test, test, test, test, test >> san francisco's regular hearing for thursday march 7, 2013. please silence any mobile devises. do state your name for the record. like to take roll at this time.

(calling roll). commissioners first in your collapsed for consideration for d d and v for 1521 through 1539 jones street are proposed for continuance march 13th. item two case at 1595 float boulevard as continuance actually march 21st, 2013. further on your calendar under the value satellites is being proposed for continuance march 21st. under your regular calendar

amendments is being proposed for continuance march 2013 and case no. 12 amendments to the planning code could establish an annual monitoring requirement for students housing projects is being proposed actually march 13th. >> just to correct the continuance update for the 12 is april. >> excuse me. i misspoke. item 12 is being proposed for continuance until april 4th. >> any comments on the proposals? >> i g did ask one to taken off

and in addition to that robert garcia is it continued. >> you'll have the opportunity to ask for the continuance when we get to that portion and is there any public comment on the items for proposeed continuance. >> move to one a and b and item 9 mill march 14, 2013. item 11 for that same date and item 12 to april 14th. >> on that motions: . (calling roll).

so move commissioners that motion passes unanimously. in places under your consent calendar. all regular items will be acted upon and there will be no separate discussion of those items. in which event the item be removed and considered for a further hearing. on item 20 at the 1191 piece by piece street request for additional authorization use. this is at is 6929 pine avenue and item 5 case on tennessee street request for zoning map amendment >> is there any public comment on the consent calendar.

>> this is your opportunity to request that. >> linda chapman. i called and asked to have this item on pine removed from consent calendar and robert garcia wants to have it removed he said although it has been posted people in the area are only recently being informed of that. so, anyway i convey that to you. the reason that i felt it should come off the consent calendar is essential the same. and also that there are in conditions being imposed on it

other than - at least in this document. other than than the ones that are closings another 10 o'clock >> we'll take it off consent and you can speak about it. >> is there any additional public comments on consent calendar? >> seeing none commissioners. >> i move to approve items 4 and 5 on consent calendar. >> second. >> on that motion (calling rol roll). so move commissioners that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places under you

commissioner item 6 draft minutes for february 28, 2013, >> is there any public content on the draft minutes. >> yes on page four at the top it's st. pi u s. >> also on the second paragraph my comment had to be with the town music studio there was something about the entertainment commission taking note of giving an approval to a permit i believe it was. in any case i asked if staff can looking at r take a look at it and report back to the other

entertainment facility. so i'd like to reiterate that. whenlipid was secretary she used to escape a running log of requests from the commission and i think it kind of tailed off for awhile but if we could resurrect that >> we've discussed that about continuing the action list for the commission i think when we bring back the rules to the commission i think that would be appropriate then. >> thank you. >> any other questions, comments commissioners. >> we have to approve. >> move to approve minutes and second.

>> on that motion to approve minutes (calling roll). >> so move commissioners that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero excuse me. item 7. >> you just few minutes ago one of the action that was mentioned in the electives report was in today's packet there was a mention that there was a san francisco parking minute manual now. we specifically ask that somebody give us the ideas up to date apparently that step was

skipped. we want to know the philosophy where they are going to be put and this might be a moment for the department indeed to present the key ideas of this manual in the context of this form and everyone else can hear it. >> commissioner. >> yeah. a couple of things i understand there is a settlement that will come back, to us there is some changing in the size and i think we'll have to approve that. i'm, of course, on that and i'll have more comments as to the settlement when it comes before

us. i've been working for 2 to 3 months with the tenants in two different forms at the address of 3974. the upper portion is being coupled by the tenants. i've had agreement on the impact i think it seems to be mitigating the business stress there are issues that have to be worked out separately from the impact but there's going to be a

look back on this particular project and i'm happy to see the progress that is being made by the restaurants to mitigate any compacts in my opinion and i'll continue to work with it >> thank you commissioner. >> as a followup to commissioner moore's parking newsletter i think in the latest issue because los angeles this is a article in there but it might behove the department to take a look at it and see if the rules are different than ourselves just to take into account to what's the term state of art? make a incision to

