item 1, at 84 city view way. it's proposed for continue to june 16. case 2006.064 d and d at 216612th avenue is continuing to june 6, 2013. those are the continuing that i have and i have no speak are charges. >> any items proposed for

continue znswer i. >> commissioner moore. >> i. >> commissioner sugay. >> i. >> i. >> move commissions that motion passes 5-0. in places in commission matters, item 3 consideration of adoption draft minutes for may 9, 2013. >> is there any public comment on the draft two minutes? see none. public comments closed. commissioner woo. >> move to approve draft minutes. >> second. >> second. >> on that motion to adopt draft minute for may 19, commissioner antanin. >> commissioner moore. >> and commission woo. >> it passes u nan muss five to

zero and places you on item four comments. >> mr. antani, it jointly between the planning commission and historic preservation and that continues to meet. we met yesterday and we will be meeting again in three weeks and we'll keep you appraised of the progress in this venture. >> thank you. >> commissioner saga. >> there's an article, lengthy articles on housing in the city and something like 8,000 units going under construction or about to be, but there was a smaller article accompanying the main one that noted that i think some where around 10 percent or less or actually able to be converted to condominiums, according to the article that had to do with the financing that developers have taken or the nature of their

business or whatever, but they used a figure of 10 percent, so the majority appear to be apartments for i don't know, forever, but for a good long time. >> commissioners if there's nothing further, it will place you under department matters, director 5 directors announcements. >> good afternoon. in the interest of time, i'll pass on the record. there's nothing urgent on this wook's hearing and i'll -- there's nothing urgent and you'll pass it on. >> item 6, review of the board of supervisors. >> good afternoon and department staff to give you your weekly report on the board of supervisors, they he heard three or four ordinances i like to share with you. the first was sponsored by supervisor cowen and this was

preapplication in the pdrb zone and this had approval on may 9. also before the committee was another ordinance by supervisor cowen and this is a use district at 1111 street. this would allow educational institutions without size use limits and permit student housing and allow the zoning administration to allow temporary structures and this is occupied by the college of the arts. this ordinance was recommended by the commission on april 25th and at the hearing, there were a couple of speakers that had approval and the committee recommended approval to the full board. this week the big item again was a couple of items, three items to be precise, these are the secret ordinances sponsored by supervisor kim and weinner,

this was the first where kim's was actionable. kim's ordinance was heard by the hpc last week and at that point the commission recommended in their resolution a very similar who what your recommendation was which was generally a disapproval of some portions but approval of other portion and they picked up the four additional questions that you asked our staff and the board to explore and then they added three of their own points. this week the hpc also ask that planning should provide an analysis that would clarify the difference between supervisor kim and supervisor wiener ridge legislation when an appeal period would end for exemption ie. they're interested between the difference between the first and last approval. secondly the hpc ask that the legislation allow entitlemented

and they specified landmark to move forward and they ask that the legislation should clarify the role of their commission during the appeal process. this week the clerk of the board of supervisors attended the meeting and have amendments. three members spoke at the hearing and the planning department also presented the member ran dumb which i like to share with you now. this memo responds to four questions from your other resolution. with regard to supervisor kim's ordinance. this memo describes our current and plan notification capacity. it also explains about while appeals -- the approval process maybe pending and potential avenues for prioritizing affordable housing and other projects. this week at the hearing, both board president chew and supervisor winer, we

stated their commitment to move forward. and he was committed tro bring potential amendments into wiener's proposal and he ask for more time to do so. the items were all continued to the call of the chair and they had discussed potentially holding a special hearing on june 3rd, but at this point there's been no further meeting announced and the items were continued to the call of the chair. at the full board of supervisors on tuesday, the historic park district was heard and this was sponsored by wiener and it was by approval. we create a new district and it was unanimously on the first reading. and supervisor comps poss -- composs added. this would review committee with the

city's better street plan and this would include the mayor, the director of public work, the director of the municipal transportation agency, the director of planning and the general planning of the puc and the director of economic work force development and the city fire marshal. this is sponsored by wiener and yee and secondly supervisor breed introduced a planning committee, and this would amend section 703 to expand the formula retail uses but it will pertain to the neighborhood transit commission. so that ordinance is a planning code and we'll plan to schedule that one before this committee within 90 days. that concludes my point. >> thank you. >> yeah, on that last item, haze valley, i think haze valley has a band on formula

retailers. the ordinance is trying to other things called formula retail. is that's what's being -- that's correct. >> i like to know what that is. >> you'll get an opportunity to make a comment to the board. >> thank you. >> the historic reservation hearing, so no place under the general public comment. and the public may address that's within the jurisdiction. your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. i did have one speaker card. >> linda chapman. >> linda chapman, will i be able to use this. >> yes. >> just stick this on here.

