office, then the perjury goes to right action and decency, which are explicitly required of all public officials, a standard the mayor himself refused to reply to himself. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. my name is danielle. i would like to see ross reinstated to his job as a sheriff. i believe domestic violence is a serious offense, and as such, am glad the allegations in this case were brought forth and taken seriously.

however, i do not believe any serious offense was committed here, certainly none that would preclude him from serving as sheriff. we're all humans, including high-level officials. we all have faults and weaknesses, and sometimes in life those come to a head. in retrospect, it is those times in life we are thankful for, provided we are shown the way to healing and cold mist, which has certainly been a part of this case, as well as the original intent of the mirkarimi family. domestic violence is about violence, but there are many other forms of violence, including being too harsh in one's judgment and and willing to really look into all aspects

of the case. when i look closely, i do not see a reason to bar him from his work. finally, as much as domestic violence cases are about violence, they should also be about compassion and learning to resolve conflicts in a way that meets the needs of all parties. here we have dealt with the offense, the root causes are being dealt with, and only fair the voters of san francisco have their share of fax for justice. -- have the facts for the sense of justice. >> my name is tammy brant, a long-time resident of section

five. official misconduct has to do with his actions related to elected office. in this incident, nor anything that transpired after words does not even come close to official misconduct. the city has done an excellent job of demonstrating no official misconduct has occurred. no matter how hard they tried, the city has not made the case. i work for unemployment insurance, and my job is to determine whether people qualified for an employer of based on their actions at work. there was no work-related misconduct in this. i implore you to remember that your duty is to ask the voters to be an impartial body that works for us, and of those who appointed you, and finally, i survived domestic violence two decades ago. i feel offended by the domestic violence exploiting a family crisis for their own agenda, which is nothing to do with protecting victims.

the situation was not a criminal incident. please be independent and impartial when you make your recommendation that there was no official misconduct and removing him was wrong. thank you. >> my name is terrance faulkner. i have served on a couple of the commissions. i was a republican county chairman on occasion. i am speaking as an individual. i attended the trial the last time there was the removal like this. like this trial, he was an airport commissioner and a union strike and in official capacity.