staff to look into that. >> thank you any additional comment? >> next item please and just for the benefit of the public under the regular calendar items 3 was just pulled off of consent that item will be heard before 15. commissioners that will place you under the director's report report 8 there are no directors announcements. item want was continued and item 10 weeks events board of supervisors and board of appeals >> good morning planning staff and i'm here to summarize what went on this week at the board of supervisors. on march 4th there was a

technical codes that was continued through march 11th and i believe there was substitute legislation introduced to that >> at the land commission they continued the planning up david information concerning the potential grand fathering for the academy art building and as well the major development sites that are great in size. also this will allow the commission application to come before this body. the department presented 3 scenarios one basis height he development and two the

affordable ability tier which including the structures a and b and third the impact fee and affordable it that plan. kim proposed a new fee of tiara 2 and tier b essential this meant that the affordable rates maintained as required while increasing the residential fees from tier one to tier 2. the amendment was passed unanimously. and on monday there was an

informational plan and the future of high-speed rail. the hearing was held at the supervisors discretion wiener. caltrans is a funded project that is to be completed to implement high-speed rail in the bay area and it will have cleaner transportation service, however, an agency group that includes the mayor's office is increasingly concerned about making sure those developments support the san francisco land use plan. specifically concerns l are about completing the downtown

transit center. most notablely the city is concerned about the underground streets like that would further concerns the forget and king rail yards that may not be consistent with the long term project. and we have the scoping meeting in san francisco today at city hall and caltrans is accepting requests. there is the land committee commission is looking at the san francisco's land use provision.

at full board of supervisors the board voted to approve on the final reading the subway district. as you know this would allow the demolition of the building. that concludes my that presentation and if you need any further follow-up information let me me know >> there's one item that will be of interest to appeal an explanation and the committee heard the project and set it back 3 feet. the planning department approved the revisions plans for that and the permit was put forth.

it was schedule for hearing last night but last week, a sequence of an appeal so the board continued it actually may 8. so the board of supervisors will hear that on april 9th. >> thank you. >> good morning tim from the department to summarize yesterday's events at the historic presentation hearing. we recognized our imply commissioner and the two remaining seats and presentation professional retain vacant. we were to take up the election of officers, however, the

hearing was continued until april 3rd. the commission also reviewed an amendment to the administration code this is an amendment that was sponsored by supervisor farrell. and a letter of support was to be drafted to the board of supervisors. always there is other projects that included a variety of a insertion of a new garage. the spc also includes the demolition of the loej house district. after staff presentation the spc

left the public comment portion in order to give them more time to include missing documents from the packet. the spc will continue it's hearing on march 21st. as you know they continue their comments to the commissioner officer. and also, we appointed another update for the college this is landmark number 2 hundred and 50. the community has obtained several estimates and we will continue to speak with the landlord and i'll have more information to give you as well. >> thank you.

commissioner that will place you under general public comments. and jurisdiction of the commission agenda has accepted, however, agenda this is your opportunity to address item 13 the civilization for the draft eir is closed this will be your opportunity to speak. with respect to all other he items you may address the commission up to 3 minutes >> i'll go ahead and call some names. linda, robert, libby, and linda

chapman. please come on up when you're ready >> i'd like to remind persons spanking to civic centers of the eir your comments need to be restricted. if i wish to speak on the project you need to wait until projects a and b are called up >> this is only for the certification of the eir. >> i'm a little bit confused about that. this is concerning the case 2004? >> it is. >> good morning. it is just concerning myopiation to the development because a fire i was actually involved with and it's one of the main roads going to

crestmont. i have some pictures if you're able to look at those pictures there's only one way in and out >> you, your questions comments are about the item itself? >> yes. >> you may want to what point. >> i apologize i'm speaking only thing item fourteen as well. >> no problem. >> linda chapman. i want to talk about the clove abusive and changes with regard to knob hill >> it's horrific. i