anyway, in our continuing conversation and i don't come in here really to bore you. my hear dresser said to me, they listen to you and i don't know if you do, but it's because so many people in my neighborhood were really disempowered including when they came in here to talk and we're so discouraged because they were just a blit rated if some people would come in and say we he represent the committee and we're middle pope neighbors or whatever, they somehow had standing and the people who actually lived in the neighborhood who were affected by the project had none. you see how lower pole neighbors eliminated its neighbors because they saw the architect, or because they were intimidated and forced out through the press or through threats or through posting their name in the windows, mine

for example, threats of being sued or verbal abuse and those organization -- that organization became a permanent expediter in affect. they advertised. you join us or give us money and we'll ex per indict your permit. the hairdresser was saying, right down the street from him, the massage parsley lore is all prostitution and middle pope neighbors which is more of a neighborhood association but with he have four people to decide they're the armor belligerent traitor, and they're going to receive money to approve tearing down the church. is this the land that it's supposed to work. we never heard of this in any other organizations, so i'm going to quickly show you, if i can do it, what are -- is this

showing. what -- what our student urban planning, native of nod hill and a former member of the head start at the little church that we'll try to reuse better took of the buildings that were saved from demolition, gorman said the developer who wanted to tear that down offered them what would be $420,000 today and if you gave him a dem ligs permit and he said, well, you can see we're not supporting it, but yet grouped -- our neighborhood didn't have groups that would take money. so i'll come back

another time with more of this information. >> thank you. >> is there any addition until public comment? >> okay. public comments are closed. commissioner hes, it will place you under your regular calendar and that's previously announced and we'll take item number 8. 2009, point 885, 2009, point 886 for the california pacific medical center. long range development plan project. which consists of items 8 a, b, c, d, e, f, g, hi, j, k, l, m and n. to adopt findings under the california environmental quality act

request for general plan amendments for the saint like campus and for the cathedral hill and minding a minding with consistence with 101.1 request for planning code text an amendments and map amendments for the saint like campus and authorization for the campus and request for authorization for the like campus, consideration of a motion for the general plan referral for the saint like campus, request for planning coat text amendments for the cathedral hill commission for the cathedral hill and office authorization for the cathedral hill campus. consideration of a motion for the general plan referral for the cathedral

campus. and use for the davie's campus and request that the board of supervisors approve a development agreement pursuant to chapter 76 to the administrator code will be before you know. >> good afternoon, elizabeth and department staff. if i can have the power point, please. items 8 a through an on today's agenda constitutes the approval to the medical centers revised long range planned project. today's presentation will include a summary of the revised project, an update on the development agreement and an over view of the actions being requested of you today. one stack concluded their presentation, they'll have a brief presentation to walk you through the revised design of the two homes. before i get started i have passed out revised planning code amendment ordinances for the saint like and the cathedral hill campus,

since your packets went out we made changes to these ordinances and wanted to get them before you today. i'm happy to go over the details but the changes are minor and not substance in nature. >> since the commission heard the presentation of the project many times i'm going to go through this section quickly emphasizing the key changes that have been made sense your approve last april. the project still consists of five new buildings, including the creation of a new campus at gary referred to as the cathedral hill campus and the medical office proposed of the saint likes and cathedral hill campuses and the neuro science institute hasn't changed at all since the approval last year. the hospital at the saint like and cathedral hill has changed. the saint like homes has been enlarged since the last approval and it has increased

by 40 beds and the height was improved by 43 feet. the cathedral hill campus improved and it has decreased by a minimum of 251 beds and the overall height decreased by 39 feet and the parking has been decreased a minimum of 235 parking spaces, and we'll touch more on during this presentation. the davis science building has not changed and the development a fwreemented relating to the campus hasn't changed since the previous an approval and i would like to turn it over to ken rich from the work force development who will go through the key development agreement. >> good afternoon commissioners, i'm going to go through the summary of the da because you saw it three weeks ago and focus on the issues

that's of concern of you that we heard three weeks ago. looking at the first slide, have you the key points and they haven't changed. significantly larger saint likes which is a part of the cpn system. cpn obligate to provide charity care with with no reference to their financial condition and about $80 million in cash for community benefits. saint like is 120 beds and it will open based on the da 24 months or less or fewer offer cathedral hill. instead of the 80 beds at saint likes with a 20 operating commitment, st. louis are be at 120 beds and more sustainable. they'll have excellence and senior committee health. standard have advices are provided in acute hospitals and a new medical office building needs